Predictive accuracy of ophthalmic artery Doppler for pre-eclampsia: a systematic review

Objectives
This systematic review investigated available evidence on the stand-alone and incremental predictive performance of ophthalmic artery Doppler (OAD) for pre-eclampsia.

Design
Systematic review.

Data sources
We conducted a literature search from PubMed (Medline), the Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE and Scopus from inception to 8 April 2025.

Eligibility criteria
Studies eligible for inclusion were prospective or retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies or randomised controlled trials that reported on the predictive performance of OAD for pre-eclampsia in singleton pregnancies; and conducted in either high-income country (HIC) or low- and middle-income country (LMIC).

Data extraction and synthesis
Two reviewers independently screened and assessed articles for inclusion. One reviewer then extracted data using a standardised data extraction sheet, and any uncertainties were discussed with a second reviewer. The Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool was used for quality and risk of bias assessment. Findings were summarised and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses statement and synthesised qualitatively.

Results
We identified and included 11 observational studies (3 from HIC and 8 from LMICs) with a total of 12 150 singleton pregnancies, of which 517 (4.3%) were complicated by pre-eclampsia at end of follow-up. The included studies were of varied quality, with three at low risk of bias, four at unclear risk and four at high risk. No interventional study was identified. Three studies (27.3%) recruited high-risk pregnancies (defined according to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) criteria as one or more of the following: chronic hypertension, personal or family history of pre-eclampsia, early (≤18 years) or late (≥40 years) first pregnancy, primipaternity, chronic kidney disease, increased body mass index >30 kg/m2, presence of diabetes mellitus prior to pregnancy, autoimmune disease and thrombophilia), while eight studies (72.7%) recruited undetermined risk pregnancies. Stand-alone performance of OAD (interpreted by area under the receiver operating curve at 95% CI) showed that in the first trimester, the peak systolic velocity (PSV) ratio demonstrated very good predictive ability (0.97, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.0) (n=1 study), and the second PSV (PSV2) demonstrated very good predictive ability (0.91, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99) (n=1 study). Also, PSV2 demonstrated fair predictive ability (0.61, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.79; and 0.53, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.66) for early and late pre-eclampsia, respectively (n=1 study). In the second trimester, the PSV ratio demonstrated very good predictive ability (0.88, 95% CI 0.84 to 0.91) (n=1 study), and PSV2 demonstrated good predictive ability (0.73, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.81; and 0.76, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.81) for pre-eclampsia (n=2 studies). In the third trimester, the PSV ratio demonstrated good predictive ability (0.82, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.89; and 0.77, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.82) for preterm and term pre-eclampsia, respectively (n=1 study). Also, PSV2 demonstrated good predictive ability 0.70 (0.57 to 0.84) (n=1 study).
Subsequently, in the second trimester, PSV ratio demonstrated better incremental predictive performance than uterine artery pulsatility index for preterm pre-eclampsia, when added to maternal factors and mean arterial pressure (MAP) (56.1%–80.2% vs 56.1%–74.8% detection rate (DR) at 10% FPR) (n=1 study). Also in the third trimester, adding PSV ratio to maternal factors and MAP was superior to soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor ratio in predicting pre-eclampsia at

Leggi
Giugno 2025

Real-world effectiveness and safety of oral azvudine versus Paxlovid in patients with COVID-19 and pre-existing hypertension: a multicentre, retrospective, cohort study in Henan Province, China

Objectives
Azvudine and Paxlovid are the primary antiviral agents for the management of COVID-19. However, there is currently insufficient evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of these drugs in treating COVID-19 patients with pre-existing hypertension. The objective of this study was to assess their effectiveness and safety among those patients in a real-world context.

Design
Retrospective cohort study.

Setting
Electronic medical record data of COVID-19 patients with pre-existing hypertension were extracted from nine hospitals in Henan Province from 5 December 2022 to 31 January 2023.

Participants
Following 2:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 996 individuals who received treatment with azvudine and 498 individuals who received treatment with Paxlovid were included in the analysis.

Primary and secondary outcome measures
The primary outcome was all-cause death and the secondary outcome was the composite disease progression.

