Il nuovo decreto sulle tariffe per le prestazioni di assistenza specialistica […]
Risultati per: Linee guida pratiche sulle cure palliative
Questo è quello che abbiamo trovato per te
Linee Guida per la prevenzione, diagnosi e gestione della BPCO
De Poli, in manovra incremento di 10 milioni per cure palliative
‘È un primo passo, ma da solo non basta’
Cure palliative pediatriche, hospice attivi solo in 9 regioni
11mila bimbi necessitano di assistenza specialistica,coperto 25%
Dalla procreazione assistita alle ultime cure anti-tumori: ecco le nuove cure gratis o con il ticket
Le nuove prestazioni erano attese da quasi otto anni e cioè da quando era comparsa la prima versione del tariffario poi sempre rinviato per il nodo risorse
Linea guida sulla diagnosi e gestione dell’endometriosi
Tumore polmone,test genetici per cure ad hoc solo a 40% pazienti
Int, esame molecolare per garantire farmaci personalizzati
Abstract 4140984: Palliative Care Interventions Effect on Quality of Life and Symptoms in Patients with Heart Failure: An Updated Systemic Review and Meta-analysis
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4140984-A4140984, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Heart failure (HF) is a prevalent medical condition, affecting approximately 6.7 million Americans. Patients with HF frequently experience comorbidities such as depression and anxiety, which can lead to diminished quality of life. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), palliative care may be beneficial for these patients in addressing their complex physical, mental, and social needs. Therefore, an assessment of palliative care involvement in HF patients is warranted to determine its impact on improving quality of life, alleviating symptoms such as dyspnea, depression, and anxiety.Hypothesis:The aim is to assess the impact of palliative care interventions on the quality of life, dyspnea, anxiety, and depression in patients with HF.Methods:A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on clinical trials retrieved from Scopus, Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases from their inception until March 2024. Studies reporting on the impact of palliative care interventions on the quality of life of patients with HF were included. The primary outcome was the effect on quality of life, while the effects on dyspnea, depression, and anxiety were secondary outcomes. Data from the studies were pooled using RevMan V5.4, and changes in the mean difference from baseline and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each outcome.Results:The meta-analysis included eleven studies, predominantly randomized controlled trials, with a total of 1662 participants, 812 of whom received palliative care interventions. The analysis revealed a significant improvement in the mean change from baseline within the intervention group compared to usual care. Specifically, the quality of life showed a mean difference change from the baseline of 1.35 (95% CI: 0.88 to 1.82), anxiety improved with a mean difference change from baseline of 0.30 (95% CI: 0.03 to 0.58), and dyspnea showed a mean difference change from baseline of 1.0 (95% CI: 0.74 to 1.26). However, there was no significant difference in the mean change from baseline for depression between both groups.Conclusion:Palliative care interventions are associated with significant improvements in quality of life, anxiety, and dyspnea in patients with heart failure compared to usual care. However, there is no significant impact on depression. These findings support the integration of palliative care into the management of heart failure patients to enhance their overall well-being.
Abstract 4116558: Navigator-driven Recommendations for Palliative Care Consults for Patients with Heart Failure and High Predicted Mortality
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4116558-A4116558, November 12, 2024. Background:Palliative care (PC) engagement can improve quality of life, reduce hospital costs, and enhance symptom control for individuals with heart failure (HF). For certain HF patients, PC can address symptoms and improve quality of life. However, referrals to PC often occur late, delaying benefits.Hypothesis:We hypothesize that a standardized recommendation for inpatient PC consultation will increase PC consultation rates and improve 30-day readmission without an impact on 30-day mortality rates.Methods:This interrupted time series study focused on high-risk HF patients at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. The cohort included patients in the Golden Hearts Program, which is a local program to identify HF patients at elevated risk for 30-day readmissions and to accelerate resources to support their transitions. Baseline data were from patients 5 months before September 1, 2023, and the intervention group were from patients 5 months afterward. A standardized message recommending inpatient PC consultation was sent to attending physicians for patients with ESCAPE scores ≥4. Recommendations were also discussed at multidisciplinary rounds with senior residents. The primary outcomes were inpatient palliative care consultation and discharge to Hospice. Secondary outcomes were 30-day readmissions and 30-day mortality. Outcome measures were assessed post-discharge using Chi-square and T-test analyses.Results:The baseline group had 203 patients; the intervention group had 213. Post-intervention, PC consultation rates decreased from 12.3% to 8% (p=0.19), Discharge to hospice decreased from 2% to 0.9% (p=0.05), 30-day mortality decreased (8.4% vs 7%, p=0.74), and 30-day readmission dropped from 23.6% to 15% (p=0.04). The average length of stay remained 5.7 days in both groups. Limitations included provider buy-in and a limited time period.Conclusion:Though the intervention aimed at targeted PC consult recommendations for advanced HF patients led to reduced 30-day readmissions, there was a not a statistically significant impact on palliative care consultation or mortality.
