Risultati per: COVID-19, nuova guida per gastroenterologi

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4141859-A4141859, November 12, 2024. Background:Field activation of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) during the COVID-19 (COVID) pandemic era involved a change in policy whereby patients underwent COVID-19 testing in the emergency department (ED) prior to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) versus bypassing the ED to the Catheterization (Cath) Lab.Research Question:We aimed to compare In-Hospital Mortality and other performance metrics of field activated STEMI patients at a large rural health system during the COVID era to pre and post pandemic periods.Methods:Retrospective single-center (Essentia Health, Duluth, MN, USA) cohort study of consecutive patients with STEMI activation identified in the field by EMS prior to the COVID era (5/27/2018–3/26/2020), during the 22 months of the COVID testing policy (3/27/2020–1/25/2022), and post-COVID when ED bypass resumed (1/ 26/2022–11/26/2023). The main outcomes of this study were in-hospital mortality and common STEMI system performance metrics.Results:A total of 373 consecutive field activated STEMI cases were included (pre COVID [N =132], COVID [N = 104], post COVID [N = 137]). Pre COVID, 40.9% of EMS activated STEMI cases stopped in the ED prior to the Cath Lab, 97.1% during the COVID era, and 51.1% in the post-COVID era (p

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page ASa807-ASa807, November 12, 2024. Background:Despite the lack of evidence supporting the use of chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CO-CPR) emphasizing the importance of rescue breathing for pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), prehospital CO-CPR is increasing. The COVID-19 pandemic may have led more bystanders to perform CO-CPR, even for pediatric OHCA. However, studies on the dissemination of CO-CPR and outcomes in pediatric OHCA are limited.Hypothesis:Spread of CO-CPR led to increased mortality in pediatric OHCA.Aims:Investigate the mortality of nationwide pediatric OHCA patients with the dissemination of CO-CPR pre- and post-COVID-19.Methods:We conducted a retrospective study using a Utstein-Style population cohort database (Japanese National Registry). Pediatric OHCA patients (≤17 years old) with bystander resuscitation attempts registered between the pre-COVID-19 era (2017-2019) and the post-COVID-19 era (2020-2021) were included. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after OHCA. The secondary outcome was 30-day poor neurological outcomes, defined as Cerebral Performance Category scores of 3, 4, or 5. We used Poisson regression with robust variance to estimate adjusted risk ratio (aRR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) and the population attributable fraction (PAF, %) with a focus on the post-COVID-19 period.Results:A total of 3,352 pediatric OHCA, 2,023 pre-COVID-19, and 1,329 post-COVID-19 patients received bystander CPR and were registered in the database. CO-CPR was more common than CPR with rescue breathing (RB-CPR) during the pre- and post-COVID-19 periods [pre-COVID-19: 1,356 (67.0%) vs. 667 (33.0%), post-COVID-19: 1,048 (78.9%) vs. 281 (21.1%)]. Comparison of CO-CPR vs. RB-CPR showed increased 30-day mortality in both periods [pre-COVID-19: 1,081/1,356 (79.7%) vs. 420/667 (63.0%), post-COVID-19: 841/1,048 (80.2%) vs. 181/281 (64.4%)]. In the overall cohort, mortality increased with CO-CPR (aRR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.09-1.23, PAF:1.60%). Due to the increased number of patients receiving CO-CPR, we estimated 21.2 excess deaths over the two-year post-COVID-19 period. Similar results were observed for poor neurological outcome (aRR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.16, PAF: 1.10%, excess poor outcome: 14.6]).Conclusion:With the spread of CO-CPR for pediatric OHCA, an estimated 10.6 excess deaths per year attributed to CO-CPR may have occurred in the post-COVID-19 period compared to the pre-COVID-19 period in Japan.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4144997-A4144997, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Myocardial injury in patients hospitalized with acute on chronic heart failure concurrent with index SARS-CoV-2 (CoV-2) infection is well described, though studies incorporating pre- and post-acute COVID-19 (PAC) are lacking. We address this gap by estimating intensity of acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) using time-series pro-BNP levels across hospitalizations pre- vs. respectively index and initial readmission (PAC1).Hypothesis:Case time series analysis will reveal association (p

