Wearable devices, or devices worn on the bodies of patients such as the Apple Watch, FitBit, or other monitoring devices, offer opportunities to innovate and improve cancer care delivery, from prevention and screening through survivorship. Fueled partly by the COVID-19 pandemic and growing need for remote and virtual care, the number of studies of technology-supported health interventions in cancer— including studies on wearables in cancer care—has increased dramatically in the past 3 to 5 years. These studies underscore the potential offered by wearable devices across the landscape of cancer care delivery. Wearable devices may be used to support a range of activities including real-time monitoring of patient data, such as heart rate, blood pressure, or sleep quality, as well as allowing patients to directly report symptoms and mood using the wearable device. This allows for more accurate and ongoing health-related data collection for patients that can be used to manage and adjust treatment and to predict the potential for negative outcomes such as hospitalization. Integrating wearable devices into cancer care delivery holds promise for improving outcomes for patients across the care continuum.
Search Results for: Linee guida sulla diagnosi e screening del dolore neuropatico
Here's what we've found for you
Scoperta una nuova forma ereditaria di tumore al seno
Un team di medici e ricercatori IEO ha scoperto una […]
Frequency of self-directed dying in the Netherlands: research protocol of a cross-sectional mixed-methods study
Introduction
In the Netherlands, assisting in suicide is allowed for physicians and regulated by the Termination of Life on Request and Assisted Suicide (review procedures) Act. However, some people decide to end their lives outside the medical domain, without a physician’s help. Two approaches for such self-directed dying are voluntary stopping eating and drinking (VSED) and independently taking lethal medication attended by a confidant (ILMC). The frequency of deaths by either of these methods in the Netherlands was examined in 2007. Since then, there have been societal, political and healthcare developments which may have had an influence on the frequency of self-directed dying. The primary objective of this study is to estimate how many people in the Netherlands currently die by VSED or ILMC. Secondary objectives include providing insight in the characteristics and quality of dying of people who choose for self-directed dying.
Methods and analysis
This cross-sectional study consists of an online questionnaire study (January to February 2024) among a randomly drawn sample (n=37 500) from a representative panel of the Dutch adult population in which participants are asked about potential experiences of close relatives choosing for VSED or ILMC. A two-stage screening procedure will be used to determine whether the respondents’ experiences represent a death by VSED or ILMC. Additional interviews (n=40) will be held with questionnaire respondents indicating their willingness to participate (May to September 2024). Quantitative data will be analysed using SPSS software, and qualitative data will be thematically analysed using NVivo software.
Ethics and dissemination
The study obtained approval from the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center, under number MEC-2023-0689. Informed consent will be sought from study participants in line with General Data Protection Regulation legislation. Results of the study will be disseminated through publications in scientific journals and conference presentations.
Trial registration number
NCT06186791.
Risk of cancers proximal to the colon in fecal immunochemical test positive screenees in a colorectal cancer screening program
In more than half of the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participants with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) result, no advanced neoplasia (AN) is detected at colonoscopy. The positive FIT result could also be generated by cancers located proximal to the colon: upper gastrointestinal, oral cavity, nose and throat cancers. We evaluated screenees’ risk of being diagnosed with a cancer proximal to the colon within the three years and compared risks between those with a positive versus those with a negative FIT.
Randomised controlled trial of population screening for atrial fibrillation in people aged 70 years and over to reduce stroke: protocol for the SAFER trial
Introduction
There is a lack of evidence that the benefits of screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) outweigh the harms. Following the completion of the Screening for Atrial Fibrillation with ECG to Reduce stroke (SAFER) pilot trial, the aim of the main SAFER trial is to establish whether population screening for AF reduces incidence of stroke risk.
