Autore/Fonte: I. Grattagliano, A. Rossi, C. Cricelli
Evoluzione nella comprensione dei meccanismi alla base della comparsa delle varianti di SARS-CoV-2 e della efficacia dei vaccini anti COVID-19
Leggi →
Febbraio 2022
Questo è quello che abbiamo trovato per te
Autore/Fonte: I. Grattagliano, A. Rossi, C. Cricelli
Stroke, Ahead of Print. Despite evidence-based guidelines,1stroke rehabilitation remains underutilized, particularly among women and minorities.2Telerehabilitation is a promising alternative to traditional in-person rehabilitation and offers a novel strategy to overcome access barriers,3which intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic.4A broadband connection is a prerequisite for its wide adoption but its availability varies across the United States (https://broadbandnow.com/national-broadband-map). Little is known about demographic and geographic variation in internet use among stroke survivors. In this study, we sought to compare internet use in a nationally representative sample of individuals with and without stroke.
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page ATMP16-ATMP16, February 1, 2022. Introduction:Findings of association between COVID-19 and stroke remain inconsistent, ranging from significant association, absence of association to less than expected ischemic stroke among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The present study examined the association between COVID-19 and risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS).Methods:We included 19,553 Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries aged ≥65 years diagnosed with COVID-19 between April 1 and November 30, 2020 and AIS hospitalization from January 1, 2019 through November 30, 2020. We used a self-controlled case series design to examine the association between COVID-19 and AIS and estimated the incident rate ratios (IRR) by comparing incidence of AIS in risk periods (0-3, 4-7, 8-14, 15-28 days after diagnosis of COVID-19) vs. control periods.Results:Among 19,553 Medicare FFS beneficiaries with COVID-19 and AIS, the median age at diagnosis of COVID-19 was 80.5 (interquartile range 73.6-87.3) years and 57.5% were women. IRRs at 0-3, 4-7, 8-14, and 15-28 days following COVID-19 diagnosis were 10.97 (95% confidence interval 10.30-11.68), 1.59 (1.35-1.87), 1.23 (1.07-1.41), and 1.06 (0.95-1.18), respectively. The association appeared to be stronger among younger beneficiaries and among beneficiaries without prior history of stroke but largely consistent across sex and race/ethnicities.Conclusions:Risk of AIS among Medicare FFS beneficiaries was ten times as high during the first 3 days after diagnosis of COVID-19 as during the control period and the risk associated with COVID-19 appeared to be stronger among those aged 65-74 years and those without prior history of stroke.
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page A54-A54, February 1, 2022. Background:COVID-19, being a prothrombotic state, has been linked to ischemic infarcts. Pooled data on impact of COVID-related stroke on mortality are sparse. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess the risk of stroke-related inpatient mortality (SRIM) during the COVID pandemic vs. pre-pandemic.Methods:Pubmed/Medline, SCOPUS & EMBASE were searched for articles till August 2021 reporting stroke and SRIM during COVID-19 pandemic vs. pre-pandemic. Random-effects model for odds ratio (OR), I2statistics for heterogeneity assessment and leave-one-out method for sensitivity analysis were employed.Results:A total of 31 studies with 455,073 stroke hospitalizations; 365253 pre-pandemic and 89820 pandemics (mean age 72 vs 70 yrs) were analyzed. With a comparable distribution of males, AF, and thrombolysis, the meta-analysis showed a nearly 40% higher risk of mortality during pandemic vs. pre-pandemic admissions (OR 1.42, 95%CI:1.06-1.92, p=0.018, I2=98.59). Further subgroup analysis showed a slightly higher risk of mortality in cohorts with mean age
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page ATP30-ATP30, February 1, 2022. Introduction:Human subjects research requires the retention of enrolled patients in order to provide accurate data. The COVID-19 pandemic introduced unique challenges for clinical trial coordination. AtRial Cardiopathy and Antithrombotic Drugs in Prevention After Cryptogenic Stroke (ARCADIA) is an NIH StrokeNet national clinical trial designed to test superiority of apixaban over aspirin for secondary stroke prevention in patients with cryptogenic stroke and atrial cardiopathy. We sought to explore the methods that allowed our site to maintain a high retention rate in our local ARCADIA population.Methods:Prior to COVID-19, our trial coordinator (JP), conducted home visits to enroll and complete study visits every 3 months for the first year. This was approved by our local institution, IRB and study sponsor. During COVID-19 precautions, phone contact was maintained and encouraged. Face-to-face visits were not possible, but our coordinator continued to deliver study drug while maintaining distancing precautions. This was followed by a phone call to remind patients of drug instructions and dosages, and inquiring about any adverse events that may have occurred since the last visit. We evaluated the number of follow up visits before and during the COVID lockdown (March through June 2020).Results:Enrollments decreased during the pandemic, in large part due to a study-wide pause in recruitment efforts. The median monthly follow-up prior to COVID-19 was 3, and increased to 5 during lockdown. Before, during and after COVID, our local retention rate has remained 100%.Conclusions:In conclusion, despite complicating factors of COVID-19, our local coordinator’s retention rate remained 100% during the COVID-19 pandemic and our median number of monthly follow up visits increased, which may be attributable to our coordinator’s efforts of socially distanced home visits and frequent communication.
