Prevalence and determinants of unsuppressed HIV viral loads among children and adolescents living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in Lubumbashi, Democratic Republic of the Congo: a retrospective cross-sectional study

Background
Despite global improvements in antiretroviral therapy (ART) access for children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV), a significant proportion continue to experience unsuppressed viral load (USVL). Limited studies focus on the factors contributing to USVL among CALHIV in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), especially in the context of evolving treatment landscapes. Understanding these determinants is crucial for enhancing ART outcomes.

Objective
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of USVL and identify factors associated with USVL among CALHIV receiving ART in Lubumbashi, DRC.

Design
A multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were gathered using an observational checklist based on assessing patient file data and entered into Microsoft Excel. Analysis was performed using STATA V.16. Variables with a p value of 0.20 from the bivariable analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model, and significant variables (p

Read More

Impact of vaccine mandates and removals on COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Australia and international comparators: a study protocol

Background
Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 was a crucial public health measure during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the multiple strategies developed to increase vaccine uptake, governments often employed vaccine mandates. However, little evidence exists globally about the impact of these mandates and their subsequent removal on vaccine uptake, including in Australia, France, Italy and the USA. The aim of this study is to provide a protocol to evaluate and quantify the impact of COVID-19 vaccine mandates and removals on vaccine uptake in these countries, with a specific focus on comparing Australian policies with those from Europe and the USA. Actualising the work outlined in this protocol will help to provide policy and technical guidance for future pandemic preparedness and routine immunisation programmes.

Methods and analysis
This protocol outlines a retrospective study using existing data sources including Australian Immunisation Register-Person Level Integrated Data Asset for Australia and publicly available data for France, Italy and California (USA). Causal inference methods such as interrupted time series, regression discontinuity design, difference-in-differences, matching and synthetic control will be employed to assess the estimated effects of vaccine mandates and removals on vaccine uptake.

Ethics and dissemination
The University of Newcastle’s human research ethics committee has approved the study (reference number: H-2024-0160). Peer-reviewed papers will be submitted, and results will be presented at public health, immunisation and health economic conferences nationally and internationally. A lay summary will be published on the MandEval website.

Read More

Implementation of an intervention to scale up coverage of pneumonia management in children younger than 5 years in a north Indian district: protocol for a quasi-experimental, mixed-methods, pre-post implementation study

Introduction
The National Family Health Survey-5 has reported an under-five mortality rate of 41.9 per 1000 live births in India. Pneumonia, one of the leading causes of under-five mortality, contributes substantially to this figure. The Indian government has made efforts through multiple national programmes, but pneumonia-specific mortality remains high. The Government of India revised their Childhood Pneumonia Management Guidelines in 2019 to improve under-five pneumonia prevention and management. This implementation study aims to achieve a high population-based coverage of pneumonia treatment for under 5 yearold children in the Palwal district of India.

Method and analysis
This implementation study uses a quasi-experimental pre-post design and a mixed-methods approach, conducted in three phases: (i) formative research, (ii) model optimisation through iterative testing in a learning block and (iii) scale-up and concurrent evaluation. The study is set in Palwal district, Haryana, and the primary catchment/study area will be the Health and Wellness Centres, the most accessible public health facilities for the community. Approximately 4167 households will be surveyed to capture ~2400 under-five children, among whom about 120 pneumonia cases (based on an estimated 5% prevalence) will be included in the analysis of treatment coverage and outcomes. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics and generalised linear models, while qualitative data from focus group discussions and in-depth interviews will be thematically analysed using NVivo software.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval was granted by the ethical committees of the Society for Applied Studies (ERC/IR Pneumonia/2021), the Regional Ethics Committee of Western Norway (2022/531608) and the WHO(ERC.0003652). Additionally, this study has obtained the Government of Haryana state (Memo no. HSHRC/2022/505) and Health Ministry steering committee (approval date: 19 Dec 2022, proposal id 2022–17596) approvals. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants, including caregivers and healthcare workers, prior to data collection. Dissemination meetings in the study country will share results with stakeholders, including Ministry of Health officials, health managers, families of under-five children, community leaders and academia, to discuss national health programme implications. Results will also be shared regionally and globally, with publications and presentations encouraged in national and international forums.

Study registration
Clinical Trials Registry – India, CTRI/2021/03/031622.

Read More

Multisectoral coordination during the COVID-19 pandemic: practices, challenges and recommendations for future preparedness–a systematic literature review protocol

Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic amplified the need for robust multisectoral coordination; yet the specific mechanisms, benefits and challenges of such collaboration particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain poorly synthesised. This review aims to delineate the key elements, benefits, challenges and improvement strategies of multisectoral coordination during COVID-19 and to compare patterns between LMICs and high-income countries (HICs).

