Search Results for: Long COVID: principali risultati, meccanismi e raccomandazioni

Objective
Regular exercise significantly benefits mental health, yet its therapeutic potential in psychiatric care remains underutilised. Understanding the factors influencing physical activity in individuals with mental illness is crucial to realising its full therapeutic potential. Our study seeks to explore motivational and socio-demographic determinants affecting exercise habits in individuals with mental illness and compare them to those without mental illness.

Design and setting
Distribution of the link to a cross-sectional online survey at psychiatric clinics, practices, university events and sports clubs, via self-help group email lists and on social media.

Methods
An online survey using validated questionnaires supplemented with self-developed items was conducted. Statistical analysis encompassed unpaired t-tests and 2 tests to compare individuals with and without mental illness, as well as multiple linear regression to investigate the relationship between childhood exercise experience, psychometrics and current physical activity behaviour in individuals with mental illness.

Participants
1564 individuals (66.5% female) including 417 diagnosed with any kind of mental illness.

Results
In comparison with mentally healthy participants, individuals diagnosed with mental illness displayed notably lower activity levels (eg, engaging in regular physical activity 55.6% vs 69.3%, x2(1, n=1458) = 26.03, p

Clozapine remains the gold standard, outperforming several antipsychotics, while specific combinations may offer added benefits but require careful risk-benefit evaluation. Networks sparsity increases the likelihood of chance findings for estimates based on single studies. These results emphasise the need for personalised treatment, further research comparing non-clozapine antipsychotic combinations to high-dose clozapine monotherapy, and studies on long-term outcomes.

Background
Survival rates after a diagnosis of cancer are improving. Poorly managed gastrointestinal (GI) side effects can interfere with delivery of curative cancer treatment. Long-term physical side effects of cancer therapy impinge on quality of life in up to 25% of those treated for cancer, and GI side effects are the most common and troublesome.

Aim
To provide comprehensive, practical guidance on the management of acute and chronic luminal gastrointestinal symptoms arising during and after treatment for cancer

Methods
A multidisciplinary expert group including patients treated for cancer, divided into working parties to identify, and synthesise recommendations for the optimal assessment, diagnosis and appropriate interventions for luminal GI side effects of systemic and local cancer therapies. Recommendations were developed using the principles of the BMJ AGREE II reporting.

Results
103 recommendations were agreed. The importance of the patient perspective and what can be done to support patients are emphasised. Key physiological principles underlying the development of GI toxicity arising from cancer therapy are outlined. Individual symptoms or symptom clusters are poor at distinguishing the underlying cause(s), and investigations are required if empirical therapy does not lead rapidly to significant benefits. Patients frequently have multiple GI causes for symptoms; all need to be diagnosed and optimally treated to achieve resolution. Investigations and management approaches now known to be ineffective or of questionable benefit are highlighted.

Conclusions
The physical, emotional and financial costs to individuals, their families and society from cancer therapy can be considerable. Identifying and signposting affected patients who require specialist services is the role of all clinicians. Progress in the treatment of cancer increasingly means that patients require expert, multidisciplinary supportive care providing effective and safe treatment at every stage of the cancer journey. Development of such expertise should be prioritised as should the education of health professionals and the public in what, when and how acute and chronic gastrointestinal symptoms and complications should be managed.

Background
To treat liver failure, three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is a promising technology used to construct hepatic tissue models. However, current research on bioprinting of hepatic tissue models primarily relies on conventional single-cell-based bioprinting, where individual functional hepatocytes are dispersed and isolated within hydrogels, leading to insufficient treatment outcomes due to inadequate cell functionality.

Objective
Here, we aim to bioprint a hepatic tissue model using functional hepatocyte organoids (HOs) and evaluate its liver-specific functions in vitro and in vivo.

Design
Human chemically induced pluripotent stem cells (hCiPSCs) were used as a robust and non-genome-integrative cell source to produce highly viable and functional HOs (hCiPSC-HOs). An oxygen-permeable microwell device was used to enhance oxygen supply, ensuring high cell viability and promoting hCiPSC-HOs maturation. To maintain the long-term biofunction of hCiPSC-HOs, spheroid-based bioprinting was employed to construct hepatic tissue models (3DP-HOs). 3DP-HOs were intraperitoneally implanted in mice with liver failure.

