Search Results for: Springer: Nuove riviste open access di Medicina Generale

Background
Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 20.01 CHEST-RT (Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Extensive Stage Small cell with Thoracic Radiotherapy) is a single-arm, open-label, prospective, multicentre phase II trial study that aims to establish the safety, feasibility and describe the efficacy of incorporating thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) (concurrent or sequential) to chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Methods
A single arm of up to 30 evaluable participants given TRT concurrent or sequentially with chemoimmunotherapy will be enrolled. Participants should commence radiotherapy with cycle 3 or cycle 4 of chemotherapy. Those not suitable for concurrent radiotherapy due to large tumour volumes may receive sequential radiotherapy. Accounting for a 15% non-evaluable rate, up to 35 participants will be enrolled. An independent data and safety monitoring committee will review the data and assess safety and feasibility. Progression to a phase III trial would be considered feasible if ≤20% of participants experienced ≥grade 3 oesophageal toxicity and ≤10% experienced ≥grade 3 pneumonitis. This approach would be considered feasible if there is ≤20% treatment discontinuation of systemic therapy secondary to radiation toxicities and ≥75% of participants have tumour volumes that can be safely treated to a dose of 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The primary outcome of the trial is safety and feasibility, and survival and responses will be assessed as secondary endpoints. A predefined subgroup analysis of toxicity will be performed on group 1 (concurrent TRT) versus group 2 participants (consolidation TRT).

Ethics and dissemination
This study was approved by the Peter MacCallum Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/73189/PMCC-2021). The protocol, technical and clinical data will be disseminated by conference presentations and publications. Any modifications to the protocol will be formally documented by administrative letters and will be submitted to the approving HREC for review and approval.

Trial registration numbers
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000586819) and ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT05796089).

Purpose
The SEV-IDF programme aims to track infants born before 33 weeks of gestation, with very low birth weight (VLBW), neonatal encephalopathy or severe birth anomalies and perinatal disease. It employs an open, prospective, multicentric, population-based cohort approach. This report aims to describe the methodology employed to establish and manage the programme, details regarding follow-up procedures, baseline characteristics of the included infants, and highlights new research opportunities emerging from the “Suivi des Enfants Vulnérables d’Ile-de-France” (SEV-IDF) programme.

Participants
The programme aims to (1) detect developmental anomalies early, (2) improve prevention using standardised data, (3) optimise follow-up care and (4) support multidisciplinary research.
Eligible participants are infants alive at discharge from the 59 maternities with a neonatal unit of the Île-de-France (IDF) region (France). A network of 567 trained physicians monitors the children’s development at 4 months, 1 and 2 years of corrected age, and 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 years of age. Collected data include sociodemographic, pregnancy and neonatal characteristics, and standardised child development scores.

Findings to date
The programme enrolled 21 175 participants between 2016 and 2023, with 16 461 (77.7%) having a gestational age less than 33 weeks, 1916 (9.0%) others having VLBW, 1525 (7.2%) having encephalopathy and 1273 (6.0%) having another severe birth anomaly.

Future plans
The collected data will enable the SEV-IDF scientific committee to describe high-risk infants in the IDF region, design evidence-based campaigns to improve the quality and effectiveness of the follow-up as well as conduct research on developmental anomalies in these high-risk infants. Ongoing research currently focuses on anticipating loss to follow-up and early detection of developmental anomalies.

Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic amplified the need for robust multisectoral coordination; yet the specific mechanisms, benefits and challenges of such collaboration particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain poorly synthesised. This review aims to delineate the key elements, benefits, challenges and improvement strategies of multisectoral coordination during COVID-19 and to compare patterns between LMICs and high-income countries (HICs).

