Search Results for: Cardio-oncology: rivista open access

3/o anno Fondazione Onda, servizi gratuiti clinico-diagnostici

3/o anno Fondazione Onda, servizi gratuiti clinico-diagnostici

Objective
To study time trends in mortality

Objectives
This study aimed to examine the impact of the first COVID-19 lockdown period on access to postnatal contraception (PNC) and wider postnatal care and to explore the experiences of PNC care within the North East and North Cumbria (NENC) Integrated Care System (ICS) during the same period.

Design
This study reports a subanalysis of the NENC Postnatal Contraception (PoCo) study, an online survey of a convenience sample of women in the NENC ICS who completed pregnancies between 2019 and 2023.

Setting
Women who completed pregnancies between 2019 and 2023 in the NENC ICS.

Participants
Out of the total 2509 eligible participants who completed the PoCo survey, women who delivered in April–June 2020, April–June 2021 and April–June 2022 were included within this subanalysis, resulting in 457 eligible survey responses. There were no additional exclusion criteria.

Primary and secondary outcome measures
Primary outcome measures were PNC uptake and number of healthcare professional contacts during the postnatal period. Secondary outcome measures were self-reported experiences of PNC care.

Results
Women who delivered in April–June 2020 had fewer postnatal contacts than women who delivered in subsequent non-lockdown cohorts and were less likely to be offered PNC prior to discharge. There were no significant differences in relation to PNC uptake. In qualitative analyses, several women who delivered in 2020 highlighted COVID-19 as a factor perceived to be associated with poor postnatal care. Across all three groups, experiences of PNC care were diverse; feeling pressured to accept PNC was frequently reported.

Conclusions
While the first COVID-19 lockdown appears to have had a significant impact on women’s experiences of postnatal care, this did not result in a substantive decrease in PNC provision, likely reflecting pre-existing shortcomings. These women and families may benefit from additional support postpandemic to mitigate the potential life course implications of restricted support in the postpartum period, and policy-makers and healthcare providers should continue to explore innovative and patient-centred approaches to improving PNC provision. Future research should continue to evaluate the longer-term impacts of these changes in non-pandemic contexts.

Introduction
Biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) have a central role in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) are commonly used as first-line agents, while non-TNFis (tocilizumab, abatacept and rituximab) have shown to be non-inferior to TNFis in head-to-head trials. In case of TNFi inadequate response, using other mechanisms of action provides a better response than using an alternate TNFi. Which non-TNFi bDMARD administered subcutaneously to allow for ambulatory management to choose in case of first line TNFi inadequate response has not been tested in a randomised clinical trial, while observational data support a potential superiority of tocilizumab over abatacept.

Methods and analysis
The SUNSTAR (SUbcutaNeouS Tocilizumab vs Abatacept in TNF Alpha inadequate responders for the treatment of Rheumatoid arthritis) study is a 52-week prospective, randomised, multicentre, open-label, superiority phase IV trial comparing subcutaneous tocilizumab with abatacept in a 1:1 ratio. Patients with active RA (Disease Activity Score-erythrocyte sedimentation rate >3.2 and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10) and with inadequate 3-month response to a first or second TNFi are included in 25 centres in France. The primary outcome is the CDAI improvement at week 24. Intention-to-treat analysis will be applied primarily. The secondary outcome is a composite outcome of the percentage of responders defined as a CDAI

Improved screening availability for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) could be the reason for the uptick in early diagnosis, according to a report issued by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Introduction
Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious complication in older adult patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery. Esketamine is known for its anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties. While it has shown preventive effects on POD in those not undergoing cardiovascular surgery, its efficacy in older adult patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery remains uncertain. Therefore, we herein aimed to evaluate the preventive effect of intraoperative subanaesthetic esketamine on POD in this specific population.

Methods and analysis
This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial will enrol 778 patients aged 60–80 years undergoing open-heart cardiovascular surgery in China, from September 2023 to December 2025. The participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the following groups: the esketamine group and the control group. In the esketamine group, esketamine (2 mg/mL) will be administered intravenously at a dosage of 0.3 mg/kg over 10 min following tracheal intubation, followed by a continuous infusion at 0.15 mg/kg/h until the end of the surgery. Patients in the control group will receive a placebo following the same dosage and regimen. The incidence of POD will be the primary outcome and will be assessed twice daily from the first to the seventh postoperative day. The postoperative sleep quality, duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital and intensive care unit stay will be the secondary outcomes.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Hospital (No. 2023068). Public disclosure is guaranteed post-trial, and the results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Trial registration number
ChiCTR2300074395.