Results
3DP-HOs demonstrated enhanced cell viability when compared with a model fabricated using single-cell-based bioprinting and exhibited gene profiles closely resembling hCiPSC-HOs while maintaining liver-specific functionality. Moreover, 3DP-HOs implantation significantly improved survival in mice with CCl4-induced acute-on-chronic liver failure and also Fah–/– mice with liver failure. 3DP-HOs significantly reduced liver injury, inflammation and fibrosis indices while promoting liver regeneration and biofunction expression.

Conclusion
Our bioprinted hepatic tissue model exhibits remarkable therapeutic efficacy for liver failure and holds great potential for clinical research in the field of liver regenerative medicine.

Objective
This study explored the experience of stigma and access to healthcare by persons with long COVID from the majority Dutch and two ethnic minority populations (Turkish and Moroccan) living in the Netherlands.

Design
This was a cross-sectional qualitative study that employed inductive and deductive thematic approaches to data analysis using MAXQDA.

Setting and participants
Between October 2022 and January 2023, 23 semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants of Dutch, Moroccan and Turkish ethnic origins with long COVID living in the Netherlands. Participants were men and women aged 30 years and above.

Results
Guided by the concepts of stigma and candidacy, the findings are structured according to the broader themes of stigma and access to care. The findings show that people with long COVID suffer self and public stigma resulting from the debilitating illness and symptoms. Especially among Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority participants, strong filial obligations and gendered expectations of responsibility and support within their communities further worsen self-stigma. This experience of stigma persisted within healthcare where lack of information and appropriate care pathways led to feelings of frustration and abandonment, especially for participants with pre-existing health conditions which further complicate candidacy. Under the access to healthcare theme, the findings show multiple challenges in accessing healthcare for long COVID due to several multifaceted factors related to the various stages of candidacy which impacted access to care. Particularly for Turkish and Moroccan ethnic minority participants, additional challenges resulting from limited access to information, pre-existing structural challenges and experience of stereotyping based on ethnicity or assumed migrant identity by health professionals further complicate access to health information and long COVID care.

Conclusions
The findings call for urgent attention and research to identify and coordinate healthcare for long COVID. There is also a need for accessible, informative and tailored support systems to facilitate patients’ access to information and care pathways for long COVID. Providing tailored information and support, addressing the various barriers that hinder optimal operating conditions in healthcare and leveraging on social networks is crucial for addressing stigma and facilitating candidacy for persons with long COVID towards improving access to care.

Objectives
To examine longitudinal trends and identify key indicators of nursing workforce shortages across Canadian provinces and territories using publicly available data.

Design
Retrospective ecological study.

Setting
Primary and secondary care in Canada. National data were extracted from Statistics Canada and the Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) between 2015 and 2022 at the provincial and territorial levels.

Participants
The study included registered nurses and registered psychiatric nurses employed in the Canadian healthcare system. Licensed practical nurses and nurse practitioners were excluded. Territories with missing data were excluded from the analysis.

Primary and secondary outcome measures
The primary outcome was nursing workforce shortage, assessed in relation to potential indicators, including the nurse-to-population ratio, job vacancy rate and annual costs of overtime work, using structural equation modelling (SEM).

Results
The Canadian nursing workforce grew by 8.0%, with the nurse-to-population ratio increasing from 11.08 to 12.13 per 1000 population. Job vacancies rose by 6.4% (95% CI: 6.29 to 6.51%), overtime hours increased by 13.09 million (95% CI: 10.28 to 15.87) and yearly overtime costs rose by 0.78 billion CAD (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.92). SEM revealed significant associations between workforce shortage and the nurse-to-population ratio (standardised β=0.863, 95% CI: 0.942 to 0.975), job vacancy rate (β=0.958, 95% CI: 0.927 to 0.990) and yearly overtime costs (β=0.983, 95% CI: 0.967 to 0.999). Predicted shortage scores were lower before 2020 but increased significantly after 2020, potentially reflecting the impact of COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions
Despite growth in the nursing workforce, increasing job vacancies, overtime hours and costs highlight persistent shortages. Monitoring these indicators is essential for effective workforce planning and sustainable healthcare delivery.

