Circulation, Volume 149, Issue 16, Page e1109-e1110, April 16, 2024.
Risultati per: Short Acting Opioid
Questo è quello che abbiamo trovato per te
Response by Aggarwal et al to Letter Regarding Article, “Development and Validation of the DOAC Score: A Novel Bleeding Risk Prediction Tool for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants”
Circulation, Volume 149, Issue 16, Page e1111-e1112, April 16, 2024.
New opioid prescription claims and their clinical indications: results from health administrative data in Quebec, Canada, over 14 years
Objectives
Describe new opioid prescription claims, their clinical indications and annual trends among opioid naïve adults covered by the Quebec’s public drug insurance plan (QPDIP) for the fiscal years 2006/2007–2019/2020.
Design and setting
A retrospective observational study was conducted using data collected between 2006/2007 and 2019/2020 within the Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System, a linkage administrative data.
Participants
A cohort of opioid naïve adults and new opioid users was created for each study year (median number=2 263 380 and 168 183, respectively, over study period).
Intervention
No.
Main outcome measure and analyses
A new opioid prescription was defined as the first opioid prescription claimed by an opioid naïve adult during a given fiscal year. The annual incidence proportion for each year was then calculated and standardised for age. A hierarchical algorithm was built to identify the most likely clinical indication for this prescription. Descriptive and trend analyses were performed.
Results
There was a 1.7% decrease of age-standardised annual incidence proportion during the study period, from 7.5% in 2006/2007 to 5.8% in 2019/2020. The decrease was highest after 2016/2017, reaching 5.5% annual percentage change. Median daily dose and days’ supply decreased from 27 to 25 morphine milligram equivalent/day and from 5 to 4 days between 2006/2007 and 2019/2020, respectively. Between 2006/2007 and 2019/2020, these prescriptions’ most likely clinical indications increased for cancer pain from 34% to 48%, for surgical pain from 31% to 36% and for dental pain from 9% to 11%. Inversely, the musculoskeletal pain decreased from 13% to 2%. There was good consistency between the clinical indications identified by the algorithm and prescriber’s specialty or user’s characteristics.
Conclusions
New opioid prescription claims (incidence, dose and days’ supply) decreased slightly over the last 14 years among QPDIP enrollees, especially after 2016/2017. Non-surgical and non-cancer pain became less common as their clinical indication.
Age-Related Fall Risk and Opioid Analgesic Use
This cohort study examines the age-related risk of serious fall events among Australian adults prescribed opioids by opioid exposure, time from initiation, and daily dose.
Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement vs Usual Care in Opioid Use Disorder
This randomized clinical trial investigates the relative efficacy of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement in addition to methadone treatment as usual compared with usual care only.
Mixed-methods feasibility outcomes for a novel ACT-based video game 'ACTing Minds to support mental health
Objectives
To determine the feasibility and acceptability of ‘ACTing Minds’, a novel single-player adventure video game based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT).
Design
A single-arm, mixed-methods repeated measures feasibility study.
Setting
Intervention and questionnaires were completed at home by participants. Semistructured interviews were also conducted at home via the Zoom platform.
Participants
Thirty-six participants were recruited into the study, 29 completed all phases of the feasibility design. Eligibility criteria required participants to be over the age of 18 and self-reporting experiencing ongoing depression, anxiety or stress.
Intervention
Participants completed a single session of the ‘ACTing Minds’ video game, lasting approximately 1 hour, designed to educate users on key principles from ACT.
Primary outcome measures
Participant recruitment and retention, questionnaire completion, long-term intervention adherence and acceptability of the intervention. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted on semistructured interviews run immediately postintervention and 3 weeks later.
Secondary outcome measures
Measures of depression, anxiety, stress, psychological flexibility, social connectedness and well-being were assessed at baseline, immediately following intervention completion, and after a 3-week follow-up period. We used a standardised battery of questionnaires.
Primary results
Twenty-nine participants completed the study. A reflexive thematic analysis indicated that participants responded positively to the intervention and the study at all stages. Themes reflect participants’ desire for an engaging therapeutic experience, use of game for exploring emotions, as well as their perspectives on how they had applied their learning to the real world.
Secondary results
Quantitative results indicated small to large effect sizes associated with decreases in depression (p2 = 0.011), anxiety (p2 = 0.096) and stress (p2 = 0.108), and increases in psychological flexibility (p2 = 0.060), social connectedness (p2 = 0.021), well-being (p2 = 0.011) and participation in usual activities (p2 = .307).
Conclusions
Implementation of the ‘ACTing Minds’ intervention is warranted, based on both qualitative and quantitative outcomes.
