Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4117883-A4117883, November 12, 2024. Introduction/Background:Cardiovascular symptoms appear in a high proportion of patients in the few months following a severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Non-invasive methods to predict disease severity could help personalizing healthcare and reducing the occurrence of these symptoms.Research Questions/Hypothesis:We hypothesized that blood long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and machine learning (ML) could help predict COVID-19 severity.Goals/Aims:To develop a model based on lncRNAs and ML for predicting COVID-19 severity.Methods/Approach:Expression data of 2906 lncRNAs were obtained by targeted sequencing in plasma samples collected at baseline from four independent cohorts, totaling 564 COVID-19 patients. Patients were aged 18+ and were recruited from 2020 to 2023 in the PrediCOVID cohort (n=162; Luxembourg), the COVID19_OMICS-COVIRNA cohort (n=100, Italy), the TOCOVID cohort (n=233, Spain), and the MiRCOVID cohort (n=69, Germany). The study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Cohorts were approved by ethics committees and patients signed an informed consent.Results/Data:After data curation and pre-processing, 463 complete datasets were included in further analysis, representing 101 severe patients (in-hospital death or ICU admission) and 362 stable patients (no hospital admission or hospital admission but not ICU). Feature selection with Boruta, a random forest-based method, identified age and five lncRNAs (LINC01088-201, FGDP-AS1, LINC01088-209, AKAP13, and a novel lncRNA) associated with disease severity, which were used to build predictive models using six ML algorithms. A naïve Bayes model based on age and five lncRNAs predicted disease severity with an AUC of 0.875 [0.868-0.881] and an accuracy of 0.783 [0.775-0.791].Conclusion:We developed a ML model including age and five lncRNAs predicting COVID-19 severity. This model could help improve patients’ management and cardiovascular outcomes.
Risultati per: Prescrizione di antibiotici durante la pandemia di Covid-19: analisi in medicina
Questo è quello che abbiamo trovato per te
Abstract 4126987: A Case of Recurrent Neurocardiogenic Syncope in a COVID-19 Patient
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4126987-A4126987, November 12, 2024. Background:COVID-19 infection has been associated with a broad range of clinical manifestations. There are very few reported cases of COVID-19 patients presenting with syncope as an initial symptom. We present an extraordinary case of recurrent neurocardiogenic syncope in a COVID-19 patient.Case:A 66-year-old male presented after experiencing two episodes of syncope. He denied any prodromal or anginal symptoms. His medications included propranolol 10 mg twice daily for essential tremors. He had no family history of unexplained syncope or sudden cardiac death. He was hemodynamically stable and had one episode of fever at 102°F. Telemetry recording showed vagal-mediated sinus arrest and pauses without escape. Blood work showed normal cell counts, electrolytes, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, with a slightly elevated C-reactive protein of 22.2 mg/L. He tested positive for COVID-19 and had negative Lyme and Ehrlichia serologies.Decision Making:Due to symptomatic long sinus pauses, propranolol was discontinued, and he received a temporary pacemaker set at 50 beats per minute (bpm). He had another syncopal episode while being paced at 50 bpm, suggesting a neurocardiogenic mechanism, so the pacing rate was increased to 70 bpm. An echocardiogram showed a normal ejection fraction without any significant valvular disease. The syncope was determined to be vasovagal due to autonomic dysfunction in the setting of COVID-19. After 72 hours without further syncope, the temporary pacemaker was removed, and he was discharged home with an implantable loop recorder (ILR). A one-month follow-up showed no syncope, and ILR interrogation showed no bradycardia or pauses.Conclusion:Neurocardiogenic syncope with prolonged asystole and sinus pauses is an uncommon presentation of COVID-19 infection. The clinical course of autonomic dysfunction following COVID-19 is not very clear, and monitoring with an ILR is reasonable before considering permanent pacemaker implantation.