Methods and analysis
Eligible studies will include empirical qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods research published in English between 1 January 2020 and 15 August 2024 that examines formal coordination mechanisms (eg, task forces, public-private partnerships, inter-agency committees) within the context of COVID-19. Searches will be conducted across PubMed, EBSCOhost, Emerald Insight, Google Scholar and selected grey-literature repositories. Citation chaining will be employed to identify additional sources.
Two reviewers will independently screen all records using Covidence, applying pre-piloted eligibility criteria to 5% of citations and proceeding only if inter-rater reliability achieves ≥0.70. Data will be extracted into a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-informed template. Qualitative data will be analysed through framework synthesis, structured by the five CFIR domains. Quantitative data will be narratively summarised and, where outcomes are sufficiently similar across at least two studies, synthesised using a fixed-effect model.
Risk of bias will be assessed using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions for non-randomised studies. Studies with serious or critical risk will be excluded from pooling. Subgroup analyses (LMIC vs HIC), sensitivity analyses (model and risk) and confidence grading using Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations will be conducted.

Ethics and dissemination
No primary data will be collected; thus additional Research Ethics Committee approval is unnecessary. The results will be disseminated via open-access publication, conference presentations and policy briefs for Nairobi County health stakeholders.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42023466849.

Background
Migrants and refugees with low language proficiency (LLP) in the dominant language of their host country have a higher risk of suffering from certain mental health disorders compared with non-migrant populations. They are also more likely to experience a lack of access to mental healthcare due to language-related and culture-related barriers. As part of the MentalHealth4All project, a digital multilingual communication and information platform was developed to promote access to mental healthcare for LLP migrants and refugees across Europe. This paper describes the study protocol for evaluating the platform in practice, among both health and/or social care providers (HSCPs) and LLP migrants and refugees.

Methods and analysis
We will conduct a pretest–post-test cross-national survey study to evaluate the platform’s effect evaluation (primary objective) and process evaluation (secondary objective). The primary outcomes (measured at T0, T2 and T3) are four dimensions of access to mental healthcare services: availability, approachability, acceptability and appropriateness of mental healthcare. Secondary outcomes (measured at T2) are: actual usage of the platform (ie, tracking data), perceived ease of use, usefulness of content, comprehensibility of information, attractiveness of content and emotional support. Participants will be recruited from nine European countries: Belgium, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Slovakia, Spain and the UK. Using convenience sampling through professional networks/organisations and key figures, we aim to include at least 52 HSCPs (ie, 6–10 per country) and 260 LLP migrants (ie, 30–35 per country). After completing a pretest questionnaire (T0), participants will be requested to use the platform, and HSCPs will participate in an additional personalised training (T1). Next, participants will fill out a post-test questionnaire (T2) and will be requested to participate in a second post-test questionnaire (T3, about 6–8 weeks after T2) to answer additional questions on their experiences through a brief phone interview (T3 is optional for migrants/refugees).

Ethics and dissemination
For all nine countries, the ethical review board of the participating university (hospital) has assessed and approved the protocol. If successful, the MentalHealth4All platform will be made publicly available to help improve access to mental healthcare services, as well as HSCPs’ cultural competencies in delivering such services, for any LLP migrants and refugees across Europe (and beyond). Findings will also be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.

Registration details
The ‘MHealth4All project’ was prospectively registered on Open Science Framework, DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/U4XSM.

Introduction
Histopathological evaluation of prostate biopsies using the Gleason scoring system is critical for prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment selection. However, grading variability among pathologists can lead to inconsistent assessments, risking inappropriate treatment. Similar challenges complicate the assessment of other prognostic features like cribriform cancer morphology and perineural invasion. Many pathology departments are also facing an increasingly unsustainable workload due to rising prostate cancer incidence and a decreasing pathologist workforce coinciding with increasing requirements for more complex assessments and reporting. Digital pathology and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for analysing whole slide images show promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of histopathological assessments. Studies have demonstrated AI’s capability to diagnose and grade prostate cancer comparably to expert pathologists. However, external validations on diverse data sets have been limited and often show reduced performance. Historically, there have been no well-established guidelines for AI study designs and validation methods. Diagnostic assessments of AI systems often lack preregistered protocols and rigorous external cohort sampling, essential for reliable evidence of their safety and accuracy.