Results
Following adherence to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and 2:1 PSM, 996 individuals were included in the azvudine group and 498 in the Paxlovid group. The Cox regression analysis revealed that the azvudine group had a significantly lower risk of all-cause death compared with the Paxlovid group (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.455 to 0.911, p=0.013). However, there was no statistically significant difference in composite disease progression between the two groups (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.711 to 1.229, p=0.629). Subgroup analysis indicated that, compared with Paxlovid, patients with moderate disease receiving azvudine treatment exhibited a significantly reduced risk of composite disease progression (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.89). The safety analysis showed that the azvudine group had fewer adverse events.

Conclusions
Among COVID-19 patients with pre-existing hypertension, the effectiveness of azvudine is not inferior to Paxlovid in reducing all-cause death and composite disease progression, with fewer adverse events.

Trial registration number
NCT06349655.

Leggi
Giugno 2025

Experiences of adopting remote technologies for blood pressure control among women with pre-eclampsia and healthcare providers: a systematic review of qualitative studies

Introduction
Pre-eclampsia is a harmful and potentially life-threatening condition affecting maternal health and fetal well-being. In response to the need for timely and continuous monitoring, remote health technologies have been implemented for blood pressure control among this group over the last decades. The purpose of this study is to synthesise qualitative evidence on the experiences of adopting remote technologies for blood pressure control among women with pre-eclampsia and their healthcare providers.

Methods
Peer-reviewed publications published in English from January 2013 to March 2023 were searched using seven electronic databases: PubMed, Nursing & Allied Health Premium (ProQuest), Scopus, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis Online, Google Scholar and EBSCO Open Dissertations. The findings were subjected to meta-synthesis using the Joanna Briggs Institute meta-aggregation approach, whereby credible and unequivocal findings supported by participant quotations were extracted, grouped into categories and then integrated into synthesised findings through consensus among reviewers. A total of 4827 studies were identified in the initial database search. Twelve eligible studies were included in the meta-synthesis.

Results
Among 12 studies, five synthesised findings were elicited from women’s experiences with remote monitoring, including reassurance and increased self-confidence in health, a sense of autonomy, enhanced awareness of their health, acceptability and satisfaction with telehealth and reduced anxiety and stress. Providers’ perspectives on telehealth were presented in four synthesised findings: increasing value for oneself and work, strengthening knowledge and skills on pre-eclampsia, improving quality of care and concerns about technology challenges.

Conclusion
Healthcare providers reported professional growth and improved care delivery, though technical challenges persist. These findings support the integration of remote monitoring into maternal healthcare.

Leggi
Giugno 2025

Behavioural activation for low mood and anxiety in male frontline NHS workers (BALM): a pre-post intervention study

Objectives
To evaluate the impact and acceptability of a tailored, gender-responsive behavioural activation (BA) intervention for improving depression and anxiety in male National Health Service (NHS) frontline workers.

Design
Pre-post intervention study.

Setting
Three NHS organisations in the North of England.

Participants
45 men aged ≥18 years working in a frontline NHS role scoring in the subclinical range (5–14) on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (depression) and/or the Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) (anxiety) at baseline.

Interventions
A tailored BA treatment programme consisting of up to eight telephone support sessions over a period of 4–6 weeks, accompanied by a BA self-help manual.

Main outcome measures
Self-reported symptom severity of depression, assessed by PHQ-9, and anxiety, assessed by GAD-7, at baseline and 4 and 6 months. Acceptability from the perspectives of male study participants and coaches who delivered the intervention was assessed in a nested qualitative study using the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA).

Results
PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores decreased from baseline to 4 months on both the PHQ-9 and GAD-7. While scores increased from 4 months to 6 months, the 6-month scores remained below those of the baseline scores. Acceptability of the intervention was high across all constructs of the TFA. The practical and action-oriented strategies of the intervention, and the confidential, flexible, convenient mode of delivery, worked to support men’s engagement with the intervention.

Conclusions
Delivery of a tailored, gender-responsive BA intervention was appealing to, and beneficial for, men working in frontline NHS roles with less severe depression and anxiety. The BALM intervention offers promise as a tailored workplace mental health programme that is aligned with men’s needs and preferences and can help overcome a reticence to engage with mental health support in NHS staff and beyond.

Trial registration number
ISRCTN48636092.

Leggi
Giugno 2025