Impact of stigma on the HIV care cascade among older persons living with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: protocol for a systematic review

Introduction
Data are limited on the impact of stigma (stigma associated with HIV and/or stigma related to old age (ageism) or both) on linkage to the HIV care cascade among older persons (aged 50 years and older) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Studies have documented the prevalence and determinants of HIV testing, antiretroviral therapy (ART) use and viral load suppression among older people in Africa. However, there is a need to conduct a systematic review to synthesise the findings on the impact of stigma on the HIV care cascade among older people in SSA. The objective of this systematic review is to collate the findings on the impact of stigma on the HIV care cascade among older people aged 50 years and older in SSA. The major research question is: what is the impact of stigma on the HIV care cascade among older persons aged 50 years and older in SSA?

Methods and analysis
We will search MEDLINE via PubMed, Web of Science Collection, Academic Search Premier from the EBSCO platform, Cochrane Central, JBI EBP, Global Health, Social Policy and Practice and Health Management Information Consortium for articles published in English from 2000 to June 2024. The search strategy will include variations of the following terms: HIV, HIV cascade, HIV testing, HIV care or linkage to care, retention in care, viral suppression, older persons, stigma, HIV-related stigma, age-related stigma, ageism, discrimination and intersectional stigma. In terms of study characteristics, the following will be included: epidemiological studies/observational studies/randomised controlled trials and qualitative studies on the HIV care cascade (ie, HIV testing, linkage to care, retention and viral suppression). We will restrict eligibility by focusing on the older population (older persons aged 50 years and older living with HIV) in SSA. The planned limits include timing (2000–2024), geographical coverage (SSA), language (English), copyright (open access publications) and age of the population (50 years and older). The primary and secondary outcomes are drawn from the HIV care cascade, including HIV testing, linkage to care, retention in care and adherence to ART.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethics approval is not needed since this is a systematic review based on published data. Dissemination will be done by submitting scientific articles to academic peer-reviewed journals. We will also present the results at relevant conferences and meetings.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42024534675.

Read More

Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol of patient-centred interventions for sustained viral suppression among patients on antiretroviral therapy in South Africa

Background
Sustained viral suppression is critical not only for ensuring long and healthy livelihoods among the people who are living with Human immunodefficiency virus (HIV), but it is also crucial for prevention of new infections of HIV perinatally and to HIV negative sexual partners through unsafe sex. Available data, however, suggest that some of the patients who are on antiretroviral therapy (ART) fail to maintain the suppressed state once they have achieved it, with others reporting subsequent episodes of viral rebound following resuppression. The association of depression, social issues including day-to-day routine and stigma with poor adherence inadvertently calls for the formulation of intervention strategies that are patient centric. The proposed systematic review and meta-analysis study will identify studies of intervention strategies that are in place to address viral suppression and viral rebound among HIV positive patients who are on ART.

Methods and analysis
The proposed study will conduct a systematic search of peer-reviewed articles through PubMed, Scopus and EBSCOhost databases. Data collection will occur in March 2025. The reviewers will include studies if they were published in South Africa, between 2013 and 2024, and if they were observational in design and written in English. Identified articles will be exported onto Rayyan software where processes of de-duplication and screening by two independent reviewers will be performed. A meta-analysis of data will be conducted on Stata 17 software using the random effects model. The results will be generated in a table and displayed graphically in a forest plot which will indicate type of study, type of intervention, point effect size and the corresponding 95% CI, weight per cent contributed by each study to the pooled estimate, pooled estimate and the 95% CI and measures of heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis will be performed to identify the source of heterogeneity. Publication bias will be assessed by funnel plot and the Egger’s asymmetry test.

Ethics and dissemination
The study protocol has obtained ethical clearance from the ethics committee of Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University (SMUREC/H/31/2024:PG). As this will be a systematic review study, involving no human participants, informed consent will not be required. However, for integrity, the findings will be prepared and disseminated widely through peer-reviewed publication and in various media, including conferences, congresses or symposia.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42024532244.

Read More

Economic evaluations of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a systematic review

Background
Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programmes and services aim to prevent complications of pregnancy and childbirth, unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions, complications caused by sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, sexual violence and impacts from avoidable cancer.

Objective
To systematically identify published economic evaluations of SRH programmes and services, assess the methods used and analyse how costs and outcomes are estimated in these studies.

Settings
Low- and middle-income countries.

Design
Systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Methods
Eight databases were searched, including EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, Health Technology Assessment, Web of Science, PsycINFO, National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED) and African Journals Online (AJOL) from 1998 to December 2023. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study Design framework. The review included economic evaluations alongside randomised trials and economic studies with modelling components. Study characteristics, methods and results of economic evaluations were extracted and tabulated. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria list and Philips checklists for trial-based and model-based studies, respectively. The review followed the reporting guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the results were synthesised narratively in line with Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance.