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page ATMP23-ATMP23, February 1, 2022. Background and Purpose:We sought to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on number of acute stroke patients admitted to Japanese primary stroke centers (PSCs).Methods:The Japan Stroke Society and the MHLW registry of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke conducted a national annual survey of hospitalization volumes for acute ischemic stroke, intracranial cerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage in PSCs. Number of acute stroke patients was defined as sum of three stroke subtypes admitted within 7 days after the onset. Monthly acute stroke volumes were compared between 2019 and 2020, among COVID-19 waves, and regional infectious rates.Results:The stroke volume data was completed in 530 PSCs. The annual acute stroke volume was declined 2.5% from 179,893 in 2019 to 174,385 in 2020. Number of acute stoke patients was declined during COVID-19 expanding periods (1stwave, Mar-May; 2ndwave Jul-Aug; 3rdwave Nov-Dec), whereas it was increased in the other months. The mean decline rate of stroke volumes from 2019 to 2020 was greater in 125 PSCs located in prefectures with high estimated SARS-CoV 2 infected rate (more than 2,300 per million people) than in 405 PSCs of the other regions (-4.6±15.4% vs -0.1±20.0%, P=0.008), especially during COVID-19 expanding periods (-8.2±17.9% vs -3.1±21.3%, P=0.009).Conclusions:Acute stroke volumes were declined in 2020 from 2019 in Japanese PSCs, especially during COVID-19 expanding periods and in highly infected regions. The overwhelmed health care system and infection control practices may have associated with decline of number of acute stroke patients during COVID-19 pandemic.
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page ATMP13-ATMP13, February 1, 2022. Introduction:Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and worse stroke outcomes. A clinical score that can identify high-risk patients could enable closer monitoring and targeted preventative strategies.Methods:We used data from the AHA’s COVID-19 CVD Registry to create a clinical score to predict the risk of stroke among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. We included patients aged >18 years who were hospitalized with COVID-19 at 122 centers from March 2020-March 2021. To build our score, we used demographics, preexisting comorbidities, home medications, and vital sign and lab values at admission. The outcome was a cerebrovascular event, defined as any ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, TIA, or cerebral vein thrombosis. We used two separate analytical approaches to build the score. First, we used Cox regression with cross validation techniques to identify factors associated with the outcome in both univariable (p
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page A53-A53, February 1, 2022. COVID-19 pandemic has affected our health and economy. Clinical trials confirmed multiple neurological symptoms due to COVID-19, ranging from headaches, insomnia to stroke, and encephalopathy. More studies are required to unravel the cellular and molecular mechanisms to find a cure for these neurological symptoms. Here, we investigate the effect of COVID-19 spike protein (S-protein) on the cerebrovasculature and cognitive functions in two mouse models that express humanized ACE-2 (h ACE2), a receptor essential for cellular infection and COVID-19 internalization. We hypothesize that COVID-19 S-protein causes cognitive dysfunction via the deterioration of cerebrovascular functions.Methods:S-protein was either injected intravenously or directly into the hippocampus of K-18 (h ACE2 in epithelial cells) or global h-ACE2 knock-in (h ACE2 KI) mice or wild-type mice. Cognitive functions were assessed by Y-maze and Barnes maze. Cerebrovascular density was determined using confocal 3-D image reconstruction. Human brain microvascular endothelial cells (HBMVEC) were treated with S-protein and assessed for apoptosis and inflammatory markers using immunoblotting and RT-PCR. K-18 and h-ACE2 KI mice received intraocular injections of S-protein; retinas were evaluated for vascular cell death and inflammation.Results:S-protein injections caused significant deterioration in memory and learning function of K-18 and h-ACE2 KI mice but not in the wild-type mice (P
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page ATP25-ATP25, February 1, 2022. Hypothesis:Hospital presentation for acute stroke may have been delayed during COVID-19. We hypothesize that stroke patients with mild symptoms (NIHSS
