Search Results for: Sindromi coronariche acute

Introduction
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for stroke prophylaxis in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Yet, DOAC use is regarded as a contraindication for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke. The stratification of patients into ‘on-therapy’ and ‘off-therapy’ categories based on their plasma DOAC concentrations is particularly crucial in the acute phase of stroke when decisions for thrombolysis or anticoagulation reversal are time-sensitive. The novel point-of-care DOAC dipstick assay (DOASENSE) rapidly assesses urine for clinically significant DOAC levels, potentially broadening eligibility for thrombolysis or targeted reversal therapy. This multicentre prospective observational registry study aims to evaluate the accuracy and clinical utility of DOAC dipstick testing compared with plasma DOAC assays in acute stroke management across regional Australian hospitals.

Methods and analysis
This multicentre, prospective, observational study will enrol participants presenting to hospitals across Victoria and Tasmania with acute ischaemic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage with DOAC ingestion within 48 hours of presentation. Plasma DOAC concentrations measured by chromogenic assays will be compared with rapid urine dipstick results from DOASENSE testing. There is a target sample size of 146 participants. The primary outcomes are as follows: (1) proportion of ischaemic stroke participants with off-therapy plasma DOAC levels and (2) eligibility for reperfusion therapy based on DOASENSE and plasma DOAC concentrations. Secondary outcomes are follows: (1) ischaemic stroke aetiology for participants with on-therapy vs off-therapy DOAC levels; (2) proportion of participants meeting criteria for pharmacological DOAC reversal based on DOASENSE outcomes; (3) incidence of false-negative and false positive DOASENSE results in clinically significant DOAC plasma concentrations at a threshold of ≥30 ng/mL and (4) an exploratory analysis of any false negative DOASENSE assays to identify potential contributing factors.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethics approval has been granted by the Eastern Health Human Research Ethics Committee (reference number: 99628). Dissemination of findings will occur through peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences.

Introduction
Neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (n(C)RT) followed by resection with total mesorectal excision (TME) constitutes the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer of the middle and lower third. However, n(C)RT has demonstrated no significant impact on overall survival but is associated with adverse effects, including impaired sphincter and sexual function. We hypothesise that omitting n(C)RT in selected patients with a clear circumferential resection margin (CRM) >1 mm as determined through preoperative MRI is not inferior regarding local recurrence rate within 3 years after surgery. That treatment approach may show fewer adverse effects and be more cost-effective.

Methods and analysis
Selective neoadjuvant therapy of rectal cancer patients (SELREC) is a randomised controlled, parallel-group, open, multicentre, non-inferiority trial. The experimental intervention involves performing TME surgery without n(C)RT. In contrast, the control intervention adheres to German S3-guidelines, incorporating neoadjuvant radiotherapy (nRT) with a dosage of 5×5 Gy or a total of 50.4 Gy. Additionally, if applicable, concomitant chemotherapy (CT) based on 5-fluorouracil is administered, followed by TME surgery within less than 12 weeks. Adjuvant treatment according to guidelines is allowed depending on the (y)pTNM stage.
The inclusion criteria for this study encompass adult patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the rectum in whom the main tumour mass is located less than 12 cm away from the anal verge, as assessed via proctoscopy. Additionally, eligible participants are required to have a preoperative tumour stage determined by MRI of either T1 or T2 with lymph node involvement (N1) or T3 with no lymph node involvement (N0) or with lymph node involvement (N1) and no distant metastases (M0). The assessment of a clear CRM >1 mm, based on MRI, is another prerequisite for inclusion. A total of 1074 patients in approximately 35 centres are planned to be allocated to the trial.
The primary endpoint of the trial is local recurrence within 3 years after surgery. The primary estimand is based on the full analysis set using a logistic mixed model (margin 3%). The first secondary endpoint is no/minor low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score at 2 years after surgery, and further secondary endpoints include survival outcomes and quality of life. Safety analysis involves describing the frequencies of major intervention-specific complications, such as the acute toxicity of n(C)RT according to CTCAE and perioperative morbidity and mortality according to Clavien-Dindo criteria.
SELREC is financially supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Ethics and dissemination
This trial has been prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register.
Previously, the study had been approved by the responsible ethics committee of Heidelberg and the local ethics committees of the collaborating institutions before patient enrolment. Any protocol deviation that has an impact on relevant parameters such as study design, endpoints or patient safety will be reported to the responsible ethics committees.
The results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal and on institutional websites.