Background
Despite the growth of the population of older people living with HIV (PLWH), data on cognitive disorders among older PLWH, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, are scarce. These data are especially underrepresented in the literature from eastern Europe and central Asia (EECA).

Objectives
This scoping review aimed to describe the peer-reviewed literature on cognitive health among PLWH in the EECA region.

Eligibility criteria
We selected articles from peer-reviewed journals that reported on cognitive assessments or the prevalence and characteristics of cognitive disorders among adult (≥18 years) PLWH in EECA countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan). Studies assessing cognition among PLWH related to traumatic brain injury, brain tumours, COVID-19, meningitis, neurosyphilis and/or other central nervous system infections were excluded.

Source of evidence
We searched for relevant data published up to March 2025 using four online databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and PsycINFO).

Charting methods
Covidence, a web-based collaborative software platform, was used for data screening and extraction. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts and full texts, resolving disagreements through consensus. The data were extracted based on the predefined data extraction criteria.

Results
A total of 1388 peer-reviewed articles were identified; 295 articles were removed due to duplication; and 1053 and 25 articles were excluded based on the abstract/title and full-text screenings, respectively. Finally, 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. All 15 studies used different neuropsychological assessments to measure cognitive performance by domain and/or cognitive disorders among various subgroups of PLWH. One cross-sectional study focused on older populations (≥40 years old), using standardised cognitive performance assessment tests. However, it neither provided information about the prevalence estimate of cognitive disorders nor identified risk factors.

Conclusion
Existing literature on cognitive disorders among older PLWH in the EECA region is limited and insufficient to estimate prevalence, or identify risk factors, and ultimately develop appropriate policy addressing the needs of older PLWH in this region. This scoping review underscores the urgent need for large-scale, longitudinal studies employing standardised, culturally adapted neuropsychological batteries and adherence to rigorous reporting standards.

Introduction
Maintaining a satisfactory level of physical activity (PA) after cardiovascular rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) is an important public health issue. However, more than half of patients do not maintain recommended levels of PA in the long term. There is growing interest in the use of cognitive-behavioural interventions that actively involve both health professionals and patients in education and research settings. We hypothesise that a personalised therapeutic education programme (PTEP) delivered by peers in collaboration with health professionals may help patients with CHD maintain appropriate levels of PA after participation in a cardiovascular rehabilitation programme (CRP).

Methods and analysis
We designed a prospective randomised controlled trial (the P-HEART-NER study) conducted jointly by health professionals and patients as experts or peers. The primary objective is to assess the impact of PTEP on objective levels of moderate to vigorous PA—measured by accelerometers—6 months after cessation of CRP. The secondary objectives are (1) to assess the impact of the intervention on light PA and sedentary time (also measured by accelerometry), (2) to evaluate changes in cardiovascular health indicators, including blood pressure, waist circumference and lipid profile, (3) to assess changes in motivation towards PA (using the Motivation Scale Towards Health-Oriented Physical Activity), PA self-efficacy (measured by the Exercise Confidence Survey) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Patients will be enrolled at the end of a 4-week phase 2 CRP after a myocardial infarction. The intervention will consist of two teleconsultations and a group workshop at 2, 4 and 5 months, respectively, each jointly delivered by a peer and a health professional. The peers who will deliver the intervention will be patients who have participated in a phase 2 CRP with good compliance and who will be trained in motivational enhancement and cognitive behavioural therapies by health professionals and expert patients. The control group will not complete the PTEP.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval was granted by the French regional ethics committee CPP Ile de France (Ref CPPIDF1-2023-DI36-Cat2). All participants will sign a written informed consent form. The results will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number
NCT05927363.