Abstract 4134569: Palliative care needs assessment by integrated palliative care outcome scale in hospitalized heart failure patients: an observational study
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4134569-A4134569, November 12, 2024. Background and purpose:Patients with heart failure (HF) have a high burden of palliative care needs (PCN) and a worse prognosis that is not lower than cancer. The Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a scale that evaluates PCN in illness patients, mostly in cancer.Purpose:To evaluate the PCN in hospitalized heart failure patients by IPOS and its relation with patients’ characteristics and mortality.Methodology:A cross-sectional study was conducted on 160 HF hospitalized patients in Vietnam, who were evaluated by IPOS, including questions using a 5-point Likert scale (0 [best]–4 [worst] points) about physical symptoms (10 items), emotional symptoms (4 items), and communication and practical issues (3 items). Patients were determined to have PCN if having ≥ two items with 4 points or ≥ 3 items with ≥ 3 points.Results and discussions:Mean age: 69,57 ± 11,95 years, male: 68.75%, mean LVEF: 44.19 ±16.11%, and NT-proBNP level: 9107.3 ± 30459.1ng/L, the percentage of patients with PCN was 59.38%. The majority of patients had moderate levels (2 points) of dyspnea (38.13%), weakness (35.0%), and low levels (0 or 1 point) of other physical symptoms. Moderate levels (2 points) were the most common in the patient’s anxiety (43.13%) and family anxiety (51.25%), feeling at peace (40.0%), sharing feelings (55.0%), enough information (45.0%), and practical issue (45.0%). Having PCN was significantly correlated to the duration of heart failure, eGFR, and usage of intravenous medication but not related to heart failure severity (NYHA class, LVEF, NT-ProBNP level) and other characteristics (age, gender, residency, educational levels, occupation). Having PCN was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality after discharge with follow-up for one year (P = 0.037).Conclusions:Hospitalized patients with HF had multi-dimensional symptom burdens in moderate levels. PCN was not related to HF severity but correlated to duration of heart failure, eGFR, and usage of intravenous medication. Having PCN was independently associated with mortality after discharge.
Abstract 4139646: Disparities in Palliative Care Utilization Among Patients With Heart Failure and LVAD implantation: A Nationwide Comparative Analysis
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4139646-A4139646, November 12, 2024. Background:Heart failure (HF) affects 6.7 million Americans and causes 500,000 deaths annually. Despite advancements in treatment, the 1-year mortality in advanced HF is 25-50%. Implantable left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are critical for bridge-to-transplant or destination therapy, with 1-year and 2-year survival rates of 80% and 70%, respectively. At least 67% of LVAD patients have palliative care (PC) needs. However, PC involvement rates have been variable. The aim of this study is to measure the utilization of PC focusing on demographic disparities.Methods:Data was obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2021 database to identify patients with a principal diagnosis of HF (ICD I50.xx), secondary diagnoses of LVAD placement (Z45.2, Z95.811) and utilization of PC during encounter (Z51.5). Analysis was performed using SPSS statistical software.Results:Out of 5,688,355 adult hospitalizations in 2021, 1,048,573 patients were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of HF. About 7.46% of HF patients received PC. Among these, patients over 75 years old, who constituted 44.4% of the cohort, accounted for 62.6% of PC involvement. PC consultation rates were similar between sexes. White patients made up 67.8% of the HF population but represented 73.6% of PC consultations, while other minority groups had a lower proportion of PC consultations.LVADs were implanted in 0.09% of HF patients, with 69.5% between 50-74 years old. A significant gender disparity was noted; 76.6% of LVAD recipients were male, and 23.4% female.PC was only involved in the care of 17.2% of LVAD patients. Age distribution of LVAD patients PC mirrored the overall LVAD cohort. Gender disparity persisted, with 80.4% of LVAD patients receiving PC being male, and 19.6% female. Racial disparities were less pronounced in this group.Conclusion:Despite proven benefits of PC involvement on the quality of life, psychological well being, and advanced care planning, specific guidelines in LVAD patients are yet to be established. This study underscores the need for more comprehensive guidelines promoting PC integration in the management of LVAD patients, and highlights demographic disparities in PC utilization among HF and LVAD patients.