Methods and analysis
This study protocol covers the retrospective validation of an AI system for prostate biopsy assessment. The primary objective of the study is to develop a high-performing and robust AI model for diagnosis and Gleason scoring of prostate cancer in core needle biopsies, and at scale evaluate whether it can generalise to fully external data from independent patients, pathology laboratories and digitalisation platforms. The secondary objectives cover AI performance in estimating cancer extent and detecting cribriform prostate cancer and perineural invasion. This protocol outlines the steps for data collection, predefined partitioning of data cohorts for AI model training and validation, model development and predetermined statistical analyses, ensuring systematic development and comprehensive validation of the system. The protocol adheres to Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model of Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis+AI (TRIPOD+AI), Protocol Items for External Cohort Evaluation of a Deep Learning System in Cancer Diagnostics (PIECES), Checklist for AI in Medical Imaging (CLAIM) and other relevant best practices.

Ethics and dissemination
Data collection and usage were approved by the respective ethical review boards of each participating clinical laboratory, and centralised anonymised data handling was approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. The study will be conducted in agreement with the Helsinki Declaration. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications (open access).

Background
Despite global improvements in antiretroviral therapy (ART) access for children and adolescents living with HIV (CALHIV), a significant proportion continue to experience unsuppressed viral load (USVL). Limited studies focus on the factors contributing to USVL among CALHIV in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), especially in the context of evolving treatment landscapes. Understanding these determinants is crucial for enhancing ART outcomes.

Objective
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of USVL and identify factors associated with USVL among CALHIV receiving ART in Lubumbashi, DRC.

Design
A multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted. Data were gathered using an observational checklist based on assessing patient file data and entered into Microsoft Excel. Analysis was performed using STATA V.16. Variables with a p value of 0.20 from the bivariable analysis were included in a multivariable logistic regression model, and significant variables (p

Introduction
Most older adults living in residential aged care facilities (RACFs) have at least one marker of potentially suboptimal prescribing. Pharmacists play a crucial role in medication management, with their effectiveness enhanced by using computerised decision support tools. The Pharmacists Review to Optimise Medicines in Residential Aged Care (PROMPT-RC) study aims to optimise medicine use by providing pharmacists in RACFs with an electronic medicine management app with integrated decision support (AusTAPER App/Pathway) to use as part of medication reviews they undertake.

Methods and analysis
The PROMPT-RC study is a parallel cluster randomised controlled trial design involving Australian RACFs. It will assess if pharmacists’ use of the AusTAPER App/Pathway for medication reviews improves medication regimens for RACF residents compared with usual care. Pharmacists in RACFs randomised to the intervention arm will be trained to use the AusTAPER App/Pathway, which flags potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) across a person’s entire medicine regimen. Pharmacists in RACFs randomised to the control arm will not have access to the AusTAPER App/Pathway—they will continue to provide usual care. The primary outcome is the difference in the number of regular medicines between treatment arms at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will measure the number of regular and pro re nata medicines, PIMs, medicine administration times, medicine regimen complexity, use of antipsychotics, antidepressants, and benzodiazepines, quality of life, mortality, instances of physical restraint, and the number of falls, hospitalisations and general practitioner/health professional visits. The cost-effectiveness of the AusTAPER App/Pathway compared with usual care will be calculated. Data collection will occur at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months postrandomisation and 3 and 6 months prebaseline. We aim to recruit 668 participants to adjust for an estimated 10% loss to follow-up, giving 334 participants in each arm. Data analysis will follow an intention-to-treat approach using a linear mixed model.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval was obtained from The University of Western Australia Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 2024/ET000525; approved 14 August 2024). Reciprocal approval was also obtained in other states. This study is registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://anzctr.org.au). Trial findings will be disseminated through national and international peer-reviewed publications and conferences.

