The Asia-Pacific region has the largest number of cases of colorectal cancer (CRC) and one of the highest levels of mortality due to this condition in the world. Since the publishing of two consensus recommendations in 2008 and 2015, significant advancements have been made in our knowledge of epidemiology, pathology and the natural history of the adenoma-carcinoma progression. Based on the most updated epidemiological and clinical studies in this region, considering literature from international studies, and adopting the modified Delphi process, the Asia-Pacific Working Group on Colorectal Cancer Screening has updated and revised their recommendations on (1) screening methods and preferred strategies; (2) age for starting and terminating screening for CRC; (3) screening for individuals with a family history of CRC or advanced adenoma; (4) surveillance for those with adenomas; (5) screening and surveillance for sessile serrated lesions and (6) quality assurance of screening programmes. Thirteen countries/regions in the Asia-Pacific region were represented in this exercise. International advisors from North America and Europe were invited to participate.
Risultati per: Nuovo test per lo screening del cancro alla prostata
Questo è quello che abbiamo trovato per te
Endoscopist characteristics and polyp detection in colonoscopy: cross-sectional analyses of Screening of Swedish Colons
Development of machine learning support for reading whole body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-MRI) in myeloma for the detection and quantification of the extent of disease before and after treatment (MALIMAR): protocol for a cross-sectional diagnostic test accuracy study
Introduction
Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is recommended by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence as the first-line imaging tool for diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Reporting WB-MRI scans requires expertise to interpret and can be challenging for radiologists who need to meet rapid turn-around requirements. Automated computational tools based on machine learning (ML) could assist the radiologist in terms of sensitivity and reading speed and would facilitate improved accuracy, productivity and cost-effectiveness. The MALIMAR study aims to develop and validate a ML algorithm to increase the diagnostic accuracy and reading speed of radiological interpretation of WB-MRI compared with standard methods.
Methods and analysis
This phase II/III imaging trial will perform retrospective analysis of previously obtained clinical radiology MRI scans and scans from healthy volunteers obtained prospectively to implement training and validation of an ML algorithm. The study will comprise three project phases using approximately 633 scans to (1) train the ML algorithm to identify active disease, (2) clinically validate the ML algorithm and (3) determine change in disease status following treatment via a quantification of burden of disease in patients with myeloma. Phase 1 will primarily train the ML algorithm to detect active myeloma against an expert assessment (‘reference standard’). Phase 2 will use the ML output in the setting of radiology reader study to assess the difference in sensitivity when using ML-assisted reading or human-alone reading. Phase 3 will assess the agreement between experienced readers (with and without ML) and the reference standard in scoring both overall burden of disease before and after treatment, and response.
Ethics and dissemination
MALIMAR has ethical approval from South Central—Oxford C Research Ethics Committee (REC Reference: 17/SC/0630). IRAS Project ID: 233501. CPMS Portfolio adoption (CPMS ID: 36766). Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. MALIMAR is funded by National Institute for Healthcare Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation funding (NIHR EME Project ID: 16/68/34). Findings will be made available through peer-reviewed publications and conference dissemination.
Trial registration number
NCT03574454.
From the Eyeball Test to the Algorithm — Quality of Life, Disability Status, and Clinical Decision Making in Surgery
New England Journal of Medicine, Volume 387, Issue 14, Page 1325-1328, October 2022.
Diagnosi e gestione del cancro al polmone
Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Prostate Cancer Mortality Among Black and White US Veterans
This cohort study uses US Veterans Health Administration data to assess the association of prostate-specific antigen screening with prostate cancer–specific mortality among non-Hispanic Black men and non-Hispanic White men.
Lung Cancer Risk Among Smokers for Whom Annual Screening Is Not Recommended
This cohort study of data on participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study assesses risk of lung cancer in smokers for whom low-density computed tomographic screening is not recommended.
Maternal Antipsychotic Prescription During Pregnancy and Standardized Test Scores of Schoolchildren
This cohort study examines the association between maternal antipsychotic prescriptions filled during pregnancy and performance in standardized tests of mathematics and language among schoolchildren in Denmark.
Screening and management of sleep disorders in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: a French multicentred, prospective, observational study protocol (FIBOBS)
Introduction
Sleep disorders are still often underestimated in patient care management even though they are present in the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for the diagnosis of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). The objective of this study will be to assess the current situation of sleep disorders in patients with FMS in France and to estimate its prevalence.