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page ATP26-ATP26, February 1, 2022. Introduction:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has changed the medical use of stroke patients. This study evaluated the health-seeking behavior of stroke patients and changes in stroke care services at the time of three domestic COVID-19 outbreaks in Korea using the Korean Stroke Registry (KSR) data.Methods:We reviewed data from patients with acute stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) from Jan 2019 to May 2021. There were three domestic COVID-19 outbreaks (1st: Feb to Mar 2020, 2nd Aug to Sep 2020, 3rd Nov 2020 to Jan 2021). Outcomes included patient characteristics, times from stroke onset to hospital arrival, and in-hospital stroke pathways.Results:The study included 34,271 patients who visited hospitals that contribute to the KSR. In the first outbreak, in Daegu city (the main epicenter), the number of patients decreased by two-thirds compared to the pre-COVID period, and the number of TIA patients was particularly decreased (9.97% to 2.91%). Unlike other regions, the median onset-to-door time increased significantly in the epicenter (361 min vs. 526.5 min, p=0.016), and longer times were common for patients with mild symptoms and who were in their 60s or 70s. The median onset-to-door time increased in the epicenter during the second outbreak, but it was not statistically significant. At the third outbreak, the median onset-to-door time was reduced even in the epicenter compared to the previous one. The number of patients decreased with each outbreak compared to the previous one, but the decrease gradually became smaller.Conclusions:Korean stroke patients in a COVID-19 outbreak region showed clear changes in health-seeking behaviors and showed a pattern of adaptation to the COVID-19 environment. There is a need for continued attention to an appropriate triage system and public education on the importance of early treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page AWP26-AWP26, February 1, 2022. Background:The coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected all aspects of stroke care delivery and resource allocation. We sought to study this effect utilizing the Florida Stroke Registry (FSR), which collects data from hospitals in large metropolitan cities and small communities, each facing pandemic peaks at different timepoints and within various healthcare system organizations.Methods:From March 2019 to March 2021, the FSR identified 82,899 patients with the final diagnosis of ischemic stroke and TIA. Stroke care metrics were compared in patients enrolled during the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020 to February 2021) to those enrolled in the immediate pre-pandemic year. These metrics included utilization of intravenous thrombolytic (IVT), Endovascular therapy (EVT), Door-To-Needle time (DTN), Door-To-Puncture time (DTP), Door-To-Computed Tomography time (DTCT) and overall Defect-Free Care (DFC).Results:Pre-pandemic patients (n= 41,929, 49.0% female, mean age 70.1 ± 14.6 years, 64.3% white, 20.4% black, 15.3% Hispanic) had similar demographics to pandemic patients (48.8% female, mean age 69.9 ± 14.4 years, 65.4% white, 19.9% black, 14.7% Hispanic). Pandemic stroke patients had more severe presentations (median NIHSS 3 [IQR 8] vs 3 [7], p < .0001), longer onset-to-arrival time (242 [677] vs 229 [654] minutes, p = 0.002), and were more likely to arrive via emergency medical services (62.3% vs. 60.8%, p < .0001) than pre-pandemic stroke patients. Although both groups received IVT equally (13.4% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.67), pandemic stroke patients were more likely to receive EVT (7.0% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.005) and had longer DTP (84 [60] vs. 81 [64] minutes, p = 0.01), shorter DTCT (22 [52] vs 23 [56] minutes, p = 0.01) and similar DTN (36 [22] vs. 37 [22] minutes, p = 0.05) times, with an increased DFC rate of 2.2% (86.6% vs. 84.4%, p < .0001).Conclusions:In this large registry based study, we found that compared to pre-pandemic care, ischemic stroke patients treated during the COVID19 pandemic presented sicker and later to the hospital and were more likely to receive EVT, but had longer door-to-puncture times. Despite many healthcare delivery challenges imposed by COVID19, Florida hospitals within the FSR maintained high quality of stroke care overall.