Trial registration number
ACTRN12624001409561.

Circulation, Volume 152, Issue 1, Page 58-73, July 8, 2025. The increasing demand for donor hearts presents both a critical challenge and a significant opportunity for innovation in cardiac transplantation. Advancements in immunosuppressive regimens and genetic engineering have reignited recent interest in xenotransplantation. Notably, 2 human patients have received genetically modified pig hearts under expanded-access authorization. They survived for 40 and 60 days, with xenograft failure preceding death in both cases. Concurrently, decedent studies have focused on monitoring the short-term physiological function of genetically modified cardiac xenografts in legally brain-dead recipients, representing a novel experimental paradigm for preclinical testing to help bridge the gap between nonhuman primate studies and clinical trials. These contemporary achievements build on a large body of exploratory efforts in cardiac xenotransplantation in nonhuman primates. Despite significant progress in overcoming hyperacute rejection, adaptive cellular and humoral immunological barriers remain. This review aims to critically evaluate the current advancements in xenotransplantation, to explore ongoing challenges, and to discuss the future potential of this innovative approach in addressing the growing demand for donor organs in cardiac transplantation.

Introduction
Emergence delirium (ED) stands out as a prevalent postoperative complication among paediatric patients, correlating with extended hospitalisation periods, escalated healthcare expenses and increased incidence of postoperative maladaptive behaviours (POMBs). Well-established pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions demonstrating efficacy in reducing the occurrence of ED are notably absent. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the potential of family-centred perioperative care for anaesthesia (FPCA) in mitigating the incidence of ED in children compared with routine anaesthesia.

Method and analysis
This multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised controlled clinical trial will enrol a total of 444 children aged 2–6 years undergoing elective short surgery (estimated duration ≤2 h). According to the stratification factors of surgical types (ophthalmology, ear, nose and throat (Oph&ENT) and non-Oph&ENT surgeries), patients will be randomly allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. For the FPCA group (group F), both children and parents will receive FPCA (including video education, mask practice, electronic pamphlet, distraction strategies and parental presence), without sedatives before surgery. For the routine anaesthesia group (group R), both children and parents will receive routine preoperative education and anaesthesia, and preoperative sedatives (such as oral midazolam or intranasal dexmedetomidine) will be recommended. The primary outcome is the incidence of ED. Secondary outcomes include the severity of ED, incidence of POMBs, cognitive function, quality of sleep and life, preoperative anxiety, compliance with anaesthesia induction and postoperative pain score. Logistic regression will be applied to compare differences in primary and secondary outcomes between groups, and patients’ age, sex, and body mass index will be considered as covariates in baseline measurements.

Ethics and dissemination
This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences and mass media. Recruitment began in October 2023.

Trial registration number
NCT06092671.

Introduction
Preventing online and offline sexual harassment (SH) is a public health priority, due to its worldwide magnitude and short- and long-term consequences to the victims and survivors. Universities are environments that may facilitate different forms of conflicts, including SH, but they also play a key role in preventing and addressing them. This paper describes ‘Uni4Equity’, a European project funded by the CERV-2022-DAPHNE Programme of the European Union (Ref. 101094121-Uni4Equity) aimed to reinforce universities’ readiness to identify, map and respond to online and offline SH at workplace and other relevant settings (classrooms, digital space), with an explicit (but not exclusive) focus on minority social groups. More specifically, the project will address the research needs of conducting multidimensional diagnosis of SH at universities (scale and determinants) as a basis for preventive actions; assessing the effectiveness of preventive interventions such as social media campaigns and training workshops; creating a university culture that actively rejects SH; improving access to existing support services; and contributing to the acknowledgement of universities as an asset in preventing this issue.

