Abstract 4122612: Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Fetal Echocardiographic Prediction of Critical Coarctation of the Aorta

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page A4122612-A4122612, November 12, 2024. Background:Current fetal echocardiographic (F-echo) metrics have inadequate specificity for confident prediction of neonatal critical coarctation of the aorta (CoA). Using single-center data, our machine learning model for the prediction of fetal CoA demonstrated improved accuracy compared to published F-echo metrics for critical CoA assessment. External validation of this model is needed.Aim:Validate a machine learning F-echo predictive model for CoA with an external patient cohort.Methods:Initial model training and testing were performed using retrospective single center data on 9 F-echo measurements for patients with prenatal concern for CoA. A random forest classifier with 80:20 split and 5-fold cross-validation predicted CoA intervention within 30 days of life. A SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis assessed the marginal contribution of each feature. The model was retrained using the 5 most influential F-echo features. External validation for this model was then performed using patients with prenatal concern for CoA retrospectively collected at a partner institution.Results:Inclusion criteria were met by 132 patients in the initial cohort and 64 patients in the external validation cohort, of whom 44% (n=58) and 25% (n=16) respectively had CoA requiring intervention. SHAP analysis for both cohorts demonstrated transverse to descending aorta angle as the most influential feature, followed by ascending to descending aorta angle (Figure 1A). Using internal cross-validation on the initial cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.93 ± 0.05 (sensitivity 0.97, specificity 1.0) with an F1 score of 0.97 ± 0.03. Validation of the model with the external cohort produced an AUC of 0.87 (sensitivity 0.81, specificity 1.0) and an F1 of 0.90 (Figure 1B).Conclusions:A random forest classifier using F-echo features predicted neonatal critical CoA with higher accuracy than previously published metrics. The model maintained high accuracy when validated with an external patient cohort. Arch angles most significantly impacted the model’s accuracy. Future directions include prospective validation and converting the model to a distributable clinical calculator.

Read More
Novembre 2024

Abstract Or108: Optimizing Post-resuscitation Care after Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta and Automated Head-up Position Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.

Circulation, Volume 150, Issue Suppl_1, Page AOr108-AOr108, November 12, 2024. Background:Addition of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) to automated head-up position (AHUP) cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the combination of active compression decompression CPR, an impedance threshold device, and controlled gradual elevation of the head and thorax, increases cerebral perfusion pressure. Optimal management of REBOA deflation after prolonged AHUP-CPR and ROSC is unknown.Hypothesis:We hypothesized that partial deflation of REBOA, rather than full deflation after ROSC, would result in better hemodynamic parameters.Aims:To compare hemodynamic parameters 1 minute before and 1 minute after complete (100%) versus partial (50%) REBOA deflation after prolonged AHUP-CPR and ROSC.Methods:Yorkshire pigs weighing ∼40 kg were anesthetized and ventilated. After 10 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, AHUP-CPR was started and continued for a median time of 44 minutes. After ROSC, REBOA deflation was initiated in two ways: complete (100%) or partial (50%) deflation over 5 seconds. The following hemodynamic parameters were measured 1 minute before and 1 minute after deflation: mean aortic pressure (MAP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CerPP), and coronary perfusion pressure (CorPP). Data, in mmHg, are presented as mean ± SD, and compared using a paired t-test.Results:13 pigs were included, with 8 pigs in the 100% deflation group and 5 in the 50% deflation group. After ROSC in the 100% deflation group, MAP was 81.5±36.0 before deflation vs. 43.0±14.4 after (p=0.01), whereas in the 50% deflation group, MAP was 90.5±33.0 vs. 83.4±33.3 (p=0.02). CerPP was 72.3±34.4 before deflation vs. 35.9±14.6 (p=0.01) in the 100% deflation group, and 84.6±31.2 vs. 77.6±31.8 (p=0.02) with 50% deflation. Similarly, CorPP was 74.1±37.3 before deflation vs. 36.1±15.8 (p=0.01) after in the 100% deflation group, and 83.0±32.7 vs. 76.1±33.0 (p=0.02) in the 50% deflation group. The differences from before to after deflation were markedly less in the 50% deflation group versus the 100% deflation group: MAP (7.0±4.3 vs. 38.5±25.7, p=0.02), CerPP (7.1±4.4 vs. 36.3±24.4, p=0.02), and CorPP (6.0±4.2 vs. 39.8±25.2, p=0.02), respectively.Conclusion:In this porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest, partial deflation of the REBOA balloon post ROSC resulted in strikingly higher hemodynamics compared with complete deflation. These findings highlight the need to develop a post-ROSC REBOA deflation strategy when used during AHUP-CPR.

Read More
Novembre 2024