Risultati per: Indicazioni per gli screening oncologici

Objectives
The objective of this scoping review was to map evidence on the acceptability of self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing (HPVSS) for cervical cancer screening among women in the sub-Saharan Africa region.

Design
Scoping review.

Methods
Using Arksey and O’Malley’s framework, we searched Scopus, PubMed, Medline Ovid, Cochrane and Web of Science databases for evidence on the acceptability of HPVSS among women aged 25 years and older published between January 2011 and July 2021. We included studies that reported evidence on the acceptability of HPVSS for cervical cancer screening. Review articles and protocols were excluded. We also searched for evidence from grey literature sources such as dissertations/theses, conference proceedings, websites of international organisations such as WHO and relevant government reports. Two reviewers independently performed the extraction using a pre-designed Excel spreadsheet and emerging themes were narratively summarised.

Results
The initial search retrieved 1018 articles. Of these, 19 articles were eligible and included in the review. The following themes emerged from the included articles: acceptability of HPVSS; lack of self-efficacy to perform HPVSS, complications when performing HPVSS, preferences for provider sampling or assistance; setting of HPVSS; HPVSS by vulnerable populations.

Conclusion
Evidence shows that HPVSS is highly acceptable for cervical cancer screening in sub-Saharan Africa. Further research exploring the acceptability of HPVSS among women residing in rural areas is required, as well as studies to determine women’s preferences for HPVSS intervention including the preferred type of sampling devices. Knowledge on the acceptability and preferences for HPVSS is important in designing women-centred interventions that have the potential to increase screening coverage and participation in cervical cancer screening programmes.

Introduction
Cancer screening is an integral component of primary care, and providers can play a key role in facilitating screening. While much work has focused on patient interventions, there has been less attention on primary care provider (PCP) interventions. In addition, marginalised patients experience disparities in cancer screening which are likely to worsen if not addressed. The objective of this scoping review is to report on the range, extent and nature of PCP interventions that maximise cancer screening participation among marginalised patients. Our review will target cancers where there is strong evidence to support screening, including lung, cervical, breast and colorectal cancers.

Methods and analysis
This is a scoping review conducted in accordance with the framework by Levac et al. Comprehensive searches will be conducted by a health sciences librarian using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, CINAHL Complete and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include peer-reviewed English language literature published from 1 January 2000 to 31 March 2022 that describes PCP interventions to maximise cancer screening participation for breast, cervical, lung and colorectal cancers. Two independent reviewers will screen all articles and identify eligible studies for inclusion in two stages: title and abstract, then full text. A third reviewer will resolve any discrepancies. Charted data will be synthesised through a narrative synthesis using a piloted data extraction form informed by the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist.

Ethics and dissemination
Since this is a synthesis of digitally published literature, no ethics approval is needed for this work. We will target appropriate primary care or cancer screening journals and conference presentations to publish and disseminate the results of this scoping review. The results will also be used to inform an ongoing research study developing PCP interventions for addressing cancer screening with marginalised patients.

Objectives
To evaluate the performance of point-of-care C-reactive protein (CRP) as a screening tool for tuberculosis (TB) using a threshold of 10 mg/L in both people living with HIV (PLHIV) and HIV-negative individuals and compare it to symptom screening using a composite reference for bacteriological confirmation of TB.

Methods
Prospective cross-sectional study.

Setting
A primary healthcare facility in Lusaka, Zambia.

Participants
Consecutive adults (≥18 years) presenting for routine outpatient healthcare were enrolled. Of the 816 individuals approached to participate in the study, 804 eligible consenting adults were enrolled into the study, of which 783 were included in the analysis.

Primary outcome measures
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV) of CRP and symptom screening.

Results
Overall, sensitivity of WHO-recommended four-symptom screen (W4SS) and CRP were 87.2% (80.0–92.5) and 86.6% (79.6–91.8) while specificity was 30.3% (26.7–34.1) and 34.8% (31.2–38.6), respectively. Among PLHIV, sensitivity of W4SS and CRP was 92.2% (81.1–97.8) and 94.8% (85.6–98.9) while specificity was 37.0% (31.3–43.0) and 27.5% (22.4–33.1), respectively. Among those with CD4≥350, the NPV for CRP was 100% (92.9–100). In the HIV negative, sensitivity of W4SS and CRP was 83.8% (73.4–91.3) and 80.3% (69.5–88.5) while specificity was 25.4% (20.9–30.2) and 40.5% (35.3–45.6), respectively. Parallel use of CRP and W4SS yielded a sensitivity and NPV of 100% (93.8–100) and 100% (91.6–100) among PLHIV and 93.3% (85.1–97.8) and 90.0% (78.2–96.7) among the HIV negatives, respectively.