Objectives
Prediction models for post-stroke mortality can support medical decision-making. Although numerous models have been developed, external validation studies determining the models’ transportability beyond the original settings are lacking. We aimed to assess the performance of two prediction models for post-stroke mortality in Berlin, Germany.

Design
We used data from the Berlin-SPecific Acute Treatment in Ischaemic or hAemorrhagic stroke with Long-term follow-up (B-SPATIAL) registry.

Setting
Multicentre stroke registry in Berlin, Germany.

Participants
Adult patients admitted within 6 hours after symptom onset and with a 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases discharge diagnosis of ischaemic stroke, haemorrhagic stroke or transient ischaemic attack at one of 15 hospitals with stroke units between 1 January 2016 and 31 January 2021.

Primary outcome measures
We evaluated calibration (calibration-in-the-large, intercept, slope and plot) and discrimination performance (c-statistic) of Bray et al’s 30-day mortality and Smith et al’s in-hospital mortality prediction models. Information on mortality was supplemented by Berlin city registration office records.

Results
For the validation of Bray et al’s model, we included 7879 patients (mean age 75; 55.0% men). We observed 763 (9.7%) deaths within 30 days of stroke compared with 680 (8.6%) predicted. The model’s c-statistic was 0.865 (95% CI: 0.851 to 0.879). For Smith et al’s model, we performed the validation among 1931 patients (mean age 75; 56.2% men), observing 105 (5.4%) in-hospital deaths compared with the 92 (4.8%) predicted. The c-statistic was 0.891 (95% CI: 0.864 to 0.918). The calibration plots of both models revealed an underestimation of the mortality risk for high-risk patients.

Conclusions
Among Berlin stroke patients, both models showed good calibration performance for low and medium-risk patients and high discrimination while underestimating risk among high-risk patients. The acceptable performance of Bray et al’s model in Berlin illustrates how a small number of routinely collected variables can be sufficient for valid prediction of post-stroke mortality.

L’Italia ha contribuito con Statale di Milano, Cnr e Siena

Introduction
Striking the balance in 24-hour movement behaviour (sedentary behaviour, physical activity and sleep) is expected to reduce the risk of a new major cardiovascular event or death (MACE). We aim to determine the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the RISE (Reduce and Interrupt sedentary behaviour using a blended behavioural intervention to Empower people at risk towards sustainable 24-hour movement behaviour change) intervention by improving 24-hour movement behaviour for prevention of MACE and gaining quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in community-dwelling people at risk with a first-ever stroke.

Methods and analysis
This assessor-blinded multicentre randomised controlled trial includes about 1000 participants with a first-ever stroke, of which 752 participants require secondary prevention based on their 24-hour movement behaviour. Participants will be randomly assigned to the experimental group (RISE intervention + usual care) or control (usual care) group. RISE is a 15-week blended care intervention: primary care physiotherapists coach people in their home setting using behaviour change techniques and the RISE eCoaching system. This system consists of: (1) an activity monitor, (2) a smartphone application that provides real-time feedback and contains e-learning modules and (3) a monitoring dashboard for the physiotherapist. A close relative of the participant is involved during the intervention to provide social support. The primary outcome is the effectiveness of the RISE intervention regarding the prevention of MACE measured at one year post randomisation using survival analysis comparing the experimental and control groups. Secondary outcomes include cost-effectiveness for MACE prevention and QALYs and changes in 24-hour movement behaviour over time using compositional data analysis.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval is obtained from Medical Ethics Review Committee Utrecht, NedMec NL83940.000.23. Findings will be disseminated through international peer-reviewed journals and conferences. A sustainable 24-hour movement behaviour change is needed to gain long-term benefits of lowering MACE in patients with stroke. The RISE intervention offers this foundation by integrating behaviour change techniques, the RISE eCoaching system, involvement of participatory support and extensively trained RISE physiotherapists. Consequently, the RISE intervention is expected to be (cost-)effective compared with usual care, and hence, this study will offer a foundation for implementing the RISE intervention in standard poststroke care.