Trial registration number
NCT04566042 ClinicalTrials.gov
Long-Acting HIV Treatment Superior to Daily Oral Drugs
People with HIV-1 who received a long-acting antiretroviral treatment combining 2 drugs, cabotegravir and rilpivirine, were better able to maintain low levels of the virus compared with those who received daily oral medication, according to interim data, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced. The US Food and Drug Administration approved the combination of cabotegravir and rilpivirine, marketed as Cabenuva, as a once-monthly injectable for adults in 2021.
Identifying provider, patient and practice factors that shape long-term opioid prescribing for cancer pain: a qualitative study of American and Australian providers
Introduction
Prescribing long-term opioid therapy is a nuanced clinical decision requiring careful consideration of risks versus benefits. Our goal is to understand patient, provider and context factors that impact the decision to prescribe opioids in patients with cancer.
Methods
We conducted a secondary analysis of the raw semistructured interview data gathered from 42 prescribers who participated in one of two aligned concurrent qualitative studies in the USA and Australia. We conducted a two-part analysis of the interview: first identifying all factors influencing long-term prescribing and second open coding-related content for themes.
Results
Factors that influence long-term opioid prescribing for cancer-related pain clustered under three key domains (patient-related, provider-related and practice-related factors) each with several themes. Domain 1: Patient factors related to provider–patient continuity, patient personality, the patient’s social context and patient characteristics including racial/ethnic identity, housing and socioeconomic status. Domain 2: Provider-related factors centred around provider ‘personal experience and expertise’, training and time availability. Domain 3: Practice-related factors included healthcare interventions to promote safer opioid practices and accessibility of quality alternative pain therapies.
Conclusion
Despite the differences in the contexts of the two countries, providers consider similar patient, provider and practice-related factors when long-term prescribing opioids for patients with cancer. Some of these factors may be categorised as cognitive biases that may intersect in an already disadvantaged patient and exacerbate disparities in the treatment of their pain. A more systematic understanding of these factors and how they impact the quality of care can inform appropriate interventions.
When Are Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants Not the Standard of Care?
In a unique review, experts discuss conditions for which warfarin or antiplatelet drugs are preferable to DOACs and conditions for which DOAC safety and efficacy is uncertain.
Association between benzodiazepine coprescription and mortality in people on opioid replacement therapy: a population-based cohort study
Objective
To investigate the association between opioid replacement therapy (ORT) and benzodiazepine (BZD) coprescription and all-cause mortality compared with the prescription of ORT alone.
Design
Population-based cohort study.
Setting
Scotland, UK.
Participants
Participants were people prescribed ORT between January 2010 and end of December 2020 aged 18 years or above.
Main outcome measures
All-cause mortality, drug-related deaths and non-drug related deaths.
Secondary outcome
ORT continuous treatment duration.
Analysis
Cox regression with time-varying covariates.
Results
During follow-up, 5776 of 46 899 participants died: 1398 while on coprescription and 4378 while on ORT only. The mortality per 100 person years was 3.11 during coprescription and 2.34 on ORT only. The adjusted HR for all-cause mortality was 1.17 (1.10 to 1.24). The adjusted HR for drug-related death was 1.14 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.24) and the hazard for death not classified as drug-related was 1.19 (95% CI, 1.09 to 1.30).
Conclusion
Coprescription of BZDs in ORT was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality, although with a small effect size than the international literature. Coprescribing was also associated with longer retention in treatment. Risk from BZD coprescription needs to be balanced against the risk from illicit BZDs and unplanned treatment discontinuation. A randomised controlled trial is urgently needed to provide a clear clinical direction.
Trial registration number
NCT04622995.
Efficacy of Drugs Acting on Histamine-1 Receptors in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Predictive value of the Trauma Rating Index in Age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Respiratory rate and Systolic blood pressure score (TRIAGES) for the short-term mortality of older patients with isolated traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study
Objectives
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Trauma Rating Index in Age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Respiratory rate and Systolic blood pressure score (TRIAGES) in predicting 24-hour in-hospital mortality among patients aged 65 years and older with isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Design
A retrospective, single-centre cohort study.
Setting
This study was conducted at a government-run tertiary comprehensive hospital.
Participants
This study included 982 patients aged 65 years or older with isolated TBI, who were admitted to the emergency department between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2021.
Interventions
None.
Primary outcome
24-hour in-hospital mortality was the primary outcome.
