Search Results for: Linee guida sul parto pre-termine

Introduction
Pre-eclampsia is a harmful and potentially life-threatening condition affecting maternal health and fetal well-being. In response to the need for timely and continuous monitoring, remote health technologies have been implemented for blood pressure control among this group over the last decades. The purpose of this study is to synthesise qualitative evidence on the experiences of adopting remote technologies for blood pressure control among women with pre-eclampsia and their healthcare providers.

Methods
Peer-reviewed publications published in English from January 2013 to March 2023 were searched using seven electronic databases: PubMed, Nursing & Allied Health Premium (ProQuest), Scopus, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis Online, Google Scholar and EBSCO Open Dissertations. The findings were subjected to meta-synthesis using the Joanna Briggs Institute meta-aggregation approach, whereby credible and unequivocal findings supported by participant quotations were extracted, grouped into categories and then integrated into synthesised findings through consensus among reviewers. A total of 4827 studies were identified in the initial database search. Twelve eligible studies were included in the meta-synthesis.

Results
Among 12 studies, five synthesised findings were elicited from women’s experiences with remote monitoring, including reassurance and increased self-confidence in health, a sense of autonomy, enhanced awareness of their health, acceptability and satisfaction with telehealth and reduced anxiety and stress. Providers’ perspectives on telehealth were presented in four synthesised findings: increasing value for oneself and work, strengthening knowledge and skills on pre-eclampsia, improving quality of care and concerns about technology challenges.

Conclusion
Healthcare providers reported professional growth and improved care delivery, though technical challenges persist. These findings support the integration of remote monitoring into maternal healthcare.

Objectives
This study aimed to examine the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown period on access to postnatal contraception (PNC) and wider postnatal care and to explore the experiences of PNC care within the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) Integrated Care System (ICS) during the same period.

Design
This study reports a subanalysis of the NENC Postnatal Contraception (PoCo) study, an online survey of a convenience sample of women in the NENC ICS who completed pregnancies between 2019 and 2023.

Setting
Women who completed pregnancies between 2019 and 2023 in the NENC ICS.

Participants
Out of the total 2509 eligible participants who completed the PoCo survey, women who delivered in April–June 2020, April–June 2021 and April–June 2022 were included within this subanalysis, resulting in 457 eligible survey responses. There were no additional exclusion criteria.

Primary and secondary outcome measures
Primary outcome measures were PNC uptake and number of healthcare professional contacts during the postnatal period. Secondary outcome measures were self-reported experiences of PNC care.

Results
Women who delivered in April–June 2020 had fewer postnatal contacts than women who delivered in subsequent non-lockdown cohorts and were less likely to be offered PNC prior to discharge. There were no significant differences in relation to PNC uptake. In qualitative analyses, several women who delivered in 2020 highlighted COVID-19 as a factor perceived to be associated with poor postnatal care. Across all three groups, experiences of PNC care were diverse; feeling pressured to accept PNC was frequently reported.

Conclusions
While the first COVID-19 lockdown appears to have had a significant impact on women’s experiences of postnatal care, this did not result in a substantive decrease in PNC provision, likely reflecting pre-existing shortcomings. These women and families may benefit from additional support postpandemic to mitigate the potential life course implications of restricted support in the postpartum period, and policy-makers and healthcare providers should continue to explore innovative and patient-centred approaches to improving PNC provision. Future research should continue to evaluate the longer-term impacts of these changes in non-pandemic contexts.

Objective
To investigate the epidemiological characteristics and temporal-spatial distribution of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP) infections among paediatric inpatients with respiratory tract infections in Tianjin, China, across three distinct phases: pre-pandemic (2017–2019), pandemic (2020–2022) and post-pandemic (2023–2024). The primary hypothesis is that the COVID-19 pandemic altered the epidemiology of MP infections in children.

Design
Retrospective, single-centre study.

Setting
Secondary care paediatric hospital in a metropolitan area.

Participants
A total of 60 213 paediatric patients hospitalised with respiratory infections between January 2017 and December 2024 were included. The study population consisted of children aged 0–18 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.22:1.00. Selection criteria included children admitted with a diagnosis of respiratory infection, while those with incomplete clinical data or non-respiratory infections were excluded.

