We would like to highlight four points regarding recent EBMT recommendations for the use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells in autoimmune diseases.1 First, the recommendations are based on conventional, integrating vector-based CAR-Ts, which require lymphodepletion chemotherapy, inpatient administration and prolonged post-infusion monitoring. In phase 1/2 trials in generalized myasthenia gravis, mRNA CAR-Ts were administered outpatient, without lymphodepletion, and resulted in no cytokine release syndrome or neurotoxicity.
Risultati per: La qualità dei nutraceutici e position paper per l’appropriato uso in medicina generale
Questo è quello che abbiamo trovato per te
Campagna e spot per un uso consapevole degli antibiotici
Schillaci: La resistenza è un’emergenza globale. No al fai da te’
L’elettrocardiogramma nello studio di medicina generale
Indagine sull’appropriatezza d’uso proflattico degli antibiotici in odontoiatria
Dengue: problema emergente. Prevenzione e controllo in medicina generale
Appropriatezza prescrittiva degli antibiotici in Medicina Generale: il Progetto OCRA
Riacutizzazione di BPCO (R-BPCO) e uso di Gabapentinoidi
Quando il Medico di Medicina Generale può… e prova a fare la differenza
Importanza dell’ecografa nel setting della medicina generale. Introduzione con survey
Antibiotici a neonati, al via studio per prevenire uso improprio
UniCamillus, oggi 99,6% dei piccoli trattato nel modo sbagliato
Bpco, mix arginina e vitamina C migliora la qualità della vita
Studio italiano, da domani il congresso di Pneumologia a Milano
Abstract Sa308: Augmentation of Intraventricular Stroke Volume during Head Up Position CPR: Implications for Clinical Outcomes
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page ASa308-ASa308, November 12, 2024. Background:Active compression-decompression (ACD) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), an impedance threshold device (ITD) and controlled, gradual, automated head and thorax elevation, collectively termed automated Head Up Position (AHUP) CPR, increases cerebral perfusion pressure (CerPP), brain blood flow, coronary perfusion pressure (CorPP), end tidal CO2 (ETCO2) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2) in animal models when compared with conventional (C) CPR. AHUP-CPR in patients is associated with increased neurologically favorable survival versus C-CPR. This study tested the hypothesis that AHUP CPR will increase cardiac stroke volume (SV) and other hemodynamics compared with C-CPR in a porcine model of cardiac arrest.Methods:Farm pigs (n=15) were sedated, anesthetized, and ventilated. Hemodynamics, including intracardiac conductance catheter based biventricular (BiV) pressure-volume (PV) loops, were continuously measured and recorded. After 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, C-CPR was performed for 2 minutes in the supine position using an automated CPR device designed for pigs at a rate of 100 compressions/minute, depth of 21% of the chest antero-postero diameter, a 50% duty cycle, and no active decompression. ACD+ITD was then performed with 3 cm of active decompression for 2 minutes, followed by AHUP-CPR, where the head and thorax were initially raised to 10 cm and 8 cm for a 2-minute priming phase, followed by elevation over the next 2 minutes to 24 cm and 9 cm. A linear mixed-effects model with a random intercept for individual pigs was used for statistical analysis.Results:CerPP, CorPP, ETCO2, and rSO2, as well as BiV SV and cardiac output, increased progressively and significantly with implementation of AHUP-CPR (p
Abstract Or108: Optimizing Post-resuscitation Care after Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta and Automated Head-up Position Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page AOr108-AOr108, November 12, 2024. Background:Addition of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) to automated head-up position (AHUP) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the combination of active compression decompression CPR, an impedance threshold device, and controlled gradual elevation of the head and thorax, increases cerebral perfusion pressure. Optimal management of REBOA deflation after prolonged AHUP-CPR and ROSC is unknown.Hypothesis:We hypothesized that partial deflation of REBOA, rather than full deflation after ROSC, would result in better hemodynamic parameters.Aims:To compare hemodynamic