Search Results for: Scompenso Cardiaco. Gestione in MG dalla diagnosi al follow-up

Introduction
Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) is the most common endocrine malignancy, with a high 5-year survival rate of approximately 98%. Despite advances in diagnosis and treatment, up to 20% of patients experience recurrence, adversely affecting their quality of life. Predictive models have been developed to assess recurrence risk and guide clinical decision-making, but these models often face limitations such as retrospective design, lack of diversity in study populations and absence of external validation. The primary aim is to externally validate existing predictive models for DTC recurrence using prospective data from a diverse Latin American cohort. The secondary aim is to explore opportunities for model recalibration to improve their performance in our population.

Methods and analysis
The CaTaLiNA study is a multicentre prospective observational study conducted across 10 hospitals in five Latin American countries, including Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay and Mexico. Patients aged 18 years or older receiving treatment for DTC, such as the first thyroid surgery, active surveillance or radiofrequency ablation will be included. Recruitment will occur from November 2023 to June 2025, with follow-up extending until June 2028. Data collection will include baseline clinical, surgical and histological characteristics, treatment details and follow-up outcomes. Statistical analysis will follow the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis guidelines, using imputation strategies for missing data and evaluating calibration and discrimination of the prediction models. Calibration measures include the ratio of expected and observed events, calibration slope and calibration plot, while discrimination will be assessed using the C-index and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Ethics and dissemination
This study protocol was approved by Comité de Ética de Investigación en Seres Humanos de la Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ ‘CEISH-USFQ’ APO-010–2023-CEIHS-USFQ Oficio No. 161-2023-CA-23030M-CEISH-USFQ. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications.

Nursing Up: ‘Sentenza storica. Ora fare pulizia’

In Italia le nuove diagnosi di tumori del sangue sono ogni anno 30mila. Di queste, circa 1.100 riguardano bambini e adolescenti. Complessivamente sono 500mila le persone che convivono con i…

Ecg, holter pressorio e cardiaco. Dalla prossima settimana nel Lazio sarà possibile fare questi esami prescritti dal medico a carico del Servizio sanitario nazionale in farmacia e ottenere la telerefertazione…

Ecg, holter pressorio e cardiaco. Dalla prossima settimana nel Lazio sarà possibile fare questi esami prescritti dal medico a carico del Servizio sanitario nazionale in farmacia e ottenere la telerefertazione…

Introduction
Approximately 1 in 13 Australian children have a neurodevelopmental disability. This project aims to assess the effectiveness and implementation of an online parenting support programme, Parenting Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (PACT) Online, for parents of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities for improving the parent–child relationship and parent and child outcomes.

Methods and analysis
This hybrid type 1 randomised controlled trial will focus on evaluating intervention effectiveness and understanding the context for implementation. The primary outcome is observed emotional availability within parent–child interactions assessed at postintervention (12 weeks postbaseline) with additional measurement at follow-up (6 months postbaseline). Secondary outcomes include (1) parent-reported emotional availability, (2) parental mindfulness, (3) parent mental health, (4) psychological flexibility, (5) adjustment to child’s disability, (6) health behaviour and (7) regulatory abilities as well as child outcomes of (1) mental health, (2) adaptive behaviour and (3) regulatory abilities. Evaluation of implementation will include an economic evaluation of costs and consequences, and an implementation analysis grounded in the consolidated framework for implementation research with a focus on contextual factors influencing implementation.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval has been obtained from the University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (023/HE000040). Dissemination of study outcomes will occur through the appropriate scientific channels. Long-term implementation will be grounded within the implementation analysis and occur in partnership with the partner organisations and consumer engagement panel. This will include releasing the PACT Online intervention as a massive open online course on the edX platform if support for intervention effectiveness and implementation is found.

Trial registration number
ACTRN12623000612617; this trial has been registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.

Objectives
To identify clustered trajectories of self-reported disability following the initiation of care by a physical therapist in outpatient orthopaedic settings and to determine baseline factors that distinguish between different trajectories.