Methods and analysis
Approximately 82 000 people aged 70 years and over and not on oral anticoagulation are being recruited from general practices in England. Patients on the palliative care register or residents in a nursing home are excluded. Eligible people are identified using electronic patient records from general practices and sent an invitation and consent form to participate by post. Consenting participants are randomised at a ratio of 2:1 (control:intervention) with clustering by household. Those randomised to the intervention arm are sent an information leaflet inviting them to participate in screening, which involves use of a handheld single-lead ECG four times a day for 3 weeks. ECG traces identified by an algorithm as possible AF are reviewed by cardiologists. Participants with AF are seen by a general practitioner for consideration of anticoagulation. The primary outcome is stroke. Major secondary outcomes are: death, major bleeding and cardiovascular events. Follow-up will be via electronic health records for an average of 4 years. The primary analysis will be by intention-to-treat using time-to-event modelling. Results from this trial will be combined with follow-up data from the cluster-randomised pilot trial by fixed-effects meta-analysis.
Ethics and dissemination
The London—Central National Health Service Research Ethics Committee (19/LO/1597) provided ethical approval. Dissemination will include public-friendly summaries, reports and engagement with the UK National Screening Committee.
Trial registration number
ISRCTN72104369.
Screening for those at risk for anxiety and depression warranting further clinical evaluation among patients presenting to breast services: a single-centre, cross-sectional study
Objectives
Studies show that anxiety and depression are widespread across patients presenting to outpatient services for medical illnesses. We expect similar or even higher prevalence in patients with breast complaints owing to the relevance of breasts in terms of sexuality, identity and confidence. Thus, this study was proposed to estimate the prevalence and identify risk factors for being at risk for anxiety and depression in patients seeking breast services.
Design
Descriptive, cross-sectional study.
Setting
Tertiary care teaching hospital in Mumbai, Western India.
Participants
Patients seeking breast services for either benign or malignant conditions.
Outcome measures
Proportion of those at risk for clinical depression (defined as a score of ≥10 on Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and proportion of those at risk for clinical anxiety warranting further clinical evaluation (defined as a score of ≥10 on Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) and their predictors.
Results
A total of 208 patients were screened, and 192 consenting patients were enrolled. The prevalence of those at risk for anxiety requiring further clinical evaluation was 46.4% (95% CI 39.2% to 53.7%) and for those at risk for major depression that warrants further clinical evaluation by a mental health provider was 29.7% (95% CI 23.3% to 36.7%). The predictors of anxiety were age (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.053; 95% CI 1.024 to 1.083; p
Neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with microsatellite instability or deficient mismatch repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis study protocol
Introduction
Whether gastric cancer (GC) patients with deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) benefit from perioperative (neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant) chemotherapy is controversial. This protocol delineates the planned scope and methods for a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to compare the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy with surgery alone in resectable dMMR/MSI-H GC patients.
Methods and analysis
This study protocol is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols-P guideline. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane (CENTRAL), and the Web of Science databases will be searched, supplemented by a secondary screening of relevant records. Both randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies will be included in this study. The primary and secondary outcomes under scrutiny will be overall survival, disease-free survival and progression-free survival. Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias. We will analyse different treatment settings (eg, neoadjuvant or adjuvant or combined as perioperative chemotherapies) separately and conduct sensitivity analyses.
Ethics and dissemination
No ethics approval is required for this systematic review and meta-analysis, as no individual patient data will be collected. The findings of our study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Prospero registration number
CRD42023494276.
Prevalence and social determinants of anxiety and depression among adults in Ghana: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Introduction
Anxiety and depression pose a significant global health challenge, especially affecting adults in low-income and middle-income countries. In many low-income and middle-income countries, including those in sub-Saharan Africa, social determinants such as access to affordable health services, conflict, food insecurity, and poverty may be associated with the prevalence of anxiety and depression, further contributing to health disparities. To mitigate the burden of anxiety and depression in sub-Saharan Africa, it is essential to develop country-level tailored mental health policies and strategies. For example, Ghana is working towards improving mental health via its 12 year Mental Health policy launched in 2021. However, the prevalence of anxiety and depression among adults in Ghana, along with associated social determinants remains largely unknown, posing challenges for mental health planning, resource allocation and developing targeted interventions. This systematic review seeks to (1) examine the prevalence of anxiety and depression among adults in Ghana and (2) explore social determinants potentially associated with anxiety and depression.
