Risultati per: Epidemiologia e classificazione del Low Back Pain

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4147691-A4147691, November 12, 2024. Background:The prognosis of patients with paradoxical low flow, low gradient, severe aortic stenosis (LFLGAS) is variable, necessitating improved risk stratification. Although this entity is more common in women, the impact of sex on outcomes remains unclear. Energy loss index (ELI), which accounts for aortic root size in estimating the severity of aortic valve stenosis, may enhance risk prediction in LFLGAS. This study aims to investigate sex-based ELI prognostic value in patients with paradoxical LFLGAS.Methods:This study analyzed clinical, echocardiographic, and outcome data collected in 294 patients with paradoxical LFLGAS, with AVA

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4134364-A4134364, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Inclisiran, an siRNA, targeting PCSK9 mRNA, reduces LDL-c levels. In SIRIUS in silico trial (NCT05974345), inclisiran was predicted to lower cardiovascular (CV) events in virtual patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).Research question:This analysis predicted the potential efficacy of inclisiran on CV outcomes in virtual patients with or without prior ischemic stroke (IS).Methods:The SIRIUS trial was conducted using a calibrated and validated knowledge-based mechanistic computational model of ASCVD applied to a virtual population with LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL. Each virtual patient was its own control. SIRIUS compared the efficacy of inclisiran vs placebo on top of High Intensity (HI) statin with or without ezetimibe on 3-Point-MACE defined as a composite of time to first occurrence of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or nonfatal IS over 5 years in patients with or without prior IS. Occurrence of fatal and non-fatal (IS) was also individually assessed in time-to-first-event analyses.Results:Among 204,691 virtual SIRIUS ASCVD patients, 39 371 (19%) had prior IS. At 5 years, the predicted mean percentage reduction in LDL-C with inclisiran as compared to placebo was –49.17% and –49.88% in patients with or without prior IS respectively. Patients with prior IS were at higher risk of 3P-MACE than patients without IS both with placebo and inclisiran (17.01% vs 14.41% with placebo and 13.44% vs 10.83% with inclisiran). However, the predicted rate of 3P-MACE in the inclisiran arm was consistently lower than in the placebo arm for both prior IS and no prior IS (HR 0.78 medium uncertainty and 0.74 low uncertainty respectively). Compared to placebo, inclisiran was also predicted to consistently reduce fatal and non-fatal IS in patients with or without prior IS (5.45% vs 7.22%; HR: 0.75 medium uncertainty and 1.87% vs 2.54%; HR: 0.73 medium uncertainty respectively).Conclusion:SIRIUS provides insights into the potential efficacy of inclisiran on CV events suggesting a substantial 3P-MACE and fatal and non-fatal IS reduction in ASCVD patients including those with prior IS, several years before the availability of results from ongoing outcomes trials (ORION-4, VICTORION-2P).

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4129733-A4129733, November 12, 2024. Background:The impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on lipid components is unclear. The objective of this study was to measure the lipid-lowering effect of GLP-1RAs.Methods:A thorough database search was performed to identify placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on GLP-1RA therapy through January 2023. From these trials, data was extracted and a robust statistical analysis was performed using a random effects model to determine outcomes with weighted mean difference (MD) in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary outcome was the mean difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Secondary outcomes were mean differences in total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein-C (HLD-C), and very low-density lipoprotein-C (VLDL-C). To account for covariates, subgroup analyses and meta-regression were performed.Results:A total of 33 studies were included in the final meta-analysis carried out between 2008 and 2023, which were conducted in 26 countries. Of the 5,918 participants, the study population comprised 2,603 (44%) males and 3,315 (56%) females, aged between 33.7 and 65.9 years. GLP-1RAs significantly reduced LDL-C compared to placebo (MD -2.93, 95% CI (-5.01, -0.85), P=0.01). Treatment effect was consistent regardless of duration of treatment;12 weeks or less MD: -5.39, 95% CI (-10.36, -0.42), P=0.03 vs >12 weeks MD: -2.39, 95% CI (-4.70, -0.007), P=0.04, P interaction 0.28). In our analysis, GLP-1RA reduced TC by ~7 mg/dl. There was no significant reduction in triglycerides (MD = -7.19, 95% CI (- 15.01, 0.62], P=0.07) and VLDL-C ~4 mg/dl (MD = -3.99, 95%, CI (-8.73, 0.75), P=0.10). Furthermore, GLP-1RA did not increase HDL-C (MD = -0.12, 95% CI (-0.73, 0.49], P=0.69. Regression analysis determined that weight loss did not affect the treatment effect on LDL-C (tau2=28.38, I2=99.83, R2=0.0, p=0.67), and total cholesterol (tau2=93.6, I2=99.86, R2=0.0, p=0.92).Conclusion:Patients on GLP-1RA experienced modest LDL-C and TC lowering compared to placebo. GLP-1RA did not decrease triglycerides and VLDL-C. GLP-1RA did not increase HDL-C.