Abstract 4137534: Troponin Can Predict Late Gadolinium Enhancement on Cardiac MRI in COVID-19 Vaccine-Associated Myocarditis
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4137534-A4137534, November 12, 2024. Background/Aim:We previously reported that late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac MRI (CMR) was as high as 82% in pediatric patients with COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis (C-VAM) despite mild clinical symptoms and normal left ventricular function. As LGE can be a harbinger for future adverse events including arrhythmias, heart failure or sudden cardiac death, we sought to identify predictors for LGE in C-VAM, specifically assessing troponin as a screening marker for C-VAM patients at risk for myocardial scarring who could then be referred for a confirmatory CMR with LGE.Methods:In this longitudinal multicenter retrospective observational study across 38 U.S. member institutions of theMyocarditisAfterCOVIDVaccination (MACiV) study network, 333 patients with C-VAM based on CDC criteria were included from April 2021 to November 2022. Data collected included demographics, laboratory values, clinical and cardiac imaging characteristics and outcomes. Using logistic regression, troponin levels at presentation were assessed as a log transformed continuous variable and categorized into tertiles.Results:The C-VAM patients were predominantly white (67%) adolescent males (91%, 15.7± 2.8 years). There were 216/333 (65%) patients who had both a reported troponin value and had a CMR. On univariate analysis, elevated troponin increased the probability of having LGE (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.58, p=0.012). Even after controlling for age, race, sex, number of vaccine doses and left ventricular ejection fraction (OR=1.32, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.65, p=0.013). Patients >15 years compared to those ≤15 years of age were 2.94 (95% CI: 1.28, 6.75, p=0.011) times more likely to have LGE at presentation. Patients with troponin levels in the highest tertile compared to lowest tertile were 2.66 times (95% CI: 1.04, 6.83, p=0.042) more likely to have LGE along with a greater involvement > 4 AHA myocardial segments with LGE (p=0.004)Conclusions:Higher troponin values are associated with presence of late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI in patients with COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis. Troponin levels at presentation may facilitate risk stratification and function as a screening tool to identify those C-VAM patients with the greatest likelihood of myocardial scarring, who may benefit from undergoing CMR for tissue characterization.
Abstract 4141078: Hearing the Voices of Families: Barriers and Facilitators of Pediatric Cardiac Ambulatory Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4141078-A4141078, November 12, 2024. Background:Social determinants of health (SDOH),exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, impact access to medical care.Research Question:Through descriptive qualitative inquiry, we explored barriers and facilitators to pediatric cardiology ambulatory care for patients with complex congenital heart disease (CCHD) during COVID-19.Methods:English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers of children with CCHD who missed at least one clinic visit during the first year of COVID-19 were recruited, with purposeful sampling of Black and Hispanic patients. Semi-structured interviews inquired about the impact of the pandemic, experience with telehealth and communication with providers, effects of SDOH, and perceived impact of their race/ethnicity on care. Content analysis summarized information and identified themes.Results:Interviews (19) were conducted: 14 in English (6 Black, 2 Hispanic, 2 White, 3 mixed race, 1 American Indian), and 5 in Spanish (5 Hispanic). Overarching themes were: Barriers to Care, Facilitators of Returning/Staying in Care, Impact of Diagnosis, and Recommendations for Improvement (Image 1). Despite challenges with finances and transportation, as well as concern for infection risk, the majority of caregivers preferred in-person care over telehealth due to physical exam, diagnostic testing, and interpersonal connection with providers. SDOH challenges including housing, transportation, and employment contributed to missing care. For some families, social vulnerability was exacerbated by their child’s CCHD diagnosis and then again by COVID-19. Universally, caregivers felt their child’s race/ethnicity did not affect the care they received. Spanish-speaking caregivers expressed their primary language as a barrier to care and their desire for more thorough explanations and teach-back from the medical team.Conclusion:While SDOH can hinder access to ambulatory cardiac care, trusting relationships with care teams facilitated engagement. Social vulnerability contributed to dynamic situations for families, especially during COVID-19, highlighting the need for routine SDOH assessment and support. English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers echoed the same challenges. Race/ethnicity was not felt to impact care received.
