Risultati per: Infezione da Helicobacter pylori: review

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4146403-A4146403, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Anticoagulation therapy is crucial in enhancing perioperative outcomes, yet uncertainty persists regarding the optimal use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) and Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) in cardiovascular interventions. Key outcomes such as bleeding, thromboembolic events, and mortality are critical. Conducting a thorough review is essential to make well-informed decisions that improve patient quality of life and mitigate complications.Hypothesis:This meta-analysis aimed to investigate whether Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) reduce perioperative complications such as bleeding, thromboembolic events, and mortality compared to Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) in patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures.Methods:The present study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases on 05/14/2024. Data extraction was rigorously performed, and a random-effects model was used for data synthesis.Results:The review included 25 studies involving a total of 25,754 patients. For bleeding risk, the meta-analysis showed that DOACs are associated with a lower risk compared to VKAs, with a relative risk (RR) of 0.69 (95% CI: 0.51 to 0.94, p = 0.0457, I2= 60%). Thromboembolic events showed no significant difference between DOACs and VKAs (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.73, p = 0.5313, I2= 15%). Mortality outcomes also showed no significant difference (RR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.20 to 1.43, p = 0.1622, I2= 68%).Conclusion:The systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that DOACs are associated with a lower risk of bleeding compared to VKAs, with no significant difference in thromboembolic events and mortality. This evidence supports the substantial benefit of DOACs in cardiovascular interventions. Further research is needed to consolidate these findings and improve patient outcomes. PROSPERO registry— CRD42024547465

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4139964-A4139964, November 12, 2024. Background:Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is estimated to occur in 120,000 US adults and remains underdiagnosed. However, awareness of ATTR-CM has improved following the introduction of new diagnostic tools and disease-modifying treatments. Hence, patients (pts) enrolled in contemporary clinical trials could be at an earlier stage of the disease than pts in past clinical studies.Aim:To assess temporal trends in the baseline risk of pts with ATTR-CM enrolled in clinical trials.Methods:Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and conference websites were searched on November 23, 2023, for peer-reviewed articles and abstracts. Randomized and single-arm clinical trials examining treatments for ATTR-CM were included, and baseline characteristics and outcomes in pts treated with placebo (PBO) were compared across studies.Results:We reviewed 39 publications derived from 4 randomized and 4 single-arm trials. Studies enrolled pts between 2008 and 2021, although 1 study (INOCARD, 2022) did not report years of enrollment. Several baseline characteristics were comparable across studies, including sex, age, race/ethnicity, genotype, and troponin I level. NYHA class at baseline varied with year of enrollment, with fewer NYHA class III pts in recent trials (Figure). Recent trials also showed a trend toward lower NT-proBNP levels (medians ranging from 1911-3178 pg/mL) and higher eGFR levels (means ranging from 54.7-69.0 mL/min/1.73 m2). In PBO groups, all-cause mortality (ACM) rates at 12 months dropped from 9% in ATTR-ACT (enrolled 2013-2015) to 6.9% in ATTRibute-CM (enrolled 2019-2020) and 5.6% in APOLLO-B (enrolled 2019-2021); ACM rates at 30 months dropped from 42.9% in ATTR-ACT to 25.7% in ATTRibute-CM.Conclusions:This systematic review found that disease-modifying treatments and diagnostic advances have led to earlier diagnosis of pts with ATTR-CM. Recent clinical trials appear to have enrolled pts with a better prognosis. Comparisons of results across these trials are limited and should acknowledge the potential impact of variability in baseline risks among trial populations.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4142193-A4142193, November 12, 2024. INTRODUCTION:Many anti-cancer agents, including alkylating, anthracycline-based, and anti-HER2 chemotherapies, have a high risk of causing clinically significant cardiac toxicity, manifesting as heart failure (HF). The efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i’s) in HFrEF and HFpEF is well-established; their role, however, in managing chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) remains unclear.AIMS:To analyze available data on the efficacy of SGLT2i’s in CTRCD.Methods:Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science databases were queried to find relevant clinical studies on the use of SGLT2i’s in CTRCD. Primary outcomes included HF incidence, HF exacerbations, and all-cause