[Articles] Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 outcomes in patients with cancer vs controls without cancer: a multivariable meta-analysis with genomic imputation

This comprehensive meta-analysis indicates that patients with active cancer with SARS-CoV-2 have a higher risk of mortality and hospitalisation than those without cancer. The risk of death was comparable between active solid and haematological tumours. SARS-CoV-2 severity and mortality risks were higher with thoracic, colorectal, or any metastatic cancers. Additionally, differences were noted in mortality risks across VOCs, diverging from VOC-associated mortality patterns in the general population.

Leggi
Maggio 2025

COnventional vs. Optimized PERiprocedural Analgosedation vs. Total IntraVEnous Anesthesia for Pulsed-Field Ablation: a Three-Arm Randomized Controlled Trial (COOPERATIVE-PFA)

Circulation, Ahead of Print. Background: Deep analgosedation (DAS) or general anesthesia (GA) is mandatory for pulsed-field ablation (PFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). In contrast to DAS, GA (conventional or total intravenous anesthesia [TIVA]) requires airway management. To find the optimal sedation regimen, this study compared ketamine-remimazolam DAS and propofol-opioid TIVA to propofol-opioid DAS, focusing on sedation-related adverse events.Methods: Patients indicated for AF catheter ablation were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to (1) DAS using intermittent propofol-opioid boluses (arm P), (2) continuous remimazolam-ketamine DAS (arm R), or (3) continuous propofol-opioid TIVA with secured airways (arm TIVA). Catheter ablation was performed using the FARAPULSE system (Boston Scientific, MA, USA). The major exclusion criterion was obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of hypoxemia, hypotensive, or hypertensive events requiring intervention or leading to procedure discontinuation. Secondary endpoints included hemodynamic instability events, procedure time, serious adverse events, and patient satisfaction.Results: One-hundred and twenty-seven patients (mean age 62.9 ± 10.3 years, 35.1% female, 47.2% with paroxysmal AF) were enrolled and randomized to the P (N = 42), R (N = 43) or TIVA (N = 42) arms. The primary endpoint occurred in 85.7% of P pts., 27.9% of R pts., and 66.7% of TIVA pts. (P < 0.001), driven by hypoxemia in the P arm (100% of pts. with the primary endpoint) and by hypotension in the TIVA arm (100%). The R arm showed a similar distribution of hypoxemia (50%) and hypotensive (66.7%) events. No differences were observed in mean procedural times, rates of serious adverse events, and assessment of patient satisfaction.Conclusions: In PFA procedures for AF, remimazolam-ketamine DAS was superior to propofol-opioid regimens (either boluses or continuous) and had the lowest risk of hypoxemia and hypotensive events. More than 80% of patients undergoing conventional propofol-opioid analgosedation experienced hypoxemia.

Leggi
Aprile 2025

High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity NPPV and Need for Endotracheal Intubation

To the Editor I have several questions about the recent randomized clinical trial that reported that patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and persistent hypercapnia were less likely to meet criteria for endotracheal intubation when randomized to high-intensity vs low-intensity noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV). I would be grateful if the authors could provide a description of the type of interface used for the NPPV (eg, nasal mask, face mask, face shield, helmet).

Leggi
Aprile 2025

High-Intensity vs Low-Intensity NPPV and Need for Endotracheal Intubation—Reply

In Reply For all patients in the trial, an oronasal mask was the first choice, with a nasal mask used as an alternative (reported in the article’s Supplement 1). An oronasal mask was used in 139 of 147 patients (95%) in the high-intensity NPPV group vs 143 of 153 patients (93%) in the low-intensity NPPV group (P = .69), and a nasal mask was used in 11 of 147 patients (7%) vs 18 of 153 patients (12%), respectively (P = .21).

Leggi
Aprile 2025

In vitro microbiota model recapitulates and predicts individualised sensitivity to dietary emulsifier

Background
Non-absorbed dietary emulsifiers, including carboxymethylcellulose (CMC), directly disturb intestinal microbiota, thereby promoting chronic intestinal inflammation in mice. A randomised controlled-feeding study (Functional Research on Emulsifiers in Humans, FRESH) found that CMC also detrimentally impacts intestinal microbiota in some, but not all, healthy individuals.

Objectives
This study aimed to establish an approach for predicting an individual’s sensitivity to dietary emulsifiers via their baseline microbiota.

Design
We evaluated the ability of an in vitro microbiota model (MiniBioReactor Arrray, MBRA) to reproduce and predict an individual donor’s sensitivity to emulsifiers. Metagenomes were analysed to identify signatures of emulsifier sensitivity.

Results
Exposure of human microbiotas, maintained in the MBRA, to CMC recapitulated the differential CMC sensitivity previously observed in FRESH subjects. Furthermore, select FRESH control subjects (ie, not fed CMC) had microbiotas that were highly perturbed by CMC exposure in the MBRA model. CMC-induced microbiota perturbability was associated with a baseline metagenomic signature, suggesting the possibility of using one’s metagenome to predict sensitivity to dietary emulsifiers. Transplant of human microbiotas that the MBRA model deemed CMC-sensitive, but not those deemed insensitive, into IL-10–/– germfree mice resulted in overt colitis following CMC feeding.

Conclusion
These results suggest that an individual’s sensitivity to emulsifier is a consequence of, and can thus be predicted by, examining their baseline microbiota, paving the way to microbiota-based personalised nutrition.

Leggi
Aprile 2025