Abstract 4145096: Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome and Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia – Two Distinct Phenotypes in Post-COVID-19 Cardiovascular Dysautonomia: Prevalence, Overlap and Clinical Characteristics
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4145096-A4145096, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) are common manifestations of cardiovascular dysautonomia (CVAD) in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. Studies regarding differences between post-COVID-19 POTS and post-COVID-19 IST have been sparse and based on small patient series.Aims:To examine clinical differences between POTS and IST in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome.Methods:A cross-sectional observational study based on a dataset of patients diagnosed with post-COVID-19 syndrome and POTS/IST, at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm in 2020-2023, was performed. Data was retrieved using patients’ medical records. ANOVA, chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used for analysis.Results:A total of 200 patients diagnosed with post-COVID POTS/IST (ICD-10 codes, I.498 + U.099) were included (female, 85%) and divided into a POTS-group (n=110) and IST-group (n=90). Sixty-one patients (31%) met the diagnostic criteria of both and were included in the IST-group. The mean ages were 38 years for the POTS-group and 42 years for the IST-group (p=0.027). Hypertension was more common within the IST-group (p
Abstract 4119613: Evaluation of Gender, Racial and Ethnic Differences in Time to PCI in the Pre and Post Covid-19 Era
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4119613-A4119613, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is recommended for reperfusion of patients presenting with ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI) within 90 minutes. In this study, we sought to identify differences in PCI timing based on gender, race and ethnicity in the pre- and post-COVID era.Methods:We collected retrospective data on 760 patients admitted with STEMI at our quaternary academic medical center from 2018-2022. We defined our binary outcome as time to PCI less than 90 minutes, and adjusted for transfers from outside hospitals. We utilized univariate logistic regression analysis to analyze the association of demographic, clinical, and cardiac catheterization details on our outcome. We then utilized multivariate logistic regression analysis to determine the association of our covariates of interests with time to PCI. The logistic regression model was adjusted for collinearity which were deemed not significant.Results:Among our study population, COVID did not significantly impact whether or not a patient had a diagnostic cardiac catheterization on univariate analysis (OR 2.68, 95% CI 0.61-18.40, p=0.23). However, the post-COVID era was significantly associated with a delayed time to PCI on multivariate analysis [OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.04-2.55, p=0.035) [Figure 1]. In addition, females were 1.8x more likely to have a delayed PCI than males on multivariate regression [OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.10-2.95, p= 0.019) [Figure 1]. Interestingly, on multivariate analysis, females were more likely to have delayed reperfusion in the pre-COVID era (OR 2.92, 1.29-6.77,p= 0.01) but not the post-COVID era (OR 1.54, 0.78-3.06,p=0.2134). Patients in the post-COVID era had increased risk of having their culprit coronary not revascularized on multivariate analysis (OR 2.85, 1.2-8.03, p= 0.03).Conclusions:At our center, COVID did not significantly impact cardiac catheterization rates. However, COVID was significantly associated with delayed reperfusion timing and not revascularizing culprit vessels. Females were much more likely to have a delayed PCI than males in the pre-COVID era which was not seen following COVID-19.