mortality. Using a random effects model, relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were computed for all outcomes.Results:Out of 807 retrieved citations, 4 observational studies with 6576 participants were included in the analysis. In SGLT2i’s and non-SGLT2i’s groups, the number of subjects, mean age, and proportion of males were 1551 vs. 5025, 67.6 vs. 68.9 years, and 42% (648) vs. 40% (2000) with median follow-up range of 1.5-3.4 years. Only one study enrolled patients with prior HF, while diabetes was common among all. Anthracyclines were the most common chemotherapy agents used and the majority of patients had a hematological malignany. Onset of HF in the SGLT2i’s group, as reported by two studies, was 6/31 and 94/930 in the non-SGLT2is group. The pooled HF incidence rate was similar between the two groups, with an RR of 0.54 (0.25-1.16, p=0.11). SGLT2i’s users had a significantly lower rate of HF exacerbations and all-cause mortality compared with those who did not receive SGLT2i’s with RR of 0.54 (0.33-0.91, p=0.02) and 0.48 (0.32-0.73, p=0.0006), respectively. Additionally, SGLT2i’s were associated with a significantly lower rate of arrhythmias [ RR 0.40 (0.22-0.70, p=0.001)]. The mortality effect was beleived to be influenced by the antitumor effects of SGLT2i’s as well. Moreover, the rates of adverse events secondary to SGLT2i’s, such as euglycemic ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia, and infections, were reported to be lower.Conclusion:The observational data on the efficacy of SGLT2i’s in CTRCD are promising. These drugs were found to have favorable effects on HF exacerbations, all-cause mortality, and arrhythmias onset associated with CTRCD. Large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to validate these findings.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4142671-A4142671, November 12, 2024. Background:Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG) is the most commonly performed operation in cardiac surgery and results from isolated CABG are used as benchmark to rate cardiac surgery programs in the US by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Accurate and reliable mortality risk prediction of CABG patients is essential for developing targeted treatment strategies. Traditional risk scores such as the STS score and EuroSCORE II offer moderate discriminative value, and have limited utility in predicting outcomes for high-risk patients. Machine learning (ML) models have emerged as an alternate method that may offer improved risk assessment. This study aims to compare machine learning models with traditional risk scores for predicting all-cause mortality in patients undergoing CABG.Methods:PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched until 18thMay 2024 for studies comparing ML models with traditional statistical methods for event prediction of CABG patients. The primary outcome was comparative discrimination measured by C-statistics with 95% confidence intervals between ML models and traditional methods in estimating the risk of all-cause mortality. A secondary aim was to compare model calibration between ML models and traditional risk scores, adhering to guidelines for predictive algorithm comparisons.Results:A total of 27 studies were included (568,190 patients). The summary C-statistic of all ML models across all endpoints was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.78-0.85), compared to traditional methods 0.73 (95% CI, 0.70-0.75). The difference in C-statistic between all ML models and traditional methods was 0.09 (p

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4148117-A4148117, November 12, 2024. Background:Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a prevalent disease in the population and is usually progressive. Most patients are treated with conservative management due to the risk involving transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) and surgical tricuspid valve replacement (STVR). The TRI-SCORE was developed to evaluate the severity of patients with TR and their risk of undergoing a correction procedure. However, there is still controversy regarding the cutoff value of the score. Therefore, we aim to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the cutoffs ≥6 with =6 with

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4114970-A4114970, November 12, 2024. Background:Pulsed field ablation (PFA) and high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation (HPSD) are emerging techniques for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), offering promising results compared to cryoballoon ablation (CBA). This network meta-analysis aims to evaluates the efficacy and safety of PFA, HPSD, and CBA.Method:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EBSCO Information Services were systematically searched for relevant studies until April 2024. The primary outcome is freedom from atrial arrhythmia. A random-effects model was used for data synthesis, and P-scores were employed for outcome ranking. Point estimation (odd ratios) was calculated for comparisons.Results:Fifteen studies were included in our network meta-analysis, involving 5,093 atrial fibrillation patients: 812 (16%), 2,659 (52%), and 1,622 (32%) patients underwent PFA, CBA, and HPSD, respectively. PFA demonstrated the highest efficacy (P-scores 99.3%). Point estimation between PFA and HPSD, and PFA and CBA, were 1.394 (95% CI: 1.047-1.858) and 1.479 (95% CI: 1.134–1.929), respectively. PFA had higher complications compared to HPSD (OR=4.44, 95% CI: 1.405-14.031) and CBA (OR=2.581, 95% CI: 0.992–6.720). HPSD had the shortest fluoroscopic time (P-scores 100%), while CBA had the longest (P-scores 0%). PFA had the shortest procedural time compared to CBA and HPSD with P-scores of 100% 50% and 0%, respectively.Conclusion:PFA showed higher efficacy but higher complication risk than HPSD and CBA. HPSD and CBA demonstrated similar efficacy and safety.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4144488-A4144488, November 12, 2024. Background:Oral anticoagulants (OAC) including Vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants like Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, and Edoxaban, have long been the standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, they increase the risk of bleeding, making them unsuitable for certain patient populations, particularly those with a personal history of bleeding, elderly individuals prone to falls or those with high-risk occupation with safety hazards. In cases of non-valvular AF, where thrombi typically form in the left atrial appendage, mechanical left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has come out as an alternative for selected patients. Numerous studies have shown that LAAC is comparable to OAC in preventing strokes while significantly reducing major bleeding events. This meta-analysis aims to compare the 4–5-year outcomes of these two treatment strategies in non-valvular AF.Methods:4 studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 1 observational study) comparing the 4–5-year outcomes of LAAC versus OAC in patients with AF were included in this meta-analysis. These studies were identified after a thorough search of PUBMED, COCHRANE, and MEDLINE databases from inception till May 2024. The outcomes of interest were MACE (composite of stroke, embolism, and death), ischemic stroke, major bleeding episodes, cardiovascular (CV) deaths, and all-cause death. The results were reported as Risk Ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), using a random effects model.Results:6,012 patients were identified from the 4 studies. After a median follow-up of 4–5 years, LAAC was associated with a clinically significant reduction in MACE (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.94, p=0.01), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.62-0.96, p=0.02), and CV mortality (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45-0.90, p=0.01). Additionally, a significant reduction in major bleeding episodes (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.44-0.91, p=0.01) was also noted between the two treatment strategies favoring LAAC treatment group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of ischemic stroke (RR: 1.07, 95% CI: 0.62-1.85, p=0.80) between the two groups.Conclusion:Over a median follow-up of 4-5 years, LAAC was found to be as effective as OAC in preventing ischemic strokes, while also showing lower incidence of MACE, all-cause, CV mortality and major bleeding episodes. More RCTs are needed to further assess the long-term outcomes between the two strategies.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4141367-A4141367, November 12, 2024. Background:Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition with high morbidity and mortality rates, and is known to pose a significant burden on the healthcare system. Telemonitoring, an innovative approach using remote monitoring of patients’ health data, has emerged as a potential solution to enhance HF management and improve patient outcomes.Research Question:This systematic review investigates whether telemonitoring interventions improve heart failure outcomes compared to standard care.Aim:We aim to synthesize the current evidence on the impact of telemonitoring on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure-related hospitalization, and health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure.Methods:We conducted a thorough search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and PLOS Medicine, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews/meta-analyses (SRs/MAs) evaluating telemonitoring interventions in heart failure. Studies were selected based on pre-defined criteria. A review of the literature and risk of bias assessment was performed independently by four reviewers.Results:Out of 16,778 articles reviewed, eight were chosen for this study, comprising 3 SRs/MAs and 5 RCTs. The findings suggest that using telemonitoring interventions, such as structured telephone support, mobile health interventions, and medication support, significantly reduces deaths and hospitalizations in heart failure patients compared to standard care. Longer telemonitoring duration (≥12 months) significantly lowered hospitalization rates.Conclusions:This systematic review suggests that telemonitoring may be associated with improved heart failure outcomes, including reduced mortality and hospitalization rates. However, further research is needed to explore telemonitoring interventions’ long-term effects and cost-effectiveness in heart failure management.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4145216-A4145216, November 12, 2024. Background:The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been proposed as a potential prognostic marker for mortality outcomes in various conditions, yet its association with chronic hemodialysis (HD) remains underexplored. We aim to study its utility by conducting a meta-analysis of this specific population.Methods:We conducted a comprehensive systematic search from PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify studies showing the association between NLR and mortality outcomes in patients with chronic HD. Random-effects model with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were employed to pool adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and odds ratios (OR), I2statistics for evaluating heterogeneity for all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiovascular mortality (CVM) outcomes. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and meta-regression analyses assessed changes in overall effects and identified confounders, respectively. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool was used to assess the quality of the studies.Results:Out of 180 articles analyzed, nineteen studies comprising 9,047 patients with a mean age of 59.5 ± 5.86 years and a mean follow-up duration of 46.7 months were included in our meta-analysis. The majority of the sample had a smoking history, hypertension, diabetes, and cerebrovascular diseases. Our meta-analysis revealed a significant association between higher NLR ( >2.5) and increased risks of both ACM (aHR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.13-1.36, P < 0.0001) (Figure 1a) and CVM (aHR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.02-1.49, P = 0.03). (Figure 1b) Studies reporting outcomes in OR also reported similar findings for ACM (OR: 4.58, 95% CI: 1.73 - 12.1, p = 0.002) (Figure 1c) and CVM (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.23, p = 0.03). Sensitivity analysis revealed no variations. The pooled AUC was 0.711 (95% CI: 0.63 - 0.80, p < 0.0001). JBI tool revealed higher scores indicating higher quality studies. Meta-regression analysis did not identify significant associations between NLR and confounding variables such as age. (Figure 1d)Conclusion:This meta-analysis strongly concludes that NLR ( >2.5) is significantly associated with ACM and CVM in patients with chronic HD and can be useful in planning for the prevention of mortality-related strategies.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4117690-A4117690, November 12, 2024. Background:Takotsubo syndrome is a reversible cause of heart failure; however, a low percentage of patients can develop serious complications, including cardiac rupture.Aims:Analyze case reports or case series of cardiac rupture in patients with Takotsubo syndrome, detailing patient characteristics to uncover risk factors and prognosis for this severe complication.Methods:We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify case reports or case series of patients with Takotsubo syndrome complicated by cardiac rupture, from inception to October 2023.Results:We identified 39 reported cases, including 44 subjects (40 females; 4 males) with a median age of 75 (IQR 71-82) years, of White/Caucasian (61%) or East Asian/Japanese (39%) ethnicity. An emotional trigger was present in 15 (34%) subjects and common admission symptoms were chest pain (35 [80%]) and dyspnea (14 [32%]). ST-segment elevation was present in 39 (93%) of 42 cases, with the anterior myocardial segments (37 [88%]) being the most compromised, followed by lateral (26 [62%]) and inferior (14 [33%]) segments. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 40±13% and an apical ballooning pattern was observed in all (100%) ventriculographies. The median time to cardiac rupture was 48 (5-120) hours since admission, with the left ventricular free wall (25 [57%]) being the most frequent site of perforation. Surgery treatment was attempted in 16 (36%) cases, and 28 (64%) patients did not survive (Figure).Conclusions:Cardiac rupture as a complication of Takotsubo syndrome is a rare clinical condition associated with high mortality. Elderly females, especially from White/Caucasian or East Asian/Japanese descent, presenting with ST-segment elevation in the anterior or lateral leads, and an apical ballooning pattern, are disproportionally affected. Additional studies with prospective collection of patient-level data are needed to better identify those at increased risk for cardiac rupture associated with Takotsubo syndrome and to address ways to improve mortality rates in this population.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4147717-A4147717, November 12, 2024. Background:SGLT2 inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in reducing cardiovascular death and hospitalization and are recommended as first-line therapy for hear failure (HF) in adults due to acquired heart diseases. Our study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and outcomes of HF patients with adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) treated with SGLT2 inhibitors.Methods:We conducted a comprehensive search of three major databases—PubMed, Scopus, and Embase—and collected articles on the use of SGLT2 inhibitors for HF in ACHD patients who were already receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI), beta-blockers (BB), and mineralocorticoid antagonists (MRA). We excluded articles related to acute decompensated HF and HF with preserved ejection fraction. The primary outcome was the change in NYHA functional class (FC). Secondary outcomes included changes in B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) levels, as well as body weight. Additionally, we evaluated the safety and tolerability of SGLT2 inhibitors in ACHD HF patients. A pooled effect size was calculated based on mean differences (MD) or log odds ratio (LogOR).Results:Our meta-analysis included 9 studies with a total of 287 patients aged 19 to 67 (median 37.5 years) (Table). When SGLT2 inhibitors were added to combined therapies, they significantly improved NYHA FC (LogOR: 1.3, 95% CI: 0.37–2.23, p=0.01) (Figure 1A), decreased NT-proBNP (MD -0.43, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.16, p=0.00) (Figure 1B), were associated with a reduction in systolic blood pressure (MD = -0.32, 95% CI: -0.51 to 0.14, p=0.00) (Figure 1C), and led to an elevation of creatinine (Cr) levels (MD = 0.18, 95% CI -0.0 to 0.36, p=0.06) (Figure 1D). Only 4 patients experienced urinary tract infections (UTIs), and none had hypoglycemia or ketoacidosis.Conclusion:Our meta-analysis demonstrates that SGLT2 inhibitors improve NYHA FC, decrease NT-proBNP, and are well-tolerated with safety features similar to adult HF clinical trials when added to combination HF therapies including ACEI/ARB/ARNI, BB and MRA. Future prospective studies are needed to assess long-term clinical outcomes in ACHD patients with HF.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4139209-A4139209, November 12, 2024. Background:There has been growing awareness and recognition of discrepant health outcomes based on ethnic and racial background in patients undergoing cardiovascular procedures. Transcatheter aortic valve procedures has become the primary treatment for aortic stenosis and is currently the standard of care. Despite widespread adoption of TAVR, African Americans (AA) have continued to remain underrepresented and typically suffer poorer outcomes. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare TAVR outcomes between AA and non-AA populations.Methodology:We systematically searched all electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of science) from inception until May 25th, 2024. A pooled analysis of data from observational studies and randomized controlled trials reporting post-TAVR outcomes based on racial background were included. The key endpoints evaluated were in-hospital mortality, post-procedure myocardial infarction (MI), pacemaker placement, in-hospital stroke, vascular complications, major bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI). We used the I2 statistic to assess heterogeneity among studies using the Random-Effects model, with significance set at I2 > 50%. All analysis was carried out using R version 4.3.2.Results:The meta-analysis of eleven observational studies, involving 953,892 TAVR patients [912,301 (95.64%) Caucasians and 41,591 (4.36%) AAs], showed a statistically significant higher risk of post-procedure pacemaker placement (OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.77-1.51, p=

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4143120-A4143120, November 12, 2024. Introduction:In patients who have undergone catheter ablation due to atrial fibrillation (AF), recurrence of this condition can occur. The effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan (S/V) on preventing atrial fibrillation recurrence compared to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor (ACEI) or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker (ARB) is not established. This meta-analysis aims to establish the best therapeutic choice for preventing AF recurrence after catheter ablation.Method:A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized clinical trial (RCT) and observational studies comparing the use of S/V with ACEI/ARB in patients who underwent catheter ablation. Results were presented as mean differences (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed by I2, and outcomes were expressed as relative risks (RR), using R software version 4.2.3.Results:Three randomized clinical trials and one cohort study, comprising 642 patients with 319 patients in the S/V group and 323 in the control group, were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months, with mean ages ranging from 58.9 to 65.8 years. A significant reduction in persistent AF occurrence was demonstrated favoring the S/V group (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.70; P=0.000004; I2: 80%) compared to the ACEI/ARB group. The analysis also showed a significant reduction in Left Atrial Volume Index (LAVI) (MD: -5.33; 95% CI: -8.76 to -1.90; P=0.002; I2: 57%) in the S/V group compared to ACEI/ARB. There was no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with S/V use (MD: 1.23; 95% CI: -0.12 to 2.60; P=0.076; I2: 0%) compared to ACEI/ARB.Conclusion:This meta-analysis demonstrated the efficacy of S/V in reducing the incidence of AF in patients undergoing catheter ablation compared to the use of ACEI/ARB. However, more randomized clinical trials are needed for a comprehensive evaluation of its efficacy in reducing AF recurrence in post-catheter ablation patients in clinical practice.