Senza DRG, i pazienti non hanno accesso a farmaci e monitoraggio
Risultati per: Linea guida sullo standard di assistenza medica nel diabete
Questo è quello che abbiamo trovato per te
Diabetologi, riconoscere come malattia il diabete 1 asintomatico
Senza DRG, i pazienti non hanno accesso a farmaci e monitoraggio
Linee guida italiane su diagnosi e gestione del malato di celiachia: cosa cambia?
Assistenza al paziente terminale: valutazione dei fattori infuenti sulla gestione clinica e palliativ
LE RECENTI LINEE GUIDA ESC – (A ∙ Scompenso cardiaco, B ∙ Management della malattia cardiovascolare nei pazienti diabetici)
Linee Guida per la prevenzione, diagnosi e gestione della BPCO
Effect of goal-directed mobilisation versus standard care on physical functioning among medical inpatients: the GoMob-in randomised, controlled trial
Objective
To assess the effect of goal-directed mobilisation (GDM) on physical functioning in medical inpatients.
Design
Randomised, controlled, single-centre, parallel, superiority trial with a 3-month follow-up and blinded outcome assessment.
Setting
General internal medicine wards of a Swiss tertiary acute hospital, September 2021 to April 2023.
Participants
Adults with expected hospitalisation of ≥5 days, physiotherapy prescription and ability to follow study procedures.
Intervention
GDM during hospitalisation, which includes personal goal setting and a short session of patient education through a physiotherapist (experimental group), versus standard care (control group).
Outcome measures
The primary outcome was the change in physical activity between baseline and day 5 (De Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI)). Secondary outcomes included in-hospital accelerometer-measured mobilisation time; in-hospital falls; delirium; length of stay; change in independence in activities of daily living, concerns of falling and quality of life; falls, readmission and mortality within 3 months.
Results
The study was completed by 123 of 162 (76%) patients enrolled, with the primary outcome collected at day 5 in 126 (78%) participants. DEMMI Score improved by 8.2 (SD 15.1) points in the control group and 9.4 (SD 14.2) in the intervention group, with a mean difference of 0.3 (adjusted for the stratification factors age and initial DEMMI Score, 95% CI –4.1 to 4.8, p=0.88). We did not observe a statistically significant difference in effects of the interventions on any secondary outcome.
Conclusions
The patient’s physical functioning improved during hospitalisation, but the improvement was similar for GDM and standard of care. Improving physical activity during an acute medical hospitalisation remains challenging. Future interventions should target additional barriers that can be implemented without augmenting resources.
Trial registration number
NCT04760392.
Diabete, le nuove tecnologie rivoluzionano la gestione: sensori, microinfusori e pancreas artificiali
I moderni dispositivi permettono di adattare la terapia insulinica alle esigenze individuali di ciascun paziente, migliorando l’efficacia del trattamento
Linea guida sulla diagnosi e gestione dell’endometriosi
Diabete tipo 1, screening bimbi riduce 94% rischio complicanze
Cherubini (Siedp) “evitabili in oltre 450 bimbi ogni anno”
Abstract 4141352: Can quantifiable aortic or coronary artery calcifications in the standard of care baseline CT or PET-CT scan of patients with Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma serve as a predictor of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events?
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4141352-A4141352, November 12, 2024. Background:Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, ischemic heart disease requiring revascularization, stroke, and heart failure, have been documented as significant contributors to mortality in cancer survivors. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) can predict MACE in non-cancer populations, while calcium in the aorta (CA) has not been evaluated as a prognostic marker. Every patient diagnosed with cancer undergoes a standard-of-care Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) or a chest CT before the initiation of chemotherapy.Hypothesis:To determine whether the CAC or CA of patients with Hodgkin’s or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, derived from standard-of-care PET-CT/chest CT, can predict the incidence of MACE.Methods:Patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy, diagnosed and followed from January 1, 2013, through June 30, 2023, were included. Patients who did not undergo a PET-CT or CT, and/or developed MACE before treatment initiation were excluded. Univariate and multivariate adjusted Cox regression models were employed to assess whether the presence of CAC, CA, or CAC-CA was associated with the development of MACE. Calcium was retrospectively quantified using TeraRecon software (Durham NC) and categorized as: 0, 1-99, and >100. Outcome analyses was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results:326 patients were included, mean age of 55 years (range: 52-60), predominantly male 201 (61%) and white 314 (96%), CAC was found in 89 patients and CA in 140. In the univariate regression model, a statistically significant association was found with values >100 for CA, CAC and CAC-CA with the risk of MACE. (Fig 1a/b/c). CAC equal to 0 demonstrated a significant protective effect against MACE. (Fig 1a). In the multivariable analysis, these associations persisted even after adjusting for comorbidities. (Table 1).Conclusion:CAC, CA and CAC/CA >100 in the standard-of-care CT/PET CT are predictors of MACE in lymphoma patients undergoing anthracycline treatment, a CAC equal to 0 has protective effect, these relationships remained statistically significant after adjusting for comorbidities.