Primary and secondary outcome measures
The primary outcome was the overall positive detection rate of MP-RNA. Secondary outcomes included annual and seasonal variations in MP-RNA detection rates, differences by sex and age group, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on MP epidemiology. All statistical methods, including those used to control for confounding, involved the use of ² tests for comparing positive rates between groups.

Results
The overall positive detection rate of MP-RNA among children hospitalised for respiratory infections during the study period was 36.58% (22 023/60 213). The annual MP-RNA-positive detection rates from 2017 to 2024 were as follows: 50.74% (411/810) in 2017, 36.28% (1150/3170) in 2018, 27.41% (1459/5323) in 2019, 10.18% (222/2181) in 2020, 11.42% (928/8129) in 2021, 13.27% (579/4364) in 2022, 28.97% (3064/10575) in 2023 and 55.38% (14 210/25 661) in 2024. The highest annual positivity rate was observed in 2024 (55.38%, 14 210/25 661), while the lowest rate occurred in 2020 (10.18%, 222/2181). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in MP-RNA detection rates across different years (²=8331.511, p

Objectives
To describe the trends in high remnant cholesterol (HRC) prevalence and identify its risk factors.

Design
A serial cross-sectional study.

Setting
Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2020 were analysed.

Participants
A total of 24 658 adults aged ≥18 years with fasting total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) measured were included.

Outcome measure
Serum TC was measured using an enzymatic method. HDL-C and TG were quantified using photometry. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) was estimated by using the Sampson formula. Remnant cholesterol (RC) was defined as TC–HDL-C–LDL-C. HRC was defined as RC≥0.78 mmol/L.

Results
The multivariable-adjusted survey-weighted HRC prevalence decreased from 26.6% (1999–2002) to 13.7% (2015–2020) with a 5.4% reduction per year (plinear-trend

Objectives
Clinical trials are needed to advance interventions such as chemoprevention that have potential to reduce the risk of malignant transformation in individuals with oral potentially malignant disorders. We explored the perspectives of those screened or invited to join an early phase clinical trial (the SAVER trial: Sodium valproate for the epigenetic reprogramming of high-risk oral epithelial dysplasia). Our objectives were to inform the SAVER trial while it was ongoing and to provide insights for future trials and chemoprevention therapy development more broadly.

Design
Qualitative study involving audio-recorded, semistructured interviews. Analysis of transcribed interviews drew on thematic approaches.

Setting
Five UK-based sites involved in SAVER.

Participants
Purposive sample of individuals (n=20) with suspected or diagnosed oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) who were approached about SAVER.

Results
Most interviewees readily accepted that OED warranted preventive treatment and were positive about the potential of chemoprevention. However, they were often concerned about the side effects of the trial medication, and together with a dislike of biopsies and a perception that the trial might disadvantage treatment, these concerns made some hesitant to participate in SAVER. Interviewees indicated that the communication of staff influenced their understanding and experience of the trial and identified several opportunities for enhancing these aspects.

Conclusions
In indicating that individuals at risk of malignant transformation are accepting of chemoprevention in principle, our findings are supportive of future research on chemoprevention for this group. The findings also draw attention to the crucial role of communication in recruitment to chemoprevention trials. We provide recommendations to support staff during recruitment and enhance individuals’ experience of the trial.

Trial registration number
ISRCTN12448611; Pre-results.

Objective
To explore the role of shared decision-making (SDM) in the implementation of evidence-based practice in women with chronic hypertension planning birth and investigate the barriers and the facilitators in the provision of antenatal care.

Methods
A multimethod multisite approach was used including case-note review (n=55) and structured observations (n=18) to assess the provision of third trimester antenatal care. The barriers and facilitators to implementation were identified from semistructured qualitative interviews with healthcare professionals (n=13) and pregnant women (n=14) using inductive thematic analysis. The findings were integrated and evaluated using the ‘Three Talk Model of Shared Decision-making’.

Setting and participants
Pregnant women with chronic hypertension, some with superimposed pre-eclampsia and their principal carers at three National Health Service hospital trusts.

