Association of socioeconomic position and childhood obesity in Finland: a registry-based study

Objective
To identify what dimensions of socioeconomic position (SEP) are most closely associated with childhood obesity in Finland, leveraging population-wide data among the whole child population aged 2–17 years in Finland.

Design
Registry-based study.

Setting
Data from several administrative registries linked on individual level covering the whole of Finland were used. Data on height and weight measurements in 2018 were obtained from the Register of Primary Health Care visits and data on sociodemographic and socioeconomic indicators (2014–2018) from Statistics Finland.

Participants
Children aged 2–17 years with valid height and weight measurements performed at the child health clinic or school healthcare in 2018 (final n=194 423).

Main outcome measures
Obesity was defined according to WHO Growth Reference curves. Sociodemographic and socioeconomic indicators were linked on individual level for adults (both parents) who lived in the same household (42 predictors). Boosted regression model was used to analyse the contribution of SEP to obesity.

Results
From socioeconomic indicators, annual household income (12.6%) and mother and father’s educational level (12.6% and 8.1%, respectively) had the highest relative influence on obesity risk. The relative influence of a child’s sex was 7.7%.

Conclusions
The parents’ SEP was inversely associated with obesity among the offspring. A remarkable number of objective SEP indicators were analysed with parents’ education and household income finally being the indicators most strongly associated with obesity among children. In future research, more attention should be paid to reliable and objective ways of measuring educational status and income rather than on developing new SEP indicators. Administrative registries with information on both healthcare and socioeconomic indicators can in future provide better opportunities to assess the influence of SEP on various health risks.

Leggi
Dicembre 2022

Validity of algorithms for identifying mild traumatic brain injury in the French national emergency department database OSCOUR: a retrospective multicentre validation study protocol

Introduction
The French emergency department (ED) surveillance network OSCOUR transmits data on ED visits to Santé publique France (the national public health agency). As these data are collected daily and are almost exhaustive at a national level, it would seem relevant to use them for national epidemiological surveillance of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). This article presents the protocol of a planned study to validate algorithms for identifying mTBI in the OSCOUR database. Algorithms to be tested will be based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes.

Methods and analysis
We will perform a multicentre validation study of algorithms for identifying mTBI in OSCOUR. Different combinations of ICD-10 codes will be used to identify cases of mTBI in the OSCOUR database. A random sample of mTBI cases and non-cases will be selected from four EDs. Medical charts will serve as the reference standard to validate the algorithms. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the different algorithms, as well as their 95% CIs, will be calculated and compared.

Ethics and dissemination
The ethics committee of the French National Data Protection Authority (CNIL) approved this study (n° 921152, 1 August 2021). Results will be submitted to national and international peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences dedicated to trauma and to methodologies for the construction and validation of algorithms.

Leggi
Dicembre 2022

Position management on pulmonary function and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in premature infants: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Introduction
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) is a common disease caused by various factors and mechanisms in premature infants. Owing to lung hypoplasia and the lack of alveolar surfactants in premature infants, oxygen therapy is often needed to maintain adequate breathing. Nevertheless, prolonged oxygen therapy can easily induce BPD, and there is currently no effective treatment. Therefore, the prevention of BPD in premature infants during hospitalisation is essential. Studies have revealed that the prone position can effectively improve the oxygenation of premature infants. However, a few studies have reported whether prone positioning can improve lung function and reduce BPD incidence. This trial will determine whether the prone position, compared with the supine position, can reduce BPD incidence and improve lung function in preterm infants.

Methods and analysis
This study protocol is for a single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial of the prone position in premature infants. Following daily feeding, premature infants will be placed in the lateral position for 30 min; then they will be turned to the supine position (control group) or prone position (intervention group) for 2 hours each in the morning and afternoon. Moreover, infants in both groups will be placed in the supine or lateral position alternately according to their medical needs for the remaining time. The study begins when the premature infants are stable within 5 days after admission and ends when they are discharged from the hospital or at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. The primary outcome is the survival rate without BPD. The secondary outcomes include lung function parameters and lung oxygen saturation.

Ethics and dissemination
This trial is approved by the ethics committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, (ref approval no.KY2021186). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration number
ChiCTR2100049847.

Leggi
Dicembre 2022

Lung CAncer SCreening in French women using low-dose CT and Artificial intelligence for DEtection: the CASCADE study protocol

Introduction
Lung cancer screening (LCS) using low-dose CT has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer-related mortality in large randomised controlled trials. Moving from trials to practice requires answering practical questions about the level of expertise of CT readers, the need for double reading as in trials and the potential role of artificial intelligence (AI). In addition, most LCS studies have predominantly included male participants with women being under-represented, even though the benefit of screening is greater for them. Thus, this study aims to compare the performance of a single CT reading by general radiologists trained in LCS using AI as a second reader to that of a double reading by expert thoracic radiologists, in a campaign for low-dose CT screening in high-risk women.

Methods and analysis
This observational cohort study will recruit 2400 asymptomatic women aged between 50 and 74 years, current or former smokers with at least a 20 pack-year smoking history, in 4 different French district areas. Assistance with smoking cessation will be offered to current smokers. An initial low-dose CT scan will be performed, with subsequent follow-ups at 1 year and 2 years. The primary objective is to compare CT scan readings by a single LCS-trained, AI-assisted radiologist to that of an expert double reading. The secondary objectives are: to evaluate the performance of AI as a stand-alone reader; the adherence to screening of female participants; the influence on smoking cessation; the psychological consequences of screening; the detection of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), coronary artery disease and osteoporosis on low-dose CT scans and the costs incurred by screening.

Ethics and dissemination
Ethics approval was obtained from the Comité de Protection des Personnes Sud-Est 1 (ethics approval number: 2021-A02265-36 with an amendment on 15 July 2022). Trial results will be disseminated at conferences, through relevant patient groups and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number
NCT05195385.

Leggi
Dicembre 2022

Green endoscopy: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), Joint Accreditation Group (JAG) and Centre for Sustainable Health (CSH) joint consensus on practical measures for environmental sustainability in endoscopy

GI endoscopy is highly resource-intensive with a significant contribution to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and waste generation. Sustainable endoscopy in the context of climate change is now the focus of mainstream discussions between endoscopy providers, units and professional societies. In addition to broader global challenges, there are some specific measures relevant to endoscopy units and their practices, which could significantly reduce environmental impact. Awareness of these issues and guidance on practical interventions to mitigate the carbon footprint of GI endoscopy are lacking. In this consensus, we discuss practical measures to reduce the impact of endoscopy on the environment applicable to endoscopy units and practitioners. Adoption of these measures will facilitate and promote new practices and the evolution of a more sustainable specialty.

Leggi
Dicembre 2022