Methods and analysis
Eligible studies will include empirical qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods research published in English between 1 January 2020 and 15 August 2024 that examines formal coordination mechanisms (eg, task forces, public-private partnerships, inter-agency committees) within the context of COVID-19. Searches will be conducted across PubMed, EBSCOhost, Emerald Insight, Google Scholar and selected grey-literature repositories. Citation chaining will be employed to identify additional sources.
Two reviewers will independently screen all records using Covidence, applying pre-piloted eligibility criteria to 5% of citations and proceeding only if inter-rater reliability achieves ≥0.70. Data will be extracted into a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-informed template. Qualitative data will be analysed through framework synthesis, structured by the five CFIR domains. Quantitative data will be narratively summarised and, where outcomes are sufficiently similar across at least two studies, synthesised using a fixed-effect model.
Risk of bias will be assessed using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions for non-randomised studies. Studies with serious or critical risk will be excluded from pooling. Subgroup analyses (LMIC vs HIC), sensitivity analyses (model and risk) and confidence grading using Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations will be conducted.

Ethics and dissemination
No primary data will be collected; thus additional Research Ethics Committee approval is unnecessary. The results will be disseminated via open-access publication, conference presentations and policy briefs for Nairobi County health stakeholders.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42023466849.

Read More

Left Atrial Diverticula Detected on Cardiac CT in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Substudy of Mind the Heart

Stroke, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Left atrial (LA) diverticula are focal outpouchings of the LA wall and may increase ischemic stroke risk. We studied recurrent ischemic stroke in patients with acute ischemic stroke and LA diverticula detected on cardiac computed tomography.METHODS:We used data from a prospective cohort study of patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing cardiac computed tomography acquired during the acute stroke imaging protocol. Cardiac radiologists systematically assessed the presence and characteristics of LA diverticula, defined as LA wall outpouchings with a length/ostium width ratio >0.5 and length ≥3 mm. We compared recurrent ischemic stroke and functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) after 2 years between patients with and without LA diverticula, adjusting for age, history of atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke, and anticoagulation use.RESULTS:Of 447 included patients (median age 72 [interquartile range (IQR), 62–81], 59% male), 126 (28%) had LA diverticula: median length 6 mm (IQR, 4–8), width 5 mm (IQR, 4–7), and volume 113 mm3(IQR, 52–254). There was no statistically significant difference in age (median 70 [IQR, 58–79] versus 73 [IQR, 63–81];P=0.06), sex (64% versus 57% male;P=0.28), history of ischemic stroke (21% versus 17%;P=0.48), atrial fibrillation (11% versus 19%;P=0.09), or baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (median 5 [IQR, 2–14] versus 5 [IQR, 3–14];P=0.54) between patients with and without LA diverticula, respectively. Recurrent ischemic stroke was more common in patients with LA diverticula (18/124 [15%] versus 24/314 [8%], adjusted hazard ratio, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.08–3.77]), and recurrence risk increased with diverticulum volume (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.01–1.03] per 10 mm3). Functional outcome was better in patients with diverticula (median modified Rankin Scale score of 2 [IQR, 1–3] versus 3 [IQR, 1–6], adjusted common odds ratio, 0.62, [95% CI, 0.42–0.92]).CONCLUSIONS:LA diverticula are a common finding on cardiac computed tomography in patients with acute ischemic stroke, and the risk of recurrent ischemic stroke was increased in these patients, particularly in those with larger diverticula. Atrial diverticula may be a risk factor for recurrent ischemic stroke.REGISTRATION:URL:https://www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/50352; Unique identifier: NL6413901818.

Read More

Association Between Age and Endovascular Treatment Outcomes: Binational Registry of 9934 EVT Cases From Korea and Taiwan

Stroke, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:As populations age, there is an increasing need to optimize endovascular treatment (EVT) and to understand country-specific differences in East Asia. We harmonized stroke registries from Korea and Taiwan to enable comparisons of patient characteristics and outcomes, with a particular focus on the impact of age.METHODS:Multicenter prospective stroke registries in Korea (CRCS-K [Clinical Research Collaboration for Stroke in Korea]) and Taiwan (TREAT-AIS [Taiwan Registry of Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke]) were harmonized to form a unified data set of patients undergoing EVT. Outcomes included 3-month modified Rankin Scale, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and successful recanalization. We assessed the association between age and outcomes in the overall population and those who were aged ≥80 years using logistic regression models, adjusting for relevant covariates.RESULTS:A total of 9934 EVT cases (7835 from Korea and 2099 from Taiwan) were included from 2011 to 2023. Patients had a mean age of 70.1±12.9 years (57.6% male; median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, 14 [interquartile range, 9–19]). Compared with Korean patients, Taiwanese patients had a higher prevalence of risk factors and more severe strokes, contributing to lower rates of favorable 3-month outcomes. Increasing age was associated with poorer EVT results; among patients ≥80 years, 18% achieved a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2, compared with 46% of younger patients. However, the risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not significantly increase with age (adjusted odds ratio per year, 1.01 [0.99–1.02]; adjusted odds ratio of ≥80 years, 0.98 [0.75–1.29]). Prestroke functional independence, baseline hemoglobin, and bridging thrombolysis were identified as significant modifiers of outcomes in the oldest patients.CONCLUSIONS:Taiwanese EVT patients had more risk factors and worse outcomes than Korean patients. Advanced age is associated with poorer functional recovery, yet selected older patients, particularly those who were functionally independent before the stroke or received bridging thrombolysis, demonstrated meaningful benefit. These results underscore the importance of individualized treatment strategies and careful patient selection, especially as populations continue to age.

Read More

Investigating the long-term public health and co-benefit impacts of an urban greenway intervention in the UK: a natural experiment evaluation – study protocol

Introduction
Urban green and blue space (UGBS) interventions, such as the development of an urban greenway, have the potential to provide public health benefits and multiple co-benefits in the realms of the environment, economy and society. This paper presents the protocol for a 5-year follow-up evaluation of the public health benefits and co-benefits of an urban greenway in Belfast, UK.

Methods and analysis
The natural experiment evaluation uses a range of systems-oriented and mixed-method approaches. First, using group model building methods, we codeveloped a causal loop diagram with stakeholders to inform the evaluation framework. We will use other systems methods including viable systems modelling and soft systems methodology to understand the context of the system (ie, the intervention) and the stakeholders involved in the development, implementation and maintenance phases. The effectiveness evaluation includes a repeat cross-sectional household survey with a random sample of 1200 local residents (adults aged ≥16 years old) who live within 1 mile of the greenway. The survey is complemented with administrative data from the National Health Service. For the household survey, outcomes include physical activity, mental well-being, quality of life, social capital, perceptions of environment and biodiversity. From the administrative data, outcomes include prescription medications for a range of non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease, type II diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory and mental health conditions. We also investigate changes in infectious disease rates, including COVID-19, and maternal and child health outcomes such as birth weight and gestational diabetes. A range of economic evaluation methods, including a cost-effectiveness analysis and social return on investment (SROI), will be employed. Findings from the household survey and administrative data analysis will be further explored in focus groups with a subsample of those who complete the household survey and the local community to explore possible mechanistic pathways and other impacts beyond those measured. Process evaluation methods include intercept surveys and direct observation of the number and type of greenway visitors using the Systems for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities tool. Finally, we will use methods such as weight of evidence, simulation and group model building, each embedding participatory engagement with stakeholders to help us interpret, triangulate and synthesise the findings.

Ethics and dissemination
To our knowledge, this is one of the first natural experiments with a 5-year follow-up evaluation of an UGBS intervention. The findings will help inform future policy and practice on UGBS interventions intended to bring a range of public health benefits and co-benefits. Ethics approval was obtained from the Medicine, Health and Life Sciences Research Ethics Committee prior to the commencement of the study. All participants in the household survey and focus group workshops will provide written informed consent before taking part in the study. Findings will be reported to (1) participants and stakeholders; (2) funding bodies supporting the research; (3) local, regional and national governments to inform policy; (4) presented at local, national and international conferences and (5) disseminated by peer-review publications.

Read More

Duration of COVID-19 symptoms in children: a longitudinal study in a Rio de Janeiro favela, Brazil

Objectives
COVID-19 in children is generally of short duration, but some may take longer to recover. This study investigated the time to symptom resolution following SARS-CoV-2 infection among children in a community setting on the outskirts of an urban centre in Brazil.

Design
Prospective cohort study.

Setting
This is a community-based cohort of children living in Manguinhos, a favela in Rio de Janeiro. The cohort was followed through home visits and telephone monitoring of symptoms. The analysis focused on symptomatic children from this cohort with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Recovery time was defined as the interval between the first date with symptoms and the first date without symptoms following a positive SARS-CoV-2 test.

Participants
A total of 1276 children (boys and girls aged 2–

Read More

Physical exercise barriers and needs in adults with congenital heart disease: a qualitative study

Objective
Regular physical exercise has well-known health benefits and is generally considered safe for adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD). However, many individuals with ACHD remain insufficiently physically active. This study explored the barriers and needs related to physical exercise as experienced by people with ACHD to inform the development of tailored strategies that support and promote increased physical activity.

Methods
Qualitative study using semistructured interviews conducted between March and May 2023. The interview guide was based on the Fear Avoidance Model, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia Heart and European Society of Cardiology guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise for cardiovascular diseases. Interviews were coded and thematically analysed to identify specific physical exercise barriers and needs.

Results
Data saturation was reached after interviewing 19 individuals living with ACHD (median age 46 years (range 24–75), 10 women). Thematic analysis identified four main barriers: (1) physical symptoms and negative past experiences, (2) alienation from peers, (3) perceived decline in physical fitness over time and (4) lack of knowledge about personal physical boundaries. Two needs were identified: (1) personalised, disease-specific exercise information and advice and (2) structured support and guidance from healthcare professionals.

Conclusions
People with ACHD face multiple barriers to engaging in physical exercise. There is a clear need for specific, personalised exercise advice from healthcare providers and the development of long-term programmes and interventions to overcome relevant barriers.

Read More

Strengthening universities response to sexual harassment with an equity approach: the UNI4EQUITY mixed-methods study protocol

Introduction
Preventing online and offline sexual harassment (SH) is a public health priority, due to its worldwide magnitude and short- and long-term consequences to the victims and survivors. Universities are environments that may facilitate different forms of conflicts, including SH, but they also play a key role in preventing and addressing them. This paper describes ‘Uni4Equity’, a European project funded by the CERV-2022-DAPHNE Programme of the European Union (Ref. 101094121-Uni4Equity) aimed to reinforce universities’ readiness to identify, map and respond to online and offline SH at workplace and other relevant settings (classrooms, digital space), with an explicit (but not exclusive) focus on minority social groups. More specifically, the project will address the research needs of conducting multidimensional diagnosis of SH at universities (scale and determinants) as a basis for preventive actions; assessing the effectiveness of preventive interventions such as social media campaigns and training workshops; creating a university culture that actively rejects SH; improving access to existing support services; and contributing to the acknowledgement of universities as an asset in preventing this issue.

Methods and analyses
The project follows an exploratory sequential design for the period 2023–2026. In phase 1, a mixed-method initial assessment based on online surveys, semistructured interviews and desk reviews is planned in six targeted universities: University of Alicante, Adam Mickiewicz University (AMU), University of Maia, University of Applied Sciences Burgenland (UASB), University of Antwerp (UAntwerp), University of Verona. Phase 2 integrates long-term and large-scale interventions at different levels of prevention (primary, secondary and tertiary) and implementation (interpersonal, institutional and social). These interventions combine online and offline training programmes addressed to students and staff, arrangements with internal and external support services and improvements in access to information and resources, including SH protocols and regulations. Phase 3 consists of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the different Uni4Equity interventions and a final evaluation of the global impact of the project.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval was obtained by the different universities research ethics committees (Universidad de Alicante, vice-rectorate for research: Ref. no. UA-2023-03-27; Università di Verona, Comitato di Approvazione per la Ricerca sulla Persona: Ref. no. UNIVR-24/2023; UAntwerp, Ethics Committee for the Social Sciences and Humanities: Ref. no. EX_SHW_2023_38_1; AMU, Ethics Committee for Research Involving Human Participants, Ref. no. UAM_19/2022/2023; UASB, Ethics Committee: Ref. no. UASB _28/08/2023; Universidade da Maia, Conselho de Ética e Deontologia: Ref. no. UMAIA_ 151/2023).
The research team will disseminate findings through peer-reviewed journal articles, presentations in scientific national and international events, policy briefs, infographics, videos and short reports.

Read More

Assessment of COVID-19 hospitalisation cost and its associated factors in Nepal: a descriptive cross-sectional study

Objective
This study aimed to assess the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) hospitalisation costs and its associated factors on Nepalese households during the second wave of the pandemic, within the context of Nepal’s COVID-19 response.

Design
A cost-descriptive cross-sectional study.

Setting
Kathmandu Metropolitan City, Nepal.

Participants
We enrolled 306 hospitalised patients.

Outcome
Telephonic interviews were conducted with COVID-19 patients between May and July 2022. Cost was assessed from a patient’s perspective. We assessed factors associated with the medical cost of COVID-19 treatment services using a generalised linear model with gamma distribution and log link in both bivariable and multivariable models for estimating coefficients and confidence intervals. Data were analysed using STATA version 13, adjusting for the potential confounders: socio-demographic characteristics, type of hospital, intensive care unit (ICU) requirement, lead time to hospital admission and number of days at hospital stay.

Results
The total median cost for hospitalisation was US$ 754.9. The median direct medical, direct non-medical and indirect costs were US$ 624.4, US$ 49.3 and US$ 493.02, respectively. After adjusting for potential confounders, the cost of COVID-19 treatment was 6.9 times higher among those admitted to private hospital (95% CI 5.72 to 8.32, p

Read More