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4138301-A4138301, November 12, 2024. Background:Hyperlipidemia (HLD) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Little is known regarding temporal variation in CVD mortality related to HLD. The COVID-19 pandemic added complexity to factors influencing CVD mortality.Question:What are the yearly trends and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on HLD-related CVD mortality in the United States?Methods:Mortality and demographic data for adults were obtained from CDC repository from 1999-2020, using ICD-10 codes HLD (E78.0-E78.5) and CVD (I00-I99). Age adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 1,000,000 population was standardized to the 2000 US population. Log-linear regression models evaluated mortality shifts. Average annual percentage change (AAPC) from 1999-2019 was used to calculate projected AAMR in 2020, subsequently compared to actual 2020 death rates to estimate pandemic-attributed excess deaths.Results:A total of 483,155 HLD-related CVD deaths were recorded between 1999-2020. Despite the CVD mortality decline in general population, HLD-related CVD AAMR rose from 36.33 [95% CI, 35.52-37.13] in 1999 to 99.77 [98.67-100.87] in 2019. Ischemic heart diseases (AAMR 49.39) were the most common causes of death while hypertension had the highest annual mortality increase (AAPC +10.23%) in populations with HLD. Higher HLD-related CVD mortality was observed in males (AAMR 104.87) than females (AAMR 61.93), in those ≥75 years (AAMR 646.45) than 35-75 years (AAMR 54.11), in non-Hispanic (NH) (AAMR 82.49) than Hispanic (AAMR 58.98) populations, and in rural (AAMR 89.98) than urban (AAMR 78.94) regions. NH Black populations (AAMR 84.35) and Western US regions (AAMR 96.88) had the highest HLD-related CVD. The first year of COVID-19 pandemic resulted in 10.55% excess HLD-related CVD death, with the most prominent increase in the 35-75 years age group (14.23%), Hispanic (17.96%), Black (14.82%), and urban (11.68%) populations.Conclusions:Our study revealed an increase in HLD-related CVD mortality which was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Higher CVD mortality disproportionately affected males, Black, elderly (≥75 years), and rural populations with HLD. Further research is needed to validate our findings and identify contributing factors.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4139757-A4139757, November 12, 2024. Background:The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly exacerbated sleep problems. Pandemic-related lockdowns and drastic changes in daily life have disrupted sleep patterns, resulting in a marked increase in sleep disturbances.Research questions:This study aims to investigate the primary factors contributing to the increase in sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic in Korea. By utilizing nationally representative data encompassing various variables, this study seeks to identify COVID-19-related factors associated with sleep disturbances during the pandemic.Method:We analyzed data from the nationally representative Korea Community Health Survey conducted in 2020, including 216,809 adults. Changes in daily life due to COVID-19 were assessed by asking participants to score their current situation compared to their pre-pandemic situation, ranging from 100 (no change) to 0 (complete cessation of daily activities). COVID-19 concerns were assessed with five questions: 1) fear of contracting the virus; 2) fear of mortality if infected; 3) fear of blame from others; 4) concerns about the health of vulnerable family members; and 5) concerns about economic impacts. Sleep disturbances were defined as sleeping 5 hours or less per night on average. Logistic regression analyses with a complex sample design were performed to examine the relationship between COVID-19-related factors and sleep disturbances, adjusting for socioeconomic and health-related variables.Results:A high level of lifestyle changes due to COVID-19 (OR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.11–1.19) and high COVID-19 concerns (OR = 1.04, 95% CI = 1.01–1.08) were associated with an increased likelihood of sleep disturbances. Conversely, resting during COVID-19 symptoms (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.76–0.87), having support during quarantine (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.89–0.97), and trust in the government and neighbors (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.89–0.96) were associated with a decreased likelihood of sleep disturbances.Conclusion:These findings suggest that sleep disturbances during the COVID-19 pandemic were mediated by lifestyle disruptions and high levels of concern. Social support and trust mitigated the impact of COVID-19-related risk factors. As part of preparedness, improving the environment to facilitate adequate rest during illness, ensuring strong social support, and fostering high levels of trust in the government and neighbors may be important to protect sleep health during future public health emergencies.