Trial registration number
German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00030567.

Importance
Background rates are critical for contextualising safety signals arising from COVID-19-related interventions in investigational or real-world settings.

Objective
To estimate background rates of medical events of interest (MEI) for which COVID-19 infection and/or COVID-19 interventions may be risk factors in two US claims databases.

Design, setting and participants
This retrospective cohort study spans the pre-COVID-19 (2018–2019) and COVID-19 (2020–2021) periods. We constructed three cohorts, in each of Inovalon/HealthVerity (Inovalon/HV) and Optum databases: a COVID-19-positive adult cohort (2020–2021), a paediatric cohort (2018–2021) and a high-risk cohort (2018–2021) comprising patients at increased risk for severe COVID-19. Participants were indexed on the day they first qualified to enter each cohort during the study period. Background rates of 17 MEI were estimated per 1000 person-years (PY) with 95% CIs.

Main outcomes and measures
Annual incidence rates (IRs) of 17 MEI.

Results
Overall, 758 414 (COVID-19-positive adults; 57.8% women), 12 513 664 (high-risk adults; 56.8% women) and 8 510 627 (paediatric patients; 49.1% women) patients were identified in the HV database. IRs of MEI varied substantially by year, data source, study cohort and duration of follow-up. The IRs of MEI were highest among COVID-19-positive adults and lowest among paediatric patients. For example, IR of myocarditis/pericarditis per 1000 PY was 3.0 (95% CI: 2.6 to 3.4) in the COVID-19-positive adult cohort vs 0.36 (95% CI: 0.34 to 0.37) among high-risk adults and 0.05 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.06) among paediatric patients. In the COVID-19-positive adult cohort, we observed higher IRs during 90-day follow-up (eg, IR of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) 26.5 (95% CI: 25.3 to 27.7)) vs 365-day follow-up (eg, IR of AMI 20.0 (95% CI: 9.2 to 20.8)) and during 2020 compared with 2021. IRs were higher in the high-risk adult and paediatric populations during the pre-COVID-19 period than during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions
Substantial variability was observed in IRs of MEI by study cohort, year, data source and follow-up duration. When generating background rates for contextualising safety signals from COVID-19 interventions, careful consideration must be given to the indicated subpopulation of interest, COVID-19-related temporal variations and data sources.

Stroke, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Studies evaluating health system factors associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) survivors are lacking. We evaluate differences in MACE incidence across postacute ICH care settings—inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF), home, or skilled nursing facilities (SNF).METHODS:Using data from Florida, New York, Maryland, Washington, and Georgia, we identified adult ICH survivors discharged to home, IRF, or SNF (April 2016–December 2018). Multivariable logistic models, adjusted for sociodemographic factors, treatment intensity, comorbidities, and frailty, estimated adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs for the association between discharge disposition (IRF versus home; IRF versus SNF) and MACE (a composite of acute stroke, acute myocardial infarction, systemic embolism, and vascular death), recurrent ICH, acute ischemic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, vascular death, and all-cause mortality within 1 year. Cardiovascular outcomes were ascertained usingInternational Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revisioncodes. We assessed age-discharge disposition interaction, performing stratified analyses for patients

Background
Gaps in research evidence lead to research waste. In burns treatment, there is a paucity of reliable evidence or data. This contributes to inconsistent patient care, especially on a global scale, where low-resource countries often lack access to the latest research advancements. This umbrella review was undertaken as part of the James Lind Alliance Priorities in Global Burns Research Prioritisation Setting Partnership (PSP) and aimed to identify and assess the quality of evidence in thermal burns care. The objective was to map which interventions in thermal burns care are supported by a reliable evidence base and for which the evidence is lacking.

