Risultati per: Gestione delle complicanze psichiatriche e cognitive nel Parkinson

This study evaluates the role of CACNA1C variants in altered prefrontal neurons in cognitive disorders.

Stroke, Ahead of Print. Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is traditionally viewed as a self-resolving episode of neurological change without persistent impairments and without evidence of acute brain injury on neuroimaging. However, emerging evidence suggests that TIA may be associated with lingering cognitive dysfunction. Cognitive impairment is a prevalent and disabling sequela of ischemic stroke, but the clinical relevance of this phenomenon after TIA is less commonly recognized. We performed a literature search of observational studies of cognitive function after TIA. There is a consistent body of literature suggesting that rates of cognitive impairment following TIA are higher than healthy controls, but the studies included here are limited by heterogeneity in design and analysis methods. We go on to summarize recent literature on proposed pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the development of cognitive impairment following TIA and finally suggest future directions for further research in this field.

Stroke, Volume 55, Issue 9, Page e265-e265, September 1, 2024.

Introduction
The efficiency of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) in cancer care hinges on facilitating clinicians’ cognitive processes as they navigate complex and uncertain judgements during treatment planning. When systems and workflows are not designed to adequately support human judgement and decision-making, even experts are prone to fallible reasoning due to cognitive biases. Incomplete integration of information or biased interpretations of patient data can lead to clinical errors and delays in the implementation of treatment recommendations. Though their impact is intuitively recognised, there is currently a paucity of empirical work on cognitive biases in MDT decision-making. Our study aims to explicate the impact of such biases on treatment planning and establish a foundation for targeted investigations and interventions to mitigate their negative effects.

Methods and analysis
This is a qualitative, observational study. We employ cognitive ethnography, informed by the Distributed Cognition for Teamwork framework to assess and evaluate MDT decision-making processes. The study involves in-person and virtual field observations of hepatopancreaticobiliary and upper gastrointestinal MDTs and interviews with their members over several months. The data generated will be analysed in a hybrid inductive/deductive fashion to develop a comprehensive map of potential cognitive biases in MDT decision processes identifying antecedents and risk factors of suboptimal treatment planning processes. Further, we will identify components of the MDT environment that can be redesigned to support decision-making via development of an MDT workspace evaluation tool.

Ethics and dissemination
This project has received management and ethical approvals from NHS Lothian Research and Development (2023/0245) and the University of Edinburgh Medical School ethical review committee (23-EMREC-049). Findings will be shared with participating MDTs and disseminated via a PhD thesis, international conference presentations and relevant scientific journals.

Objectives
The Action To promote brain HEalth iN Adults study aimed to determine the feasibility and applicability of recruitment using home blood pressure (BP) monitoring, routine blood biochemistry and videoconference measures of cognition, in adults at high risk of dementia.

Design
A decentralised double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised feasibility trial with a four-stage screening process.

Setting
Conducted with participants online in the state of New South Wales, Australia.

Participants
Participants were aged 50–70 years with moderately elevated BP (systolic >120 and 80 and

Patients with worse baseline pain experienced greater improvements in sleep.

Introduction
Insomnia is prevalent among patients visiting physiotherapists due to musculoskeletal complaints and associated with poorer pain prognosis. Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) may be effective for improving sleep quality and pain-related outcomes in these patients, but its availability and utility are limited in daily physiotherapy practice. The aim of this randomised controlled trial (RCT) is to evaluate the effectiveness of digital CBT-I in addition to usual treatment in patients with chronic musculoskeletal complaints and insomnia, compared with usual treatment only.

Methods and analysis
In this RCT, eligible and consenting participants will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to one of two interventions: (1) digital CBT-I adjunct to physiotherapy treatment or (2) usual physiotherapy treatment. Patients with musculoskeletal complaints and insomnia visiting a physiotherapist in Norway will be invited to participate in the study. We aim to include 188 participants to detect a difference in the primary outcome. Outcome variables will be assessed at baseline (prior to randomisation) and at 6-week, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome is between-group difference in insomnia severity, assessed with the Insomnia Severity Index (0–28 points) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include between-group differences in pain intensity, physical function, work ability, health-related quality of life, mental distress, and self-reported use of sleep and pain medication. Exploratory analyses will identify patient characteristics influencing the effect of the digital intervention.

Ethics and dissemination
This trial is approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Central Norway (Ref. 2023/533381). The results of the trial will be published in peer-review journals and disseminated at national and international conferences.

Trial registration number
ISRCTN91221906.

Objectives
Information processing speed (IPS) has been proposed to be a key component in healthy ageing and cognitive functioning. Yet, current studies lack a consistent definition and specific influential characteristics. This study aimed to investigate IPS as a multifaceted concept by differentiating cognitive and motor IPS.