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page ASa907-ASa907, November 12, 2024. Background:Different from the negative impact of COVID-19 pandemic on outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) collapsed before emergency medical service (EMS) arrival, there was a report suggested that COVID-19 pandemic did not affect outcomes after OHCA witnessed by EMS personnel. However, no large-scale studies have examined the impact of COVID-19 pandemic after EMS-witnessed OHCA, focusing on favorable neurological outcomes.Research Questions:Does COVID-19 pandemic affect favorable neurological outcomes after EMS-witnessed OHCA?Aims:To assess COVID-19’s impact on favorable neurological outcomes after EMS-witnessed OHCA.Methods:We performed an interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) with a prospective, nationwide, population-based registry in Japan to assess trends of incidence and favorable neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2) at 30 days with adult EMS-witnessed OHCA between pre-pandemic (January 2016-March 2020) and pandemic (April 2020-December 2021) periods. Subgroup analyses were performed by stratifying regions by infection spread status defined by whether a state of emergency has been declared. To assess whether there are differences in trends between areas with and without COVID-19 spread, we performed a controlled ITSA between the two areas.Results:We identified 58,315 patients with adult EMS-witnessed OHCA, 41,112 during the pre-pandemic period and 17,203 during the pandemic period. There was no significant increase in the incidence of EMS-witnessed OHCA during the pandemic period (0.03 per 100,000 person-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], –0.02 to 0.08; p = 0.21). Favorable neurological outcome significantly decreased (relative risk [RR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91; p < 0.01). In subgroup analysis, favorable neurological outcome significantly decreased in areas with COVID-19 spread (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.81; p < 0.01), while there was no significant difference in areas without COVID-19 spread (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.07; p = 0.24). A controlled ITSA showed that favorable neurological outcome significantly decreased in areas with COVID-19 spread compared to without COVID-19 spread (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.98; p = 0.04).Conclusion:Unlike previous studies, our research with a nationwide, population-based registry showed that COVID-19 pandemic influenced favorable neurological outcome in EMS-witnessed OHCA. This trend appears to be more pronounced in areas with widespread infection.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4142337-A4142337, November 12, 2024. Background:We previously demonstrated a significantly increased inpatient mortality of COVID-19 infection-induced male Takotsubo (TTS) patients during the early pandemic period. Since then, our management of COVID-19 prevention and treatment have evolved significantly, reducing both hospitalization and mortality rates. With these advancements, we have analyzed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of reported COVD-19-associated TTS patients since the initial pandemic.Research Question:What are the clinical characteristics and mortality outcomes of COVID-19-associated TTS patients especially in the context of improved prevention and treatment?Aims:To identify clinical characteristics and outcome correlates in patients with COVID-19-associated TTS.Methods:We completed a systematic review of 191 patients with TTS from 95 published case reports, 13 case series, and 4 observational cross-sectional/cohort studies published from April 1, 2020 to May 1, 2024 (PubMed). We performed clustering analysis using the clinical, imaging, and inpatient mortality data of 78 patients, which categorized groups of patients based on how closely associated or similar they are relative to other groups. Following this, we applied feature analysis to identify which features contributed the most to the clustering results.Results:Of all TTS cases, the mean age was 64.2±16.1 with 32.9% males. A total of 122 (63.9%) had COVID-19 infection, 21 (11.0%) had COVID-19 vaccination, and 50 (26.2%) patients had other triggers (2 patients had both COVID-19 infection and a non-infectious trigger). In-hospital mortality was 28.6% (16 of 56) for males and 13.2% (15 of 114) for females (p-value = 0.01). There was no association between COVID-19 vaccine administration and in-hospital mortality (0%, 0 of 21). There were notable differences in the clinical and demographic characteristics of TTS patients before and after September 2021 based on clustering analysis. Feature analysis indicated that COVID-19-induced TTS strongly correlated with in-hospital mortality and long-term adverse outcome in male patients.Conclusion:More male TTS patients were found during the pandemic than is expected of the traditional TTS archetype. A triad of “male, COVID-19 infection and TTS” appears to predict higher inpatient mortality. Compared to our prior study, inpatient mortality rates for TTS COVID patients have declined for all groups. Vaccine-induced TTS is associated with a benign clinical phenotype.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4141946-A4141946, November 12, 2024. INTRODUCTION:Mechanisms contributing to the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC, aka Long COVID) and associated functional limitations are unclear.RESEARCH QUESTION:Determine cardiovascular, autonomic and exercise physiology among patients with Long COVID.METHODS:Twenty-one Long COVID patients (16 females, 41±12yrs) underwent cardiovascular assessment during head-up tilt at supine, 30oand 60o, a 10-minute upright standing orthostatic challenge and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Baroreceptor sensitivity was determined with Valsalva maneuver. Heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) were monitored continuously. Plasma norepinephrine (NE) was monitored during tilt.RESULTS:During tilt, HR increased with transition from supine to 30oand 60o(72±12 v. 80±14 v. 90±15bpm, P