parameters 1 minute before and 1 minute after complete (100%) versus partial (50%) REBOA deflation after prolonged AHUP-CPR and ROSC.Methods:Yorkshire pigs weighing ∼40 kg were anesthetized and ventilated. After 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, AHUP-CPR was started and continued for a median time of 44 minutes. After ROSC, REBOA deflation was initiated in two ways: complete (100%) or partial (50%) deflation over 5 seconds. The following hemodynamic parameters were measured 1 minute before and 1 minute after deflation: mean aortic pressure (MAP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CerPP), and coronary perfusion pressure (CorPP). Data, in mmHg, are presented as mean ± SD, and compared using a paired t-test.Results:13 pigs were included, with 8 pigs in the 100% deflation group and 5 in the 50% deflation group. After ROSC in the 100% deflation group, MAP was 81.5±36.0 before deflation vs. 43.0±14.4 after (p=0.01), whereas in the 50% deflation group, MAP was 90.5±33.0 vs. 83.4±33.3 (p=0.02). CerPP was 72.3±34.4 before deflation vs. 35.9±14.6 (p=0.01) in the 100% deflation group, and 84.6±31.2 vs. 77.6±31.8 (p=0.02) with 50% deflation. Similarly, CorPP was 74.1±37.3 before deflation vs. 36.1±15.8 (p=0.01) after in the 100% deflation group, and 83.0±32.7 vs. 76.1±33.0 (p=0.02) in the 50% deflation group. The differences from before to after deflation were markedly less in the 50% deflation group versus the 100% deflation group: MAP (7.0±4.3 vs. 38.5±25.7, p=0.02), CerPP (7.1±4.4 vs. 36.3±24.4, p=0.02), and CorPP (6.0±4.2 vs. 39.8±25.2, p=0.02), respectively.Conclusion:In this porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest, partial deflation of the REBOA balloon post ROSC resulted in strikingly higher hemodynamics compared with complete deflation. These findings highlight the need to develop a post-ROSC REBOA deflation strategy when used during AHUP-CPR.
Randomised clinical trial of a 16 mg vs 24 mg maintenance daily dose of buprenorphine to increase retention in treatment among people with an opioid use disorder in Rhode Island: study protocol paper
Introduction
Buprenorphine is a highly effective treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD). However, provider observations and preliminary research suggest that the current standard maintenance dose may be insufficient for suppressing withdrawal and preventing cravings among people who use or have used fentanyl. Buprenorphine dosing guidelines were based on studies among people who use heroin and have not been formally re-evaluated since fentanyl became predominant in the unregulated drug supply. We aim to compare the effectiveness of a high (24 mg) vs standard (16 mg) maintenance daily dose of buprenorphine for improving retention in treatment, decreasing the use of non-prescribed opioids, preventing cravings and reducing opioid overdose risk in patients.
Methods and analysis
Adults who are initiating or continuing buprenorphine for moderate to severe OUD and have a recent history of fentanyl use (n=250) will be recruited at four outpatient substance use treatment clinics in Rhode Island. Patients continuing buprenorphine must be on doses of 16 mg or less and have ongoing fentanyl use to be eligible. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either a high (24 mg) or standard (16 mg) maintenance daily dose, each with usual care, and followed for 12 months to evaluate outcomes. Providers will determine the buprenorphine initiation strategy, with the requirement that participants reach the study maintenance dose within 7 days of randomisation. Providers may adjust the maintenance dose, if clinically needed, for participant safety. The primary study outcome is retention in buprenorphine treatment at 6 months postrandomisation, measured using clinical and statewide administrative data. Other outcomes include non-prescribed opioid use and opioid cravings (secondary), as well as non-fatal or fatal opioid overdose (exploratory).
Ethics and dissemination
This protocol was approved by the Brown Institutional Review Board (STUDY00000075). Results will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
Trial registration number
NCT06316830.
Protocollo Fiaso-Egualia per l'uso corretto dei farmaci
Obiettivo ridurre la spesa privata a carico dei cittadini
Protocollo Fiaso-Egualia per l'uso corretto dei farmaci
Obiettivo ridurre la spesa privata a carico dei cittadini