Daily mobility, activity and environmental determinants of stress in ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and GPS studies: a scoping review protocol

Introduction
Stress is omnipresent in our everyday lives and a key risk factor for our physical and mental health. Yet little is known about the impact of geographic life environments, linked to our daily activities and mobility patterns, on our momentary and daily stress levels.
We propose this review to gather evidence on the spatio-temporal determinants of momentary or daily stress in studies using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) or experience sampling methods (ESM) in addition to global positioning systems (GPS) tracking. We will focus on the spatio-temporal definition and modelling of environmental exposures accounting for participant daily activities and mobility patterns and their association with stress.

Methods and analysis
This scoping review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework for scoping reviews (2018). We will search the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, PsycInfo and Scopus databases. We will include papers using EMA or ESM and GPS measuring chronic, daily or momentary stress as an outcome; these methods are also referred to as geographically-explicit ecological momentary assessment.
Articles published from January 2000–June 2025 will be screened. Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts to agree on the inclusion of articles. No geographical or population limitation will be imposed.

Ethics and dissemination
This study is a scoping review based on previously published and publicly available literature. It does not involve the collection of primary data, human participants, or the processing of personal or sensitive information. Therefore, ethical approval is not required in accordance with institutional and international research ethics guidelines. The results will be submitted in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences.

Read More

Caregivers challenges in engaging with the health system to optimise medication management of older care recipients: a qualitative study including home visits

Objectives
Medication management is a demanding task for family caregivers of older adults, adding to their care burden. The aim was to identify the challenges family caregivers experience in managing medications of older care recipients to obtain caregiver-centred evidence for developing social and health services to meet their needs.

Design
The qualitative data were collected during two consecutive home visits using thematic interviews with a narrative approach during the period of October 2017 to September 2018. The interview data were qualitatively analysed using the framework method with a combination of the inductive and deductive approaches. Human error theory with systems approach and prospective risk management was used as a theoretical framework.

Setting
Family caregiving of older adults.

Participants
21 officially contracted family caregivers and their older (≥65 years) care recipients using >1 prescription medicine from the capital region of Finland.

Results
Three conceptual models were constructed: (1) to position family caregiving in the public social and healthcare system, (2) to identify challenges and (3) needs for development in medication management prioritised from challenges. Family caregivers were not well integrated as a part of the health system, but left alone to manage the care recipient’s medications. When urgent treatment-related matters arose, caregivers were not able to reach the physician. The major development needs concerned (1) identification of the caregivers as family caregivers in healthcare and community pharmacies, (2) making familiar healthcare professionals accessible, (3) ensuring sufficient customised support for managing medications at home (up-to-date medication list, monitoring and medicines information), (4) more active involvement and communication in the care process and (5) adopting compatible electronic health records between primary and secondary care, and pharmacies and social services.

Conclusions
Family caregiving practices and support services should be developed in cooperation with the caregivers to meet their needs and place the families at the centre of the medication use process. Strengthening the integration of family caregiving to the social and healthcare system is vital, for example, by making easy access to family physician and involving pharmacists more actively in supporting medication management.

Read More

Cross-sectional study of the rates of military sexual trauma (MST) and associations with adverse mental health outcomes among UK female ex-service personnel: a study protocol

Introduction
This study investigates the rates of military sexual trauma (MST) and its associations with adverse mental health among a sample of UK female ex-service personnel who served during the Iraq/Afghanistan eras.

Methods and analysis
Female ex-service personnel, who participated in the fourth phase (Phase 4) of the King’s Centre for Military Health Research (KCMHR) Health and Well-being Cohort Study (2022–2023) and consented to be recontacted for follow-up studies (n=295), are being invited to participate in an online questionnaire between July 2024 and February 2025. The questionnaire contains surveys and questions related to experiences of sexual harassment and sexual assault during and outside of military service, disordered eating and broader female health issues. While the questionnaire relates to several female health topics, this study focuses on the surveys related to experiences of sexual trauma and eating disorders. Sociodemographic variables and some health variables, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), complex PTSD, common mental disorders, alcohol misuse, physical somatisation and social support, will be extracted from participants’ pre-existing data collected in Phase 4 of the KCMHR Cohort Study. Analyses will assess rates of MST, and hierarchical multiple logistic regressions will investigate associated health impacts. Rates and ORs, employing 95% CIs, will be reported.

Ethics and dissemination
This study has been granted full ethical approval by the King’s College London Research Ethics Committee (Ref: HR/DP-23/24–39040). Participants provide informed consent before participating and have access to a signposting booklet containing contact details for a range of support services. A risk protocol is in place, which outlines the procedure to be undertaken if a participant contacts the research team in distress. Findings will form part of a PhD thesis and will be further disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and dissemination with veteran mental health services and charities, and relevant government departments.