Results
Healthcare professionals delivering care to pregnant women with high blood pressure were aligned with most communication practices (set out in the Calgary-Cambridge communication guide). Pregnant women with hypertension who described being engaged in shared decisions about birth developed a trusting relationship with their maternity team. Despite frequent caesarean section birth (52%) and early term birth (median gestation at delivery 38 weeks (IQR1 37 weeks, IQR3 39 weeks) identified by case-note review; integrated data (observations, case-note review and qualitative interviews) found pregnant women with high blood pressure were not regularly provided with personalised information based on what they would find helpful, encouraged to share their own thoughts or offered choice in relation to timing or mode of birth. Uncertainty regarding the evidence around optimal timing of birth was the main barrier identified by professionals. Facilitators included training for professionals in SDM, midwife-led antenatal classes for high-risk women and multiprofessional clinics.

Conclusions
Strategies to promote more widespread adoption of SDM are likely to improve the experiences of women with high blood pressure making decisions about childbirth.

Introduction
Understanding how uncertainty tolerance (UT) evolves in medical students is crucial to identify training needs and implement effective interventions. However, the dynamic nature of UT and the mechanisms behind its changes over time remain poorly understood. This systematic review aims to map the development of UT in medical students across the course of their training by synthesising the available evidence. We will adopt a systematic mixed studies review approach to provide an integrative synthesis of both quantitative and qualitative data, offering a comprehensive overview of UT temporal evolution.

Method and analysis
The protocol follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We will conduct searches in Embase, Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ERIC, Cochrane Library and PsycINFO, from inception to July 2026. We will manually search the references of included studies and track citations through Google Scholar to identify additional eligible studies. Two reviewers will independently extract data from each eligible study using a pre-piloted Microsoft Excel data extraction form. A thematic synthesis will be employed to develop analytic themes from the existing literature, generating new concepts and explanatory hypotheses. Study quality will be evaluated using the QuADS score.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval is not necessary for this systematic review, as no primary data will be collected. The protocol for this review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO: CRD42024591340.

While the adenoma detection rate (ADR) is associated with post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) risk, it is unknown to what extent this reflects missed colorectal cancer (CRC) versus missed pre-cancerous lesions. We evaluated the association between physician ADR and prevalent CRC detection during colonoscopy.

Pubblicate su Annals of Rheumatic Diseases nuove raccomandazioni

Objectives
To evaluate the impact and acceptability of a tailored, gender-responsive behavioural activation (BA) intervention for improving depression and anxiety in male National Health Service (NHS) frontline workers.

Design
Pre-post intervention study.

Setting
Three NHS organisations in the North of England.

Participants
45 men aged ≥18 years working in a frontline NHS role scoring in the subclinical range (5–14) on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (depression) and/or the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) (anxiety) at baseline.

Interventions
A tailored BA treatment programme consisting of up to eight telephone support sessions over a period of 4–6 weeks, accompanied by a BA self-help manual.

Main outcome measures
Self-reported symptom severity of depression, assessed by PHQ-9, and anxiety, assessed by GAD-7, at baseline and 4 and 6 months. Acceptability from the perspectives of male study participants and coaches who delivered the intervention was assessed in a nested qualitative study using the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA).

Results
PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores decreased from baseline to 4 months on both the PHQ-9 and GAD-7. While scores increased from 4 months to 6 months, the 6-month scores remained below those of the baseline scores. Acceptability of the intervention was high across all constructs of the TFA. The practical and action-oriented strategies of the intervention, and the confidential, flexible, convenient mode of delivery, worked to support men’s engagement with the intervention.

Conclusions
Delivery of a tailored, gender-responsive BA intervention was appealing to, and beneficial for, men working in frontline NHS roles with less severe depression and anxiety. The BALM intervention offers promise as a tailored workplace mental health programme that is aligned with men’s needs and preferences and can help overcome a reticence to engage with mental health support in NHS staff and beyond.

Trial registration number
ISRCTN48636092.

Gruppo di lavoro per garantire uniformità e solidità scientifica

Introduction
Mental health problems are important causes of disability and economic costs worldwide. Randomised clinical trials examining the treatment of mental health disorders measure heterogeneous outcomes, causing difficulties in data synthesis, interpretation and translation into clinical practice. The aim of the Patient Important Outcomes in Psychiatry (PIO-Psych) Initiative is to develop an overarching, transdiagnostic research-based and consensus-based core outcome set for adult mental health disorders.