Methods and analyses
The project follows an exploratory sequential design for the period 2023–2026. In phase 1, a mixed-method initial assessment based on online surveys, semistructured interviews and desk reviews is planned in six targeted universities: University of Alicante, Adam Mickiewicz University (AMU), University of Maia, University of Applied Sciences Burgenland (UASB), University of Antwerp (UAntwerp), University of Verona. Phase 2 integrates long-term and large-scale interventions at different levels of prevention (primary, secondary and tertiary) and implementation (interpersonal, institutional and social). These interventions combine online and offline training programmes addressed to students and staff, arrangements with internal and external support services and improvements in access to information and resources, including SH protocols and regulations. Phase 3 consists of qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the different Uni4Equity interventions and a final evaluation of the global impact of the project.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval was obtained by the different universities research ethics committees (Universidad de Alicante, vice-rectorate for research: Ref. no. UA-2023-03-27; Università di Verona, Comitato di Approvazione per la Ricerca sulla Persona: Ref. no. UNIVR-24/2023; UAntwerp, Ethics Committee for the Social Sciences and Humanities: Ref. no. EX_SHW_2023_38_1; AMU, Ethics Committee for Research Involving Human Participants, Ref. no. UAM_19/2022/2023; UASB, Ethics Committee: Ref. no. UASB _28/08/2023; Universidade da Maia, Conselho de Ética e Deontologia: Ref. no. UMAIA_ 151/2023).
The research team will disseminate findings through peer-reviewed journal articles, presentations in scientific national and international events, policy briefs, infographics, videos and short reports.

Objective
This study aimed to evaluate the utility of optical sensor-based technology in mitigating the frequency and severity of peripheral intravenous infiltration and/or extravasation (PIVIE) in neonates.

Design
Single-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study.

Setting
Tertiary-level neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (112 cots) at the Women’s Wellness and Research Centre (WWRC), Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC), Doha, Qatar, January 2019–December 2022.

Participants
All neonates admitted to the NICU requiring intravenous therapy via a neonatal short peripheral intravenous catheter (n-SPC) were included. Participants were excluded if the insertion was unsuccessful, if they had incomplete data, or if they received intravenous therapy exclusively through alternative vascular access devices.

Interventions
The study analysed two cohorts representing different clinical practices over two distinct periods. In the conventional cohort (Phase 1, 2019–2020), PIVIE detection relied solely on periodic ‘Touch Look Compare (TLC)’ assessments. In the ivWatch cohort (Phase 2, 2021–2022), continuous optical sensor-based monitoring using the ivWatch system was implemented alongside TLC assessments. This sequential design allowed for a comparison of outcomes between the two phases.

Outcome measurements
The primary outcomes were the occurrence and severity of PIVIE. Secondary outcomes included the influence of patient demographics, vascular access characteristics, and management details on PIVIE incidence and severity.

Results
Over the 4-year data collection period, 32 713 peripheral intravenous catheters were analysed across two cohorts. PIVIE was the most common reason for unplanned device removal. In the conventional cohort (Phase 1, 2019–2020), 4941 infiltration events were reported (29.9%), compared with 4872 events (30.1%) in the ivWatch cohort (Phase 2, 2021–2022). However, severity measures using the Intravenous Extravasation Grading Scale (IEGS) revealed a marked reduction in severe PIVIE cases, with severe events decreasing from 243 (4.9%) in the conventional cohort to 54 (1.1%) in the ivWatch cohort (p

Background
Childbirth can have psychological, social and emotional effects on women and their families. Psychological birth trauma (PBT) is defined as the emotional distress and mental health challenges resulting from negative or distressing experiences during the childbirth process. Labour management plays an important role in the health of women and children. Consequently, the study aims to assess the status of PBT among Iranian women, identify factors influencing it and suggest effective preventive strategies.