Trial registration number
NCT06124248.

Purpose
The pathogenesis of the long-lasting symptoms which can follow an infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus (‘long covid’) is not fully understood. The ‘COroNaVirus post-Acute Long-term EffectS: Constructing an evidENCE base’ (CONVALESCENCE) study was established as part of the Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing COVID-19 UK National Core Study. We performed a deep phenotyping case-control study nested within two cohorts (the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children and TwinsUK) as part of CONVALESCENCE.

Participants
From September 2021 to May 2023, 349 participants attended the CONVALESCENCE deep phenotyping clinic at University College London. Four categories of participants were recruited: cases of long covid (long covid(+)/SARS-CoV-2(+)), alongside three control groups: those with neither long covid symptoms nor evidence of prior COVID-19 (long covid(-)/SARS-CoV-2(-); control group 1), those who self-reported COVID-19 and had evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, but did not report long covid (long covid(-)/SARS-CoV-2(+); control group 2) and those who self-reported persistent symptoms attributable to COVID-19 but no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection (long covid(+)/SARS-CoV-2(-); control group 3). Remote wearable measurements were performed up until February 2024.

Findings to date
This cohort profile describes the baseline characteristics of the CONVALESCENCE cohort. Of the 349 participants, 141 (53±15 years old; 21 (15%) men) were cases, 89 (55±16 years old; 11 (12%) men) were in control group 1, 75 (49±15 years old; 25 (33%) men) were in control group 2 and 44 (55±16 years old; 9 (21%) men) were in control group 3.

Future plans
The study aims to use a multiorgan score calculated as the cumulative total for each of nine domains (ie, lung, vascular, heart, kidney, brain, autonomic function, muscle strength, exercise capacity and physical performance). The availability of data preceding acute COVID-19 infection in cohorts may help identify the consequences of infection independent of pre-existing subclinical disease and also provide evidence of determinants that influence the development of long covid.

Introduction
Treatment of the node negative contralateral neck in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) remains debated, with no clear consensus. Prophylactic contralateral neck treatment (either surgically or via irradiation) is generally recommended when the estimated risk of occult nodal metastasis is >20%. Unfortunately, patients undergoing bilateral neck treatment often require long-term supportive care for swallowing dysfunction. Reducing the impact of treatment on long-term quality of life is key in patients with OPC who have a good prognosis and tend to be young and fit at presentation. Lymphatic mapping and the use of free-hand single photon emission CT (fhSPECT) combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy is a novel approach to address this clinical need. The Lymphatic mapping Of Oropharyngeal Cancer trial aims to (a) validate a lymphatic mapping protocol in OPC using new technology (fhSPECT) with radiotracers and (b) establish lymphatic drainage patterns and the occult metastatic rate in the contralateral neck in OPC.

Methods and analysis
The design is a prospective multicentre cohort trial to understand the lymphatic drainage pattern in 150 patients with OPC and unilateral neck metastases. The trial has two phases: (1) imaging phase (n=75)—aim: develop an imaging protocol to establish the lymphatic drainage pattern in a population of patients with proven unilateral neck metastasis from OPC. The intervention will involve peritumoural injection of radiotracer followed by fhSPECT scan under general anaesthesia (GA) (at time of examination under anaesthetic). A SPECT/CT scan (gold standard for lymphatic mapping) will be carried out subsequently as a comparator. The primary outcome is the rate of contralateral drainage. Secondary outcome is the accuracy of fhSPECT versus SPECT/CT. The number of contralateral nodes on SPECT/CT will be used as the denominator in calculating the sensitivity of fhSPECT in independently verified images. fhSPECT should achieve sensitivity >94%. A minimum number of 20/75 patients will be required to demonstrate contralateral drainage to proceed to the surgical stage. An imaging substudy (n=20) aims to develop a secondary imaging protocol in the event of

Objectives
The COVID-19 pandemic induced significant changes in access policies to general practice (GP) in most countries. This study aimed to compare and discuss changes in the diagnostic patterns and GP procedures before and during the pandemic.

