In more than half of the colorectal cancer (CRC) screening participants with a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) result, no advanced neoplasia (AN) is detected at colonoscopy. The positive FIT result could also be generated by cancers located proximal to the colon: upper gastrointestinal, oral cavity, nose and throat cancers. We evaluated screenees’ risk of being diagnosed with a cancer proximal to the colon within the three years and compared risks between those with a positive versus those with a negative FIT.
Risultati per: Sviluppo di un test meno invasivo per la malattia infiammatoria intestinale
Questo è quello che abbiamo trovato per te
Patricia Lorusso (Aacr), 'Il tumore diventerà una malattia cronica a lunga sopravvivenza e buona qualità di vita'
La presidente dell’Associazione americana ricerca sul cancro, ‘vedremo grandi cambiamenti’
Real-world Stool-based mSDC2 Test Improved Detection of Advanced Colorectal Neoplasia for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Prospective, Multicenter, Community-based Study.
I test salivari Hiv e Hcv a casa con Anlaids Lombardia
Parte in tutta Italia la campagna ‘A casa mi testo’
Correction: A Next-Generation Version of the Multitarget Stool DNA Test (Cologuard)
A correction to a summary published online on March 14, 2024
Innovativo test delle urine per una accuratezza diagnostica del cancro alla prostata
Cost of SARS-CoV-2 self-test distribution programmes by different modalities: a micro-costing study in five countries (Brazil, Georgia, Malaysia, Ethiopia and the Philippines)
Objective
Diagnostic testing is an important tool to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, yet access to and uptake of testing vary widely 3 years into the pandemic. The WHO recommends the use of COVID-19 self-testing as an option to help expand testing access. We aimed to calculate the cost of providing COVID-19 self-testing across countries and distribution modalities.
Design
We estimated economic costs from the provider perspective to calculate the total cost and the cost per self-test kit distributed for three scenarios that differed by costing period (pilot, annual), the number of tests distributed (actual, planned, scaled assuming an epidemic peak) and self-test kit costs (pilot purchase price, 50% reduction).
Setting
We used data collected between August and December 2022 in Brazil, Georgia, Malaysia, Ethiopia and the Philippines from pilot implementation studies designed to provide COVID-19 self-tests in a variety of settings—namely, workplace and healthcare facilities.
Results
Across all five countries, 173 000 kits were distributed during pilot implementation with the cost/test distributed ranging from $2.44 to $12.78. The cost/self-test kit distributed was lowest in the scenario that assumed implementation over a longer period (year), with higher test demand (peak) and a test kit price reduction of 50% ($1.04–3.07). Across all countries and scenarios, test procurement occupied the greatest proportion of costs: 58–87% for countries with off-site self-testing (outside the workplace, for example, home) and 15–50% for countries with on-site self-testing (at the workplace). Staffing was the next key cost driver, particularly for distribution modalities that had on-site self-testing (29–35%) versus off-site self-testing (7–27%).
Conclusions
Our results indicate that it is likely to cost between $2.44 and $12.78 per test to distribute COVID-19 self-tests across common settings in five heterogeneous countries. Cost-effectiveness analyses using these results will allow policymakers to make informed decisions on optimally scaling up COVID-19 self-test distribution programmes across diverse settings and evolving needs.
Spallanzani, tenere alta attenzione su malattia tropicale Chagas
Giornata mondiale. All’Inmi test per chi viene da America latina
L'Ictus malattia anche dei giovani, colpiti 12mila under 55 l'anno
Al via Congresso,test su popolazione insieme alla GdF a L’Aquila
Test promettenti su vaccino anti-recidive del tumore al pancreas
Sperimentale e terapeutico, è basato su Rna
Un test sul fiato per scoprire i tumori: così si farà la diagnosi con il respiro
Sarà sfruttata la sensoristica all’avanguardia insieme all’intelligenza artificiale.
Protocol for a mixed-methods study to develop and feasibility test a digital system for the capture of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies (the PRO-CAR-T study)
Introduction
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies are novel, potentially curative therapies for haematological malignancies. CAR T-cell therapies are associated with severe toxicities, meaning patients require monitoring during acute and postacute treatment phases. Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs), self-reports of health status provided via online questionnaires, can complement clinician observation with potential to improve patient outcomes. This study will develop and evaluate feasibility of a new ePRO system for CAR-T patients in routine care.
Methods and analysis
Multiphase, mixed-methods study involving multiple stakeholder groups (patients, family members, carers, clinicians, academics/researchers and policy-makers). The intervention development phase comprises a Delphi study to select PRO measures for the digital system, a codesign workshop and consensus meetings to establish thresholds for notifications to the clinical team if a patient reports severe symptoms or side effects. Usability testing will evaluate how users interact with the digital system and, lastly, we will evaluate ePRO system feasibility with 30 CAR-T patients (adults aged 18+ years) when used in addition to usual care. Feasibility study participants will use the ePRO system to submit self-reports of symptoms, treatment tolerability and quality of life at specific time points. The CAR-T clinical team will respond to system notifications triggered by patients’ submitted responses with actions in line with standard clinical practice. Feasibility measures will be collected at prespecified time points following CAR T-cell infusion. A qualitative substudy involving patients and clinical team members will explore acceptability of the ePRO system.
Ethics and dissemination
Favourable ethical opinion was granted by the Health and Social Care Research Ethics Committee B(HSC REC B) (ref: 23/NI/0104) on 28 September 2023. Findings will be submitted for publication in high-quality, peer-reviewed journals. Summaries of results, codeveloped with the Blood and Transplant Research Unit Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement group, will be disseminated to all interested groups.
Trial registration number
ISCTRN11232653.
Tumore ovaio, 4800 casi avanzati l'anno. Importante il test Hrd
Oncologi, nuove cure e esami specifici migliorano sopravvivenza
Allerta in Giappone per una rara infezione, “malattia carnivora”
Per le preoccupazioni la Corea del Nord avrebbe cancellato una partita
Identificato un nuovo target terapeutico per la malattia di Alzheimer
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening With a Blood Test That Meets the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Coverage Decision
Current test performance characteristics of blood-based colorectal cancer screening tests are insufficient to justify their high costs compared with less expensive and more effective alternatives such as fecal immunochemical testing, triennial stool DNA testing combined with a fecal immunochemical testing assay, and colonoscopy.