Design
Retrospective cohort study using electronic health record and patient-reported outcome data.

Setting
Data were extracted from the ATI Patient Outcomes Registry, encompassing patient encounters from over 900 ATI outpatient physical therapy clinics in 26 states across the USA.

Participants
Patients receiving physical therapy after surgery were excluded. The final analytical sample included 597 245 unique patients initiating care between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2021 for management of a spine, upper extremity or lower extremity musculoskeletal condition.

Interventions
Patients received treatments which could include strengthening and range of motion exercises, manual therapy, education, functional training and pain-relieving modalities.

Primary and secondary outcome measures
The primary outcome was trajectory of self-reported, joint-specific disability measure scores up to 6 months following initial evaluation.

Results
Three distinct disability trajectory clusters were identified (proportion of sample; beta coefficient (95% CI)): significant immediate worsening (3.4%; –1.31 (–1.33, –1.28)), significant gradual improvement (61.4%; (0.36 (0.35, 0.36)) and minimal change (35.2%; –0.20 (–0.21, –0.19)). Results were similar when stratified by primary diagnosis of upper extremity, lower extremity or spine conditions, with small differences in the relative proportion of trajectory class membership by body region. Predictive factors for less favourable disability trajectories included older age, lower physical and mental health scores, body region, higher social deprivation index, insurance type and certain comorbidities.

Conclusions
Most patients showed improvement in disability after exposure to treatment by a physical therapist, but a notable proportion experienced minimal change or worsening. Multiple demographic, physical, mental and social health factors differentiated trajectory class membership, highlighting opportunities to improve how and to whom this type of guideline-supported non-pharmacological care is delivered.

Introduction
Approximately 90% of people with experience of homelessness report adverse childhood experiences, having far-reaching consequences across the life course. Trauma-informed approaches have burgeoned in the last decade; however, biological understandings, including neurological perspectives of the impact of trauma, are typically overlooked. At present, there is little evidence exploring the impacts of executive function (EF) deficits in adulthood as a result of childhood trauma from a lived experience perspective, with none specifically exploring the role these deficits might play in homelessness.

Methods and analysis
The proposed research takes a realist evaluative synthesis approach combining evidence from the extant literature with qualitative data from professionals involved in the delivery of services to support people with experience of homelessness (n=15–20) and people with experience of homelessness who have previously engaged with services (n=15–20).
A combination of keywords (Adverse childhood experiences, executive function, social functioning and complex needs) and their synonyms will be used to search databases MEDLINE, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and CINAHL. Data analysis will follow a realist logic, developing and refining programme theories. An iterative and cyclical approach to data analysis and evidence synthesis will be taken until the aims of the research have been met.

Ethics and dissemination
Findings from this study will contribute to new understandings of the pathways into and out of homelessness through the lens of EF. Findings will contribute to the development of a trauma-informed care toolkit for service providers. Findings will be disseminated via coproductive workshops, conferences and peer-reviewed publications.
This study has received ethical approval from the ethics committee at Northumbria University.

Introduction
Depression and anxiety are highly prevalent mental health conditions that significantly affect quality of life and cause societal burdens. However, their detection and diagnosis rates remain low owing to the limitations of the current screening methods. With rapid technological advancements and the proliferation of consumer-grade wearable devices and smartphones, their integration into digital phenotyping research has enabled the unobtrusive screening for depression and anxiety in natural settings. The Smartphone and Wearable Assessment for Real-Time Screening of Depression and Anxiety study aims to develop prediction algorithms to identify individuals at risk for depressive and anxiety disorders, as well as those with mild-to-severe levels of either condition or both. By collecting comprehensive data using smartphones and smartwatches, this study aims to facilitate the translation of artificial intelligence-based early detection research into clinical impact, thereby potentially enhancing patient care through more accurate and timely interventions.

