Risultati per: Standard Italiani per la cura del diabete mellito

Agenas, 8 milioni di ricoveri, convive alta e bassa qualità cure

Una simulazione per sensibilizzare sull’impatto emotivo e psicologico

Illustrato Bilancio sociale. Parte secondo lotto della Biobanca

Illustrato Bilancio sociale. Parte secondo lotto della Biobanca

Illustrato Bilancio sociale. Parte secondo lotto della Biobanca

Illustrato Bilancio sociale. Parte secondo lotto della Biobanca

Perdita di funzionalità del compartimento staminale è più veloce

Con tipo 2 raddoppia rischio Alzheimer e demenza vascolare

Un ‘doppio diabete’ che può accelerare distruzione cellule Beta

Eccessiva crescita fetale, parto pretermine per aumento del glucosio

Introduction
First-line oxygenation strategy in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure consists in standard oxygen or high-flow nasal oxygen therapy. Clinical practice guidelines suggest the use of high-flow nasal oxygen rather than standard oxygen. However, findings remain contradictory with a low level of certainty. We hypothesise that compared with standard oxygen, high-flow nasal oxygen may reduce mortality in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure.

Method and analysis
The Standard Oxygen versus High-flow nasal Oxygen-trial is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial comparing high-flow nasal oxygen versus standard oxygen in patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) for acute respiratory failure with moderate-to-severe hypoxaemia. 1110 patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups with a ratio of 1:1. The primary outcome is the number of patients who died 28 days after randomisation. Secondary outcomes include comfort, dyspnoea and oxygenation 1 hour after treatment initiation, the number of patients intubated at day 28, mortality in ICU, in hospital and until day 90, and complications during ICU stay.

Ethics and dissemination
The study has been approved by the central Ethics Committee ‘Sud Méditerranée III’ (2020-07-05) and patients will be included after informed consent. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration number
NCT04468126.

Riflette la ricerca di un benessere fisico e psicologico

Studio, già una perdita peso del 3% migliora controllo diabete

Dati Iss, il 66% senza cintura nei sedili posteriori, il 20% non usa il seggiolino per i bambini

Introduction
Patients with generalised joint hypermobility, including knee hypermobility (GJHk), often experience knee pain and are typically managed with low-intensity strength training and/or proprioceptive training as part of standard care. However, not all patients experience satisfactory outcomes. High-load strength training may offer additional benefits, such as increased muscle cross-sectional area, neural drive and tendon stiffness, which may reduce pain and improve active knee joint stability during movement tasks and daily activities. So far, no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have compared high-load strength training with traditional treatment strategies (standard care) for this patient group.

Methods and analysis
In this RCT, we aim to recruit patients with GJHk and knee pain from primary care physiotherapy clinics in the Region of Southern Denmark and via social media. Patients with competing injuries or experience with high-load strength training will be excluded. Patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) to either 2 weekly sessions of high-load strength training or standard care for 12 weeks. The primary outcome is self-reported knee pain during an activity nominated by the patient as the most aggravating for their present knee pain measured using the Visual Analogue Scale for Nominated Activity (VASNA, 0–100; 0=no pain and 100=worst imaginable pain). This will be collected at baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months. Secondary outcomes include self-reported knee function and adverse events (collected at baseline, 12 weeks and 12 months), objective measurements including a 5-repetition maximum single-leg press, proprioception and single-leg-hop for distance (collected at baseline and 12 weeks), and a range of other outcome measures such as fear of movement, tendon stiffness and global perceived effect. We aim to recruit 90 patients in total to detect a 10 mm group difference in the primary outcome with 80% power.

Ethics and dissemination
This study was funded by Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant number 2034-00088B) on 14 June 2022; the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark approved it (S-20230050) on 30 August 2023. The first recruitment site opened on 15 February 2024, and the final results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal to inform rehabilitation strategies for symptomatic GJHk.Protocol version 1, dated 4 July 2024.

Trial registration number
NCT06277401.

Oltre la metà li considera membri della famiglia