Methods and analysis
The FIBOBS study is a multicentred, prospective, observational trial performed by 46 specialised chronic pain structures in France. Patients with FMS visiting for a first consultation or follow-up (if they have already been followed up for less than a year with a pain management service) will be included after giving their informed consent. Data will be collected through the physician questionnaire filled during the inclusion visit. Patient self-questionnaires will be completed from home. The primary outcome of the study will be to estimate the prevalence of sleep disorders classified into three categories: (a) poor sleep quality in general, (b) sleep apnoea syndrome and (c) restless legs syndrome, using self-administered questionnaires.
Ethics and dissemination
This protocol is approved by the ethics committee Comité de Protection des Personnes ‘Ile de France II’ in accordance with French regulations. The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conferences.
Trial registration number
NCT04775368.
Serial Bone-Mineral Density Screening in Men
Fracture prediction is not improved significantly by repeat BMD measurement.
Cancer Screening Guidelines Are Not Simple, But They Could Be Less Complex
Annals of Internal Medicine, Ahead of Print.
Evaluation of Harms Reporting in U.S. Cancer Screening Guidelines
Annals of Internal Medicine, Ahead of Print.
Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk for Interval Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer in Fecal Immunochemical Test–Based Screening
Annals of Internal Medicine, Volume 175, Issue 10, Page 1366-1373, October 2022.
Using FIB-4 score as a screening tool in the assessment of significant liver fibrosis (F2) in patients with transfusion-dependent beta thalassaemia: a cross-sectional study
Objective
To evaluate the performance of the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score as a screening tool to detect significant liver fibrosis (F2) compared with transient elastography (TE), among chronic transfusion-dependent beta-thalassaemia (TDT) patients in a resource-poor setting.
Design
A cross-sectional study.
Setting
Adolescent and Adult Thalassaemia Care Centre (University Medical Unit), Kiribathgoda, Sri Lanka.
Participants
45 TDT patients who had undergone more than 100 blood transfusions with elevated serum ferritin >2000 ng/mL were selected for the study. Patients who were serologically positive for hepatitis C antibodies were excluded.
Outcome measures
TE and FIB-4 scores were estimated at the time of recruitment in all participants. Predefined cut-off values for F2, extracted from previous TE and FIB-4 scores studies, were compared. A new cut-off value for the FIB-4 score was estimated using receiver operating characteristics curve analysis to improve the sensitivity for F2 prediction.
Results
Of the selected 45 TDT patients, 22 (49%) were males. FIB-4 score showed a significant linear correlation with TE (r=0.52;p
Identificato un potenziale marcatore genetico per il trattamento del cancro al pancreas
Randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of screening and referral for social determinants of health on Veterans outcomes: protocol
Introduction
Health policy leaders recommend screening and referral (S&R) for unmet social needs (eg, food) in clinical settings, and the American Heart Association recently concluded that the most significant opportunities for reducing cardiovascular disease (CVD) death and disability lie with addressing the social determinants of CVD outcomes. A limited but promising evidence base supports these recommendations, but more rigorous research is needed to guide health care-based S&R efforts. Funded by the Veteran Health Administration (VA), the study described in this paper will assess the efficacy of S&R on Veterans’ connections to new resources to address social needs, reduction of unmet needs and health-related outcomes (adherence, utilisation and clinical outcomes).
Methods and analysis
We will conduct a 1-year mixed-methods randomised controlled trial at three VA sites, enrolling Veterans with CVD and CVD-risk. 880 Veterans experiencing one or more social needs will be randomised within each site (n=293 per site) to one of three study arms representing referral mechanisms of varying intensity (screening only, screening and provision of resource sheet(s), screening and provision of resource sheet(s) plus social work assistance). For each Veteran, we will examine associations of unmet social needs with health-related outcomes at baseline, and longitudinally compare the impact of each approach on connection to new resources (primary outcome) and follow-up outcomes over a 12-month period. We will additionally conduct qualitative interviews with key stakeholders, including Veterans to identify potential explanatory factors related to the relative success of the interventions.
Ethics and dissemination
Ethics approval was obtained from the VA Central Internal Review Board on 13 July 2021 (reference #: 20-07-Amendment No. 02). Findings will be disseminated through reports, lay summaries, policy briefs, academic publications, and conference presentations.
Trial registration number
NCT04977583.