Introduction
While chronic kidney disease (CKD) is well characterised in adults, less is known about the prevalence of CKD in children and adolescents, where it is rare and associated with unique characteristics and implications for long-term health outcomes. This study protocol outlines a systematic review to assess the global prevalence of CKD in children and adolescents along with causes and associated risk factors. This is warranted to better characterise prevalence and to identify at-risk groups that would benefit from screening efforts. We will explore the risk and burden of CKD and its variations by sociodemographic characteristics (age group, race, sex/gender) and geographical regions (country, International Society of Nephrology region and income groups based on World Bank country classifications).

Methods and analysis
We will conduct a systematic review of studies reporting on the prevalence of CKD in children and adolescents following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2015 (PRISMA-P-2015) and the PRISMA 2020 methodological guidelines (PRISMA 2020). Searches will be undertaken in the following databases with the date range from 2000 to date: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Citation Index (via Clarivate), Web of Science Core Collection, Google Scholar and grey literature sites (registries, government reports) to identify studies that report on the prevalence of CKD in children and adolescents from ages 0 to 18. The primary outcome will be the global prevalence of CKD in children and adolescents. Secondary outcomes will include the causes of and risk factors for CKD, and examining differences and temporal trends in CKD prevalence across countries, geographical regions, income levels and sociodemographic characteristics.

Ethics and dissemination
No direct involvement with patient data will be used in this systematic review, as data will be obtained from previously published reports. Ethical approval is therefore not required. Our findings will be published in an open-access peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42024547467.

Introduction
As the field of radiation oncology continues to evolve with rapidly advancing technologies, the need for innovative educational methods is critical. Extended reality (XR) technologies—including virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality—have emerged as transformative tools in medical education. While the potential of XR in healthcare education is recognised, there is a lack of comprehensive exploration specifically in the context of radiation oncology education. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on XR technologies in radiation oncology training and education, identify barriers to their adoption and highlight opportunities for broader integration into curricula.

Methods
This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley framework with enhancements by Levac et al and will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive search will be conducted across databases, including MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science, to identify relevant studies on the use of XR technologies in radiation oncology education. Studies will be selected based on predetermined inclusion criteria using the population, concept, context framework. Data extraction will focus on the types of XR technologies used, educational settings, learning outcomes, barriers to adoption and methodologies for evaluating XR effectiveness. The results will be synthesised through descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis. A consultation phase will engage experts to refine findings and ensure the practical relevance of the review.

Ethics and dissemination
This protocol does not require ethics approval at the current stage as it involves a scoping review of publicly available literature. Ethics approval will be obtained prior to initiating the consultation phase involving experts. Written informed consent will be obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study will be conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations and was approved by the Chang Gung Medical Foundation Institutional Review Board on 13 May 2025 (ref.: 202500731B0). The findings of this review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and tailored executive summaries aimed at educators, policymakers and stakeholders in radiation oncology education.

Dedman D, Williams R, Bhaskaran K, et al. Pooling of primary care electronic health record (EHR) data on Huntington’s disease (HD) and cancer: establishing comparability of two large UK databases. BMJ Open 2024;14:e070258. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070258
This article was previously published with an error.
The word ‘million’ was incorrectly changed to ‘months’ in the first sentence of the final paragraph under the Data Sources section under Methods. The corrected text should read:
Analyses were conducted using the November 2020 build of the CPRD GOLD and CPRD Aurum databases, containing around 20 million and 40 million patient records, respectively, and the most contemporaneous linked data available at the time.

Nasce rivista ‘la miglior vita possibile’ per promuovere nuovi hospice e lo sviluppo di reti assistenziali domiciliari

Objectives
To compare outcome data of hemicolectomy patients before and after the establishment of a preoperative anaesthesia assessment clinic (PAC).