Methods and analysis
This study is a mixed-method research with an explanatory sequential approach. The first phase is quantitative and cross-sectional, involving 300 postpartum women visiting health centres in Tabriz-Iran. In this phase, cluster sampling will be used, and data will be collected using the following questionnaires: Sociodemographic and Obstetric Characteristics, Birth Trauma Scale, PTSD Symptom Scale 1, Perceived Quality of Care Scale, Childbirth Experience Questionnaire version 2.0, Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale, Postpartum Specific Anxiety Scale Research Short-Form and the questionnaire on the desire for subsequent pregnancy. The second phase is qualitative, and participants will be selected based on the results of the quantitative phase and extreme cases, using purposive sampling. Data analysis will be performed using qualitative content analysis with a conventional approach. Qualitative data will be collected through in-depth and semi-structured individual interviews with open-ended questions. In the third phase, strategies to prevent childbirth psychological trauma will be designed by integrating the results of the quantitative and qualitative studies, reviewing the literature and gathering expert opinions using a modified Delphi study. Examining PBT and its influencing factors can provide culturally relevant, evidence-based strategies. These strategies can be effective in improving the quality of care for women during childbirth.

Ethics and dissemination
This study has received approval from the Ethics Committee of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences in Tabriz, Iran (code number: IR.TBZMED.REC.1402.945). All participants will provide written informed consent before taking part in the study. The outcomes will be shared through articles published in journals, presentations at medical conferences, the validation of a reliable scale for assessing the level of PBT in postpartum women, and the provision of strategies to prevent childbirth psychological trauma. These resources will be valuable for policymakers and healthcare providers.

Introduction
Raltegravir is a potent HIV-integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI). Despite its strong activity against HIV-1 strains resistant to other antiretroviral drug classes, it is usually used in combination with other antiretroviral drugs due to the empirical requirement for anti-HIV drug combinations to ensure effective anti-retroviral therapy (ART). As an early-arriving INSTI, raltegravir is clinically familiar for its safety, tolerability and treatment effectiveness. High-dose calcium carbonate formulated as an antacid (as opposed to a supplement formulation) taken orally together with raltegravir is known to reduce systemic raltegravir exposure due to chelation and reduced absorption. This study aims to assess the effect of daily calcium carbonate antacid as TUMS Ultra Strength (US) administration in lower doses, as currently used for oral calcium supplementation, on the steady-state pharmacokinetics (PKs) of once-daily oral raltegravir.

Methods and analysis
This is an open-label, three-treatment series in three periods in a single group, fixed-sequence PK study in 12 healthy adult volunteers with HIV on ART. Subjects will take 1200 mg of raltegravir single QD oral dose alone for 7 days (period one), then raltegravir 1200 mg with calcium carbonate 500 mg from day 8 to day 14 (period two) and raltegravir 1200 mg with calcium carbonate 1000 mg from day 15 to day 22 (period three). We will conduct serial PK sampling from observed dosing on days 7, 14 and 21, with 24-hour PK sampling scheduled for days 8, 15 and 22. Follow-up will continue until day 51.

Ethics and dissemination
This study will adhere to the ICH GCP Guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethics approval was obtained from the Ottawa Health Science Network Research Ethics Board under study ID 20190750–01 hour. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment. This protocol will be published in a peer-reviewed journal prior to the study’s completion and closure. Results generated from this activity will also be reported in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration number
NCT04258475.

The pandemic led to increased mortality and disease burden with limited access to healthcare services. Establishing resilient healthcare systems and appropriate public health policies are key to ensure continuity of care during national crises.

Caldo, afa? Anche i farmaci “soffrono”. Ma cosa accade davvero ai medicinali quando le temperature schizzano così in alto come in questi giorni?Disattenzioni come lasciare una medicina in macchina o…

When implemented in routine health systems at primary care level in India and Tanzania, contrary to expectations, pulse oximetry and CDSAs were not found to increase rates of hospitalisation within 24 h of primary care referral, nor to decrease deaths, or delayed or un-referred hospitalisations. Wider health system challenges, including referral barriers, inequitable oxygen access and hospital care quality must be addressed if the potential of these tools in delivering child outcome benefits is to be realised.