Telehealth service use and quality of care among US adults with diabetes: A cross-sectional study of the 2022 health information national trends survey

Objective
To characterise telehealth use, reasons for using or not using telehealth and the factors associated with telehealth use among US adults with diabetes.

Design
A cross-sectional study.

Setting
Data were sourced from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Participants
US adults aged 18 years or older with self-reported diagnosis of diabetes (both type 1 and type 2).

Primary and secondary outcomes
Past 12-month utilisation of telehealth services, modality (eg, video, voice only), overall perception of quality of care, perceived trust in healthcare system and patient-centred communication score.

Results
In an analysis of 1116 US adults with diabetes, representing 33.6 million individuals, 48.1% reported telehealth use in the past year. Telehealth users were likely to be younger, women, with higher income, and urban dwellers. Older adults (≥65 years) were less likely to use telehealth compared with those aged 18–49 years (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.90). Higher income and more frequent healthcare visits were predictors of telehealth usage, with no significant differences across race, education or location. Across respondents with telehealth usage, 39.3% reported having video-only, 35.0% having phone (voice)-only and 25.7% having both modalities. The main motivations included provider recommendation, convenience, COVID-19 avoidance and guidance on in-person care needs. Non-users cited preferences for in-person visits, privacy concerns and technology challenges. Patient-reported quality-of-care outcomes were comparable between telehealth users and non-users, with no significant differences observed by telehealth modality or area of residence (metro status).

Conclusions
Around half of US adults with diabetes used telehealth services in the past year. Patient-reported care quality was similar for telehealth and in-person visits. However, further efforts are needed to address key barriers to telehealth adoption, including privacy concern, technology difficulties, and care coordination issues.

Leggi
Novembre 2024

Level of option B+PMTCT drug adherence with male partner involvement and associated factors among breastfeeding women until 18 months in North Gojjam Zone, Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022: a multicentre cross-sectional study

Background
Adherence to option B+antiretroviral therapy medication is crucial for the effective implementation of the Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission (PMTCT) programme. Ethiopia has adopted the WHO’s target of achieving over 95% adherence. However, research conducted in southern Ethiopia found that only 81.4% of women adhered to option B+medication, which reflects a poor level of adherence and remains a concern.

Objective
The objective of the study was to assess the level of option B+PMTCT drug adherence and associated factors among women who were breast feeding for up to 18 months in government health facilities of North Gojjam Zone, Amhara region, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022

Design
An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted.

Setting
The study was carried out in hospitals located in the North Gojjam Zone of Northwest Ethiopia.

Participants
The study was conducted with 223 HIV-positive women who were breast feeding for up to 18 months, from 1 March 2022 to 30 April 2022.

Primary and secondary outcomes
The primary outcome was to assess the level of option B+PMTCT drug adherence, while the secondary outcome was to identify factors associated with option B+PMTCT drug adherence among HIV-positive women who were breast feeding for up to 18 months. Associations between variables were analysed using both bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models, with a p

Leggi
Ottobre 2024

The changing nature of worry about COVID-19 among the English public: a secondary analysis of 73 national, cross-sectional surveys, January 2020 to April 2022

Objectives
To investigate worry about COVID-19 during the pandemic, and whether worry was associated with phase of the pandemic, COVID-19 death and incidence rates, Government interventions (including lockdown and advertising), age, being clinically at-risk, ethnicity, thinking that the Government had put the right measures in place, perceived risk of COVID-19 to self and the UK, and perceived severity of COVID-19.

Design
Secondary analysis of a series of cross-sectional surveys.

Setting
73 online surveys conducted for the English Department of Health and Social Care between 28 January 2020 and 13 April 2022.

Participants
Participants were people aged 16 years and over living in the UK (approximately 2000 per wave).

Primary outcome measures
Our primary outcome was self-reported worry about COVID-19.

Results
Rates of being ‘extremely’ or ‘very’ worried changed over time. Worry increased as infection rates increased and fell during lockdowns, but the association became less obvious over time. Respondents aged 60 years and over were less likely to be worried after the launch of the vaccination campaign, while those who were clinically at-risk or from a minoritised ethnic community were more likely to be worried. Higher worry was associated with higher perceived risk, and higher perceived severity of COVID-19. There was no evidence for an association with agreeing that the Government was putting the right measures in place to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The launch of graphic Government advertising campaigns about COVID-19 had no noticeable effect on levels of public worry.

Conclusions
In future infectious disease outbreaks, spikes in worry may attenuate over time, although some sections of society may experience higher anxiety than others.

Leggi
Ottobre 2024