Design
This observational study was conducted retrospectively through an electronic health record review covering periods before (2014–2017) and after (2017–2022) the PAC was established.

Setting
An acute care hospital in Norway.

Participants
A total of 612 patients undergoing elective open or laparoscopic hemicolectomy were included, of whom 338 (55.2%) had attended the PAC.

Primary and secondary outcome measures
The primary outcome was the rate of cancellation of planned surgeries, and the secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay (LOS), unanticipated intraoperative anaesthesia-related events and the presence of documentation relevant to the planning of anaesthesia in the patient’s medical records preoperatively.

Results
Compared with the after-PAC cohort, the before-PAC cohort was numerically more likely to have their planned surgery cancelled (OR=1.97, 95% CI (0.84 to 4.61); p=0.12). The before-PAC cohort also had a numerically lower rate of unanticipated intraoperative anaesthesia-related events (18.6%) than the after-PAC cohort (22.5%; p=0.240). However, neither of these differences was statistically significant. Median LOS was significantly shorter in the after-PAC cohort (4.79 days, IQR (3.80–6.12)) than in the before-PAC cohort (5.16 days (4.09–7.18); p=0.001). Moreover, the presence of documentation relevant to the planned anaesthesia in the medical records was significantly more common for after-PAC patients.

Conclusions
The establishment of the PAC reduced the rate of planned surgery cancellations but increased the rate of recorded intraoperative anaesthesia events. Patients who attended the PAC had a significantly shorter LOS and more anaesthesia-related information in their medical records.

Trial registration number
NCT05520229.

Objectives
To determine if carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for common breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home is feasible and acceptable in the UK, and if it would be feasible to test this intervention in a future definitive randomised controlled trial.

Design
We conducted a two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomised, open pilot trial of the intervention versus usual care, with a 1:1 allocation ratio, using convergent mixed methods.

Setting
Home-based care without 24/7 paid care provision, in three UK sites.

Participants
Participants were dyads of adult patients and carers: patients in the last weeks of their life who wished to die at home and lay carers who were willing to be trained to give subcutaneous medication. Strict risk assessment criteria needed to be met before the approach, including a known history of substance abuse or carer ability to be trained to competency.

Intervention
Intervention-group carers received training by local nurses using a manualised training package.

Primary outcome measures
Quantitative data were collected at baseline and 6–8 weeks post-bereavement and via carer diaries. Interviews with carers and healthcare professionals explored attitudes to, experiences of and preferences for giving subcutaneous medication and experience of trial processes. The main outcomes of interest were feasibility, acceptability, recruitment rates, attrition and selection of the most appropriate outcome measures.

Secondary outcome measures
The secondary outcome measure was time to symptom relief, calculated using data items from the carer diary, after the patient had died.

Results
In total, 40 out of 101 eligible dyads were recruited (39.6%), which met the feasibility criterion of recruiting >30% of eligible dyads. The expected recruitment target (50 dyads) was not reached, as fewer than expected participants were identified. Although the overall retention rate was 55% (22/40), this was substantially unbalanced (30% (6/20) usual care and 80% (16/20) intervention). The feasibility criterion of >40% retention was, therefore, considered not met. A total of 12 carers (intervention, n=10; usual care, n=2) and 20 healthcare professionals were interviewed. The intervention was considered acceptable, feasible and safe in the small study population. The intervention group had a considerably shorter time to medication administration than the usual-care group (median time to administer medication in intervention=5 min, usual-care=105 min). Intervention group carers felt confident in administering medication. Healthcare professional support was sought by intervention group carers in 24 out of 147 (16.3%) medication administration entries. The context of the feasibility study was not ideal, as district nurses were overstretched, unfamiliar with research methods and possibly not in equipoise. A disparity in readiness to consider the intervention was demonstrated between carers, who were uniformly enthusiastic, and healthcare professionals who were not. Findings confirmed methodological and ethics issues pertaining to researching the last days of life care.

Conclusion
The success of a future definitive trial is uncertain because of equivocal results in the progression criteria, particularly poor recruitment overall and a low retention rate in the usual-care group. Future work regarding the intervention should include understanding the context of UK areas where this has been adopted, ascertaining wider public views and exploring healthcare professional views on burden and risk in the NHS context. There should be consideration of the need for national policy and the most appropriate quantitative outcome measures to use. This will help to ascertain if there are unanswered questions to be studied in a trial.