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4138733-A4138733, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Identifying low-voltage areas (LVAs) within left atrium (LA) is crucial for predicting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Animal studies have shown that the parasympathetic neurotransmitter vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) affects atrial electrophysiological remodeling.Hypothesis:Thus, we hypothesized that elevated serum VIP levels might contribute to the development of LVAs and that serum VIP concentrations could serve as a biomarker for LVA presence in AF patients.Aims:The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the blood levels of VIP and the presence of LVAs in AF patients with electroanatomical mapping (EAM).Methods:We conducted an observational, prospective cross-sectional study on AF patients undergoing PVI between 2021 and 2023. Blood samples for VIP were collected before atrial septal puncture, and EAM was performed using CARTO 3® before PVI. VIP concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Patients were divided into two groups based on LVA presence (≥5% or

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4124369-A4124369, November 12, 2024. Background:Several clinical trials have demonstrated non-inferiority of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and low to intermediate surgical risk. However, mid-term results are still contentious.Question:Is TAVR superior to SAVR in the mid-term in terms of mortality outcomes or adverse cardiovascular events?Methods:We searched Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane databases for RCTs that compared TAVR with SAVR in patients with symptomatic severe AS with a follow-up of at least 4 years. Outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality and disabling stroke.Results:We included six RCTs involving 6,444 patients with severe AS, of whom 3,282 (50.9%) underwent TAVR. There was no difference in mortality from all causes (RR 1.08; 95%CI 0.94-1.25; p=0.30; I2=45%) and disabling stroke (RR 0.95; 95%CI 0.75-1.21; p=0.67; I2=9%) between groups. In the subgroup analysis, 5-year mortality (RR 1.28; 95%CI 1.10-1.49; I2=0%) was higher in the TAVI group. The new pacemaker implantation rate was higher in the TAVI group (RR 2.22; 95%CI 1.42-3.45; p=0.0004 ; I2=91%). However, new atrial fibrillation rate was higher in the SAVR group (RR 0.42; 95%CI 0.37-0.49; p=0.00001; I2=62%).Conclusion:Mid-term mortality and disabling stroke of patients with severe AS treated with TAVR or SAVR were similar.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4124323-A4124323, November 12, 2024. Background:Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a leading cause of stroke. However, predictors of stroke after AF ablation have not been well clarified, therefore, evidences of anticoagulation therapy after the procedure have been limited. Although left atrial low-voltage areas (LVAs) reflects atrial cardiomyopathy, which is a potential cause of thromboembolism, there are few reports of an association between LVAs and stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between atrial cardiomyopathy assessed by LVAs and stroke in patients undergoing AF ablation.Methods:The study design was a single center, retrospective observational study. This study included 1,486 (age, 68 ± 10 years; female, 501 [34%]; persistent AF, 905 [61%]) consecutive patients who underwent initial AF ablation from December 2014 to March 2022. The definition of LVAs were areas with a bipolar voltage of

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4139930-A4139930, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Despite a rigorous screening process, including cardiac catheterization, a subset of single right ventricle (SRV) patients demonstrate suboptimal short-term outcomes after the Fontan operation. The goal of this study was to perform a comprehensive assessment of diastolic function in pre-Fontan SRV patients using invasive reference-standard measures and determine their associations with post-Fontan outcomes.Methods:Children 2-6 years old with SRV physiology undergoing pre-Fontan heart catheterization were recruited prospectively. SRV patients were divided into those who had an optimal or suboptimal outcome. A suboptimal outcome was defined as length of stay ≥14 days or heart transplant/cardiac death in first year after Fontan. Patients with hemodynamically insignificant patent ductus arteriosus referred for catheterization closure were recruited as controls. Patients underwent pressure-volume loop analysis using reference-standard methods. The measure of ventricular stiffness, β, was obtained via preload reduction. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for extracellular volume (ECV) and serum draws for matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) activity were performed.Results:Of 19 SRV patients, 9 (47%) had a suboptimal outcome. 15 controls were included. Demographic and catheterizations are shown in Table 1. Echocardiographic and MRI data are shown in Table 2. Patients with suboptimal outcomes had lower ventricular stiffness, lower ECV, and lower MMP-2 compared to patients with optimal outcomes (Figure 1). Patients with suboptimal outcomes had similar stiffness to biventricular controls. Patients with optimal outcome had less total fluid in the first 24 hours than the suboptimal group (1107 (IQR 953, 1303) vs. 1482 (IQR 1305, 1598) mL, p = 0.03). The only invasive measure that had an association with suboptimal outcome was β, p=0.038.Conclusion:SRV patients with suboptimal outcome after Fontan had lower ventricular stiffness compared to patients with optimal outcome. Lower stiffness led to an increased need for fluid resuscitation and higher chest tube output after Fontan. The usual response in chronically increased RV afterload is for the RV to hypertrophy and stiffen over time in order to maintain cardiac output. This is not seen in low SRV stiffness patients and may represent a maladaptive extracellular matrix response to chronic afterload elevation. This novel phenotype that may have important clinical implications and requires further study.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4144749-A4144749, November 12, 2024. Background:Although high rates of P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) have been reported, contemporary practice pattern in the U.S. are not well studied.Objectives:To investigate the temporal trends, variability, and clinical outcomes of P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment in NSTE-ACS across U.S.Methods:Consecutive patients that underwent early invasive strategy for NSTE-ACS (coronary angiogram ≤ 24 hours of arrival) in National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) Chest Pain-Myocardial Infarction (MI) registry was analyzed. Initially, a time-trend analysis was conducted on the complete cohort from January 1, 2013, to March 31, 2023. Subsequently, a more recent cohort (January 1, 2019, to March 31, 2023), with a complete set of variables, was used to construct a hierarchical regression model to quantify variability in the use of pretreatment among institutions and hospital regions. For this contemporary cohort, instrumental variable analysis was performed to compare in-hospital outcomes between patients who received pretreatment and those who did not.Results:Use of P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment has decreased from 24.8% in 2013Q1 to 12.4% in 2023Q3. Among the contemporary cohort of 110,148 patients (2019-23; mean age, 63.9 [SD 12.5] years; 33.0% female), 17,509 (15.9%) received pretreatment. Significant variability in P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment was observed (range: 0-100%): hierarchical regression model demonstrated that two identical patients would have more than a three-fold difference in the odds of pretreatment by changing institution or hospital region (OR 3.63; 95% CI, 3.51-3.74 and 3.21; 95% CI, 2.90-3.54, respectively). Instrumental variable analysis demonstrated no significant differences in in-hospital all-cause death (1.5% vs 1.7%; p=0.071), recurrent MI (0.56% vs 0.57%; p=0.98), or major bleeding (2.7% vs 2.8%; p=0.98) between the two groups. However, in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery, pretreatment was associated with a longer length of stay (11.2 ± 5.1 days vs 9.8 ± 5.0 days; p < 0.001).Conclusions:Within the nationwide registry in the U.S., we observed a significant variability in the use of P2Y12 inhibitor pretreatment among NSTE-ACS patients in the U.S. Given the lack of clear advantages and the potential for prolonged hospital stays, our findings highlight the importance of efforts to improve standardization.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4140066-A4140066, November 12, 2024. Background:The no-reflow has been reported to be associated with larger infarct size and mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). A pathological classification of no-reflow was proposed: structural no-reflow—microvessels within the necrotic myocardium exhibit loss of capillary integrity (it is usually irreversible)—and functional no reflow—patency of microvasculature is compromised due to distal embolization, spasm, ischemic injury, reperfusion injury. It may be reversible. After about 6 hours of AMI, myocardial necrosis occurs, which leads to the coronary microcirculation to injury which contribute to no-reflow. The rate of no-reflow was lower in patients presented with AMI, who had reperfusion in less than 4 hours. In AMI within 4 hours of pain-to-balloon time, the proportion of reversible causes of no-reflow may be higher compared to irreversible causes. The incidence of no-reflow was higher in patients with attenuated plaque ≥5 mm in length as