Methods and analysis
This cross-sectional observational study will enrol up to 2500 participants (at least 1000) aged 19-59 years from South Korea via social media outreach and clinical referrals. The eligible participants must use a compatible smartphone. Each participant will be followed up for 4 weeks. Data will be collected using a custom-developed smartphone application called PixelMood. Active data collection will include daily, weekly and monthly self-report questionnaires incorporating validated scales, such as the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7. Passive data from smartphones include information on physical activity, location, ambient light and smartphone usage patterns. Optionally, participants using the Apple Watch or Galaxy Watch devices can provide additional data on physiological responses and sleep health. The primary outcome will be the development of machine-learning algorithms to predict depression and anxiety based on these digital biomarkers. We will employ various machine-learning techniques, including random forest, support vector machine and deep-learning models. The secondary outcomes will include the association between digital biomarkers and clinical measures, and the feasibility and acceptability of data collection methods. Various features characterising mobile usage behaviours, physical/social activity, sleep patterns, resting physiological states and circadian rhythms will be exploited to serve as potential digital phenotyping markers. Advanced machine-learning and deep-learning techniques will be applied to multimodal data for model generation.

Ethics and dissemination
This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Korea University Anam Hospital (approval number: 2023AN0506). The results of this study will be disseminated via multiple channels. The findings will be presented at local, national and international conferences in relevant fields, such as psychiatry, psychology and digital health. Manuscripts detailing the study results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication.

Trial registration number
The present study was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS, https://cris.nih.go.kr; identifier: KCT0009183).

Introduction
Low back pain (LBP) is highly prevalent across the Western world, including Switzerland (CH) and Belgium (BE), with women experiencing higher disability rates than men. Chronic LBP (CLBP), persisting beyond 3 months, leads to diminished health-related quality of life and increased healthcare and societal costs. Evidence indicates a direct relationship between body mass index (BMI) and CLBP severity, with high BMI significantly driving LBP-related healthcare expenses. Current evidence supports combining pain neuroscience education (PNE) with cognition-targeted exercise therapy (CTET) to effectively manage CLBP.
An economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial, entitled ‘Lifestyle Intervention in Overweight/Obese CLBP Patients: an International Multi-centre RCT’ (BO2WL), will be conducted in CH and BE. It aims to evaluate the addition of a lifestyle intervention to PNE and CTET compared with PNE and CTET alone for treating individuals with CLBP and overweight or obesity. This protocol outlines the details of the economic evaluation of this trial.

Methods and analysis
The trial consists of a 14-week intervention followed by a 52-week post-intervention follow-up. Primary outcomes include direct and indirect costs, as well as quality-adjusted life years and pain intensity. Cost data will be converted into 2026 Belgium (BE) and 2026 Swiss Francs (CHF) for CH, with a discount rate of 3.5%. Incremental cost-utility and cost-effectiveness ratios will be calculated from a societal perspective for each country.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethics approval was obtained by the local ethics committees (Bern, CH: project ID 2022–02210; Brussels and Geel, BE: BUN 1432022000296). Results of the main trial and economic evaluation will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration number
NCT05811624.

Introduction
As spaceflight missions become more frequent and prolonged, the effects of microgravity on the musculoskeletal system represent a critical concern for astronauts’ health given their increased risk of spinal pain and injury. A better understanding of the adaptations induced by microgravity on neuromuscular control of the spine is essential to guide the development of effective countermeasures. Thus, this systematic review will aim to investigate the effects of microgravity on the neuromuscular control of the spine.

Methods and analysis
This protocol has been developed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, grey literature and specialised space research resources will be searched from inception up to December 31, 2024. Screening processes, data extraction and risk of bias assessment will be conducted by two independent reviewers. Studies investigating the acute and long-term effects of microgravity on neuromuscular control of the spine will be included. Studies investigating spaceflight conditions or other protocols simulating microgravity, such as parabolic flights, dry immersion and long-term bed rest, will be considered eligible. Non-randomised studies of intervention with before-and-after design will represent the main studies of interest, and their risk of bias will be evaluated with the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions tool. Random-effect meta-analyses will be conducted for quantitative synthesis when clinical and methodological consistency is ensured. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines.

