Autore/Fonte: UEG Journal
Linee guida tedesche per la gestione della diverticolite
Leggi →
Novembre 2022
Questo è quello che abbiamo trovato per te
Autore/Fonte: UEG Journal
Autore/Fonte: NICE
Autore/Fonte: NICE guideline
Autore/Fonte: Canadian Urological Association
Neonatologi, proseguire fino ai 6 anni le cure
ANSA Incontra con gli esperti, focus su tecnologia e prevenzione
ANSA Incontra con gli esperti, focus su tecnologia e prevenzione
Objective
The perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin plus docetaxel (FLOT) was recommended by the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines for gastric cancer (2018 edition) for patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (class IIA). However, the economic impact of FLOT chemotherapy in China remains unclear. The analysis aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of FLOT versus epirubicin, cisplatin plus fluorouracil or capecitabine (ECF/ECX) in patients with locally advanced resectable tumours.
Design
We developed a Markov model to compare the healthcare and economic outcomes of FLOT and ECF/ECX in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Costs were estimated from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system. Clinical and utility inputs were derived from the FLOT4 phase II/III clinical trial and published literature. Sensitivity analyses were employed to assess the robustness of our result. The annual discount rate for costs and health outcomes was set at 5%.
Outcome measures
The primary outcome of incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) was calculated as the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).
Results
The base-case analysis found that compared with ECF/ECX, the use of FLOT chemotherapy was associated with an additional 1.08 QALYs, resulting in an ICER of US$851/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis results suggested that the HR of overall survival and progression-free survival had the greatest impact on the ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that FLOT was more likely to be cost-effective compared with ECF/ECX at a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$31 513/QALY.
Conclusions
For patients with locally advanced resectable tumours, the FLOT chemotherapy is a cost-effective treatment option compared with ECF/ECX in China.
Trial registration number
NCT01216644.
We are pleased to announce 2 new sections of Gastroenterology: Gastro Curbside Consult and Gastro Grand Rounds.
Autore/Fonte: British Medical Journal
Autore/Fonte: Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
Autore/Fonte: Brazilian Society of Cardiology
Autore/Fonte: Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Autore/Fonte: United European Gastroenterol J
Autore/Fonte: KDIGO