evaluated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).Objective:The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of no-reflow after PCI and the association between attenuation plaque as detected by IVUS and no-reflow in ACS patients within 4 hours of pain-to-balloon time.Methods and Results:We retrospectively evaluated 77 ACS patients within 4 hours of pain-to-balloon time between December 2020 and March 2022. Patients were divided into the reflow group (final TIMI 3) (n = 58) and the no-reflow group (final TIMI < 3) (n = 19). The median peak creatine kinase (CK) level was significantly higher in the no-reflow group compared to the reflow group (3754 IU/L [IQR: 4155] vs. 1712 IU/L [IQR: 2849]). Blood pressure decrease during PCI was significantly more pronounced in the no-reflow group (47.4% vs. 8.6%, p < 0.001). The proportion of low attenuation plaque observed by IVUS with a length of ≥5 mm was significantly higher in the no-reflow group compared to the reflow group (52.6% vs. 25.5%, p = 0.032). The proportion of low attenuation plaque with an angle of ≥180 degrees was significantly higher in the no-reflow group compared to the reflow group (68.4% vs. 41.2%, p=0.043).Conclusion:In ACS patients within 4 hours of pain-to-balloon time, the peak CK and the decrease in blood pressure during PCI were significantly greater and the proportion of low attenuation plaque with a length of ≥5 mm and an angle of ≥180 degrees were significantly higher in the no-reflow group.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4140382-A4140382, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Although an estimated 54% of patients with heart failure (HF) and chronic pain report high symptom-associated distress, it is unclear whether pain predicts reduced physical function, cognitive function, independent activities of daily living (IADL) or health-related quality of life (HRQL) over time. The aims were to evaluate baseline pain presence as a predictor of physical function, cognitive function, IADL, and HRQL at baseline, 10 weeks, 4 months, and 8 months after baseline.Methods:In a retrospective longitudinal secondary analysis, data were analyzed from 237 participants with HF enrolled in the Cognitive Intervention to Improve Memory in Heart Failure Patients study. Pain presence was measured with the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 Questionnaire (HUI-3), physical function was measured by the Timed Up and Go (TUG), cognitive function was measured with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), IADL was measured by the Everyday Problems Test (EPT), and HRQL was measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (LHFQ). Descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, and linear mixed models were used to achieve the aims while controlling for gender.Results:The demographics were mean age 66.31 ± 12.02 years, gender 46% men, 54% women, race 13.5% Black, 85.7% White, 0.8% Other, NYHA class I: 9.7% II: 37.6% III: 52.7%, average LVEF: 48.9%. A total of 160 (67.51%) reported pain.In independent t-tests, patients with pain experienced significantly longer (i.e., worse) TUG scores at all timepoints except 10 weeks, and significantly higher (i.e., worse) LHFQ scores at all timepoints (see Table 1). However, in linear mixed models, pain at baseline did not predict TUG scores (F = 1.239, p = .298), MoCA scores (F = 0.148, p = .931), EPT scores, (F = 0.522, p = .668), or LHFQ scores (F = 0.364, p = .779) over time – see Table 1.Conclusions:Patients with HF and pain experienced significantly worse LHFQ and TUG scores at multiple timepoints. However, pain did not significantly predict cognitive function, physical function, IADL, or HRQL over time. Future prospective studies are needed to examine other outcomes associated with pain in this population and utilize more robust pain instruments.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4143480-A4143480, November 12, 2024. Background:Social isolation and loneliness have been found to be associated with many chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease (CVD) and those with both CVD and social isolation may have a worse prognosis. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been shown to improve outcomes following cardiac events. We hypothesize that CR may have beneficial impacts on quality of life, social support, depression, and pain rated via Dartmouth COOP Charts (COOP).Research Question:What is the impact of cardiac rehabilitation on quality of life, perceived social support, depression, and chronic pain?Methods:Data from Penn State Hershey Medical Center’s CR program was extracted pre-and post-CR, including Body Mass Index (BMI), Metabolic Equivalents (METs) performed, and components of COOP (social support, quality of life (QoL), depression, pain), with impairment rated from 1 to 5, with 5 representing worse impairment. Analysis was performed with paired t-test. Sensitivity analysis was performed including only high-risk participants (pre-rehab COOP score ≥ 3) for social support, depression, and pain as well