Abstract 4142087: Prevalence of Standard Modifiable Risk Factors in Patients with Ischemia and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4142087-A4142087, November 12, 2024. Introduction:Ischemia with nonobstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) is an increasingly recognized clinical syndrome. Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs; hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking) are associated with the development of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, but the prevalence in INOCA is not well described.Methods:From 2017 to 2024, 221 patients with INOCA underwent invasive coronary physiologic assessment including vasoreactivity testing with acetylcholine provocation, guidewire-based assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), and fractional flow reserve (FFR). In our present study, we sought to examine the prevalence of SMuRFs in patients with INOCA.Results:In the entire cohort, the prevalence of SMuRFs were as follows: hypertension (63.3%), diabetes (23.1%), hypercholesterolemia (70.6%), and smoking (7.2%). 33 (14.9%) had no SMuRFs and the rest (85.1%) had at least one modifiable risk factor. SMuRF-less INOCA patients were younger (53.0 ± 11.8 years vs 58.5 ± 10.4 years; p=0.017) and were more commonly female (90.1% vs 68.1%; p=0.007). CFR, IMR and FFR were similar in both groups, but patients with SMuRFs had higher left ventricular end diastolic pressure (14.3 ± 4.7 mmHg vs 11.6 ± 3.4 mmHg; p=0.001) (Figure 1). Among patients with SMuRFs and no SMuRFs, the frequency of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), vasospastic angina (VA), and mixed CMD/VA were similar, but patients with 0 SMuRFs had higher rates of myocardial bridging (21.2% vs 8.5%; p=0.044) (Figure 2).Conclusion:There was a high prevalence of SMuRFs in our study sample, with the majority of patients having hypertension and hyperlipidemia. The presence of SMuRFs was associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Among INOCA phenotypes, myocardial bridging was more common in patients without SMuRFs.
Abstract 4140901: Compression-Only or Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4140901-A4140901, November 12, 2024. Background:This meta-analysis aims to compare chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CO-CPR) with standard CPR (sCPR), which includes mouth-to-mouth ventilation, as potential strategies for managing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Methods:We systematically searched various databases and registries such as MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov to retrieve relevant studies. We used the revised Cochrane “Risk of bias” tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) to assess the risk of bias in included studies. Revman 5.4 was used to pool dichotomous outcomes under a random effects model.Results:A total of 4 RCTs were included in our meta-analysis. Our results indicate that CO-CPR was associated with a significantly increased survival to hospital discharge compared to sCPR (RR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.46) with minimal heterogeneity (I2= 0%). No significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding 1-day survival (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.23), survival to hospital admission with a good neurological outcome (CPC 1 or 2) (RR 1.10, 95% CI: 0.80 to 1.51), return of spontaneous circulation (RR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.95 to 1.17), and survival to hospital admission (RR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.25).Conclusion:This meta-analysis found that chest compression-only CPR (CO-CPR) significantly improves survival to hospital discharge compared to standard CPR for managing OHCA while yielding comparable results for other resuscitation outcomes.
