Search Results for: Indagine sull'accesso della popolazione transgender alle cure primarie

Here's what we've found for you

Developing a core outcome set for gender-affirming healthcare in transgender and gender diverse adults in Sweden using the Delphi approach: a study protocol

Introduction
Despite an increasing amount of research related to gender-affirming treatment (GAT) outcomes among transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people (ie, people who experience discomfort or distress in the misalignment between their gender and sex assigned at birth) in recent years, the evidence base for current recommendations is suboptimal. One contributing factor is the heterogeneity in the outcomes and outcome measures used. This study seeks to address this challenge by developing a foundational core outcome set (COS) to be used for TGD adults receiving GAT in Sweden.

Methods
Recommendations from the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials initiative will be used to address this aim in four phases. Phase 1, an umbrella review of peer-reviewed literature and international guidelines in GAT will be conducted to identify relevant outcomes. In phase 2, we will solicit input from TGD individuals through the review of patient and interest organisations’ reports and an anonymous survey to identify outcomes of personal significance. In phase 3, using the Delphi method, 2–3 rounds of assessment will be conducted where researchers, healthcare professionals, policy-makers and TGD adults rate the identified outcomes by perceived importance. In phase 4, a consensus meeting will convene representatives from all stakeholder groups to finalise the COS.

Analysis
The results of this study will consist of a COS for GAT regarding TGD adults in Sweden. Participant survey responses will be evaluated using interpretive analysis to identify core outcomes. During each of the Delphi rounds, Likert-type scale ratings will be aggregated for outcomes to advance or be eliminated in each round.

Ethics and dissemination
The study has received ethical approval by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Umeå medicine department, Registration number: 2024-04672-01). The results of this study will be published open-access and disseminated through TGD interest organisations and a Swedish research network for gender dysphoria.

Trial registration number
COMET registration number 3223.

Read More →

Objectivity in Medicine vs Inference in Poetry

A compelling aspect of both medicine and poetry is how each incites us to articulate our perceptions through specific applications of expressive language. In medicine, words are firmly grounded upon what we directly observe; assumptions are discouraged, for concern that unconscious biases might lead to erroneous conclusions. In poetry, on the other hand, what we see is often just a touchstone for what we can infer, our imaginations unbounded by an idiom that senses as much as it describes. These two modes of comprehending are instructively contrasted in “The Morning After the Election.” We are at first dropped into a narrative about a father and a daughter, reckoning momentarily that the daughter “who had once been his son” and now living far away has been rejected by her family—until the poetically appreciated detail of “the mustache obscuring his lip quivered” as he describes her new imperilment leads us to a deeper inference instead that he must accept and love her. Additional surprising implications that further test objectivity follow, from the reference to another “perfect” son whose death during childbirth ended the patient’s marriage, which underscores how the speaker may have wrongly construed that the transgender child caused familial strife, to the oversimplified and also partly true (yet in retrospect not entirely so, and thus all the more poignant) reason for the patient’s clinic visit as solely “because his blood pressure is high.” Poetry, by transcending the ostensible and harkening to the intuited, allows us to more fully grasp the complexities of our patients’ experiences.

Read More →

Evaluation of the outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) service in Malaysian public hospitals: a mixed-methods study protocol

Introduction
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is an innovative approach to manage infections that require extended courses of intravenous antibiotics by enabling patients to receive treatment in an outpatient setting. In Malaysia, there has yet to be a systematic evaluation of the OPAT service. This study aims to describe the safety, clinical indications and treatment outcomes of the OPAT service in Malaysia, assess patients’ satisfaction and experiences and determine the facilitators and barriers associated with the provision of the OPAT service in Malaysia.

Methods and analysis
A mixed-methods approach combining qualitative and quantitative methods will be employed for a comprehensive understanding of the provision of the OPAT service in Malaysian public hospitals. The study consists of four distinct parts: systematic review, retrospective cohort analysis of clinical outcomes, patients’ satisfaction survey and focus group discussions on providers’ experiences. A longitudinal analysis of the clinical outcomes (treatment success/failure, infection cure, adverse events, readmission and mortality) of the OPAT patients’ cohort will be conducted using descriptive and conclusive statistics, in addition to rates of patients’ satisfaction and evaluation of providers’ experiences.

Ethics and dissemination
This study is registered in the National Medical Research Register (NMRR ID-24-00941-2C8) and approved by the Medical Research and Ethics Committee, Ministry of Health Malaysia (Ref: 24-00941-2C8). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at one or more scientific conferences.

Read More →
Older Entries →