Risultati per: Nuovo test del sangue per la diagnosi di cancro alla prostata

This JAMA Guide to Statistics and Methods article explains the test-negative study design, an observational study design routinely used to estimate vaccine effectiveness, and examines its use in a study that estimated the performance of messenger RNA boosters against the Omicron variant.

Introduction
Participation in bowel cancer screening is lower in regions where there is high ethnic diversity and/or socioeconomic deprivation. Interventions, such as text message reminders and patient navigation (PN), have the potential to increase participation in these areas. As such, there is interest in the comparative effectiveness of these interventions to increase bowel cancer screening participation, as well as their relative cost-effectiveness.

Methods and analysis
This study will use a three-arm randomised controlled trial design to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of text message reminders and PN to increase the uptake of bowel cancer screening in London. Participants will be individuals who have not returned a completed faecal immunochemical test kit within 13 weeks of receiving a routine invitation from the London bowel cancer screening hub. Participants will be randomised (in a 1:1:1 ratio) to receive either (1) usual care (ie, ‘no intervention’), (2) a text message reminder at 13 weeks, followed by repeated text message reminders at 15, 17 and 19 weeks (in the event of non-response) or (3) a text message reminder at 13 weeks, followed by PN telephone calls at 15, 17 and 19 weeks in the event of non-response. The primary endpoint will be participation in bowel cancer screening, defined as ‘the return of a completed kit by week 24’. Statistical analysis will use multivariate logistic regression and will incorporate pairwise comparisons of all three groups, adjusted for multiple testing.

Ethics and dissemination
Approvals to conduct the research have been obtained from University College London’s Joint Research Office (Ref: 150666), the Screening Research, Innovation and Development Advisory Committee (‘RIDAC’, Ref: 2223 014 BCSP Kerrison), the Health Research Authority (Ref: 22/WM/0212) and the Confidentiality Advisory Group (Ref: 22/CAG/0140). Results will be conveyed to stakeholders, notably those managing the screening programme and published in peer-reviewed journals/presented at academic conferences.

Trial registration number
ISRCTN17245519

Introduction
Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are a major cause of long-term disability. Urethral discharge syndrome (UDS), abnormal vaginal discharge (AVD) and genital ulcer disease (GUD) are very common in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), where, due to lack of resources, these infections are managed according to a syndromic approach. Although microbiological diagnosis using nuclear acid amplification tests (NAAT) is already a standard to prescribe targeted treatments in industrialised countries, no randomised clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate clinical usefulness and acceptability of NAAT in comparison with syndromic approach in LMICs. The results of this study could inform diagnostic guidelines since they may suggest an update of the current recommendation if microbiological diagnosis using NAAT in the management of STD is demonstrated to be both useful and acceptable in an LMIC context.

Methods and analysis
The primary objective of this randomised, open-label trial is to evaluate the clinical usefulness of a NAAT and its acceptability in comparison with a clinical syndromic approach and to explore whether this test could replace the syndromic approach in the management of STDs at a national referral hospital in Uganda. 220 patients presenting to the STD clinic at Mulago Hospital in Kampala, Uganda with AVD, UDS or GUD will be randomised to either standard of care (syndromic management) or NAAT-based treatment with a 1:1 ratio. All the patients will be asked to return after 2 or 3 weeks for a control visit. Primary outcome will be therapeutic appropriateness.

Ethics and dissemination
This trial was approved by the Mulago Hospital Research and Ethical Committee (MHREC2023-97) and the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (HS31000ES). Patients will give informed consent to participate before taking part in the study. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals in open-access formats and data made available in anonymised form.

Trial registration number
NCT05994495.

A urine-based test involving 18 genes was more accurate at diagnosing high-grade prostate cancer than existing biomarker tests such as blood levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), according to a recent study published in JAMA Oncology.

Introduction
Perioperative anaphylaxis (POA) can lead to significant complications. Therefore, accurate identification of allergens for POA patients is critical to ensure the safety of future surgical and anaesthetic procedures. Existing perioperative allergen detection methods face challenges in sensitivity and specificity. The passive mast cell activation test (pMAT) has recently emerged as a potential diagnostic tool. Our study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of pMAT for identifying perioperative allergens, with a focus on non-depolarising neuromuscular blocking agents, the most common culprits of POA.

Methods and analysis
This prospective diagnostic accuracy study will measure the diagnostic accuracy of pMAT in POA patients. Participants will undergo skin testing (ST), basophil activation testing (BAT) and pMAT. The diagnostic validity of pMAT will be assessed based on the results of ST and BAT. The assessment of diagnostic accuracy will include sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and false-positive and false-negative rates while measurement of the consistency rate will assess reliability.

Ethics and dissemination
This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of China-Japan Friendship Hospital (2023-KY-247). Results will be disseminated through academic presentations and peer-reviewed journal publications and will provide valuable scientific data and some new insights into the diagnostic accuracy of pMAT.

This report describes the development of an 18-gene urine panel for high-grade prostate cancer and validates its external performance relative to current guideline-endorsed biomarkers.

This cohort study examines the applicability of personalized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with fecal-hemoglobin (f-Hb)-guided screening intervals to reduce the number of fecal immunological tests and colonoscopy, as well as determine if it demonstrates equivalent efficacy as universal biennial screening.

New England Journal of Medicine, Ahead of Print.