Ethics and dissemination
As this systematic review is based on previously published studies, no ethical approval is required. The findings will be disseminated through publication in an international peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences. All data relevant to the study will be included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42024608544.

Introduction
RaCeR 2 is a pragmatic multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial, with full economic evaluation. The primary aim is to assess whether individualised (early) patient-directed rehabilitation (EPDR) results in less shoulder pain and disability at 12 weeks postrandomisation following surgical repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder compared with the current standard (delayed) rehabilitation. This paper provides the protocol for the RaCeR 2 health economic evaluation.

Methods and analysis
The health economic analysis of RaCeR 2 is made up of three phases: (1) development of an initial state-transition model structure, (2) within-trial cost consequence analysis and (3) long-term model-based cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from the National Health Service and Personal Social Service perspective in England. Descriptive statistics (eg, mean, standard deviation, 95% confidence intervals and minimum and maximum values) will be reported for within-trial resource use, costs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Health state-specific costs and HRQoL will be estimated using regression model approaches and used to inform a state-transition simulation model designed to quantify the long-term costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) experienced by patients over the model’s time horizon. Where appropriate, final CEA model results will be reported as cost per QALY gained for individualised EPDR versus standard (delayed) rehabilitation. Model assumptions and overall parameter uncertainty will be tested using probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses. All regression analyses will be adjusted for baseline participant demographic and symptomatic characteristics.

Ethics and dissemination
A favourable ethical review was granted by London-Stanmore Research Ethics Committee (23/LO/0195) on 13 April 2023. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, at scientific conferences, and via the study website.

Trial registration number
ISRCTN11499185

Introduction
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women worldwide. Survivors often experience physical and psychological effects arising from breast cancer and its treatment, which can last months and years, adversely impacting quality of life. As the number of early breast cancer survivors increases, models of specialist-led follow-up care in hospital settings are not sustainable and evidence suggests that they may not meet survivors’ needs. Nurse-enabled, shared-care, follow-up models between cancer specialist and primary care teams have potential to address this need.

Methods and analysis
The proposed research is a multicentre, prospective, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial designed to test the effectiveness and implementation of IBIS-Survivorship, a follow-up care model for patients with early breast cancer who have completed primary treatment. The IBIS-Survivorship intervention involves a nurse-led consultation, development of a Survivorship Care Plan and case-conferencing between a breast care nurse and the patient’s primary care provider. This study seeks to recruit 1079 breast cancer survivors across six cancer centres (clusters) in Australia. Health-related quality of life at 12 months assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast Cancer questionnaire will be the primary endpoint, along with a range of patient-reported outcomes, safety indicators and cost-effectiveness measures as secondary endpoints. General and generalised linear mixed models will be used to assess the effectiveness of the intervention versus usual care. Implementation and process outcomes will be assessed using the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance framework.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval was provided by the Metro South Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2020/QMS/59892) and reciprocally across the other five trial sites under National Mutual Acceptance arrangements. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed academic journal publications and presentations at national and international conferences.

Trial registration
Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) Trial ID: ACTRN12621000188831.

Introduction
Young people (YP) whose parents have depression are at elevated risk for developing depression themselves and could benefit from preventive interventions. However, when parents are in a depressive episode, this reduces the effects of psychological interventions for depression in YP. Moreover, parental depression is often managed suboptimally in usual care. There is, therefore, a case for identifying and optimising parental depression treatment to enhance the effectiveness of psychological preventive interventions for depression in YP.