Methods and analysis
The development of the PIO-Psych transdiagnostic core outcome set will include three phases: (1) a systematic scoping review of the literature to develop the initial list of outcomes for the Delphi study; (2) a Delphi study in three rounds including people with lived experience of mental health disorders and their relatives, clinicians, researchers and others (administrators, mental healthcare policymakers, philosophers); (3) a hybrid consensus meeting to agree on the final overarching, transdiagnostic core outcome set and corresponding time points of assessment of each outcome.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval is not applicable to this study according to the Research Ethics Committee of the Capital Region of Denmark, as it is not an interventional study. All data will be reported anonymously, and it will not be possible to identify study participants. Results will be disseminated via stakeholder and research networks and peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration details
The PIO-Psych Initiative was pre-registered with COMET (Core Outcome Measures for Effectiveness Trials) on 17 May 2024 (https://www.comet-initiative.org/Studies/Details/3125).

Background
Recent meta-analyses suggested diclofenac may be superior to indomethacin in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy of 100 mg rectal indomethacin versus diclofenac on PEP incidences.

Design
This multicentre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial was conducted in nine tertiary centres in China. Patients with low and high risk for PEP and native papilla were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive 100 mg diclofenac or 100 mg indomethacin rectally before ERCP. The primary outcome was the occurrence of PEP defined by the Cotton consensus. The intention-to-treat principle was conducted for the analysis.

Results
The trial was terminated early for futility after the predetermined first interim analysis. Between June 2023 and May 2024, 1204 patients were randomised into the diclofenac group (n=600) or indomethacin group (n=604). Baseline characteristics were balanced. The primary outcome occurred in 53 patients (8.8%) of 600 patients allocated to the diclofenac group and 37 patients (6.1%) of 604 patients allocated to the indomethacin group (relative risk 1.44; 95% CI 0.96 to 2.16, p=0.074). PEP occurred in 35 (14.2%) of 247 high-risk patients in the diclofenac group and 26 (9.8%) of 266 high-risk patients in the indomethacin group (p=0.124). PEP incidences were also comparable in low-risk patients between the two groups (18/353 (5.1%) vs 11/338 (3.3%), p=0.227). Other ERCP-related complications did not differ between the two groups.

Conclusion
Pre-procedure 100 mg rectal diclofenac was not superior to the same dose of rectal indomethacin regarding preventing PEP. These findings supported current clinical practice guidelines of 100 mg indomethacin or diclofenac for PEP prophylaxis in patients without contraindications.

Trial registration number
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05947461).

Objective
This study explored the experience of stigma and access to healthcare by persons with long COVID from the majority Dutch and two ethnic minority populations (Turkish and Moroccan) living in the Netherlands.

Design
This was a cross-sectional qualitative study that employed inductive and deductive thematic approaches to data analysis using MAXQDA.

Setting and participants
Between October 2022 and January 2023, 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants of Dutch, Moroccan and Turkish ethnic origins with long COVID living in the Netherlands. Participants were men and women aged 30 years and above.

Results
Guided by the concepts of stigma and candidacy, the findings are structured according to the broader themes of stigma and access to care. The findings show that people with long COVID suffer self and public stigma resulting from the debilitating illness and symptoms. Especially among Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority participants, strong filial obligations and gendered expectations of responsibility and support within their communities further worsen self-stigma. This experience of stigma persisted within healthcare where lack of information and appropriate care pathways led to feelings of frustration and abandonment, especially for participants with pre-existing health conditions which further complicate candidacy. Under the access to healthcare theme, the findings show multiple challenges in accessing healthcare for long COVID due to several multifaceted factors related to the various stages of candidacy which impacted access to care. Particularly for Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority participants, additional challenges resulting from limited access to information, pre-existing structural challenges and experience of stereotyping based on ethnicity or assumed migrant identity by health professionals further complicate access to health information and long COVID care.

Conclusions
The findings call for urgent attention and research to identify and coordinate healthcare for long COVID. There is also a need for accessible, informative and tailored support systems to facilitate patients’ access to information and care pathways for long COVID. Providing tailored information and support, addressing the various barriers that hinder optimal operating conditions in healthcare and leveraging on social networks is crucial for addressing stigma and facilitating candidacy for persons with long COVID towards improving access to care.