Risultati per: Diagnosi di COVID-19: dal sospetto alla conferma

This randomized trial showed no difference in local or systemic side effects in patients receiving their vaccines on either schedule.

Background
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous clinical trials were initiated. Although concerns were raised regarding the quality of the trials, the eventual research output yielded from the trials remains unknown. The objective of this study was to include all clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov during the first 6 months of the pandemic and assess if and where their results had been reported, their completion and discontinuation rates, achieved enrolment and changes made to the primary outcome after trial registration.

Methods
We included all interventional studies related to COVID-19 first registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between 1 January 2020 and 1 July 2020. We systematically searched for trial results, reported through 15 May 2023, in scientific publications, preprints and ClinicalTrials.gov. We assessed the achieved trial enrolment, trial discontinuation (reaching

Objectives
To examine trajectories of functional limitations, fatigue, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and societal costs of patients referred to long COVID clinics.

Design
A population-based longitudinal cohort study using real-time user data.

Setting
35 specialised long COVID clinics in the UK.

Participants
4087 adults diagnosed with long COVID in primary or secondary care deemed suitable for rehabilitation and registered in the Living With Covid Recovery (LWCR) programme between 4 August 2020 and 5 August 2022.

Main outcome measures
Generalised linear mixed models were fitted to estimate trajectories of functional limitations, using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS); scores of ≥20 indicate moderately severe limitations. Other outcomes included fatigue using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue (FACIT-F) reversed score (scores of ≥22 indicate impairment), HRQL using the EQ-5D-5L, and long COVID-related societal costs, encompassing healthcare costs and productivity losses.

Results
The mean WSAS score at 6 months after registration in the LWCR was 19.1 (95% CI 18.6, 19.6), with 46% of the participants (95% CI 40.3%, 52.4%) reporting a WSAS score above 20 (moderately severe or worse impairment). The mean change in the WSAS score over the 6-month period was –0.86 (95% CI –1.32, –0.41). The mean reversed FACIT-F score at 6 months was 29.1 (95% CI 22.7, 35.5) compared with 32.0 (95% CI 31.7, 32.3) at baseline. The mean EQ-5D-5L score remained relatively constant between baseline (0.63, 95% CI 0.62, 0.64) and 6 months (0.64, 95% CI 0.59, 0.69). The monthly societal cost per patient related to long COVID at 6 months was £931, mostly driven by the costs associated with working days lost.

Conclusions
Individuals referred to long COVID clinics in the UK reported small improvements in functional limitations, fatigue, HRQL and ability to work within 6 months of registering in the LWCR programme.

New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 391, Issue 19, Page 1860-1862, November 14, 2024.

This Viewpoint summarizes the factors contributing to increased risk of severe outcomes and hospitalization associated with COVID-19 among older adults, stresses the importance of assessing COVID-19 risk before infection occurs, calls for all immunocompromised older adults to be considered for COVID-19 treatment, and details 3 recommended COVID-19 therapies.