Read More

Family profiles in relation to early childhood caries: a cross-sectional study in France

Objective
There are no clearly defined family profiles with an overall view of the predictors of early childhood caries (ECCs). The aim of our study was to identify the profiles of families that are particularly affected by ECCs. We also examined the factors that can be acted on to promote oral health.

Design
In this single-centre cross-sectional study, the researchers examined the mouths of 300 children with caries and recorded the Decayed, Missing and Filled Teeth Index (dmft). These observations were supplemented by a questionnaire completed by the families, focusing in particular on their sociodemographic characteristics (e.g. age, parents’ professions and jobs, social assistance and family composition).

Setting
This work was conducted at Lille University Hospital between 2019 and 2024.

Participants
The participants included 300 caregiver-child dyads with children under the age of 6 years.

Primary and secondary outcome measures
Childhood Caries Index (dmft) and family characteristics associated with ECCs.

Statistical analyses
A multiple correspondence analysis was used, followed by a hierarchical clustering on principal components analysis, to identify the family profiles associated with ECC risk.

Result
Of the patients included in the study, 42% were girls, 58% were boys and their mean age was 4 years (±1.1 years). The mean dfmt index was 8.7 (±4.6); 77% of the participants had lesions on the smooth surfaces of the teeth, and 80% of the participants had a severe stage of caries disease. The analysis revealed three high-risk profiles based on the characteristics of the child’s mother and the family sibling composition. The first profile was larger families where the focal child was not the eldest. The second profile was families with foreign-born mothers and a low socioeconomic level. The third profile was families with mothers facing geographical and financial difficulties in accessing healthcare.

Conclusion
This study enabled us to identify the profiles of families at risk of caries. These at-risk profiles highlight the need to implement specific interventions acting at different levels and focused on oral health education in interprofessional practice during the key period of the first 1000 days of life. These factors could help to bridge the gap between oral health and general health, improve children’s oral health and reduce social health inequalities.

Ethics and dissemination
This human study has been ethically approved by the French Committee for the Protection of Individuals (N° 2019-A00827-50).

Trial registration number
The protocol is recorded on clinicaltrials.gov, with ID: NCT04195607.

Read More

Beyond the puff: qualitative insights into smoking behaviours and societal perceptions among university students in India

Objectives
The objective of the study was to understand the smoking behaviour of adults and how societal perceptions influence the smoking behaviour of university students.

Design
Qualitative study.

Setting
National Institute of Medical Sciences university, India.

Participants
20 face-to-face interviews were carried out among university students who were in the age group of 19–30 years using a combination of purposive sampling, followed by snowball sampling methods.

Results
Qualitative responses revealed that stress, cravings for cigarettes and mealtimes were key triggers for smoking behaviour. Many participants felt guilty about their smoking and often became irritated by advice from non-smoking friends. All participants had experienced negative health effects, including physical and sensory issues, as well as other adverse experiences. Students expressed a dislike for judgemental attitudes from society. They respected elders and found it difficult to smoke in front of them. Rather than being blamed for their smoking, they preferred supportive assistance to help them quit.

Conclusions
The study highlights the importance of understanding college students’ smoking behaviour, as it greatly influences their smoking habits. Cessation efforts should target this group and emphasise the negative experiences associated with smoking. Additionally, students recommend creating a non-judgemental and supportive environment to aid in quitting, rather than a judgemental and blaming society.

Read More

Prolonged Caffeine Therapy for Preterm Infants

Approximately 13 million newborns were preterm (born before 37 weeks of gestation) across all member states of the World Health Organization in 2020. In 2023, the US preterm birth rate was 10.4%. Nearly all preterm infants require specialized in-hospital care to support their immature respiratory, cardiovascular, central nervous, digestive, and immune function. The length of the initial hospital stay depends on the duration of gestation, the medical condition at birth, and the development of complications such as infections or chronic lung disease. The main determinant of discharge readiness is the infant’s physiological maturity, defined as adequate control of breathing, respiratory stability, full oral feeding with appropriate weight gain, and good temperature control in a crib. In addition, the preparedness of the family and the suitability of the home environment should be confirmed. Most very preterm infants (those born between 28 and

Read More

Patient-Reported Incident Measure (PRIM) tools for reporting patient safety incidents: protocol for a scoping review

Introduction
Patient safety incidents during healthcare cause a high burden and mortality, but many go unreported. Involving patients and caregivers in the identification and reporting of safety incidents would add value to the current incident reporting systems used by health professionals. Identifying and analysing patient safety incidents is essential to prevent future events, allowing organisations to apply a learning-from-error approach and to implement improvement plans. Patient-Reported Incident Measures are tools for patients and caregivers to report safety issues related to their healthcare. In accordance with WHO’s patient safety taxonomy, the term patient safety incidents is used throughout this protocol to encompass events that do and do not reach the patient, including what are commonly referred to as near misses and adverse events. We aim to identify and describe the published literature about tools for patients or caregivers to report patient safety incidents in healthcare.