Methods
Systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials in thermal burns were identified and assessed using reliability criteria determined a priori. Multiple systematic review databases were searched in June 2023, including the Cochrane Library, KSR Evidence database and NIHR Journals Library. Summary of findings and, where available, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation was used to assess certainty of evidence. Reliable reviews were mapped onto clinical categories identified by patients, carers and healthcare professionals as part of the PSP.

Results
232 systematic reviews were identified, of which 83 met reliability criteria and were included. The main reason for not meeting reliability criteria was poorly defined eligibility criteria (n=128). Of the 83 reliable reviews, most were conducted in pain (n=28) or wound management (n=14) and acute care (n=13). Certainty of evidence was mixed. Reviews mapped onto nine of the 17 clinical categories identified by the PSP.

Conclusion
This review summarises the available high-quality evidence in burns care and identifies evidence gaps, indicating that many important clinical questions remain unanswered. There is a discrepancy between the treatments investigated in high-quality research and the clinical areas considered as most important to stakeholders. These findings provide direction for future research to improve global burns care.

Introduction
Ischaemia–reperfusion (I/R) injury remains a major challenge in heart transplantation, with mortality risk increasing significantly when allograft ischaemic time exceeds 4 hours. Non-ischaemic heart preservation (NIHP), using continuous hypothermic perfusion, has shown promise in preliminary studies for reducing I/R injury and improving outcomes. This randomised controlled trial aims to compare NIHP with standard static cold storage (SCS) in adult heart transplantation.

Methods and analysis
The trial is a prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-blinded, randomised controlled trial including 66 adult heart transplant recipients across four Swedish hospitals. Participants will be randomised into 1:1 ratio to NIHP or SCS preservation groups and undergo a 12-month follow-up period. The primary outcome is 1-year survival free from acute cellular rejection or retransplantation. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, I/R injury markers, graft function and adverse events. Substudies will evaluate renal function using MRI and continuously monitor physical activity and heart rhythm via wearable devices. Analysis will follow intention-to-treat principles, with time-to-event analysis using Cox proportional hazard models and Kaplan-Meier estimates.

Ethics and dissemination
The study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. It will be conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant local and international regulations. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals following Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials guidelines.

Trial registration number
NCT04066127.

Stroke, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:In acute ischemic stroke, infarcted tissue gradually becomes detectable on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) as a hypodensity representing vasogenic edema. We studied whether subtle NCCT density changes are also present in penumbral tissue.METHODS:This observational cohort study included patients with stroke with anterior circulation occlusions from the CRISP2 study (CT Perfusion to Predict Response to Recanalization in Ischemic Stroke Project 2) who were transferred from a primary to a comprehensive stroke center for consideration of endovascular thrombectomy. Patients received baseline NCCT and computed tomography perfusion at the referring hospital and magnetic resonance imaging at the receiving hospital. We created baseline relative NCCT images, which compare voxel density to the corresponding area in the contralateral hemisphere. We analyzed the relative density of rNCCT in the core and penumbra (based on computed tomography perfusion in referring hospitals). We also assessed the correlation between relative density and the degree of hypoperfusion in the penumbra, defined as the time-to-maximum of the tissue residue function. We studied the association between penumbral changes and functional outcomes on the full distribution of the modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days.RESULTS:From the 314 patients, 162 met inclusion criteria with a median (interquartile range) age of 73 (61–83) years, penumbra volume of 78 (52–113) mL, and core volume of 0.6 (0–13.0) mL; 54% were men. The relative density was reduced by a median of 1.8% (P