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page ATP23-ATP23, February 1, 2022. Background:Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a viral disease that has primarily been known to cause respiratory symptoms; however, there has also been an association of COVID-19 with neurological symptoms, including acute ischemic stroke (AIS). There is a lack of data on the characteristics of AIS patients with COVID-19 from the stroke belt. We aim to describe the characteristics of patients with COVID-19 and AIS and compare the characteristics of those who required intensive care unit (ICU) admission versus ward-only.Methods:Single center, retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted in a tertiary academic center from March 1-December 31, 2020. The institutional COVID database was utilized for data collection. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Primary outcome measure was mortality. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay (LOS) and discharge disposition.Results:Both COVID-19 and AIS were found in 2.4% (n=75) of patients out of 3,031 patients with COVID-19, during the study period. These patients were male (45, 60%), African American (43, 57%), 65±12 years old, with hypertension (69, 92%) and Diabetes Mellitus type 2 (50, 67%). We noted a 20% (n=15) overall in-patient mortality rate among patients with both COVID-19 and AIS. Among these patients, 23% (n=17) required ICU admission. Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics were comparable among ICU versus ward-only patients except for higher LDH (476.12±189.70 vs 276.17±88.35 U/L, p==0.0003); and lower relative lymphocytic count (3.57±3.56 vs 8.93±7.83 103cells/μL, p=0.0160) among those admitted into the ICU. Mortality (13, 68% vs 6, 32%, p
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page ATMP21-ATMP21, February 1, 2022. Background:Although hospital admissions for stroke declined in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with comorbid COVID-19 and stroke had increased mortality. We explored stroke mortality in 2020 and its association with COVID-19 prevalence and state-level hospital capacities.Methods:We analyzed CDC National Vital Statistics System and COVID Data Tracker data from 2017-2020. The primary outcome was age-adjusted stroke (ischemic and hemorrhagic) mortality rate per 100,000. The secondary outcome was % change in state-level stroke mortality rates in 2020 (vs. 2017-19); we report its correlation with state-level 1) prevalence of confirmed COVID-19 infections by 12/31/2021, 2) total COVID mortality by 12/31/20, and the 2020 average state-level % of 3) hospital and 4) ICU beds occupied by COVID-19 patients.Results:Figure 1A shows the typical seasonal decline in stroke mortality in quarters 2/3 was attenuated in 2020. The % change in state-level stroke mortality in 2020 (Figure 1B) was not correlated with prevalence of COVID-19 infection (rho=0.05, p=0.74), mortality (rho=0.10, p=0.49), or the % of ICU beds occupied by COVID-19 patients (rho=0.24, p=0.09). There was a correlation with % of hospital beds occupied by COVID-19 patients (rho=0.35, p=0.01) (Figure 2).Conclusion:Overall stroke mortality increased in 2020, particularly in Q2/3, the early-to-mid phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the state level, the average % of all hospital beds occupied by COVID-19 patients in 2020 was the only COVID-19 metric associated with change in stroke mortality. Future work should determine if this association was due to decreased hospital capacity to deliver standard stroke care.