Methods and analysis
We will conduct a scoping review. We have developed inclusion criteria using the PCC (population, concept and context) format, where population includes adult patients or caregivers; concept refers to documents describing formal tools used to report patient safety incidents; and context includes any healthcare setting, such as hospitals or mental health centres, during or immediately after care. The scoping review will be reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. Evidence sources include primary research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, conference abstracts, letters, guidelines, as well as policy documents, reports, blogs and websites, without language restriction. An initial database search in Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library from database inception up to June 2023 identified 4500 initial citations, of which 4103 were selected for evaluation after duplicates were removed. We will supplement the search by checking the reference lists of included studies for additional sources of evidence and an additional search in Google to identify non-peer-reviewed documents. This initial search will be updated before completing the review. We will use a self-created data collection form for data extraction and perform a narrative synthesis to integrate and summarise the review findings. We will describe the general characteristics of the tool: setting, scope, format, content, type of patient safety incident and severity, the moment of notification, relation to patient safety incident reporting and learning systems, development process, testing, validation, or piloting, among other characteristics. As a result of this scoping review, we intend to provide an index of patient/caregiver-reported safety notification tools and a list of descriptive or evaluation studies.

Ethics and dissemination
We will only use published data. Approval from the human research ethics committee is not required. The results of this scoping review will be submitted for publication in an international peer-reviewed journal and scientific meetings. Findings will also be disseminated through digital science platforms and academic social media.

Read More

Remote ischaemic preconditioning in cemented hip arthroplasty (the PRINCIPAL study)–randomised controlled trial: study protocol

Introduction
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective treatment for severe osteoarthritis. However, THA has a high surgical risk for patients with concomitant diseases and is associated with several serious complications, such as myocardial infarction, acute kidney injury and cognitive dysfunction. This study will explore the potential protective effects of remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) in cemented THA patients.

Methods and analysis
The PRINCIPAL study is designed as a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, blinded trial to assess the impact of RIPC in cemented THA patients. The study will compare two patient groups—one group will have the RIPC procedure, and the second will have the sham procedure. The primary outcome is the peak troponin T concentration during the three postoperative days. Secondary outcomes include markers of arterial stiffness (augmentation index (AIx), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, central blood pressures), neural (neuron-specific enolase, S100B) and renal injury biomarkers (estimated glomerular filtration rate, creatinine, cystatin C), markers of systemic inflammation (hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, IL-10) and oxidative stress (total peroxide concentration, total antioxidant capacity), as well as clinical outcome measures such as major adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality.

Ethics and dissemination
The ethical board of the University of Tartu has granted approval for the study (no. 384T-26). The results of this study will be disseminated in international peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number
NCT06323018.

Read More

Exploring cognitive function and postoperative neurocognitive recovery after cardiac surgery in older adults (ECPON): a protocol for an observational study

Introduction
Cardiovascular disease is one of the most common health issues facing the older population, and the number of older adults undergoing cardiac surgery is expected to increase. Postoperative neurocognitive impairment is a frequent and often unrecognised complication that can adversely affect a patient’s recovery, quality of life and daily activities, as well as impact the lives of their family members. Patients may express cognitive difficulties as a feeling of ‘not being the same since the operation’. This study aims to investigate the factors that influence neurocognitive function and patient-reported cognitive symptoms among patients aged 65 and older following cardiac surgery, and explore the impact on the overall postoperative recovery. Additionally, the study aims to describe the perspectives of close relatives on the recovery process.

Methods and analysis
A longitudinal observational study with a mixed-methods approach will be conducted in two thoracic surgical departments in Sweden. A total of 220 patients and 1 close relative for each patient will participate. Neurocognitive function will be assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively using a digitalised neurocognitive test battery. We will also evaluate postoperative patient-reported cognitive symptoms and signs, delirium, frailty, health-related quality of life, depression, perceived self-efficacy, fatigue and functional capacity. Each patient’s close relative will assess the observed cognitive function and report on caregiver burden. At the 6-month mark, a purposive sample of patients and their close relatives will be interviewed to explore their experiences of postoperative cognitive recovery.

Ethics and dissemination
The study has been approved by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (Reference number: 2024-03380-01) and will adhere to the Helsinki Declaration and its amendments. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences, as well as presented in various popular science forums and patient organisations.

Trial registration number
NCT06469515; Pre-results.

Read More