Abstract 4141704: An Innovative, Non-invasive, Credit-Card Sized Device for Ambulatory 12 Lead ECG Recording: First-In-Human Experience Compared to Standard 12 Lead ECG
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4141704-A4141704, November 12, 2024. Background:The multiple electrodes needed to generate a 12-lead electrocardiogram (12L ECG) limits its use to traditional health care settings. An innovative credit-card sized unit (HeartBeam, Santa Clara, CA, USA) when placed on the chest without cables captures a vectorcardiogram (VCG). A personalized transformation matrix (PTM) then converts the signals into a 12L ECG.Objective:This is the first quantitative (standard intervals and amplitudes) and qualitative (rhythm diagnosis) accuracy assessment of a synthesized 12L ECG (Syn 12L) compared to a simultaneously recorded standard 12L ECG (Std 12L) on patients in sinus rhythm (SR) or in a non-life-threatening arrhythmia.Methods:The 80 patients, who were enrolled at a single center (Dedinje Cardiovascular Research Institute, Belgrade, Serbia), first underwent recording of a Std 12L and VCG to create a unique PTM, which was used to create the Syn 12L from the VCG. Then a simultaneous Std 12L and VCG were recorded. The quantitative endpoint was the calculated difference (mean and standard deviation [SD]) between the Syn 12L and Std 12L in a series of intervals (RR, PQ, QJ, and QT) and amplitudes (P wave, R wave, and T wave). For the qualitative endpoint, 2 blinded electrophysiology physicians (EP) classified the Syn 12L and Std 12L arrhythmia status.Results:Of the 80 patients, 41 were in SR and 39 in another rhythm (3:SR with PACs, 5:SR with PVCs, 1:SR with pre-excitation, 16:atrial fibrillation, 3:atrial flutter, 2:atrial pacing, and 9:ventricular pacing). The interval and amplitude differences are listed in the table. Rhythm classification by the blinded EPs demonstrated a sensitivity of 94.9% (95% CI: 82.7-99.4%) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 91.4-100%) compared to Std 12L.Conclusion:In this first study comparing the performance of a 12L ECG created from a credit card sized VCG recorder, the 12L Syn demonstrated clinically equivalent interval and amplitude accuracy and excellent agreement in arrhythmia classification when compared to a simultaneously recorded 12L Std. This approach holds significant promise, potentially permitting patients to obtain a 12L ECG outside of a health care setting with a compact, easy to use device.
Abstract 4141710: Artificial Intelligence Guided Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Standard-Of-Care in Stable Chest Pain Syndromes
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4141710-A4141710, November 12, 2024. Background:Stress perfusion CMR has excellent diagnostic and prognostic values in assessing chest pain syndromes. AI-guided methods may overcome complex scanning and increase clinical adaptation of stress CMR.Aim:To assess the benefits of AI-guided stress perfusion CMR.Methods:Consecutive patients with stable chest pain underwent stress CMR using either a standard scanning method (SOC) or an AI-assist (AIA) machine learning protocol to automate scan planning, plane prescription, sequence tuning, and image reconstruction. Scan duration, the ratio of scan preparation time over the entire scan duration, and scan quality using a 5-point scale were compared between AIA and SOC. Cox regression models were constructed to associate evidence of ischemia on stress CMR, by either scanning method, with composite endpoints including cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, unstable angina hospitalization, and late CABG. A second composite endpoint included the performance of additional cardiac imaging tests (stress imaging and CCTA) and invasive coronary procedures after CMR.Results:Among 594 patients (62.8 ± 14 years), 29% underwent stress CMR with AIA. 26% had stress-perfusion ischemia, and 39% had LGE present. AIA stress CMR had lower scan duration (median 44.0 [IQR 40-47] vs. 52.5 min [IQR 46-60]; p
Abstract 4120131: Absence of standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRF-less) among 5002 Middle Eastern patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: (Interim analysis from the Jo-SMuRF Study)
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4120131-A4120131, November 12, 2024. Introduction:A growing number of patients develop atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) despite the absence of standard modifiable risk factors i.e. hypertension (HTN), type 2 diabetes (T2D), dyslipidemia (DSL), and cigarette smoking (SMuRF-less). There is scarcity of studies on prevalence and clinical profiles of SMuRF-less patients in the Middle Ease (ME).Aim:To study the prevalence and clinical features of ME patients with ASCVD who are SMuRF-less vs. those with ≥ 1 SMuRFs, presence of other risk factors and utilization of secondary preventive medications in the 2 groups, and one year survival.Methods:Clinical details of adult patients with ASCVD who participated in 5 previous registries were analyzed according to the absence or presence of ≥ 1 SMuRFs.Results:Of the 5002 patients included in the analysis, 676 (13.5%) were SMuRF-less and 4326 (86.5%) had ≥ 1 SMuRFs. Prevalence of the 4 SMuRFs in the whole cohort was 53.5% HTN, 47.8% T2D, 40.2% smoking, and 37.5% DSL, and the SMuRF group was 61.9%, 55.2%, 46.5%, and 43.4%, respectively. Compared with the SMuRFs group, patients in the SMuRFless group were younger (mean age 52±11.4 years vs. 56.3±11.5 years, respectively, p