Methods and analysis
This is a randomised controlled trial (Skills for adolescent WELLbeing) to determine the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) intervention compared with usual care in increasing the time to a major depressive episode in YP by 9-month follow-up (primary outcome). The intervention offers a 12-week treatment-optimisation phase for parents depressed at study entry, followed by randomisation of the young person to a small group manualised online CBT programme facilitated by a therapist. YP allocated to the intervention will receive eight weekly sessions plus three monthly continuation sessions. Secondary outcomes include the number of depression-free weeks, mental health symptoms and functioning. Mechanisms of intervention action will be assessed with mediation analysis of quantitative data and thematic analysis of qualitative interviews. Participants (parents/carers with depression and their children aged 13–19 years) will be identified through existing cohorts of adults with depression, from primary care through health boards in Wales and England, UK, schools and advertising including via social media.

Ethics and dissemination
The trial has received ethical approval from Wales NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC) 5, the Health Research Authority and Health and Care Research Wales (IRAS 305331; REC 22/WA/0254). This manuscript is based on V.5.7 of the protocol (17 January 2025). Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Reports and social media messages will be used to disseminate findings to the wider public.

Trial registration number
ISRCTN13924193 (date registered: 15 March 2023).

Introduction
Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a chronic condition causing arterial narrowing or blockage, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. Hybrid revascularisation combines open surgical and endovascular techniques to manage multilevel disease by addressing inflow and outflow obstructions. Despite increasing adoption, evidence on the long-term outcomes of these procedures remains limited.

Objective
To evaluate the long-term outcomes of hybrid revascularisation procedures in PAD, including patency rates, limb salvage, survival, reintervention rates and complications, and to provide evidence-based insights for clinical practice and research.

Methods and analysis
This review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. It will include randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and large case series (≥10 patients, with at least 1 year of follow-up) assessing adult patients undergoing hybrid revascularisation for PAD. Primary outcomes are patency rates, limb salvage and survival; secondary outcomes include complication rates, functional improvements and quality of life. Searches will be conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and ClinicalTrials.gov. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment will be performed independently in duplicate by two reviewers. Meta-analyses with random-effects models will summarise findings where feasible, while narrative synthesis will address instances of insufficient data. Subgroup analyses will explore outcomes by demographics, lesion characteristics and procedural details. Risk of bias will be assessed using Cochrane and Newcastle-Ottawa tools.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval is not required. Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42024615809.

Introduction
Thousands of patients with mental illness are admitted to acute adult mental health wards every year in England, where local guidance recommends that all mental health settings be entirely smokefree. Mental health Trusts presently invest substantial effort and resources to implement smoke-free policies and to deliver tobacco dependence treatment to patients. Providing adequate support can help those who smoke remain abstinent or quit smoking during their smoke-free inpatient stay and beyond. At present, little is known about how best to support patients to prevent their return to pre-admission smoking behaviours after discharge from a smoke-free mental health inpatient stay. We have developed an intervention which includes targeted resources to support smoking-related behaviour change in patients following discharge from a smoke-free mental health setting. The aim of this trial is to determine the feasibility of a large-scale clinical trial to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the SCEPTRE intervention, compared with usual care.

Methods and analysis
This feasibility study will be an individually randomised, controlled trial in eight National Health Service mental health Trusts recruiting adults (≥18 years) admitted to an acute adult mental health inpatient setting who smoke tobacco on admission, or at any point during their inpatient stay. Consenting participants will be randomised to receive a 12-week intervention consisting of components aimed at promoting or maintaining positive smoking-related behaviour change following discharge from a smoke-free mental health inpatient setting or usual care. Data will be collected at baseline, 3 months and a second timepoint between 4 and 6 months post-randomisation. With 64 participants (32 in each group), the trial will allow a participation rate of 15% and completion rate of 80% to be estimated within a 95% CI of ±3% and ±10%, respectively. The analysis will be descriptive and follow a prespecified plan.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethics approval was obtained from the North West—Greater Manchester West Research Ethics Committee. We will share results widely through local, national and international academic, clinical and patient and public involvement networks. The results will be disseminated through conference presentations, peer-reviewed journals and will be published on the trial website: https://sceptreresearch.com/.

Trial registration number
ISRCTN77855199.