Stroke, Ahead of Print. BACKGROUND:Multiple recent randomized trials have demonstrated the benefit of thrombectomy over medical management alone in adult patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke and large infarct on baseline imaging. Cohort studies have also identified improved functional outcomes in pediatric patients who received thrombectomy. However, the role of thrombectomy in pediatric stroke with large baseline infarct remains uncertain.METHODS:A case-control study was undertaken using pooled data from 3 cohort studies of pediatric stroke (Save ChildS, Save ChildS Pro, Pediatric LVO Stroke Study). Pediatric patients of age 1 to 18 years with acute anterior circulation LVO stroke presenting within 24 hours since last seen well with an Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography (CT) Score of 0 to 5 on CT or magnetic resonance imaging were included. Isolated M2 occlusion or focal cerebral arteriopathy–inflammatory subtype cases were excluded. Thrombectomy-treated patients were compared with patients who received medical management alone. The primary clinical outcome was the pediatric modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days, compared between groups using ordinal logistic regression.RESULTS:Of 56 pediatric patients with anterior circulation LVO and low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score presenting between January 1, 2000 and August 31, 2023 from 45 centers across Europe, North America, and Australia, 40 patients were eligible for inclusion (female: n=14, 35.0%; mean age, 9.1 years; range, 1.5–17; SD, 5.27). Thrombectomy-treated patients (n=24) had significantly better pediatric modified Rankin Scale scores at 90 days than medical management alone patients (n=16; odds ratio, 3.68 [95% CI, 1.11–12.21];P=0.034). There was no significant difference between groups in the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (P=0.806).CONCLUSIONS:In this multicentre case-control study, pediatric patients (age, 1–18 years) with anterior circulation LVO stroke and low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score who received thrombectomy had significantly better functional outcomes than those treated with medical management alone. Exclusion of pediatric patients from thrombectomy based on low Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score alone may not be appropriate.

Introduction
Chronic low back pain (LBP) is among the world’s leading causes of disability and declines in quality of life. Despite considerable financial and research investment, current interventions demonstrate only modest success or are associated with deleterious side effects. Furthermore, most treatment efforts are directed towards LBP that has already become chronic, rather than interventions capable of preventing pain chronicity in the first instance. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a portable and cost-effective form of non-invasive brain stimulation, presents a potential means of targeting acute pain and preventing the transition to chronic pain. However, this approach has been limited primarily to experimental settings that require intensive appointments and specialist expertise. Thus, this assessor-blinded, participant-blinded, and therapist-blinded, randomised controlled trial aims to explore the effectiveness of home-based tDCS for improving pain and disability in people with acute LBP. This may provide insight into the potential for tDCS to expedite recovery from acute LBP and prevent pain chronicity.

Methods and analysis
40 individuals with acute LBP (onset

This JAMA Patient Page describes the condition of chronic migraine, its risk factors, and preventive and acute treatment options.

Introduction
The cardiovascular (circulatory) system is a closed-loop system. The dynamic interaction of the heart and vascular system plays a pivotal role in maintaining adequate cardiac output. Heart failure (HF) is commonly described as a problem of the pump, that is, mechanical myocardial failure causing poor perfusion to the body. Still, the contribution of the vasculature is often neglected. Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) carries a poor prognosis and is often accompanied by concomitant chronic kidney disease (CKD) and acute kidney injury (AKI), which inevitably lead to adverse outcomes. The interaction of the heart with the vasculature is conceptualised as ventricular–vascular (arterial) coupling. Arterial stiffness, a non-traditional risk factor for cardiovascular disease, can be measured non-invasively using carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV). High cf-PWV values mimicking increased arterial stiffness could be a causational factor towards precipitating ADHF or AKI. This study aims to assess whether cf-PWV is higher during the hospitalisation phase of patients with HF (ADHF) and CKD (AKI in CKD) compared with stable compensated HF and stable CKD.

Methods and analysis
This prospective non-randomised observational study aims to recruit 120 patients aged≥60 years. Arterial stiffness will be assessed in three groups. These groups are decompensated HF with reduced ejection fraction (n=40), decompensated HF with preserved ejection fraction (n=40) and AKI in CKD stage 3a, 3b and 4, n=40. After 4 weeks from hospital discharge, patients in a stable, compensated state will be asked to attend a follow-up clinic visit to repeat the cf-PWV measurement. The primary outcome measure is variation in cf-PWV during hospitalisation against follow-up.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval was granted in October 2021 (REC reference 21/EM/0239), recruitment started in February 2022 and the results are expected in late 2025. The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number
NCT05012722.