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4143772-A4143772, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Mitral valve prolapse (MVP) is the most common cause of primary mitral regurgitation and is estimated to affect between 1-3% of the general population. A subset of individuals with MVP develop malignant arrhythmias, often in the context of myocardial fibrosis. The genetics of MVP, and genetic factors explaining why only some individuals with MVP have adverse outcomes, remains poorly understood.Methods:We defined MVP using a combination of claims data and echocardiographic diagnosis across 15 cohorts spanning 5 countries and performed a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for MVP including 19,487 MVP cases among 2,247,054 individuals. Causal genes were prioritized using a combination of methods including the identification of variants in active promoters/enhancers using mitral valve ATAC-seq data from an external dataset. To determine whether prioritized genes may be differentially expressed in myocardial fibrosis, we compared single-cell RNA sequencing between fibrosed papillary muscles and normal left ventricular among two individuals with severe MVP.Results:There were 67 unique genome-wide significant (GWS; p

Background
Increasing evidence has emerged for traditional, complementary and integrative medicine (TCIM) to treat COVID-19 which requires systematic summaries of the net benefits of interventions against standard care and one another. The study aims to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) regarding TCIM therapies for treating mild/moderate acute COVID-19, potentially informing the WHO guideline development and clinical decision-making.

Methods and analysis
We will search Embase, MEDLINE, Virtual Health Library on Traditional Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, WHO’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform with additional searches of Chinese and Korean literature sources for randomised controlled trials comparing TCIM with placebo, standard care, no treatment or with an alternate type of TCIM to treat COVID-19. We will limit the search dates from 2020 to 28 March 2024. Reviewers will, in duplicate, screen eligible articles, extract data and evaluate the risk of bias. We will conduct frequentist network meta-analyses for network comparisons and each outcome. We will assess the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach and classify interventions from most to least effective or harmful.

Ethics and dissemination
This NMA is based on the existing trials and data which is not subject to ethical approval. We will publish the NMA in a peer-reviewed journal. This may provide methodological reference and clinical evidence for TCIM on future epidemic-prone diseases.

PROSPERO registration number
CRD42024517321.

Introduction
Post-COVID-19 condition, or syndrome, also known as long COVID, is an infection-associated chronic condition that can develop after a SARS-CoV-2 infection and last at least 3 months to years. Despite representing a high burden for the Unified Health System (SUS), which has affected millions of Brazilians, it has received limited attention in Brazil. Prevalence studies to date have failed to include a broad representation of the population, and there has been insufficient exploration of the impact on people’s lives and the burden of and barriers to accessing health services. This article presents the research protocol for the quantitative component of a mixed methods project to produce evidence to inform SUS’s provision of care for long COVID. The protocol was designed to study long COVID in SUS patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in a large city in Southeast Brazil to capture symptoms and factors associated with the syndrome, effects on quality of life and employment, health needs, use of health services and barriers to accessing necessary healthcare.

Methods and analysis
An ambidirectional cohort study to capture data retrospectively and prospectively from adults previously discharged from SUS hospitals for COVID-19. The study involves up to two telephone surveys with the patients or proxies selected from a sampling plan for population estimates. Survey questions include baseline and follow-up data on demographic, socioeconomic, comorbidities, work status, health-related quality of life, vaccination status, long COVID symptoms, healthcare needs, use and barriers to access. Descriptive and appropriate multivariable analyses will be employed.

Ethics and dissemination
The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of participant institutions and by the Brazilian National Research Ethics Commission. All participants provided verbal consent. We plan to publish articles in scientific journals and multimedia resources for SUS professionals and the general population.