as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2.Results:A total of 743 participants were included with a mean (±SD) age of 66.3 (±11.3) years. CR improved METs performed, QoL, depression, and pain (Table 1). When analyzing all participants, CR did not improve social support or BMI. However, when only analyzing those with higher social support needs at baseline (n= 78) as well as elevated BMI ≥30kg/m2, CR was associated with improved social support and BMI. QoL, depression and pain also improved among the higher risk groups (Table 2).Conclusion:CR programs have demonstrated benefits for cardiovascular mortality and may have powerful impacts on patients’ mental health, pain, and social support. Further studies are needed to further elucidate the role CR may have in improving outcomes in participants with social isolation and loneliness.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4147079-A4147079, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Observational studies in heart failure (HF) patients have shown that low levels of the thyroid hormone triiodothyronine (T3) with otherwise normal thyroid testing (‘low T3 syndrome’) is a risk factor for adverse clinical outcomes. Preclinical studies have shown beneficial effects from T3 therapy on myocardial contractility, myocardial relaxation, and vascular resistance, but human studies are lacking.Research Question:In patients with HF and low T3 syndrome, is oral liothyronine (LT3) safe, and does it impact cardiovascular clinical and physiologic phenotypes?Aims:Primary aim: To evaluate the safety of oral LT3 therapy in HFrEF and HFpEF. Secondary aim: To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of oral LT3 therapy in HFrEF and HFpEF.Methods:A total of 28 participants with HFrEF and 28 with HFpEF aged 18+ years enrolled in a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial and were prescribed LT3 or placebo for 8 weeks with a 2-week washout period. Primary outcomes were safety as assessed by T3 level; arrhythmic events by EKG, 14-day adhesive patch monitoring, and ICD (HFrEF only); and adverse events. Secondary efficacy outcomes included Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire, NT-proBNP level, peak O2 consumption during a cardiopulmonary exercise test, and actigraphy. Secondary mechanistic outcomes included non-invasive assessments of cardiac and arterial function measured via echocardiography and arterial tonometry.Results:Low T3 syndrome was present in 20% of screened participants. After LT3 treatment, T3 levels markedly increased compared with placebo. Heart rate was higher on LT3 (mean difference 2.4 beats per minute, p

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4146434-A4146434, November 12, 2024. Background:PET/CT stress test may be performed to risk stratify patients including those without known coronary artery disease (CAD) who may be at risk for short-term adverse cardiac events. In patients with low- to moderate (LTM) risk for short-term MACE and without a known history of CAD, a small percentage of these patients will undergo a coronary angiogram within 90-days, of which some will be diagnosed with high-grade stenosis. The purpose of this study is to determine factors associated with this approach and findings.Methods:Patients without a history of known CAD (n=43,271) undergoing a PET/CT from 2018-2023 at Intermountain Health, with scan interpreted clinically as LTM short-term risk for adverse cardiac events, and ischemic burden 70% stenosis in any vessel), an a priori list of clinical data and PET/CT results were examined.Results:Within 90 days of the LTM risk PET/CT, 3,163 (8.2%) had a coronary angiogram. Of these, 806 (25.5% of angiograms and 2.1% of total LTM) had high-grade CAD. The PET/CT ancillary findings were associated with the largest odds of performing an angiogram and the presence of high-grade CAD (Tables). Factors most likely to be associated with performing an angiogram were an ischemic burden of 7.5-10% (adjusted-OR [adj. OR]=11.54), coronary artery calcification (CAC) score of >300 (adj.-OR =1.62), and myocardial blood flow (MBF) of MBF 2.3). Other clinical parameters associated, after adjustment, with an angiogram were age, male sex, hypertension, elevated troponin, and inpatient status. Many of the same factors were found to be associated with the identification of high-grade CAD. However, being an inpatient was associated with increased odds of angiogram but a decrease in odds of high-grade CAD.Conclusions:In patients without a known history of CAD who underwent PET/CT clinically adjudicated as LTM short-term risk and ischemic burden