Abstract 4147316: Utilization of Palliative Care for Patients Living with Long-Term (LT) LVAD Therapy
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4147316-A4147316, November 12, 2024. Background:Outpatient palliative care has been associated with improved health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in patients with heart failure. However, there is limited understanding of its utilization among patients with long-term left ventricular assist device (LT-LVAD) therapy. The prevalence of LVAD implantation as long-term therapy has increased over the past decade; these patients may particularly benefit from outpatient palliative care.Objective:To identify the predictors of outpatient palliative care utilization in a sample of LT-LVAD patients from a high-volume LVAD center.Methods:This retrospective chart review analyzed data from 270 patients who received LVAD as long-term therapy between January 1, 2017, and December 30, 2021, and were supported on LVAD therapy for at least two years. Patients who received heart transplantation prior to the study end-date were excluded. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of receiving outpatient palliative care (with or without inpatient palliative care) versus receiving inpatient palliative care alone.Results:Among 270 patients, the mean age was 62 years (+/- 12), 74.2% were male, 79.0% Black and 17.3% White. By device: 77.4% received HeartMate 3™ (HM3), 19.6% HVAD™ LVAD, 3.0% HeartMate II™. Patients lived an average of 4 years (+/- 1) post-implantation. The mean number of hospitalizations from implantation to death or end-of-study was 7.85 (+/- 7.04). 180 patients received inpatient palliative care consultation alone; 90 patients received at least one outpatient palliative care visit. Black patients had increased odds of receiving outpatient palliative care compared to White patients (OR 2.27, P=0.040). For each additional hospitalization a patient experienced, the odds of receiving outpatient palliative care increased (OR 1.06, P=0.002). Patients with HVAD™ LVAD were less likely to receive outpatient palliative care than those with HM3 (OR 0.45, P=0.029).Conclusion:In this large cohort of patients supported on LT-LVAD therapy, Black patients were more likely to receive outpatient palliative care than White patients. More frequent hospitalizations and LVAD type were associated with an increased likelihood of outpatient palliative care visits. Future studies should explore the factors contributing to these differences to better understand and enhance palliative care utilization for all patients on LT-LVAD therapy.
Abstract 4143804: Factors Associated With Increased Inpatient Mortality Risk In End Stage Heart Failure Patients That May Help Providers To Identify triggers For Palliative Care Consultation
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4143804-A4143804, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Palliative care interventions for patients with heart failure have been shown to significantly improve quality of life, reduce symptom burden, and enhance functional status. Timing of referral becomes challenging as disease progresses and readmission rates increase. We studied factors associated with inpatient mortality in patients with end stage heart failure, ineligible for additional advanced therapies.Methods:Individuals with acute decompensated heart failure admitted between 2021-2023, who were ineligible for further advanced cardiac therapies and referred to palliative care, were included to this retrospective study. Data on demographic variables, clinical parameters (NYHA classification, Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) scores, comorbidities, type of heart disease, BNP, albumin, creatinine levels), and palliative care interventions (symptom burden assessments, family meetings, and advanced care planning (ACP) discussions) were collected. We conducted bivariate and multivariate analyses using Kruskal-Wallis and chi-square tests, and adjusted regression models to compare characteristics between individuals who died while admitted and survivors.Results:A total of 97 individuals were included in the study, with a mean age of 68 ± 17.7 years, 33.0%(n=32) of whom were female. Patients who died during admission had significantly higher rate of established ACP following palliative care consult (p< 0.01) and had a shorter time from consultation to discharge and were more likely to be declared DNR/DNI during admission. Hospital length of stay was shorter for patients who died in the hospital Lower KPS scores, with KPS scores
Abstract 4141265: Single Center Utilization of Prenatal Palliative Care in Patients with Critical Congenital Heart Disease: Missed Opportunities?
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4141265-A4141265, November 12, 2024. Background:Congenital heart disease (CHD) is a common congenital anomaly with lesions requiring intervention before initial hospital discharge defined as critical CHD (CCHD). Advances in prenatal detection, surgical, and post-operative care have improved early survival of patients with CCHD, yet long-term survival is limited. Fetal echocardiography has improved diagnosis and characterization of CCHD, and prenatal palliative care (PC) consult can improve shared decision making, communication, and parental stress of patients with life-limiting conditions. We hypothesized that the utilization of prenatal PC consults for patients with CCHD would be low (
Scompenso cardiaco, cure migliori se i malati sono coinvolti
Pazienti, pronti a dare contributo per nuova sanità territoriale