Results
Among the 982 patients, 8.75% died within 24 hours of admission. The non-survivors typically had higher TRIAGES and lower GCS scores. Logistic regression showed significant associations of both TRIAGES and GCS with mortality; the adjusted ORs were 1.98 (95% CI 1.74 to 2.25) for TRIAGES and 0.72 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.77) for GCS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis indicated an area under the ROC curve of 0.86 for GCS and 0.88 for TRIAGES, with a significant difference (p=0.012). However, precision–recall curve (PRC) analysis revealed an area under the PRC of 0.38 for GCS and 0.47 for TRIAGES, without a significant difference (p=0.107).
Conclusions
The TRIAGES system is a promising tool for predicting 24-hour in-hospital mortality in older patients with TBI, demonstrating comparable or slightly superior efficacy to the GCS. Further multicentre studies are recommended for validation.
State-level variation in distribution of oxycodone and opioid-related deaths from 2000 to 2021: an ecological study of ARCOS and CDC WONDER data in the USA
Objectives
This study aims to characterise oxycodone’s distribution and opioid-related overdoses in the USA by state from 2000 to 2021.
Design
This is an observational study.
Setting
More than 80 000 Americans died of an opioid overdose in 2021 as the USA continues to struggle with an opioid crisis. Prescription opioids play a substantial role, introducing patients to opioids and providing a supply of drugs that can be redirected to those seeking to misuse them.
Methods
The Drug Enforcement Administration annual summary reports from the Automation of Reports and Consolidated Orders System provided weights of oxycodone distributed per state by business type (pharmacies, hospitals and practitioners). Weights were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per capita and normalised for population. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research provided mortality data for heroin, other opioids, methadone, other synthetic narcotics and other/unspecified narcotics.
Results
There was a sharp 280.13% increase in total MME/person of oxycodone from 2000 to 2010, followed by a slower 54.34% decrease from 2010 to 2021. Florida (2007–2011), Delaware (2003–2020) and Tennessee (2012–2021) displayed consistent and substantial elevations in combined MME/person compared with other states. In the peak year (2010), there was a 15-fold difference between the highest and lowest states. MME/person from only pharmacies, which constituted >94% of the total, showed similar results. Hospitals in Alaska (2000–2001, 2008, 2010–2021), Colorado (2008–2021) and DC (2000–2011) distributed substantially more MME/person over many years compared with other states. Florida stood out in practitioner-distributed oxycodone, with an elevation of almost 15-fold the average state from 2006 to 2010. Opioid-related deaths increased +806% from 2000 to 2021, largely driven by heroin, other opioids and other synthetic narcotics.
Conclusions
Oxycodone distribution across the USA showed marked differences between states and business types over time. Investigation of opioid policies in states of interest may provide insight for future actions to mitigate opioid misuse.
Effects of opioid-free anaesthesia compared with balanced general anaesthesia on nausea and vomiting after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a single-centre randomised controlled trial
Objectives
Opioid-free anaesthesia (OFA) has emerged as a promising approach for mitigating the adverse effects associated with opioids. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of OFA on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) following video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Design
Single-centre randomised controlled trial.
Setting
Tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China.
Participants
Patients undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery were recruited from September 2021 to June 2022.
Intervention
Patients were randomly allocated to OFA or traditional general anaesthesia with a 1:1 allocation ratio.
Primary and secondary outcome measures
The primary outcome measure was the incidence of PONV within 48 hours post-surgery, and the secondary outcomes included PONV severity, postoperative pain, haemodynamic changes during anaesthesia, and length of stay (LOS) in the recovery ward and hospital.
Results
A total of 86 and 88 patients were included in the OFA and control groups, respectively. Two patients were excluded because of severe adverse events including extreme bradycardia and epilepsy-like convulsion. The incidence and severity of PONV did not significantly differ between the two groups (29 patients (33.0%) in the control group and 22 patients (25.6%) in the OFA group; relative risk 0.78, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.23; p=0.285). Notably, the OFA approach used was associated with an increase in heart rate (89±17 vs 77±15 beats/min, t-test: p
The Importance of Treating Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy
During the ongoing opioid epidemic, it is crucial that pregnant people with opioid use disorder (OUD) receive accepted medical treatment with methadone or buprenorphine to prevent infections, overdose, and death in the pregnant person, as well as fetal death and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. Internists and other primary care physicians have an important role to play in ensuring that pregnant persons receive appropriate treatment for OUD. In this issue of JAMA Internal Medicine, Suarez et al provide new information on the risk of major congenital abnormalities associated with use of methadone and buprenorphine during pregnancy. Given the importance of ensuring that pregnant people with OUD receive treatment during pregnancy and after birth, we have taken the unusual step of publishing 2 accompanying Invited Commentaries.
British Columbia’s Safer Opioid Supply Policy and Opioid Outcomes
This cohort study examines whether there were changes in opioid prescribing and opioid-related health outcomes after implementation of British Columbia’s Safer Opioid Supply policy.