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page ATP24-ATP24, February 1, 2022. Objectives:Evidence suggests an association of increased cerebrovascular accidents frequency in patients diagnosed with the novel coronavirus disease, COVID-19. Coagulopathy resulting from the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection is suspected. This study aims at evaluating thrombotic markers in relation to stroke severity and functional outcomes in a patient cohort of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with concurrent COVID-19.Methods:We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of 28 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 via polymerase chain reaction and concomitant AIS confirmed by brain imaging. We analyzed data regarding initial stroke presentation, markers of coagulopathy, and 90-day functional outcomes.Results:The patient cohort displayed high rate of comorbidities with 78.6% having at least 1 vascular risk factor. NIHSS had a median of 16 at initial presentation and median stroke volume of 52 mL. Median NIHSS at discharge or prior to death was 19, and median 90-day mRS was 4. Highest fibrinogen level recorded showed a median of 759.54 mg/dL (IQR 653.75-940.75), D-dimer and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) showed a median highest recorded value 24,106 ng/mL (IQR 6105.00-80165.00) and 442 ng/mL (IQR 277.00-545.50), respectively. LDH (p=0.0008), D-dimer (p=0.001), and maximum fibrinogen levels (p=0.049) near the time of stroke significantly predicted final NIHSS and functional outcome 90-days after discharge.Conclusions:Adult patients with acute ischemic stroke and concurrent COVID-19 disease exhibited abnormally high markers of coagulopathy, and LDH, D-Dimer, and fibrinogen levels were predictors of morbidity and neurological disability at 90-days in this patient population. Further research is necessary to establish a definitive pattern and assess the ability to use these markers as prognostic elements of 90-day functional outcome.
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page AWP28-AWP28, February 1, 2022. Background:Large vessel occlusion (LVO) is the most common stroke subtype for those patient’s presenting with COVID-19. Clot perviousness, or a clot’s permeability to iodinated contrast, provides insight to an individual’s responsiveness of hyperacute revascularization, clot origin and functional post-stroke outcomes. We aimed to calculate LVO perviousness for those with and without COVID-19 and its association with revascularization and outcomes.Methods:This is a retrospective case-control study for individuals presenting with middle cerebral artery (MCA) LVO with and without COVID-19 positivity. Clot perviousness was calculated by a blinded experienced neuroradiologist. Perviousness scores were compared with demographic and comorbidity information as well as revascularization and functional outcomes.Results:18 individuals with a MCA LVO (9 COVID-19 infected) were included. Those with COVID-19 were significantly more likely to have diabetes mellitus [67% (6/9) versus 11% (1/9),p= 0.05] and hypertension [89% (8/9) versus 22% (2/9),p= 0.02]. Clot perviousness trended lower in the COVID-19 group [11.0 (8.2 – 26.4) versus 31.7 (30.4 – 39.2), p = 0.10]. Those with COVID-19 infection tended to have a lower clot pervious score, [22% (2/9) versus 78% (7/9), p =0.057]. The majority of those presenting with COVID-19 died during the hospitalization.Conclusions:Our data suggests for those with COVID-19 and MCA LVO, clots tended to be more impermeable to iodinated contrast. This finding may be due to the underlying coagulopathy of COVID-19, namely alternations in fibrin homeostasis.
Stroke, Volume 53, Issue Suppl_1, Page ATP22-ATP22, February 1, 2022. Background:COVID-19 is thought to induce a pro-thrombotic state, which might increase stroke risk. The purpose of this project is to assess stroke severity, type and coagulation markers such as D-dimer, fibrinogen, and CRP in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and COVID-19, compared to a control group of AIS without COVID-19.Methods:We captured discharge diagnosis of all patients at our medical center with AIS and COVID based on their discharge ICD-10 coding between June 2020 and May 2021; and identified AIS without COVID matched for age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Group 1 was AIS with COVID-19, Group 2 matched (3:1) AIS without COVID-19. We compared baseline demographics, NIHSS, D-dimer, fibrinogen, CRP, presence of large vessel occlusion (LVO) in COVID-19 AIS vs non-COVID-19 AIS. We used a T test to compare parametric and Mann Whitney U for non-parametric values.Results:In total 23 (of 397 total AIS) patients were in Group 1; 69 in Group 2. D-dimer levels (mean) were 3237.3 in Group 1, and 2706.8 in Group 2 (NS), Fibrinogen 464.4 and 379.8 (NS), CRP 7.9 and 9.4 (NS). Median NIHSS was 21 versus 5 (p=0.003). LVO was present in 17 patients in Group 1 (73%) and 23 (33%) in Group 2 (NS). In total, only 5.8% (23 of 397) of all AIS in our data had Covid-19 infection.Conclusion:COVID in stroke was an infrequent finding in our sample (5.8%). Patients with COVID and stroke had higher initial stroke severity, but did not differ in coagulation values. Weather coagulation markers can help distinguish patients with COVID related stroke will require subsequent studies. We need additional data before treatment recommendations specific to stroke in COVID can be made.