Abstract 4125636: Impaired blood pressure regulation in post-COVID-19 postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome: novel disease mechanisms beyond sinus tachycardia
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4125636-A4125636, November 12, 2024. Background:Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is a prevalent cardiovascular disorder after COVID-19 infection. Although POTS is characterized by the presence of sinus tachycardia, other hemodynamic disturbances including blood pressure (BP) regulation, remain largely unexplored.Aims:We investigated BP changes using 24-hour ambulatory-BP-monitoring in patients with new-onset POTS after COVID-19 compared with pre-pandemic healthy controls.Methods:We performed a case-control study in 100 verified COVID-19 patients with new-onset POTS (mean age 40.0±12.9 years, 85% women) diagnosed by positive head-up tilt-testing versus 100 healthy controls (mean age 45.0±14.6 years, 70% women) from a population-based cohort with negative active standing test, no history of syncope, orthostatic intolerance, or endocrine disease. We analyzed 24-hour Systolic BP (SBP) and hypotensive SBP episodes (
Abstract 4143186: Prior Statin Therapy Reduces Inflammation and Improves Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized for Covid-19: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4143186-A4143186, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Statins are lipid-lowering agents with anti-inflammatory effects. Data surrounding the benefits of statins in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) are conflicting. We sought to better understand the impact of statins in the context of Covid-19-related inflammation.Methods:We leveraged the International Study of Inflammation in Covid-19, a prospective multicenter cohort study of patients hospitalized specifically for Covid-19 between February 1, 2020 and October 30, 2022. Participants underwent systematic assessment of biomarkers of inflammation. We used logistic regression modeling and inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) to examine the association between prior statin use and the composite outcome of in-hospital death, need for mechanical ventilation, and need for renal replacement therapy.Results:A total of 4,464 patients were included in the study, of whom 1,364 (27.5%) were taking a statin prior to admission. There were 1,061 primary outcome events, including 540 deaths, 854 mechanical ventilation and 313 renal replacement therapy. Amongst biomarkers of inflammation, statin use was associated solely with lower levels of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) after adjusting for known confounders. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, statin use was associated with lower odds of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.63, 95%CI[0.53-0.76]) compared to patients not on statins. Findings were consistent with IPTW (aOR 0.92, 95%CI [0.89- 0.95]). The proportion of the effect of statin on the primary outcome mediated by suPAR was estimated at 31.5%.Conclusion:Prior statin use is associated with improved outcomes and lower inflammation as measured by suPAR levels in patients hospitalized for Covid-19.
Abstract 4114220: Majority of Patients with New Ventricular Dysfunction After Acute COVID-19 Infection Did Not Have Cardiac Recovery
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4114220-A4114220, November 12, 2024. Background:It is still not well understood whether cardiac injury observed during acute COVID-19 infection extends after recovery from the initial viral infection. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of left and right ventricular dysfunction in patients hospitalized with acute COVID-19 and evaluate for cardiac recovery.Methods:A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted. Adult patients were identified by hospitalizations using ICD-10 code U07.1 from March 2020 to October 2021. Patients were included if they had: 1) acute COVID-19 infection confirmed by RT-PCR and 2) a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) performed during their hospitalization. Clinical and echocardiographic data were collected and analyzed. Longitudinal TTE parameters were obtained from follow-up studies performed after discharge.Results:A total of 750 patients (mean age 64.3 ± 15.3 years, 60.0% male) were included. The average time to follow-up TTE was 8.7± 7.4 months. 133 patients (17.7%) had new LV dysfunction seen on TTE (Figure 1). LV recovery (defined as normalization of LVEF or improvement of LVEF by >10% from baseline) was observed in 28 of 74 (37.8%) survivors. 9 of 26 patients (34.6%) who had a follow-up TTE
Abstract 4126581: COVID-19 Impacted Septal Reduction Therapies in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4126581-A4126581, November 12, 2024. Background:Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic had a significant impact on emergent and elective treatment strategies in patients with cardiovascular disease. We aimed to examine the impact of COVID-19 on septal reduction therapy (SRT) in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).Methods:National Inpatient Sample 2019-2021 was queried to identify patients with HCM and SRT using appropriate ICD codes. Temporal trends for SRT were obtained before and after COVID-19 outset.Results:There was a significant decline in the number of SRT from 2019 to 2020 (1505 vs. 1180, p
Abstract 4144056: Quantitative Testing Reveals Severity of Autonomic Dysfunction after Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Comparison with Controls and Autonomic Failure