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4140363-A4140363, November 12, 2024. Introduction:An estimated 23-85% of adults with chronic heart failure (HF) experience comorbid chronic pain, yet no comprehensive theoretical models have been developed or tested that completely capture the salient variables which affect pain. The aim of this study was to construct a preliminary theoretical model of pain in HF and evaluate the associations between identified variables in the model with pain presence.Methods:In this cross-sectional study, baseline data were obtained from the Cognitive Intervention to Improve Memory in Heart Failure Patients study (MEMOIR-HF) (n = 235). The Biopsychosocial Model of Chronic Pain was adapted for an HF-specific population. The dependent variable was pain presence (yes/no), which was measured using the Health Utilities Index Mark-3 (HUI-3). Independent variables were identified for the model using previous literature and univariate analyses comparing patients with vs. without pain in MEMOIR-HF. Logistic regression was used to test for differences between patients with pain present and not present.Results:Demographics were 45.5% men, 54.5% women, 86.4% White, 13.6% Black, mean age 66.39 (SD 12.04) years. Of 235 patients, 159 (67.66%) reported pain on the HUI-3 items.The variables that were included following univariate analysis and literature review were age, self-reported race and gender, comorbid conditions, sleep disturbances, HF severity, B-type natriuretic peptide, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, body mass index, and depression. Patients with pain were more likely to have worse HF severity (NYHA Class II or III compared with Class I) (Class II: OR 5.09 [1.71 – 15.08], p = .003, Class III: 5.05 [1.73 – 14.71], p = .003), more severe depression (OR 1.14 [1.06 – 1.23], p = .001), and worsened daytime sleepiness (OR 0.90 [0.83 – 0.98], p = .017), see Table 1.Conclusions:We believe this study is one of the first to construct and test a preliminary comprehensive model of pain in HF. Complete characterization of pain in HF is needed before treatments can be improved. Future research is needed to explore variables that were not available in the MEMOIR-HF dataset. More robust pain measures are needed to adequately test all variables.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4146364-A4146364, November 12, 2024. Background:According to the European Guidelines, “low-risk” pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients is defined as a risk of death < 5% within a year and represents a treatment-goal. However, the impact of morbidity (e.g. hospitalization and clinical worsening), were not included in this definition.Research Questions:Can REVEAL 2.0 risk score further identify low-risk PAH patients for both morbidity and mortality?Aims:Using the REVEAL 2.0 risk score, to propose a modified definition of “low-risk” to include the risk of both morbidity and mortality at 1- and 3-years, respectively.Methods:A harmonized dataset from 8 PAH randomized controlled trials from the FDA was used for this analysis and REVEAL 2.0 risk score was calculated for each patient. Modified low-risk was a priori defined by “risk of death ≤ 5% at 3-years and risk of clinical worsening ≤10% at 1-year”. Clinical worsening was defined as any of the following: lung transplantation or hospitalization due to PAH worsening, initiation of prostanoids/chronic oxygen, 15% decrease in 6-MWD from baseline, a worsening of NYHA, addition of a new PAH medication.Results:A total of 4,122 PAH patients were included: median age 49 (36, 62) yo, mPAP 50 (40, 60) mmHg, PVR 10 (7, 14) WU, 6MWD 375 (306, 423) m, NTproBNP 884 (230, 3010) pg/mL. Patients with a REVEAL 2.0 risk score ≤ 4 had a 1-year clinical worsening free-survival and 3-year survival rate of 92% and 95% (Figure 1). The 3-years survival was significantly better in patients with a REVEAL 2.0 ≤ 4 compared to 5-6: HR=0.47, 95%CI[0.27-0.84], p=0.01. Compared to patients with REVEAL 2.0 risk score of 5-6 (“classical” low-risk), those with a REVEAL 2.0 risk score ≤ 4 (“refined low-risk”) had a better clinical, biological, hemodynamic presentation, and outcomes (Table 1).Conclusion:This study is the first embedding both morbidity and mortality within the definition of low risk for PAH patients and suggests that PAH patients with REVEAL 2.0 risk score ≤ 4 meet this definition. This definition may be a promising new treatment-goal strategy in future randomized controlled trials but also for daily clinical practice.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4141389-A4141389, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is an increasingly prevalent form of heart failure (HF) in the US today. Our prior work revealed low albumin at first hospitalization for HF exacerbation with underlying HFpEF to be an independent predictor of all-cause mortality in a small cohort of patients. We now sought to confirm our earlier findings across a larger and more diverse patient population.Methods:Seven thousand, eight hundred and forty patients had a first admission to Mayo Clinic for HF exacerbation with an echo-confirmed left ventricular ejection fraction >50% between 2010 and 2020. Patient baseline demographics, co-morbidities, admission laboratory values, echocardiographic parameters, discharge medications, and outcomes were obtained from chart abstraction. To validate our previous model, patients were grouped based on the number of risk factors as previously defined: age >80 years, serum albumin level