Methods and analysis
Electronic databases (eg, African Index Medicus, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO) will be searched with all screening steps conducted by two independent reviewers. Secondary search strategies, including grey literature searches, will be used. Studies reporting on the prevalence of anxiety, depression and/or a combined symptom measure (ie, psychological distress) among adults in Ghana, using validated instruments will be included. If data allows, random-effects-meta-analyses will be performed to estimate pooled prevalence rates of anxiety and depression. Potential clinical and methodological moderators will be examined using subgroup analyses and meta-regression. A narrative synthesis will explore social determinants potentially associated with anxiety and depression among adults in Ghana.
Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval is not required as no primary data will be collected. Results will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed publication and presentations at academic conferences. Plain language summaries will be provided to relevant non-governmental organisations working in Ghana.
PROSPERO registration number
CRD42023463078
Association between onychomycosis and ulcerative complications in patients with diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study in Dutch general practice
Introduction
Diabetic foot ulcers are feared complications of diabetes mellitus (DM), requiring extensive treatment and hospital admissions, ultimately leading to amputation and increased mortality. Different factors contribute to the development of foot ulcers and related complications. Onychomycosis, being more prevalent in patients with diabetes, could be an important risk factor for developing ulcers and related infections. However, the association between onychomycosis and diabetic complications has not been well studied in primary care.
Research design and methods
To determine the impact of onychomycosis on ulcer development and related complications in patients with diabetes in primary care, a longitudinal cohort study was carried out using routine care data from the Extramural Leiden University Medical Center Academic Network. Survival analyses were performed through Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent covariates.
Results
Data from 48 212 patients with a mean age of 58 at diagnosis of DM, predominantly type 2 (87.8%), were analysed over a median follow-up of 10.3 years. 5.7% of patients developed an ulcer. Onychomycosis significantly increased the risk of ulcer development (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.66), not affected by antimycotic treatment, nor after adjusting for confounders (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.49). The same was found for surgical interventions (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.35 to 1.75) and skin infections (HR 1.48, CI 95% 1.28 to 1.72), again not affected by treatment and significant after adjusting for confounders (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.51 and HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.48, respectively).
Conclusions
Onychomycosis significantly increased the risk of ulcer development in patients with DM in primary care, independently of other risk factors. In addition, onychomycosis increased the risk of surgeries and infectious complications. These results underscore the importance of giving sufficient attention to onychomycosis in primary care and corresponding guidelines. Early identification of onychomycosis during screening and routine care provides a good opportunity for timely recognition of increased ulcer risk.
ACP: linee guida cliniche per i nuovi trattamenti del diabete tipo 2
L’American College of Physicians pubblica raccomandazioni cliniche per i nuovi […]
Real-world Stool-based mSDC2 Test Improved Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Prospective, Multicenter, Community-based Study.
Dolore cronico,ne soffre 1 miliardo e mezzo di persone nel mondo
Esperta,studi su molecola contro perdita efficacia dei farmaci
Dolore cronico,ne soffre 1 miliardo e mezzo di persone nel mondo
Esperta,studi su molecola che contrasta perdita efficacia farmac
Effect of Health Service Area on Primary Care Physician Provision of Low-Value Cancer Screening
Annals of Internal Medicine, Ahead of Print.
Effect of Health Service Area on Primary Care Physician Provision of Low-Value Cancer Screening
Annals of Internal Medicine, Ahead of Print.
Multitarget Stool RNA Testing
To the Editor Dr Barnell and colleagues reported an mt-sRNA colorectal cancer screening test with higher sensitivity for colorectal cancer compared with FIT (94.4% for mt-sRNA vs 77.8% for FIT). Although sensitivity is important in colorectal cancer screening, I believe the description of the lower specificity of mt-sRNA compared with FIT is misleading.