Objectives
This study aims to compare the outcomes of different pharmacotherapies for subjective tinnitus patients using a comprehensive network meta-analysis.
Design
Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Data sources
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL Complete databases were searched from inception until 6 March 2025.
Eligibility criteria
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing pharmacotherapy treatment effects for subjective tinnitus patients were included with tinnitus severity as the primary outcome, and annoyance and tinnitus loudness as secondary outcomes.
Data extraction and synthesis
Two reviewers independently retrieved and screened full articles using a standardised and prepiloted Excel form. Network meta-analysis was conducted with heterogeneity, study risk of bias (ROB), risk of publication bias and certainty of evidence examined using I2, 2, ROB2, funnel plots and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation assessments.
Results
Sixty full-text RCTs from 21 countries were included in the analysis with 22% low ROB, 58% some concerns and 20% high ROB. The heterogeneity parameter I2 was 0.67 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.84), 0 (95% CI 0 to 0.9) and 0.63 (95% CI 0 to 0.89) for the severity, annoyance and loudness network analysis, respectively. The only significant publication bias assessment by Egger’s test was detected in the loudness network analysis (p