Messaggio del presidente della Repubblica nella Giornata Mondiale delle Malattie Rare
Risultati per: Malattia di Parkinson, stop al tremore con gli ultrasuoni
Questo è quello che abbiamo trovato per te
Gaslini e UniGe, Scoperta una nuova malattia del neurosviluppo
E’ associata alla mutazione genetica
Svelato il tallone d’Achille della malattia di Parkinson
Malattia di Chron, una dieta può portare alla remissione
La sperimentazione condotta con successo dal Meyer
Linee guida sulla malattia epatica associata all’alcol
Farmaci per la disfunzione erettile collegati a un ridotto rischio di malattia di Alzheimer
Antithrombotic Treatment for Stroke Prevention in Cervical Artery Dissection: The STOP-CAD Study
Stroke, Ahead of Print. Background:Small, randomized trials of cervical artery dissection (CAD) patients showed conflicting results regarding optimal stroke prevention strategies. We aimed to compare outcomes in patients with CAD treated with antiplatelets versus anticoagulation.Methods:This is a multi-center observational retrospective international study (16 countries, 63 sites) that included CAD patients without major trauma. The exposure was antithrombotic treatment type (anticoagulation vs. antiplatelets) and outcomes were subsequent ischemic stroke and major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial hemorrhage). We used adjusted Cox regression with Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) to determine associations between anticoagulation and study outcomes within 30 and 180 days. The main analysis used an “as treated” cross-over approach and only included outcomes occurring on the above treatments.Results:The study included 3,636 patients [402 (11.1%) received exclusively anticoagulation and 2,453 (67.5%) received exclusively antiplatelets]. By day 180, there were 162 new ischemic strokes (4.4%) and 28 major hemorrhages (0.8%); 87.0% of ischemic strokes occurred by day 30. In adjusted Cox regression with IPTW, compared to antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation was associated with a non-significantly lower risk of subsequent ischemic stroke by day 30 (adjusted HR 0.71 95% CI 0.45-1.12, p=0.145) and by day 180 (adjusted HR 0.80 95% CI 0.28-2.24, p=0.670). Anticoagulation therapy was not associated with a higher risk of major hemorrhage by day 30 (adjusted HR 1.39 95% CI 0.35-5.45, p=0.637) but was by day 180 (adjusted HR 5.56 95% CI 1.53-20.13, p=0.009). In interaction analyses, patients with occlusive dissection had significantly lower ischemic stroke risk with anticoagulation (adjusted HR 0.40 95% CI 0.18-0.88) (Pinteraction=0.009).Conclusions:Our study does not rule out a benefit of anticoagulation in reducing ischemic stroke risk, particularly in patients with occlusive dissection. If anticoagulation is chosen, it seems reasonable to switch to antiplatelet therapy before 180 days to lower the risk of major bleeding. Large prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.
Tumore del pancreas, scoperto come la malattia sfugge alle cure
Usa un trucco genetico. Studio apre a nuove cure
No vax: nuovo stop per le multe fino a fine anno, cancellarle costa oltre 150 milioni
Il nuovo rinvio al 31 dicembre 2024 grazie a un emendamento al decreto milleproroghe al voto dalla prossima settimana
Intermittent Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome Mimicking a Ventricular Tachycardia
This case report describes a patient in their 50s with a history of pneumoconiosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who presented to the emergency department with sudden onset shortness of breath.
SMI: sburocratizzare la medicina generale, valorizzare la telemedicina, stop alla medicina difensiva
Le tre richieste della medicina generale alla politica
Medici: aumenti lordi di 290 euro, stop a camici globetrotter e a troppi straordinari
Oltre agli aumenti passi in avanti su orario di lavoro, pronte disponibilità, guardie mediche e sulla possibilità per le Asl di spostare i sanitari
Outpatient paracentesis for the management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: study protocol for the STOP-OHSS randomised controlled trial
Introduction
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is the most significant short-term complication of pharmacological ovarian stimulation. Symptoms range from mild abdominal discomfort to rare complications such as renal failure, thromboembolism and respiratory distress syndrome.
Currently, clinical practice typically involves monitoring the patient until the condition becomes severe, at which point they are admitted to hospital, where drainage of ascitic fluid (paracentesis) may take place. Preliminary studies have indicated that earlier outpatient paracentesis may reduce the progression of OHSS and prevent hospitalisation in women.
Methods and analysis
This UK, multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group, adaptive (group sequential with one interim analysis), open-label, superiority, confirmatory, group sequential, individually randomised controlled trial, with internal pilot will assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness and safety of outpatient paracentesis versus conservative management (usual care) for moderate or severe OHSS. 224 women from 20 National Health Service and private fertility units will be randomised (1:1) and followed up for up to 13.5 months. The primary outcome is the rate of OHSS related hospital admission of at least 24 hours within 28 days postrandomisation. The primary analysis will be an intention to treat with difference in hospitalisation rates as measure of treatment effect. Secondary outcomes include time to resolution of symptoms, patient satisfaction, adverse events and cost-effectiveness. A qualitative substudy will facilitate the feasibility of recruitment. Participant recruitment commenced in June 2022.
Ethics and dissemination
London—Southeast Research Ethics Committee approved the protocol (reference: 22/LO/0015). Findings will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals and abstracts to relevant national and international conferences, as well as being disseminated to trial participants and patient groups.
Trial registration number
ISRCTN71978064.
“Alarming” Number of Patients Stop Taking Second-Line Diabetes Drugs
A large proportion—about 40%—of people with type 2 diabetes who were prescribed second-line medications after taking metformin to manage their condition stopped the drugs within 1 year, according to a retrospective cohort study that involved more than 82 000 insured participants between 2013 and 2017.
Oms: 'Il Covid è stata la prima malattia X, può succedere ancora'
Tedros a Davos: ‘Lo ripetiamo non per creare il panico ma per prepararsi’
Colpito da malattia rarissima 13enne salvato al Meyer di Firenze
Affetto dermatomiosite giovanile con complicanza, rischiava vita