Design, setting and participants
A retrospective data analysis using data from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (a population-based cohort of UK adults born in 1946) at childhood (ages 8, 11 and 15) and adulthood (ages 60–64 and 68–70). Using structural equation modelling, we constructed two models of IPS with 2124 and 1776 participants, respectively.

Outcome measures
Measures of interest included IPS (ie, letter cancellation, simple and choice reaction time), intelligence (ie, childhood intelligence and National Adult Reading Test), verbal memory, socioeconomic status (SES) and cognitive functions measured by the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III, as well as a variety of health indexes.

Results
We found distinct predictors for cognitive and motor IPS and how they relate to other cognitive functions in old age. In our first model, SES and antipsychotic medication usage emerged as significant predictors for cognitive IPS, intelligence and smoking as predictors for motor IPS while both share sex, memory and antiepileptic medication usage as common predictors. Notably, all differences between both IPS types ran in the same direction except for sex differences, with women performing better than men in cognitive IPS and vice versa in motor IPS. The second model showed that both IPS measures, as well as intelligence, memory, antipsychotic and sedative medication usage, explain cognitive functions later in life.

Conclusion
Taken together, these results shed further light on IPS as a whole by showing there are distinct types and that these measures directly relate to other cognitive functions.

New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 391, Issue 7, Page 598-608, August 15, 2024.

Background
Perturbation-based balance training (PBT) has shown promising, although diverging, fall-preventive effects; however, the effects on important physical, cognitive and sociopsychological factors are currently unknown. The study aimed to evaluate these effects on PBT at three different time points (post-training, 6-months and 12-months) in community-dwelling older adults compared with regular treadmill walking.

Methods
This was a preplanned secondary analysis from a randomised, controlled trial performed in Aalborg, Denmark, between March 2021 and November 2022. Community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 were randomly assigned to participate in four sessions (lasting 20 min each) of either PBT (intervention) or regular treadmill walking (control). All participants were assigned to four testing sessions: pretraining, post-training, 6-month follow-up and 12-month follow-up. At these sessions, physical, cognitive and sociopsychological measures were assessed.

Results
In total, 140 participants were randomly allocated to either the PBT or control group. Short-term (pretraining to post-training) between-group differences were seen for choice stepping reaction time (–49 ms, 95% CI –80 to –18), dual-task gait speed (0.05 m/s, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09) favouring the PBT group. However, these improvements were not sustained at the 6-month and 12-month follow-up. No significant between-group differences were found in other physical, cognitive or sociopsychological factors.

Conclusions
This study showed that PBT, in the short term, improved choice stepping reaction time and dual-task gait speed among community-dwelling older adults. Yet, these improvements were not retained for 6- or 12-months. The healthy state of the study’s population may have imposed a ceiling effect limiting the ability to show any clinically relevant effects of PBT.

Trial registration number
NCT04733222.

Introduction
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is an intermediate phase between normal cognitive ageing and dementia and poses a serious threat to public health worldwide; however, it might be reversible, representing the best opportunity for secondary prevention against serious cognitive impairment. As a non-pharmacological intervention for those patients, interventions that combine physical exercise and cognitive training, whether delivered simultaneously or sequentially, may have superior effects on various cognitive domains, including global cognition, memory, executive function and attention. The supportive evidence remains incomplete. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a combined exercise and cognitive intervention in Chinese older adults with mild cognitive impairment (COGITO), empowered by digital therapy and guided by the Health Action Process Model and the Theory of Planned Behaviour (HAPA-TPB theory) in a home-based setting.

Methods and analysis
This study is a randomised controlled, assessor-blinded multi-centre study. Four parallel groups will include a total of 160 patients, receiving either a combined exercise and cognitive intervention, an isolated exercise intervention, an isolated cognitive intervention or only health education. These interventions will be conducted at least twice a week for 50 min each session, over 3 months. All interventions will be delivered at home and remotely monitored through RehabApp and Mini-programme, along with an arm-worn heart rate telemetry device. Specifically, supervisors will receive participants’ real-time training diaries, heart rates or other online monitoring data and then provide weekly telephone calls and monthly home visits to encourage participants to complete their tasks and address any difficulties based on their training information. Eligible participants are community-dwelling patients with no regular exercise habit and diagnosed with MCI. The primary outcome is cognitive function assessed by the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) and Community Screening Instrument for Dementia (CSI-D), with baseline and three follow-up assessments. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, physical fitness, sleep quality, intrinsic capacity, frailty, social support, adherence, cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit.

Ethics and dissemination
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Peking University. Research findings will be presented to stakeholders and published in peer-reviewed journals and at provincial, national and international conferences.

Trial registration number
ChiCTR2300073900.