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4144056-A4144056, November 12, 2024. Background:COVID-19 infections have been associated with cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction (AD). Clinical findings include fatigue, cognitive impairment, and postural intolerance. However, quantitative post-COVID AD assessments are lacking.Objective:Compare autonomic testing measures of post-COVID-19 subjects to controls and those with pure autonomic failure (PAF).Methods:Autonomic testing included 1) change in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) with active standing (AS) and tilt table testing (TT), 2) time to BP nadir and recovery during AS and TT, 3) Valsalva ratio (VR), and 4) respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). Comparisons between two groups were made using t-tests, Kruskal-Wallis, or chi-square tests. Multivariable linear regression was used to adjust findings for age and sex. A p-value of
Abstract 4139757: COVID-19-Related Changes in Dalily Life, Concerns, and Their Associations with Sleep Disturbances
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4139757-A4139757, November 12, 2024. Background:The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly exacerbated sleep problems. Pandemic-related lockdowns and drastic changes in daily life have disrupted sleep patterns, resulting in a marked increase in sleep disturbances.Research questions:This study aims to investigate the primary factors contributing to the increase in sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea. By utilizing nationally representative data encompassing various variables, this study seeks to identify COVID-19-related factors associated with sleep disturbances during the pandemic.Method:We analyzed data from the nationally representative Korea Community Health Survey conducted in 2020, including 216,809 adults. Changes in daily life due to COVID-19 were assessed by asking participants to score their current situation compared to their pre-pandemic situation, ranging from 100 (no change) to 0 (complete cessation of daily activities). COVID-19 concerns were assessed with five questions: 1) fear of contracting the virus; 2) fear of mortality if infected; 3) fear of blame from others; 4) concerns about the health of vulnerable family members; and 5) concerns about economic impacts. Sleep disturbances were defined as sleeping 5 hours or less per night on average. Logistic regression analyses with a complex sample design were performed to examine the relationship between COVID-19-related factors and sleep disturbances, adjusting for socioeconomic and health-related variables.Results:A high level of lifestyle changes due to COVID-19 (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.11–1.19) and high COVID-19 concerns (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01–1.08) were associated with an increased likelihood of sleep disturbances. Conversely, resting during COVID-19 symptoms (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.76–0.87), having support during quarantine (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89–0.97), and trust in the government and neighbors (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.89–0.96) were associated with a decreased likelihood of sleep disturbances.Conclusion:These findings suggest that sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic were mediated by lifestyle disruptions and high levels of concern. Social support and trust mitigated the impact of COVID-19-related risk factors. As part of preparedness, improving the environment to facilitate adequate rest during illness, ensuring strong social support, and fostering high levels of trust in the government and neighbors may be important to protect sleep health during future public health emergencies.
Abstract 4142506: Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Myocarditis: COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination vs. Pre-Pandemic Viral Etiologies
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4142506-A4142506, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Myocarditis has been reported after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination, but the immune mechanisms remain unclear. This study aimed to identify the proteome-based immunopathogenesis of post-vaccination myocarditis compared to viral myocarditis in the pre-COVID-19 era.Methods:Proteomic analysis of right ventricle (RV) biopsy specimens was performed in myocarditis patients (pre-pandemic viral myocarditis: n=3, post-vaccination myocarditis: n=3) and controls (normal endomyocardial biopsy specimens of heart transplant recipients, n=4) using mass spectrometry. Differentially expressed proteins were analyzed with CIBERSORTx, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis, and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA). To examine the relationship between the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and post-vaccination myocarditis, immunohistochemistry (IHC), mass spectrometry analysis of spike protein, and activation-induced marker (AIM) assay in T cells from RV samples were conducted.Results:In the proteomic analysis, 6,861 proteins were identified. Post-vaccination myocarditis showed increased extracellular matrix formation and cardiac fibrosis. Both pre-pandemic and post-vaccination myocarditis had elevated pro-inflammatory cytokine activities. However, post-vaccination myocarditis exhibited higher expression of interferon-alpha (IFNα) and pattern recognition receptor activation, including TLR3 and TLR7. Pre-pandemic myocarditis showed higher activation of the complement system, neutrophils, and NK cells, whereas post-vaccination myocarditis showed increased Th2 cell activation and classical macrophage activation. Spike protein and related T-cell activation were not detected.Conclusion:The immune activation in myocarditis after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination may be triggered by the mRNA in the vaccine via an IFNα-driven immune response, leading to autoimmune-like features. Further studies are necessary to validate whether these proteins correlate with clinical characteristics.