Design and setting
A register study including data from 11 Danish GP clinics.

Participants
Enlisted patients from GP followed 1 year before (February 2019 to January 2020; n=48 650) and 1 year during (April 2020 to March 2021; n=47 207) the COVID-19 pandemic.

Outcome measures
Diagnostic patterns, consultation type (face-to-face, email and phone), contact persons (GP or GP staff) and patient characteristics.

Results
The average number of contacts with GP increased from 6.3 contacts per year per patient before the pandemic to 8.3 annual contacts during the pandemic (p

Objectives
This study aims to determine key workforce variables (demographic, health and occupational) that predicted National Health Service (NHS) staff’s absence due to illness and expressed intention to leave their current profession.

Design, setting and participants
Staff from 18 NHS Trusts were surveyed between April 2020 and January 2021, and again approximately 12 months later.

Outcome measures
Logistic and linear regression were used to explore relationships between baseline exposures and four 12-month outcomes: absence due to COVID-19, absence due to non-COVID-19 illness, actively seeking employment outside current profession and regularly thinking about leaving current profession.

Results
22 555 participants (out of a possible 152 286 employees; 15%) completed the baseline questionnaire. 10 831 participants completed the short follow-up questionnaire at 12 months and 5868 also completed the long questionnaire; these participants were included in the analyses of sickness absence and intention to leave, respectively. 20% of participants took 5+ days of work absence for non-COVID-19 sickness in the 12 months between baseline and 12-month questionnaire; 14% took 5+ days of COVID-19-related sickness absence. At 12 months, 20% agreed or strongly agreed they were actively seeking employment outside their current profession; 24% thought about leaving their profession at least several times per week. Sickness absence (COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 related) and intention to leave the profession (actively seeking another role and thinking about leaving) were all more common among NHS staff who were younger, in a COVID-19 risk group, had a probable mental health disorder, and who did not feel supported by colleagues and managers.

Conclusions
Several factors affected both workforce retention and sickness absence. Of particular interest are the impact of colleague and manager support because they are modifiable. The NHS workforce is likely to benefit from training managers to speak with and support staff, especially those experiencing mental health difficulties. Further, staff should be given sufficient opportunities to form and foster social connections. Selection bias may have affected the presented results.

Introduction
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women experience inequitable cervical cancer outcomes including higher incidence and mortality rates than other Australian women. Cervical cancer can be prevented through human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, which is primarily delivered through school immunisation programmes and found to be very effective. However, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescents have lower rates of HPV vaccination uptake compared with non-Indigenous adolescents.

Objectives
This study explored the perspectives and experiences of HPV vaccination programme providers and school staff involved in the delivery of school-based HPV vaccination programmes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescents in Queensland.

Design
This qualitative project recruited 10 maximally diverse schools to participate. We purposively invited immunisation programme providers and school staff associated with delivering or supporting and used a snowballing approach to recruitment. We used an Indigenist Research approach and an ecological model for health to centre Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander experiences and priorities.

Participants
We interviewed 18 immunisation programme providers and school staff involved in delivery between 2020 and 2022. Interview topics included programme delivery and processes, engagement with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescents and caregivers, factors impacting uptake and completion, and suggestions for improvement.

Results
Stakeholders highlighted multilayered challenges navigating a school-based immunisation programme across health and education sectors, especially within the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This included logistical barriers around programme coordination and scheduling, roles and responsibilities, and communication issues between schools, programme providers, caregivers and adolescents. Four themes were identified: (1) co-ordination of the clinic between schools and programme providers, (2) supporting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families through the vaccination pathway, (3) HPV vaccination resources and (4) COVID-19 disruptions to HPV vaccination programme.

Conclusions
The findings suggest a need for better communication and coordination of the school-based clinic, including consideration of staff capacity and school resources; enhanced linkages with and support for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander student support staff and community organisations who play a critical role in supporting adolescents’ vaccination, and flexible methods of consent supported by culturally appropriate resources. These findings informed recommendations for improved practice and will contribute towards reaching Australia’s cervical cancer elimination targets.