Annals of Internal Medicine, Ahead of Print.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4143186-A4143186, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Statins are lipid-lowering agents with anti-inflammatory effects. Data surrounding the benefits of statins in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) are conflicting. We sought to better understand the impact of statins in the context of Covid-19-related inflammation.Methods:We leveraged the International Study of Inflammation in Covid-19, a prospective multicenter cohort study of patients hospitalized specifically for Covid-19 between February 1, 2020 and October 30, 2022. Participants underwent systematic assessment of biomarkers of inflammation. We used logistic regression modeling and inverse probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) to examine the association between prior statin use and the composite outcome of in-hospital death, need for mechanical ventilation, and need for renal replacement therapy.Results:A total of 4,464 patients were included in the study, of whom 1,364 (27.5%) were taking a statin prior to admission. There were 1,061 primary outcome events, including 540 deaths, 854 mechanical ventilation and 313 renal replacement therapy. Amongst biomarkers of inflammation, statin use was associated solely with lower levels of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) after adjusting for known confounders. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, statin use was associated with lower odds of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.63, 95%CI[0.53-0.76]) compared to patients not on statins. Findings were consistent with IPTW (aOR 0.92, 95%CI [0.89- 0.95]). The proportion of the effect of statin on the primary outcome mediated by suPAR was estimated at 31.5%.Conclusion:Prior statin use is associated with improved outcomes and lower inflammation as measured by suPAR levels in patients hospitalized for Covid-19.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4141078-A4141078, November 12, 2024. Background:Social determinants of health (SDOH),exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, impact access to medical care.Research Question:Through descriptive qualitative inquiry, we explored barriers and facilitators to pediatric cardiology ambulatory care for patients with complex congenital heart disease (CCHD) during COVID-19.Methods:English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers of children with CCHD who missed at least one clinic visit during the first year of COVID-19 were recruited, with purposeful sampling of Black and Hispanic patients. Semi-structured interviews inquired about the impact of the pandemic, experience with telehealth and communication with providers, effects of SDOH, and perceived impact of their race/ethnicity on care. Content analysis summarized information and identified themes.Results:Interviews (19) were conducted: 14 in English (6 Black, 2 Hispanic, 2 White, 3 mixed race, 1 American Indian), and 5 in Spanish (5 Hispanic). Overarching themes were: Barriers to Care, Facilitators of Returning/Staying in Care, Impact of Diagnosis, and Recommendations for Improvement (Image 1). Despite challenges with finances and transportation, as well as concern for infection risk, the majority of caregivers preferred in-person care over telehealth due to physical exam, diagnostic testing, and interpersonal connection with providers. SDOH challenges including housing, transportation, and employment contributed to missing care. For some families, social vulnerability was exacerbated by their child’s CCHD diagnosis and then again by COVID-19. Universally, caregivers felt their child’s race/ethnicity did not affect the care they received. Spanish-speaking caregivers expressed their primary language as a barrier to care and their desire for more thorough explanations and teach-back from the medical team.Conclusion:While SDOH can hinder access to ambulatory cardiac care, trusting relationships with care teams facilitated engagement. Social vulnerability contributed to dynamic situations for families, especially during COVID-19, highlighting the need for routine SDOH assessment and support. English- and Spanish-speaking caregivers echoed the same challenges. Race/ethnicity was not felt to impact care received.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4145096-A4145096, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) and Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) are common manifestations of cardiovascular dysautonomia (CVAD) in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome. Studies regarding differences between post-COVID-19 POTS and post-COVID-19 IST have been sparse and based on small patient series.Aims:To examine clinical differences between POTS and IST in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome.Methods:A cross-sectional observational study based on a dataset of patients diagnosed with post-COVID-19 syndrome and POTS/IST, at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm in 2020-2023, was performed. Data was retrieved using patients’ medical records. ANOVA, chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact tests were used for analysis.Results:A total of 200 patients diagnosed with post-COVID POTS/IST (ICD-10 codes, I.498 + U.099) were included (female, 85%) and divided into a POTS-group (n=110) and IST-group (n=90). Sixty-one patients (31%) met the diagnostic criteria of both and were included in the IST-group. The mean ages were 38 years for the POTS-group and 42 years for the IST-group (p=0.027). Hypertension was more common within the IST-group (p