Abstract 4139661: Usefulness of High-sensitive Troponin I and N-terminal pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Risk Stratification on and after Omicron Variant Waves: COVID-MI Registry Cohort-2 Analysis
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4139661-A4139661, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Troponin-defined myocardial injury or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) elevation frequently coincides with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Our prior study (COVID-MI Registry Cohort-1) confirmed that high-sensitive troponin I (HsTnI) and NT-proBNP effectively stratified mortality risk. However, variants of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) change rapidly, and it remains unclear whether these biomarkers are consistently effective in predicting prognosis of COVID-19 patients irrespective of epidemic periods.Research Questions:Can HsTnI or NT-proBNP stratify mortality risk in recent COVID-19 cohorts?Aims:To assess the potential of HsTnI and NT-proBNP levels for risk stratification in the recent COVID-19 waves.Methods:In the COVID-MI Registry Cohort-2, we enrolled 1115 consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted between October 2021 and October 2022, during the Omicron variant endemic. We collected data of HsTnI or NT-proBNP levels from hospital charts or using the samples in our hospital’s serum/plasma bank if the data were not available. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality.Results:On admission, more than one-third of patients were classified as having severe COVID-19. HsTnI and NT-proBNP levels were available for 427 and 414 patients, respectively. The median HsTnI and NT-proBNP levels were 16 (interquartile range [IQR]: 5-57) ng/L and 524 (IQR: 140-2056) pg/mL, respectively. We stratified the patients into three groups by HsTnI level:
Abstract 4146939: Impact of Diagnosis Timing (Early vs Late) on Atrial Fibrillation Progression in Patient with New Onset Atrial Fibrillation During COVID Illness
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4146939-A4146939, November 12, 2024. Background:New onset AF during acute illness has a high rate of AF recurrence within 5-yr. However, little is known about AF progression in patients with new onset AF during COVID illness. It is also unknown whether the time of COVID diagnosis (early vs late) impacts AF progression. More specifically, did the potentially different immune and inflammatory responses during early vs late COVID produce structural and electrical cardiac remodeling that would increase the likelihood of AF progression.Objective:We sought to compare AF progression in patients with new onset AF during early vs late COVID and hypothesized that early COVID was associated with increased AF progression compared to late COVID.Methods:From Apr 2020 to Feb 2024, patients receiving a SARS-2-CoV test without a history of AF with new onset AF and at least 3-mo of follow up were included (N=11,767). Patients were subdivided based on pos vs neg SARS-2-CoV test and time of diagnosis. Early COVID diagnosis (n=3052) included Apr 2020-Aug 2021 and late COVID (n=8715) included Sep 2021-Feb 2024. AF progression endpoints at 3-, 6- and 12-mo included AF hospitalization, AF emergency department (ED) visit, cardioversion and AF ablation.Results:Patients with late COVID were more likely females with hypertension, coronary artery disease and hyperlipidemia compared to early COVID patients. At 3- and 6-mo follow-up there was no difference in AF progression between the early and late COVID groups for any endpoint. In contrast, at 12-mo follow up there was in increase in late diagnosis group AF ED visits (11% vs 7.6%,p
Abstract 4143094: COVID-19 Infection Had Significant Impact on In-Hospital Outcomes of Women with Peripartum Cardiomyopathy
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4143094-A4143094, November 12, 2024. Background:Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is defined as a dilated form of cardiomyopathy that occurs within the last month of pregnancy and up to 5 months postpartum. The etiology is likely multifactorial and viral infections may account for up to a third of PPCM cases. We aimed to examine the impact of concurrent COVID-19 infection on in-hospital outcomes of women with PPCM.Methods:National Inpatient Sample was queried to identify women admitted with PPCM with COVID-19 (group A) between the years 2020-2021 and without (group B) concurrent COVID-19 infection between the years 2016-2019.Results:A total of 19135 women were admitted with PPCM between the years 2016-2021, of whom 420 (2%) had concurrent COVID-19 infection. Group A PPCM followed a seasonal pattern with peak incidence in fall (43%) followed by winter (31%), spring (13%) and summer (13%) [p=0.002]. Group A was more often Hispanic (20.3% -vs- 10.8%, p