Conclusion
Sensitivity and specificity of CRP were similar to symptom screening in HIV-positive outpatients. Independent use of CRP offered limited additional benefit in the HIV negative. CRP can independently accurately rule out TB in PLHIV with CD4≥350. Parallel use of CRP and W4SS improves sensitivity irrespective of HIV status and can accurately rule out TB in PLHIV, irrespective of CD4 count.

This systematic review to support the 2023 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement on screening for skin cancer summarizes published evidence on the benefits and harms of screening for skin cancer in individuals 15 years or older.

This 2023 Recommendation Statement from the US Preventive Services Task Force concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of visual skin examination by a clinician to screen for skin cancer in adolescents and adults (I statement).

This JAMA Patient Page describes the pros and cons of screening for skin cancer, as well as skin cancer risk-reduction practices.

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) initially released its skin cancer screening recommendations in 1996 and concluded that there was not enough evidence to recommend skin examinations for the early detection of skin cancer in adults. They recently released an updated draft recommendation stating there is still insufficient evidence to assess the balance of benefits and harms of routine visual skin examination by a clinician to screen for skin cancer in adolescents and adults (I statement). After nearly 3 decades, dozens of additional published studies, and strong observational evidence suggesting a clear association between earlier stage of skin cancer detection and decreased mortality risk, why has the position of the task force not changed?

Annals of Internal Medicine, Ahead of Print.

Circulation, Ahead of Print. Background: Research suggests N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) to be a strong predictor of incident atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke. However, its utility in AF screening remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate NT-proBNP as a potential marker for screening efficacy with respect to AF yield and stroke prevention.Methods: In the LOOP Study, 6004 AF-naïve individuals aged 70-90 years with additional stroke risk factors were randomized 1:3 to either continuous screening with implantable loop recorder (ILR) and anticoagulation initiation upon detection of AF episodes ≥6 minutes, or usual care (Control). This post-hoc analysis included the study participants with available NT-proBNP measurement at baseline.Results: A total of 5819 participants were included (mean age 74.7 years (standard deviation, 4.1), 47.5%females). The median NT-proBNP level was 15 pmol/L [interquartile range: 9-28], corresponding to 125 pg/mL [interquartile range: 76-233]. NT-proBNP above median was associated with an increased risk of AF diagnosis both in the ILR group (hazard ratio (HR) 1.84 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51-2.25]) and the Control group (HR 2.79 [95% CI: 2.30-3.40]). Participants with NT-proBNP above median were also at higher risk of clinical events compared with those having lower levels (HR 1.21 [95% CI: 0.96-1.54] for stroke or systemic embolism (SE), 1.60 [95% CI: 1.32-1.95] for stroke/SE/cardiovascular death, and 1.91 [95% CI: 1.61-2.26] for all-cause death). Compared with usual care, ILR screening was associated with significant reductions in stroke/SE and stroke/SE/cardiovascular death among participants with NT-proBNP above median (HR 0.60 [95% CI: 0.40-0.90] and 0.70 [95% CI: 0.53-0.94], respectively), but not among those with lower levels (pinteraction=0.029 for stroke/SE and 0.045 for stroke/SE/cardiovascular death). No risk reduction in all-cause death was observed in either NT-proBNP subgroup for ILR versus Control (pinteraction=0.68). Analyzing NT-proBNP as a continuous variable yielded similar findings.Conclusions: In an elderly population with additional stroke risk factors, ILR screening for AF was associated with a significant reduction in stroke risk among individuals with higher NT-proBNP levels, but not among those with lower levels. These findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrant further study before clinical implementation.

Men who were screened more frequently received more prostate cancer diagnoses but not earlier treatment.

New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 388, Issue 15, Page 1405-1414, April 2023.

Many screening colonoscopies are done in patients with limited life expectancy.

Annals of Internal Medicine, Ahead of Print.

In Toscana e Veneto progetto pilota con 400mila test

The US Preventive Services Task Force has reaffirmed its 2016 recommendation against population-based serologic genital herpes screening in asymptomatic adults and adolescents, including pregnant persons (D recommendation). With little new data identified in a focused evidence update (ie, no new eligible studies were included), the current 2023 recommendation reaffirmed with moderate certainty that the potential harms of serologic screening for genital herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals outweigh potential benefits. This recommendation aligns with corresponding guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

In this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Lee and colleagues reported the results of a stepped-wedge cluster randomized implementation trial aimed at identifying and decreasing unhealthy alcohol use among primary care patients. The intervention by Lee et al significantly increased screening and brief counseling about unhealthy alcohol use in primary care patients but did not increase treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD).