Risultati per: Progressi nel trattamento della psoriasi: review

Objectives
Sepsis-associated hypotension or shock is a critical stage of sepsis, and a current clinical emergency that has high mortality and multiple complications. A new restrictive fluid resuscitation therapy has been applied, and its influence on patients’ renal function remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of restrictive fluid resuscitation on incidence of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) in adult patients with sepsis hypotension and shock compared with usual care.

Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

Data sources
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched through 1 November 2024.

Eligibility criteria
We included randomised controlled trials that compared restrictive fluid resuscitation with liberal fluid therapy on patients with sepsis-associated hypotension and shock, to find out their effect on the incidence of severe AKI. Severe AKI was defined as the AKI network score 2–3 or Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes stages 2 and 3.

Data extraction and synthesis
Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included trials. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Systematic Review Handbook for randomised clinical trials. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses, trial sequential analysis (TSA), Egger’s test and the trim-and-fill method were performed. Findings were summarised in GRADE evidence profiles and synthesised qualitatively.

Results
Nine trials (3718 participants) were included in this research and the analysis was conducted in random effects model. There was a significant difference in the incidence of severe AKI (risk ratio 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.96, p=0.006; I2=0%) and the duration of mechanical ventilation (mean difference –41.14, 95% CI –68.80 to –13.48; p=0.004; I2=74%) between patients receiving restrictive fluid resuscitation and patients receiving liberal fluid resuscitation. TSA showed that the cumulative amount of participants met the required information size, the positive conclusion had been confirmed. The GRADE assessment results demonstrated moderate confidence in the incidence of severe AKI, as well as the results of all second outcomes except the Intensive Care Unit length of stay (ICU LOS), which received limited confidence. The result of incidence of worse AKI was rated as of high certainty.

Conclusions
It is conclusive that fluid restriction strategy is superior to usual care when it comes to reducing the incidence of severe AKI in sepsis-associated hypotension and shock. Shorter duration of ventilation is concerned with fluid restriction as well, but the heterogeneity is substantial. GRADE assessments confirmed moderate and above certainty. Traditional fluid resuscitation therapy has the potential to be further explored for improvements to be more precise and appropriate for a better prognosis.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42023449239.

Introduction
Cancer and its treatments can lead to a wide range of side-effects that can persist long after treatments have ended. Across Europe, survivorship care is traditionally hospital-based specialist-led follow-up, leading to gaps in supportive care. Improved screening, diagnosis and treatment increase survival rates. With more individuals living with, through and beyond cancer, the predominance of the hospital-based specialist model is unsustainable, costly and resource-intensive. An understanding of what alternative Models of Care are available and the barriers and facilitators to their implementation is a first step towards enhancing supportive care across the cancer journey. The aim of this scoping review is to source and synthesise information from studies evaluating patient-oriented models of cancer survivorship supportive care for adults in Europe.

Methods and analysis
The scoping review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses—Scoping Review Extension guidelines and will be guided by a six-stage methodological framework. A search strategy has been developed according to the Population, Concept and Context structure and will be applied to seven databases. A targeted search of grey literature will be completed. All identified records will be screened using predefined eligibility criteria by at least two researchers and undergo full-text review for inclusion. Data pertaining to the conceptualisation, evaluation and implementation of sourced Models of Care will be extracted.

Ethics and dissemination
As there is no primary data, ethical approval is not required. This review will be conducted as part of the EU COST Action CA21152—Implementation Network Europe for Cancer Survivorship Care. The protocol and subsequent scoping review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The Action involves representatives from most countries across Europe which will assist with the dissemination of the work to key stakeholders.

Introduction
Urinary incontinence (UI) is a common condition among older adults with adverse consequences to health and well-being. Shame, stigma and cultural perspectives can prevent treatment-seeking behaviour. Although there is an abundance of studies in the health research literature that explore the physiological basis of UI, there is limited evidence on the role culture plays in shaping knowledge of, attitudes to and beliefs about UI. This review aims to answer what is known about the role of culture in shaping the attitudes and beliefs on UI to identify gaps in the literature and direct future research.

Methods and analysis
The Joanna Briggs Institute method for scoping reviews will be used to conduct the review, in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cumulated Index in Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EBSCOhost, Scopus databases and WHO Index Medicus databases will be searched, without any restriction on language and publication date, enhancing the comprehensiveness and inclusivity of the review. A preliminary search of MEDLINE was conducted (09 February 2024) to identify articles. The screening and analysis of the search results from the databases will be managed using Covidence software. Two authors will screen articles, with a third involved as needed to resolve any differences. Findings will be organised using tables and key themes will be identified.

Ethics and dissemination
Formal ethics approval is not required for this review as it does not involve any human or animal participants. Findings will be disseminated in a high-impact peer-reviewed journal with a focus on open-access publication at conferences and used to inform studies on the development of culturally sensitive management programmes for UI with the full involvement of patients.

Trial registration
Open Science Framework https://osf.io/3d97f

Despite common approaches to defining SMM, there are opportunities to improve comparability. No two definitions for use with administrative data in different settings involved a similar incidence and set of components and involved a similar distribution of components among cases. Harmonization of the purpose, constituent codes, and sources of data would facilitate comparisons between maternity systems.

Women who underwent child marriage are vulnerable to and disproportionally affected by IPV, emphasising the need for international efforts on targeted IPV interventions and ending child marriage globally to prevent more victims.

Introduction
Nonagenarians and centenarians, compared with other age groups, often exhibit distinct physiological characteristics and a higher prevalence of comorbidities, thus further complicating their care in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Despite the increasing number of such patients being admitted to ICUs, comprehensive research and studies on their characteristics, outcomes and complications during their ICU stays remain lacking. This scoping review will comprehensively address the following question: What are the characteristics, outcomes, complications and mortality rates among nonagenarians and centenarians admitted to ICUs, including their preadmission health status, reasons for admission, duration of hospital/ICU stays, and factors associated with adverse outcomes? The key objectives are to map the breadth and depth of the available evidence and identify key concepts, gaps and variations in research focus. Finally, we aim to highlight well-studied areas suitable for systematic synthesis, point to underexplored topics warranting further investigation and propose standardised approaches to research design and reporting in this domain.

Methods and analysis
We will conduct a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. All studies and publications reporting data on patients aged ≥90 years will be included, from an unlimited timeline to 31 August 2024. Studies reporting the characteristics, outcomes and complications of nonagenarians and centenarians admitted to ICUs will be included. The data will be analysed and summarised descriptively through a narrative approach. Qualitative data related to quality-of-life outcomes will be analysed thematically, as applicable.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethics approval was not required. The findings will be disseminated through professional networks, conference presentations and publications in scientific journals.

Even after successful tuberculosis treatment, children and adolescents can experience respiratory impairments and disability that may reduce their quality of life, ability to participate in activities, and growth potential. The epidemiology and clinical manifestations of these impairments vary by age, reflecting distinct biological and behavioural differences. Future research should prioritize these younger populations to ensure their unique needs and challenges are adequately represented.

This CPG provides the first evidence-based recommendations on use of food restrictions to prevent infections in children and adolescents undergoing chemotherapy and paediatric haematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Weight gain in outpatient programmes was markedly slower than in inpatient treatment. Clearer reporting of weight gain and a better understanding of the sequelae of faster/slower recovery is important to set future weight gain targets. Our results set an important baseline for current programmes to benchmark against.

Introduction
Stand-alone HIV clinics in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have effectively expanded antiretroviral therapy since the 2000s, transforming HIV from a deadly infection into a chronic condition. However, over the past decade, there has been a significant rise in the prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) globally and in SSA. People living with HIV are at higher risk for some NCDs, including hypertension, diabetes and different cancers. The region’s current healthcare infrastructure is not equipped to address this growing burden. Integrating health services for HIV and NCDs (ie, combining services for HIV with services for hypertension, diabetes, depression and mental health, substance use disorder or cancer) could be one strategy for responding to these challenges. In this scoping review, we aim to identify randomised controlled trials on HIV-NCD integration, assess implemented integration models and measured outcomes and highlight evidence gaps.

Methods and analysis
This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O’Malley (2005) methodological framework. Reporting will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. We will conduct a systematic search of the databases OVID Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Global, Africa Index Medicus, including terms related to HIV, NCDs and healthcare integration. Included trials must have been conducted within SSA and have been published in English or French after 1 January 2010. We will not select based on sample size or number of clusters. Both the title and abstract screening and full-text screening will be done in Covidence by at least two reviewers working independently. Data extraction will focus on key variables, including study design, geographical location, integration intervention, measured outcomes and reported findings.

Ethics and dissemination
This scoping review aims to generate new insights from publicly available research. Therefore, ethical approval is not required. Study findings will be shared through discussion with policymakers, implementation science researchers and healthcare providers. The results of this study are intended to be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration
This protocol has been registered with Center for Open Science OSF Registry (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/RGQSN). The search was conducted on 25 March 2024 and updated on 21 October 2024. The review is expected to be completed by March 2025.

Car-T da donatore contro neuroblastoma che non risponde a cure

Car-T da donatore contro neuroblastoma che non risponde a cure

Introduction
Intensive care unit (ICU) delirium is an acute brain dysfunction that affects up to 7 out of 10 patients admitted to ICUs. Patients who develop ICU delirium cannot think clearly, have trouble paying attention, do not understand what is happening around them and may see or hear things that are not there. ICU delirium increases the time patients spend in ICUs and hospitals and therefore healthcare costs. ICU delirium is also associated with increased mortality and dementia in the longer term. ICU delirium prevention and management strategies are likely to include both pharmacological and non-pharmacological components as part of a complex intervention, but it is unclear which components should be included. The objective of this meta-review is to systematically map the quantity and certainty of the available evidence from reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, which will be used to design a multicomponent intervention to prevent and manage ICU delirium.

Methods and analysis
A systematic search strategy was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO and Web of Science (from inception to 26 September 2023), as well as Epistemonikos (from inception to 19 July 2023). We will include all critically ill adults (aged≥18 years) and any ICU delirium prevention or management intervention (pharmacological or non-pharmacological). For pharmacological interventions, we will include reviews of RCTs. For non-pharmacological interventions, we will consider reviews of RCTs, quasi-experimental and cohort studies. We will use the International Consensus Study (Del-COrS) core outcome set for research evaluating interventions to prevent or manage ICU delirium and synthesise our findings using quantitative data description methods. We will involve our Patient and Public Involvement group of people who experienced ICU delirium to develop and comment on such aspects as the research question, methodology and which outcomes are most important.

Ethics and dissemination
No ethical approval is required for this study. The results of this meta-review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conferences. They will also form part of an evidence map and logic model for the prevention and management of ICU delirium.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42023473260

Introduction
Breastfeeding is the biological norm for infant nutrition. In certain scenarios, feeding at the breast is not possible, because of either maternal or neonatal reasons. In those cases, infants can still receive expressed mother’s own milk (MOM) and its beneficial properties. Mothers can express their milk using a variety of methods, while applying different hygiene practices, in different settings; moreover, expressed milk might receive processing before it is fed to the infant, particularly to reduce transmission of viruses such as cytomegalovirus to premature infants. The present protocol was designed to gather the evidence on the effect that the expression method, the hygiene regimen and setting and any processing used on expressed MOM can have on the clinical outcomes of recipient infants.

Methods
This systematic review will follow the methodological recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration, in accordance with WHO recommendations and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We will apply a hybrid search strategy, by combining structured database search with predefined snowballing searches. We will include primary research studies only, without restrictions on the type and including observational studies; no publication time, setting or language restriction will be applied, provided the abstract is available in English. Studies evaluating different methods of MOM expression, hygiene practices or settings during expression, processing of MOM and reporting clinical outcomes on recipient infants will be eligible. The searches have been planned to be performed in April–May 2024. Two reviewers will independently perform the reference screening, data extraction and risk of bias analysis of eligible studies, by using standardised tools specific for each study design. Quantitative and thematic narrative data synthesis will be performed and statistical heterogeneity between studies tested. Meta-analyses of extracted data will be performed where applicable. For relevant outcomes, certainty of the evidence will be tested by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethical approval is not required for this study since no original data will be collected. There is patient and public involvement throughout this research process. The results of this review will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and through conference presentations. Moreover, this systematic review will inform recommendations on milk banking of the WHO Department of Nutrition and Food Safety.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42024523299.

Objectives
Providing adequate access to mental health services is a global challenge. Smartphone apps offer a potentially cost-effective, available and accessible solution for monitoring, supporting and treating mental health conditions. This systematic review describes and evaluates the usage of smartphone apps across a wide range of mental health disorders in terms of clinical effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability.

Design
This is a systematic review of studies examining treatment, self-monitoring and multipurpose smartphone apps for mental health disorders.

Data sources
Studies were identified through a comprehensive search of the Ovid and PubMed databases. Articles published up to 14 January 2024 were included based on predefined criteria.

Eligibility criteria
We included randomised controlled trials that compared mental health apps (single- or multipurpose) with treatment-as-usual or no treatment for clinical populations with mental health disorders. Studies were excluded if they focused on web-based interventions, combined apps with non-TAU treatments or targeted physical health apps.

Data extraction and synthesis
Two independent reviewers screened and selected studies, with a third reviewer resolving inconsistencies. Extracted data included study details, participant characteristics, app information and outcome measures related to effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability. A risk-of-bias assessment for each study was conducted.

Results
Out of 4153 non-duplicate articles screened, 31 studies met full-text eligibility criteria. These included 6 studies on treatment apps, 4 on self-monitoring apps and 21 on multipurpose apps for a range of mental health disorders. Fifteen were identified as having between some and high concern on the risk-of-bias assessment. While smartphone apps were generally effective and acceptable, their feasibility appeared to decline over time.

Conclusions
Smartphone apps are promising tools for mental healthcare, demonstrating effectiveness and acceptability. However, challenges such as reduced feasibility over time, potential biases and underrepresented demographics require further research. This review proposes five recommendations for improving clinical translation in future studies.

Introduction
Appropriate use of pesticides minimises harm to human health and the environment. Despite regulations and restrictions on use, however, many farmers still use highly toxic pesticides in ways that endanger their health and the environment. Many pesticide users know little about the health effects of these chemicals or how to handle them safely. A systematic review will collate evidence of the effectiveness of educational interventions among farmers regarding health hazards and the safe handling of pesticides. The review aims to summarise the impact of educational interventions on knowledge and reported behaviour of pesticide users and to identify characteristics of more effective interventions.

Methods and analysis
We will search MEDLINE, LILACS, AGRICOLA, IMBIOMED, SciELO, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase databases and from the grey literature, Open Grey and WHO to identify potentially eligible studies. We will consider randomised and non-randomised controlled trials that evaluated the impact of educational interventions among farmers about the safe use of pesticides. We will include studies published between 2000 and 2024 in English, Spanish and Portuguese and consider outcomes of knowledge about pesticide health effects, knowledge about safe handling of pesticides and reported behaviour when handling pesticides. A meta-analysis of eligible studies, using a random-effects model, will estimate the impact of educational interventions on the outcomes as the difference between the intervention group and the control group at the last point of measurement. We will assess heterogeneity using the 2 test and I2 statistic, conduct a sensitivity analysis by removing each study from the meta-analysis and evaluate publication bias with a funnel plot and Begg and Egger tests. Subgroup analyses will examine the impact of different kinds of educational interventions.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethics approval is not required as no information from individuals are collected. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal or disseminated at relevant conferences.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42023413028.