Trial registration number
ISRCTN11211024.

Introduction
Teenage pregnancy remains a critical global health issue, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The intergenerational transmission of teenage pregnancy underscores the need for targeted interventions. Existing research on intergenerational approaches is fragmented, with varying methodologies and outcomes. This scoping review seeks to address this gap by answering the following research questions: What are the available intergenerational interventions for teenage pregnancy, and what are the associated risks and protective factors for early and late teenage pregnancy?

Methods and analysis
This study does not involve primary data collection and therefore does not require ethical approval. The review will be conducted in five stages: identifying the research question; identifying relevant studies; study selection; charting the data; and collating, summarising and reporting the results. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, grey literature and relevant organisational websites will be conducted for literature published between 2014 and 2024. Data will be extracted using a standardised form and synthesised narratively. Stakeholder consultation will be conducted to refine findings and ensure relevance. The findings will be reported in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The results will be presented through narrative synthesis, with tables and charts used to summarise key information.

Ethics and dissemination
As the review is based on publicly available data, ethical approval is not required. Ethical clearance will be sought for stakeholder consultations, if necessary. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, conferences, policy briefs and shared openly on the Open Science Framework (OSF). This protocol is registered in the OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CM9WK).

Objectives
Ensuring equity in clinical trials has been declared a global priority. Australia is competitive in the international clinical trial sphere. We aimed to explore factors that influence oncology clinical trial participation in Australia.

Design
Scoping review.

Data sources
On 27 May 2024, a systematic search using a predefined strategy was conducted across four electronic databases (Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE and Scopus), grey literature and hand searches.

Eligibility criteria
All cancer (haematological and non-haematological) clinical trials that discussed factors influencing participation in Australia were included. There were no language or age restrictions.

Data extraction and synthesis
Data were extracted using a predesigned extraction tool. Quantitative results were analysed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data were synthesised using a framework method into four domains (1) patients, (2) healthcare professionals, (3) clinical trials and (4) health services.

Results
Of 1084 citations identified, 393 duplicates were removed. Of the 691 titles and abstracts screened, 54 articles underwent full-text review, and 42 articles were included in the final analysis. Key factors that influence clinical trial participation were identified across all domains, many consistent with the international literature. For example, while self-reported willingness emerged as a key facilitator across diverse patient groups, cohort studies revealed lower participation rates for migrant populations, older patients and those residing in regional areas. Importantly, we were also able to identify the foundations of an evidence base of interventions that directly support increased clinical trial participation.

Conclusion
This scoping review contributes new findings to a body of international literature, while contributing a unique Australian perspective. These findings establish the foundations of an evidence base that supports inclusive clinical trial participation.

Introduction
Symptom management is crucial in cancer care, yet patient symptoms are often overlooked in routine care. There is some evidence that electronic symptom monitoring and management can improve patients’ physical function, symptom control, quality of life and survival outcomes. However, the evidence of the impact on survival outcomes in patients with advanced cancer is still limited and debated. This study aims to conduct a prospective randomised controlled trial by a professional symptom management team to monitor and manage symptoms in advanced cancer patients via an electronic information systems for patient-reported outcomes (ePRO) system (WeChat mini-program) and to verify its effectiveness on improving overall survival.

Methods and analysis
This is a single-centre, prospective, open-labelled, randomised, parallel-controlled clinical trial targeting patients with advanced cancer. We plan to recruit 940 patients using a stratified block randomisation method based on different tumour types. The control group will receive a symptom management self-care manual (both electronic and paper versions). Similarly, the intervention group will receive the same manual and education while also received symptom management by the hospital’s specialised symptom management team through the ePRO system. The primary outcome is comparison of overall survival between groups at the 24-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes will include quality of life, psychological status and incidence of adverse events.

Ethics and dissemination
The study protocol and related documents received approval from the Ethics Committee of Peking University Cancer Hospital (IRB) in December 2023 (2023YJZ99). Ethical approval will be obtained before implementing any major study revisions in the future. The results of this study will be disseminated through academic seminars, peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences.

Trial registration number
ChiCTR2400081247.