Introduction
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for severe osteoarthritis. However, THA has a high surgical risk for patients with concomitant diseases and is associated with several serious complications, such as myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury and cognitive dysfunction. This study will explore the potential protective effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) in cemented THA patients.

Methods and analysis
The PRINCIPAL study is designed as a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, blinded trial to assess the impact of RIPC in cemented THA patients. The study will compare two patient groups—one group will have the RIPC procedure, and the second will have the sham procedure. The primary outcome is the peak troponin T concentration during the three postoperative days. Secondary outcomes include markers of arterial stiffness (augmentation index (AIx), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, central blood pressures), neural (neuron-specific enolase, S100B) and renal injury biomarkers (estimated glomerular filtration rate, creatinine, cystatin C), markers of systemic inflammation (hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, IL-10) and oxidative stress (total peroxide concentration, total antioxidant capacity), as well as clinical outcome measures such as major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.

Ethics and dissemination
The ethical board of the University of Tartu has granted approval for the study (no. 384T-26). The results of this study will be disseminated in international peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number
NCT06323018.

Circulation, Volume 151, Issue 25, Page e1098-e1098, June 24, 2025.

Circulation, Volume 151, Issue 25, Page 1814-1817, June 24, 2025.

Stroke, Volume 56, Issue 7, Page 1965-1968, July 1, 2025. Poverty profoundly influences stroke risk, access to care, and recovery, yet remains largely invisible in hyperacute stroke trials. Despite growing awareness of health inequities, current research and clinical frameworks rarely capture socioeconomic data at the point of care—particularly during the hyperacute phase, when decisions are time sensitive. This commentary highlights the urgent need to incorporate measures of poverty and social vulnerability into hyperacute stroke care and research. We briefly review existing evidence on the relationship between socioeconomic status and acute stroke outcomes, identify gaps in current data collection practices, and explore why capturing such information has remained a challenge. To address this gap, we propose a practical, rapid-assessment approach using brief, validated tools to measure economic strain in emergency or prehospital settings. These tools can be embedded into clinical workflows with minimal disruption while providing critical context for interpreting outcomes and guiding resource allocation. We envision incorporating such tools into future randomized controlled trials to ensure that socioeconomic factors are systematically captured and analyzed—ultimately enabling more inclusive trial designs, equitable care delivery, and data-driven policy change.

Objective
To evaluate the prognostic ability of the haemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio in predicting in-hospital mortality among elderly patients diagnosed with acute ischaemic stroke.

Design
Retrospective, longitudinal, observational study using a hospital-based database.

Setting
Claims data from 1 January 2014 until 31 January 2020 were extracted from the database of two hospitals affiliated with Nanjing University.

Participants
Patients aged ≥80 years who were diagnosed with acute ischaemic stroke, excluding those with cancers or other malignant diseases.

Outcome measures
Patients were stratified into three groups based on the tertiles of the haemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio. The dose-dependent relationship between this ratio and in-hospital mortality risk was determined with robust locally weighted regression analyses and restrictive cubic spline on continuous variables. The primary endpoint was defined as all-cause mortality during the hospital stay, and the secondary endpoint centred on the duration of the hospital stay.

Results
A total of 606 patients constituted the dataset for the conclusive analysis (mean age, 84.6 ± 3.2 years; female, 40.3%). The haemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio was categorised into three tertiles (T1, 8.34). After adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical variables, a statistically significant inverse correlation was observed between higher ratios and lower risk of in-hospital mortality, with HRs of 0.48 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.68) for T2:T1 and 0.14 (95% CI, 0.08 to 0.23) for T3:T1. A dose-dependent relationship was evident between the haemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio and in-hospital mortality risk. The sensitivity analysis indicated that no attenuation was observed in the HR in both non-anaemic and anaemic cases. The results also indicated that a shorter length of hospital stay was associated with a higher haemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio.

Conclusions
A high haemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution ratio may be an independent protective factor for in-hospital mortality and reduced length of stay in elderly patients suffering from acute ischaemic stroke.