Results
7575 studies were screened and categorised. 20 studies were included in the review. The studies assessed the cost-effectiveness and costs of SRH programmes and services from an individual, healthcare or societal perspective. The main SRH programme considered was contraceptive services. The main outcome measures reported were disability-adjusted life years, quality-adjusted life years, couple years of protection and pregnancies averted. Most of the studies did not indicate the costing approach used, and many of the studies evaluated direct medical costs only. Most of the study designs were model-based with significant heterogeneity between the models. The review showed that many studies did not fulfil all of the requirements for a high-quality economic evaluation. 1 out of the 20 studies reviewed considered equity.

Conclusions
The review revealed heterogeneity in approaches to evaluating the costs and outcomes of SRH programmes. These methodological limitations may have implications for their use by public health decision-makers to inform optimal decision-making.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42023435241.

Read More

Factors influencing community demand for assisted partner services for HIV in western Kenya: a multilevel qualitative analysis

Objectives
This study explores factors affecting community-level demand for assisted partner services (APS) and HIV testing services (HTS) in western Kenya.

Design
This is a multilevel qualitative analysis conducted as part of the APS Scale-up Study, a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness study of APS integrated within routine HTS. For this analysis, in-depth phone interviews assessed demand for APS and factors influencing decisions to participate in APS.

Setting
Participants were recruited from eight healthcare facilities and (for APS stakeholders) from affiliated healthcare institutions in western Kenya (Kisumu and Homabay). Interviews were conducted by phone in 2019 and 2020.

Participants
67 participants were interviewed: 14 APS providers, 16 female index clients, 17 male sexual partners and 20 community members. Participants were recruited using criteria-based purposive sampling to represent different types of facilities and to include indexes who named different numbers of partners and stakeholders representing all Kenyan healthcare system levels.

Results
Collectively, participants perceived that demand and uptake of APS could be impacted by multiple stigmas related to HIV, sexual behaviours and identities; long clinical wait times; certain gender norms and expectations; and fear of relationship dissolution, loss of financial support and intimate partner violence. However, different stakeholder groups generally focused on different factors; women focused more on gender dynamics and family roles; male sexual partners on stigma and structural barriers; HTS providers focused on HIV testing accessibility; and community-level stakeholders focused on low community awareness of APS.

Conclusions
Stigma reduction, awareness about APS, creation of male entry points at the facility level and provision of social support mechanisms have the potential to increase demand for APS.

Read More

Understanding stigma as a barrier to cancer prevention and treatment: a qualitative study among people living with HIV in Uganda and Zambia

Objectives
Extended life expectancy due to treatment improvements has increased the diagnosis of cancer among people living with HIV (PLWH) in Africa. Despite documented impacts of stigma on cancer preventive behaviours and care, little is known about the intersections of cancer and HIV stigma and the effects on prevention and care behaviours for both conditions. This study aims to examine experiences and drivers of cancer stigma and their associations with access to and utilisation of cancer prevention services among PLWH.

Design
This was a qualitative study consisting of eight focus group discussions with PLWH and 14 key informant interviews with HIV healthcare providers collected in January 2024.

Setting
Data were collected from two districts of Uganda and Zambia. In Uganda, the two selected districts were Arua, in the northern West Nile region, and Moroto, in the northeast Karamoja region. In Zambia, the study districts were Mongu, in the Western Province, and Chipata in the Eastern Province.

Participants
Each study district held two PLWH focus groups (one male, another female) with 5–7 participants per group and 3–4 key informant interviews for a total of 55 participants. PLWH and healthcare providers were eligible if they were (1) aged 18 years or older and (2) an HIV-positive client receiving antiretroviral therapy services at the participating clinic or working in a health services capacity at the clinic.

Results
Cancer stigma drivers included widespread misconceptions about disease origins and outcomes, associations with other stigmatising conditions and behaviours such as HIV, TB, and substance use, limited treatment options that heightened fears of diagnosis and inadequate training of healthcare providers. Study participants noted that experiences of stigma led to reduced treatment-seeking behaviours among PLWH, increased social isolation, and poor cancer-related care practices within clinics. Recommended interventions to combat stigma included improved education for providers and patients, private counselling, and peer support.

Conclusions
Results underscore the presence and impacts of stigma in the study population, emphasising the need for research informing culturally sensitive interventions that enhance educational outreach and promote engagement in care among targeted populations.

Trial registration number
This article is linked to an ongoing clinical trial registered on clinical trials.gov (clinical trial No: NCT05487807; Registration date: 27 November 2023) and relates to the pre-results stage.

Read More