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4145209-A4145209, November 12, 2024. Background:Acute decompensated heart failure accounts for an increasing proportion of hospitalizations in the United States and is linked to high readmission and 30-day mortality rates. Prior studies suggest up to 17% mortality rate within 30 days for patients admitted with heart failure.Research Questions/Hypothesis:We present an analysis characterizing patients who experienced mortality within 30 days of admission at a large safety net hospital following the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods/Approach:A retrospective review was conducted for all heart failure admissions of patients >18 years of age admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU) at Los Angeles General Medical Center from January to December 2021 after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Demographics, insurance information, drug use, medication use, heart failure etiology, and CCU interventions were indexed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.Results/Data:172 patients were identified during the study period. 10% of patients died within 30 days of admission, of which 94% died during the same admission. Of patients who died during index admission, 88% had heart failure with reduced EF. None of these patients were on all four pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT), with 33% on one or no GDMT medications.There was not a statistically significant difference in mortality rate when comparing those with active stimulant use 5/60 (8%) to those without active illicit drug use 12/112 (11%) (RR 0.79, 95% CI, p= 0.64).9/17 (53%) patients died of refractory cardiogenic shock, 5/17 (29%) were found in cardiopulmonary arrest of unknown etiology while undergoing treatment for acute decompensated heart failure. Two patients (12%) died of septic shock while 1/17 (5%) died of hemorrhagic shock related to chronic liver disease.Conclusion(s)The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated significant healthcare inequalities, especially for urban underserved populations leading to late presentations of disease and worse outcomes, however, based on our data the overall inpatient mortality rate remained largely similar to pre-pandemic values.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4140179-A4140179, November 12, 2024. Background:COVID-19 has led to significant global morbidity and mortality. Its impact on patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains unclear.Aim:To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 infection on the readmission rate and associated outcomes in patients with HCM.Methods:In a retrospective study using the 2020 National Readmission Database, we collected data on patients with HCM who were admitted with the principal diagnosis of COVID-19. The primary outcome was the all-cause 30-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes were common causes of readmission, in-hospital mortality, and resource utilization.Results:In 2020, a total of 1503 patients with HCM (mean age 67 years, 49% female) were hospitalized for COVID-19. Among them, 1216 (80.9%) were discharged alive and 180 (14.8%) were readmitted within 30 days. In-hospital mortality for readmissions remained relatively unchanged compared with index admissions (15.4% vs 19.0%, P=.34; Table 1). The most common cause of readmission was COVID-19 infection (38%), followed by other infections (11%) and acute kidney injury (4%). The most common cardiac cause for readmission was paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (2%). The mean length of stay for readmissions was relatively similar to the index admission (7.8 vs 9.9 days, P=.43). The mean hospital charge associated with readmission was $84,976 (total hospital charges were $15.2 million). The mean hospital cost associated with readmissions was $24,603 (total hospital costs were $4.4 million). A higher Charlson comorbidity index score was the main independent predictor of higher readmission rates.Conclusions:This study highlights the significant burden of COVID-19 on patients with HCM. Despite efforts to reduce readmission rates, a considerable percentage of patients experienced readmission within 30 days, largely attributed to COVID-19 infection. Close follow-up after discharge could prevent such readmission and the associated high mortality rates.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4148010-A4148010, November 12, 2024. Background:Severe COVID-19 infection has been associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. In this study, we report associations between echocardiographic findings and laboratory markers that portend RV failure in patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19 infection on ECMO.Methods:A single-center study was conducted in the cardiovascular ICU of our institute. A retrospective chart review was performed on 41 patients with COVID-19 on ECMO between March and October 2020. Twenty-two patients had transthoracic echocardiograms (TTE) completed while on ECMO (VV-ECMO = 19, VA-ECMO = 3). Echocardiograms (echo) were obtained pre-cannulation, during ECMO, and post-ECMO decannulation. RV parameters analyzed included tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), basal diastolic RV diameter, right ventricular fractional area of change (RV FAC), and S’. Laboratory values including BNP, CRP, D-dimer, ferritin, fibrinogen, lactate and troponin were analyzed for correlation with echo findings.Results:TAPSE was significantly lower in deceased patients (1.9± 0.4cm vs 1.3±0.6 cm, P< 0.05). RV FAC and S’ were also lower in the deceased group. TAPSE while on ECMO showed a positive association with peak D-dimer levels in survivors and a negative association in deceased patients. Peri-ECMO fibrinogen and CRP levels were negatively associated with TAPSE in survivors while fibrinogen showed positive association in deceased patients. LDH peak, fibrinogen initial and lactate peak were higher in the deceased[ZQ1] group. There is a trend of increased RV basal diameter in the deceased group (3.9±0.9 vs 4.2±0.9 cm). Last troponin levels were negatively associated with basal diastolic RV diameter while on ECMO in deceased patients.Conclusion:Preservation of RV longitudinal contractility, as reflected by TAPSE, may play an important role in the survival of COVID-19 patients on ECMO. Laboratory markers such as LDH, D-dimer, fibrinogen and lactate may have prognostic value in predicting RV failure. Further studies are required to determine if early initiation of therapies to improve RV systolic function in COVID-19 ECMO patients with ARDS improves outcomes.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4140585-A4140585, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Stroke-related mortality poses significant challenges in the US. Increased at-home deaths since COVID-19 pandemic prompted changes in the provision of end-of-life care.Question:What were the settings of stroke deaths in the US during COVID-19 pandemic?Methods:Decedent-level mortality data from death certificates in CDC repository were obtained for the year 2020 (pandemic) and 2019 (comparison). Demographic data include age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, and place of stroke death, including inpatient, outpatient/emergency room (ER), hospice/nursing facilities (H/NF), and at-home. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed demographic impact on stroke mortality by place-of-death, yielding odds ratios (OR) with significance threshold of p65 years were more likely to die in H/NF (OR 10.05, p