Objectives
To explore experiences of physiotherapists working with adults living with Long COVID in Canada.

Design
Cross-sectional descriptive qualitative study involving online semi-structured interviews.

Participants
We recruited physiotherapists in Canada who self-identified as having clinically treated one or more adults living with Long COVID in the past year.

Data collection
Using an interview guide, we inquired about physiotherapists’ knowledge of Long COVID, assessment and treatment experiences, perspectives on physiotherapists’ roles, contextual and implementation factors influencing rehabilitative outcomes, and their recommendations for Long COVID rehabilitation. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a group-based thematic analytical approach. We administered a demographic questionnaire to describe sample characteristics.

Results
13 physiotherapists from five provinces participated; most were women (n=8; 62%) and practised in urban settings (n=11; 85%). Participants reported variable amounts of knowledge of existing guidelines and experiences working with adults living with Long COVID in the past year. Physiotherapists characterised their experiences working with adults living with Long COVID as a dynamic process involving: (1) a disruption to the profession (encountering a new patient population and pivoting to new models of care delivery), followed by (2) a cyclical process of learning curves and evolving roles of physiotherapists working with persons living with Long COVID (navigating uncertainty, keeping up with rapidly emerging evidence, trial and error, adapting mindset and rehabilitative approaches and growing prominence of roles as advocate and collaborator). Participants recommended the need for education and training, active and open-minded listening with patients, interdisciplinary models of care, and organisational- and system-level improvements to foster access to care.

Conclusions
Physiotherapists’ experiences involved a disruption to the profession followed by a dynamic process of learning curves and evolving roles in Long COVID rehabilitation. Not all participants demonstrated an in-depth understanding of existing Long COVID rehabilitation guidelines. Results may help inform physiotherapy education in Long COVID rehabilitation.

Objectives
This study aims to identify the factors influencing vaccine hesitancy, willingness and its variation over time in order to inform more responsive strategies for increasing vaccination uptake. The specific objectives are: (1) to describe and compare levels of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among the general population in rural and urban settings in West Africa over time and (2) to identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination willingness and hesitancy among the general population across five West African countries over time.

Design
Following a baseline survey (Wave I), three serial cross-sectional surveys (Waves II-IV) were implemented.

Setting
The study was conducted in Burkina Faso, Guinea, Mali, Senegal and Sierra Leone from November 2021 to July 2022.

Participants
A total of 13 571 study participants were included in the study (n=4373, n=4593 and n=4605 for survey Waves II, III and IV, respectively). Inclusion criteria were being 18 years or older, living in the study area and willing to provide informed consent. A two-stage sampling strategy was used to select the sample from among the general population.

Primary and secondary outcomes
Primary outcomes were the variability of vaccine hesitancy over time and across the five West African countries. Secondary outcomes were factors associated with vaccine willingness.

Results
A small but steady increase in hesitancy to COVID-19-vaccination can be observed across countries, with an upward trend of vaccine hesitancy reported by 952 participants (33.9 %) in Wave II, 1055 (37.3%) in Wave III and 1089 (38.1%) in Wave IV. Among the countries included, Senegal shows the highest level of vaccine hesitancy (‘Definitely no’ and ‘Probably no’ ranging from 50.2% to 56.0% and 26.2 to 28.3%, respectively). At the same time, Senegal has the lowest vaccination coverage overall. Across all five countries and survey waves, the primary factor associated with vaccination willingness is fear of experiencing severe COVID-19 disease (Wave II: OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.51, Wave III: OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.59 and Wave IV: OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.66). Perceived improved financial status seems to influence willingness to get vaccinated negatively (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.81) and unlike in Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich and Democratic countries, men seem more reluctant to get vaccinated than women (OR 0.77, 95%, CI 0.65 to 0.93).

Conclusions
Our findings suggest that vaccine hesitancy should be monitored over time to inform communication strategies, which are responsive to changes in vaccination-related public sentiments. Additionally, a focus on social solidarity and the importance of women in vaccination advocacy can help improve COVID-19 vaccination coverage in West Africa.

Trial registration number
The general protocol is registered on clinicaltrial.gov (protocol number: NCT04912284).

Misurando la presenza di certi anticorpi