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4142748-A4142748, November 12, 2024. Background:Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) represents approximately 20% of ischemic strokes. The optimal treatment strategy for secondary prevention remains uncertain for patients with ESUS. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus aspirin therapy in patients with a history of ESUS.Methods:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and Web of science databases were systematically searched for eligible trials until March 2024. The primary outcome of interest was recurrent stroke. Major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) were assessed as safety outcomes. We pooled hazard rations (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for analysis.Results:Four RCTs comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus aspirin were included comprising 13,970 patients, of whom 6,989 (50%) were randomized to the DOACs group. The mean follow-up was 16 months. Compared to aspirin, DOACs did not reduce the incidence of recurrent stroke (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.81-1.09; p=0.44), ischemic stroke (HR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.79-1.06; p=0.23), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.87-1.42; p=0.40), and major bleeding (HR: 1.56; 95% CI: 0.85%-2.86; p=0.15). However, patients in the DOACs group presented significantly higher incidence of CRNMB (HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.23-1.92; p=0.0002) when compared with the aspirin group.Conclusion:Compared with aspirin, DOACs use was associated with an elevated risk of CRNMB and did not demonstrate superior efficacy in preventing recurrent stroke among patients with ESUS.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4144815-A4144815, November 12, 2024. Background:Natriuretic peptides (NP) are frequently employed in diagnosing heart failure (HF); however, their effectiveness in guiding HF treatment lacks sufficient evidence. To address this gap, we conducted an updated meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of NP-guided therapy versus usual care in decompensated HF.Methods:PubMed, Embase and Cochrane database were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared NP-guided treatment to usual care for patients with acute decompensated heart failure. The reported outcomes were (1) all-cause mortality; (2) cardiovascular death; and a (3) composite of all-cause mortality and HF hospitalizations. Heterogeneity was examined with I2statistics. A random-effects model was used for outcomes with high heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was done using R Studio 4.3.2.Results:We included 10 RCTs with 4122 patients, of whom 2072 (50.3%) underwent NP-guided treatment. Mean follow-up was 14.8 months. All-cause mortality (HR 1.03; 95% CI 0.81-1.32; p=0.79; figure 1A), cardiovascular death (HR 1.33; 95% CI 0.72-2.47; p=0.36; figure 1B), and the composite outcome of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.77-1.11; p=0.4; figure 1C) were not significantly different between groups.Conclusion:These findings suggest that NP-guided therapy does not reduce mortality and heart failure readmissions in the management of patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4131100-A4131100, November 12, 2024. Background:Previous literature shows that metabolic surgery effectively decreases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in patients with obesity. The use of metabolic surgery has, however, been limited in people with obesity and pre-existing CVD due to concerns of poor post-operative cardiovascular outcomes. This study aims to determine the effectiveness and safety of metabolic surgery in patients with pre-existing CVD.Methods:A search of electronic databases, PubMed, Cochrane Central and SCOPUS was conducted from their inception till May 2024. The study was conducted adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes of interest were risk of all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), risk of myocardial infarction (MI), and cerebrovascular events in patients with and without prior CVD undergoing bariatric surgery. Data was pooled as generic inverse variance using a random effects model, and presented as hazard ratios (HR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI).Results:We included four studies in our analysis (n = 5,244). Our pooled analysis shows that metabolic surgery leads to significant reduction in risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: [0.42, 0.61]; p